• Login
  • Register
The Daily Sceptic
No Result
View All Result
  • Articles
  • About
  • Archive
    • ARCHIVE
    • NEWS ROUND-UPS
  • Podcasts
  • Newsletter
  • Premium
  • Donate
  • Log In
The Daily Sceptic
No Result
View All Result

Vaccine Effectiveness Drops to Minus-75% in 18-29 Years-Olds as Omicron Slices Through Vaccine Protection and Booster Effect Starts to Wear Off

by Will Jones
24 December 2021 5:50 PM

The latest Vaccine Surveillance report from the UKHSA shows a sharp drop in unadjusted vaccine effectiveness against infection (calculated from the raw infection rate data) in 18-29 year-olds, down to minus-75% in the month ending December 19th, from minus-10% the previous week.

Unadjusted vaccine effectiveness fell in all age groups this week, particularly sharply in 30-39 year-olds, where it hit minus-98%. In 40-49 year-olds it fell to minus-131%. Negative vaccine effectiveness means the vaccinated are more likely to be infected than the unvaccinated. A vaccine effectiveness of minus-100% means the vaccinated are twice as likely to be infected as the unvaccinated.

With Omicron infections particularly prevalent in the young and the vaccinated, this drop is likely to be the impact of Omicron, combined with a waning of vaccine efficacy. The high relative rates of infection in the vaccinated compared to the unvaccinated undermine any argument for vaccine passports or mandates that depend on the idea that the vaccinated are less likely to be infected or pass on the virus. If anything, it’s the vaccinated who are a higher transmission risk to the unvaccinated rather than vice-versa.

Unadjusted vaccine effectiveness against hospitalisation and death continues to hold at a high level on this data, and has even increased in recent weeks in line with what is presumably a booster effect – though a drop in vaccine effectiveness against hospitalisation in 18-29 year-olds this week may portend a coming shift.

Tags: Booster vaccineUKHSAVaccine efficacyVaccines

Donate

We depend on your donations to keep this site going. Please give what you can.

Donate Today

Comment on this Article

You’ll need to set up an account to comment if you don’t already have one. We ask for a minimum donation of £5 if you'd like to make a comment or post in our Forums.

Sign Up
Previous Post

You Are a Third Less Likely to Catch Covid this Christmas Than Last Christmas and 80% Less Likely to Die From It. So Why the Panic?

Next Post

News Round-Up

Subscribe
Login
Notify of
Please log in to comment

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

124 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
RedhotScot
RedhotScot
3 years ago

Can someone please explain this -75%.

How does that work?

0
0
RedhotScot
RedhotScot
3 years ago
Reply to  RedhotScot

Sorry, just re-read it. Get it now.

12
0
Rowan
Rowan
3 years ago
Reply to  RedhotScot

Well done.

3
-8
Ron
Ron
3 years ago
Reply to  RedhotScot

Consider the following for a more strategic approach to improving the immune system.

An article titled “Prevention and reversal of chronic diseases: A protocol” has been published recently in Public Health and Toxicology, and is available Open Access at the following link: (http://www.publichealthtoxicology.com/Prevention-and-reversal-of-chronic-diseases-A-Protocol,144538,0,2.html). While the methodology has been tailored to three specific diseases in past studies, it is general, and can be readily tailored to any chronic disease. Equally important, based on two recent studies showing strong commonality between chronic disease contributing factors and COVID-19 contributing factors (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34485092/; https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34779496/), the methodology may be applicable to prevention of infectious diseases (including COVID-19) as well.

1
0
Anonymous
Anonymous
3 years ago

Negative efficacy?!

Negative?!

How is this not the biggest news story on the planet right now? What has happened to these people’s immune systems?! Will they recover?!

73
0
OliveTrees
OliveTrees
3 years ago
Reply to  Anonymous

They always have an excuse, if you read the lengthy disclaimers they keep adding to as the data gets worse for the vaccinated. It boils down to, “we don’t know the exact number of the unvaxxed, so when the data says something bad about the vaxxed, blame the unvaxxed stats.”

Fortunately, these rolling statistics help to see trends that can’t be just down to not knowing exact numbers.

17
0
rayc
rayc
3 years ago
Reply to  Anonymous

What happened is that the vaxxed are fond of testing themselves while the unvaxxed generally are not. Next question?…

19
-17
Julian
Julian
3 years ago
Reply to  rayc

Please cite your source for this assertion

9
-3
rayc
rayc
3 years ago
Reply to  Julian

This forum is the source. You can read daily opinions of how you must be a complete idiot to regularly test yourself here. Especially before Xmas. I also second this opinion personally – never had any corona test, nor do I intend to take it when I have cough (and I’ve had some cough like 20 times in the past 2 years).

28
-6
Julian
Julian
3 years ago
Reply to  rayc

Well it’s certainly true that people who post here often state they don’t get tested, and a lot of people here are not vaxxed, but we’re a tiny group and possibly not that representative. A lot of the tests are imposed by work, travel, schools and it’s not implausible to think that plenty of unvaxxed are pushed into a corner to take a test. I am afraid like all covid data, it’s not that useful. Not to me, anyway.

15
0
TruthHurts2077
TruthHurts2077
3 years ago
Reply to  Julian

I’m pleased to say I’ve NEVER been tested / vaxxed for Covid. I have no intention to do either in 2022.

32
0
Emerald Fox
Emerald Fox
3 years ago
Reply to  TruthHurts2077

For anyone travelling abroad in/out of the UK, I don’t know how it’s possible to avoid being tested. You can’t do it yourself before getting on a plane – that’s not accepted.
Personally, I don’t believe these tests ‘work’ in any other sense that that they are a way of controlling people, and a method of keeping the fear going – fear of missing your plane if your ‘test’ comes out as a ‘positive’.
Everything with ‘Covid’ is designed to keep the population under control – right down to having your neighbours snitching on you, just like in East Germany.

25
0
Black Flag
Black Flag
3 years ago
Reply to  Emerald Fox

We live on an island and I know how to sail. I’m certainly not sticking around to have my door kicked in if it comes to that. You could swim the bloody channel if you got desperate enough.

Last edited 3 years ago by Black Flag
1
0
Rowan
Rowan
3 years ago
Reply to  TruthHurts2077

You are not alone. The rest are a dying breed.

3
0
David Beaton
David Beaton
3 years ago
Reply to  Julian

Please research the origins of the Drosten computer model PCR test as explained by Dr Reiner Fuellmich et al. and the WHO convenient ‘redefinition’ of a “Covid Case” as a positive Drosten PCR test.

Drosten ( whose claims for higher Academic qualifications have been called into serious doubt) is the German Ferguson.

Last edited 3 years ago by David Beaton
3
0
mishmash
mishmash
3 years ago
Reply to  Julian

Each negative test convinces them the jab is working and they made the right decision. More tests with less time in between allows them to live more of their lives in a delusional state of falsely certified protection.

Last edited 3 years ago by mishmash
3
0
gone_loopy
gone_loopy
3 years ago
Reply to  rayc

I agee with you, there are a lot of people i know who are constantly testing, i dont

12
0
miketa1957
miketa1957
3 years ago
Reply to  rayc

I don’t have any hard data, but I suspect this is right. The unvaxxed – like the wife and I – are avoiding the system like the plague.

21
0
David Beaton
David Beaton
3 years ago
Reply to  rayc

Those who don’t believe in the Vax don’t believe in the fake PCR test either! Why would they when the whole world knows it is a fraud constructed by fake “virologist” Drosten and the CCP.

It is amazing how HMG the MSM and the NHS can maintain the fiction that a false Covid ‘positive’ test. run at 40-45 cycles of amplification when 20-25 are the maximum producing any “result” ( not an infection) is a “case”of Covid.

What they rely on for this fiction is the WHO redefinition of a “case” as a positive Covid test – clearly now totally false.

Bill Gates bankrolls and controls the WHO.

Last edited 3 years ago by David Beaton
8
0
Star
Star
3 years ago
Reply to  rayc

How centralised is testing? How many companies taken together carry out 90% of the tests? Is there a monopoly over some aspect, some of the hardware or software?

I read that for a test to be licenced it is supposed to have a false negative rate of no more than 3% and a false positive rate of no more than 20%.

If actual rates approach those, and on various reasonable assumptions, then a person who is negative doesn’t have to test themselves more than a few times to get at least one false positive.

What heaven for hypochondriacs that is. Test themselves a few times and they’re bound to get a positive. Then they can lock themselves in their bathroom and convince themselves their sore throat will soon turn into a heart attack or whatever. Meanwhile many of these twats say it’s us, the unvaxxed, who are a burden on health resources. Shame on them.

2
0
George L
George L
3 years ago
Reply to  Julian

Blimey.. I’ve got to agree with rayc here.. it must be the Christmas spirit..

16
0
huxleypiggles
huxleypiggles
3 years ago
Reply to  George L

Now, now George.

2
0
rayc
rayc
3 years ago
Reply to  George L

lol Merry Christmas, George!

3
0
gone_loopy
gone_loopy
3 years ago
Reply to  Julian

This is what I’m seeing all the time , the vaxxed are obsessed with the testing

16
-1
DanClarke
DanClarke
3 years ago
Reply to  rayc

I agree with that, the vaxed in my family are obsessed, they’ve been racking up the tests for a couple of weeks now, probably added a few hundred to the total, they even like to talk about it and compare notes, even the younger ones.

17
0
TheBluePill
TheBluePill
3 years ago
Reply to  DanClarke

The bias goes both ways. The unvaxxed may not be getting PCR “tested” everytime they get the sniffles. On the other hand, the bedwetters have been getting PCR tested every time they met a person who cleared their throat. I know many bedwetters who are tripple jabbed and have been off down the test centre twice a week for the last 18 months. Cumulative positives are at most one (normally within two weeks of a clotshot).

Last edited 3 years ago by TheBluePill
2
0
amanuensis
amanuensis
3 years ago
Reply to  rayc

Two independent studies which ‘did things properly’ (UKHSA, figure 6 in the latest vaccine surveillance report) and Imperial College (usual suspects) both show the AZ and Moderna vaccines as making things worse, and Pfizer not far behind.

Thus it isn’t just a testing artefact — the negative VE appears to be a real risk.

I’d also note the trend in the data — the situation appears to be getting worse each week.

11
0
Rowan
Rowan
3 years ago
Reply to  amanuensis

The trends are literally breathtaking.

5
0
sophie123
sophie123
3 years ago
Reply to  amanuensis

Not to mention the same trend seen in Sweden (Lancet paper) and Qatar (NEJM) and Israel

5
0
rayc
rayc
3 years ago
Reply to  amanuensis

Are you talking about the PDF linked to this article? Because pages 5-15 (which are explicitly referenced from the “do not use this unadjusted data” section) don’t show vaccines being ineffective or making things worse, quite the opposite.

Last edited 3 years ago by rayc
2
-1
huxleypiggles
huxleypiggles
3 years ago
Reply to  Anonymous

“Will they recover?”

NO!

5
0
Rowan
Rowan
3 years ago
Reply to  Anonymous

What has happened to these people’s immune systems?

Their immune systems have been fcuked up by the vaccines that aren’t vaccines, but bioweapons.

Will they recover?

Who knows, but their immune systems are almost certainly being destroyed for sinister purposes. Those behind the vaccine rollouts must know they are causing great harm, but that doesn’t seem to bother them or their paid-off lackeys in government.

Last edited 3 years ago by Rowan
19
0
Hugh
Hugh
3 years ago
Reply to  Rowan

More pertinently, how long will those who have avoided them so far have to hold out? Or will the pressure be on for years?

6
0
David Beaton
David Beaton
3 years ago
Reply to  Rowan

“Their immune systems are almost certainly being destroyed for sinister purposes”

So will they develop an “Acquired Immune Deficiency ( syndrome)’ …better known as AIDS?

Perhaps Dr Fauci will be on hand to ‘help’? He is, after all, very experienced in this field.

Last edited 3 years ago by David Beaton
4
0
caipirinha17
caipirinha17
3 years ago
Reply to  Anonymous

On p5 the report indicates the HSA are comparing rates of infection in the jabbed vs unjabbed. This looks like the relative (not absolute) risk reduction calculation to me, which doesn’t seem like the most useful way to assess effectiveness since there are so many variables in play at any given time. I think all it proves is that the jabs weren’t designed to prevent infection, which we already know.

2
0
David Beaton
David Beaton
3 years ago
Reply to  Anonymous

No!

They will possibly develop ” immune deficiency”…which they will have ‘acquired ‘ through repeated injection with pathogenic spike proteins …so they will have a condition called “Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome”…better known as AIDS … ( ring any bells?) which means that their own now deficient immune system will probably be unable to fight off even the mildest infection without further medical intervention.

Dr Fauci of course as we know was very “engaged” with the developing of vaccines for HIV as a cause of AIDS.

3
0
BS665
BS665
3 years ago

The covidians prefer a strong delusion to the truth.

25
0
OliveTrees
OliveTrees
3 years ago
Reply to  BS665

You’d think someone in the past would have written something about that. Like, one of the apostles…

6
0
BS665
BS665
3 years ago
Reply to  OliveTrees

I can grasp the leaders gaining stuff from this, but what do ‘normal’ people get from fake fear?

5
0
Julian
Julian
3 years ago
Reply to  BS665

Not sure they are thinking of it in terms of what they gain, they have been put into a tizz by the covid advertising plus there’s an element of not wanting to speak out of turn and not wanting to admit they have been had

14
0
Jon Garvey
Jon Garvey
3 years ago
Reply to  Julian

There’s also still an extraordinary level of apathy after two years that have damaged everybody: “Ordinary people are too busy too spend all evening watching YouTube clips.” So said a biological science graduate to me, not too busy to watch Strictly Come Dancing for the whole series.

13
0
BS665
BS665
3 years ago
Reply to  Jon Garvey

It takes a helluva lot more energy to follow and obey the BS than to opt out. There is no intelligible reason for their reaction if they are truly apathetic.

3
0
Julian
Julian
3 years ago
Reply to  BS665

Peer pressure. I’ve seen it in action in settings with smaller numbers, most people masked up, then they see a few people with no masks, and there’s no-one in “authority”, the masks start to drop.

18
0
BS665
BS665
3 years ago
Reply to  Julian

As mundane as that. What a disappointment.

2
0
Emerald Fox
Emerald Fox
3 years ago
Reply to  BS665

It’s fear of ‘social disapproval’ – being seen to do ‘the right thing’. That’s what all the face mask wearing is.
The really dense ones may wear a face mask through fear of catching ‘The Virus’.

But, anyway, this just goes round and round, doesn’t it? The questions are, what’s going to happen next, and is ‘the resistance’ ever going to get itself organised enough to stop this madness?
It’s not “just another 3 weeks” … it must be obvious by now that this is going to continue forever … the house of cards hasn’t come tumbling down … Javid is still swanning about wagging his finger at the naughty British who don’t want their jabs.

Test & Trace haven’t had their contract renewed to 2025 because the Government intends to cut it in 2023… no – there are enough variants in the hat to keep coming…

9
0
BS665
BS665
3 years ago
Reply to  Emerald Fox

Covid compliance is like sin. Unless you repent quickly you never will, and it becomes almost impossible to give up the vice. 3 more years may not help them see the light, but ingrain the absurdity into permanence.

4
0
David Beaton
David Beaton
3 years ago
Reply to  BS665

Three more years? Where will many be by then?

1
0
BS665
BS665
3 years ago
Reply to  BS665

I like to believe people are rational or at least original enough to do something independent. Clearly projection.

1
0
BS665
BS665
3 years ago
Reply to  Julian

Well they should decapitate those responsible!

3
0
rayc
rayc
3 years ago
Reply to  BS665

Their lives are boring, it makes them feel special that they are finally part of something extraordinary, part of a great struggle, if you will.

Also, the mentality described by Heinrich Mann in “Der Untertan” (Man of Straw). There he it “wohliges Gruseln” – “comforting creeps” – kind of the same sensation that people get from hearing about macabre stories or watching horror movies, but combined with a belief that there is an authority which tells a person how to behave “right” and that the “bad” events may be avoided if only you subject yourself to that authority.

A primitive childish feeling of safety and unity achieved from delegating your freedoms and fate to your guardian/leader whenever faced with a “danger” (and this is where the “fear” element comes in, except that the real danger can be replaced by the fear of the very authority who you are supposed to trust).

6
0
Anonymous
Anonymous
3 years ago

“Negative vaccine effectiveness means the vaccinated are more likely to be infected than the unvaccinated.”

To translate the gist of the information in the article: The mRNA clot-shots are compromising the immune systems of those who take them.

Amidst other serious injuries, many of the “inoculated” end up with autoimmune disease and acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS).

Many people who have been “vaccinated” simply can’t cope with every day head colds and such like. Because their immune systems have been shot to pieces.

Nuremberg II is not just a throw-away remark anymore.   

44
0
CoronanationStreet
CoronanationStreet
3 years ago
Reply to  Anonymous

And who was the world expert on Aids and how to spill millions of $ trying to cure it through treatments which were even more dangerous than Aids. Yep, Anthony Fauci.

18
0
rayc
rayc
3 years ago
Reply to  CoronanationStreet

Uhh… unlike 30 years ago aids is a pretty much controllable disease nowadays.

1
-1
Anonymous
Anonymous
3 years ago
Reply to  rayc

Uhh… unlike 30 years ago aids is a pretty much controllable disease nowadays.

You display the arrogance that is very typical of an idiot.

For your education (if it’s possible for you through your self-important arrogance to take anything onboard):
AIDS is a symptom. It is not a disease. The generally accepted disease that causes the “aids” you are referring to in your comment is HIV, which is an abbreviation for human immunodeficiency virus.

(HIV is another fictional virus which Big Pharma has made a fortune from.)         

As for HIV being “pretty controllable”, it is, but to control it means the sufferer taking a concoction of drugs for their entire lives.

The AIDS symptoms that arise from the mRNA clot-shots are not caused by HIV, they are caused by … (yes, you’ve guessed it) … the clot-shots.

Perhaps you should educate yourself in future before jumping in and attempting to arrogantly belittle someone.  

3
0
PatrickF
PatrickF
3 years ago

Thank you, my immune system. Thank you, my scepticism.

52
0
Black Flag
Black Flag
3 years ago
Reply to  PatrickF

Don’t forget cynicism, which must be added to daily, lest you find that you have been insufficiently cynical.

8
0
A Heretic
A Heretic
3 years ago

I don’t suppose they’re going to tell us how many of the unvaccinated hospitalisations/deaths were in the “already seriously ill” category.

20
0
Julian
Julian
3 years ago
Reply to  A Heretic

They have said they don’t know, when asked (I think JHB asked Hancock). Even if they don’t know exactly, I expect they have a pretty good idea, which is why we’re not given the information.

18
0
crisisgarden
crisisgarden
3 years ago

After careful consideration, close analysis of the data, listening to arguments on all sides and weighing up the risks/benefits to me, my loved ones and the wider community, I’ve decided that they can stick their toxic bullshit up their arse. Sideways. and repeatedly until they have so much negative immunity that they catch covid without even being exposed to it. Twice, breakthrough case, centred on the arse. Sideways. Twice.

41
0
huxleypiggles
huxleypiggles
3 years ago
Reply to  crisisgarden

As the Scottish football fans chanted:

“You can stick your fuckin booster up your arse.”

Repeat.

25
0
isobar
isobar
3 years ago
Reply to  huxleypiggles

Sideways!

7
0
crisisgarden
crisisgarden
3 years ago
Reply to  isobar

Twice.

7
0
isobar
isobar
3 years ago

Am not sure how far this will go, but at least it’s a start!

https://dailyexpose.uk/2021/12/10/uk-team-file-complaint-of-crimes-against-humanity-with-the-international-criminal-court/

17
0
CoronanationStreet
CoronanationStreet
3 years ago

A “vaccine” which offers no sterilising immunity and which only offers “protection” for 10 weeks. Not much of a vaccine given we’re suposedly talking about the booster which it hs been said tops up protection of the previous two jabs received in some cases 3 and 6 months previously.
From what base is it topping up protection, for whom and against what?

It is actually now likely they knew the jabs only offered very limited “protection” thereby laying the way for the requirement for multiple annual jabs, eventually profitting ome companies greatly.

Surely now the main strain has been officially described s indistinguishable from a cold, the emergency use authorisations must end s there are ample alternative treatments available at any pharmacy.

27
0
Julian
Julian
3 years ago
Reply to  CoronanationStreet

There was never an emergency

35
0
George L
George L
3 years ago
Reply to  Julian

Absolutely…

BMJ 2020 LESS DEADLY THAN EVERY YEAR BEFORE 2009.PNG
17
0
rtaylor
rtaylor
3 years ago
Reply to  George L

That’s a pretty damning chart! Do you have a link to the particular article please?

0
0
karenovirus
karenovirus
3 years ago

Well Seasons Greetings one and all as I settle down to Channel 5s Xmas Eve offering:
‘Outbreak’, 1975, Dustin Hoffman, Morgan Freeman.
Hazmat suits galore, Very topical.

Last edited 3 years ago by karenovirus
18
0
Sforzesca
Sforzesca
3 years ago
Reply to  karenovirus

Don’t watch it.
You might get converted to the dark side. Lol.
(You won’t. God bless).

Last edited 3 years ago by Sforzesca
5
-1
Hopeless
Hopeless
3 years ago
Reply to  karenovirus

I prefer the Christmas story in which the Infant Jesus receives gifts of gold, frankincense and Pfizer. His mother says that the first two are welcome, but to stick the third into Herod.

26
0
George L
George L
3 years ago
Reply to  Hopeless

That gave me a good laugh.. thanks.. 🙂

6
0
huxleypiggles
huxleypiggles
3 years ago
Reply to  Hopeless

Love it.

4
0
isobar
isobar
3 years ago
Reply to  Hopeless

Nice one!

2
0
crisisgarden
crisisgarden
3 years ago
Reply to  karenovirus

Sorry to be a pedant but it was 1995. I remember seeing at the cinema as a teenager! And given what we know now, was probably predictive programming.

4
0
BS665
BS665
3 years ago
Reply to  crisisgarden

You mean planned brainwashing?

2
0
karenovirus
karenovirus
3 years ago
Reply to  crisisgarden

My bad, I even checked it on IMDB 🙄
No alcohol honest!.

Mind you it might as well have been 1975 it’s so dated but, yes, prescient😱🧪⚗🔬

🎅 🎂 🍾 🎅

3
0
crisisgarden
crisisgarden
3 years ago
Reply to  karenovirus

I think the film Contagion really is propaganda and can distinctly remember reading it as such when I first saw it. A film with no purpose other than to plant the idea of a global pandemic.

5
0
PatrickF
PatrickF
3 years ago

I’ve just invented a contraceptive pill that offers ‘some’ protection.
Any takers?

21
0
iane
iane
3 years ago
Reply to  PatrickF

Well, if it has negative effectiveness, I think you could be on to a winner!

6
0
George L
George L
3 years ago
Reply to  PatrickF

Does it guarantee the energy to participate too.. asking for a friend.. 😉

8
0
BS665
BS665
3 years ago
Reply to  PatrickF

You mean it doesnt offer it to all? What if they take 3?

Last edited 3 years ago by BS665
1
0
crisisgarden
crisisgarden
3 years ago
Reply to  PatrickF

If it works as well as these vaccines, hell, even I might able to conceive!

4
0
artfelix
artfelix
3 years ago
Reply to  PatrickF

If I take it will it stop my neighbours from getting pregnant?

8
0
Annie
Annie
3 years ago
Reply to  PatrickF

Only if everybody else takes it too.

5
0
Sforzesca
Sforzesca
3 years ago

Cannot for the life of me understand why the BBC aren’t mentioning this.
In any sane world this would be the death of bigpharma, Gates, Blair etc. (and I mean that literally).
How I long for that Mussolini moment….

28
0
BS665
BS665
3 years ago
Reply to  Sforzesca

BBC are the reich broadcasters. This is no longer a rhetorical characterisation.

They ignored all protests and opposition worldwide, and simply rubber stamp the covidian duplicity.

It’s not misinformation. It’s DISINFORMATION (deliberate lying).

24
0
Victory Gin
Victory Gin
3 years ago
Reply to  Sforzesca

Me too – my biggest fear is that the criminals who manufactuered and prolonged this whole debacle whether for political or financial reasons will simply walk away from it all and not face a single trial for their crimes.

9
0
artfelix
artfelix
3 years ago
Reply to  Victory Gin

I don’t think they will walk away – they have gambled everything on winning and now I think it’s pretty clear they are going to lose. I think they know that – so expect some V2s fired our way on their way out, but in the end they know the jig is up and all they have left is the Luger and the bunker. Hope they don’t shoot the dog this time, or in Fauci’s case feed him to the sand flies.

Last edited 3 years ago by artfelix
5
0
George L
George L
3 years ago

Guess who..

GUESS WHO.jpg
4
-1
BS665
BS665
3 years ago
Reply to  George L

micron 🤣

2
0
George L
George L
3 years ago
Reply to  BS665

I’ll get your prize off to you first thing in the morning.. but first you have to test negative to a PCR run at 45 cycles.. your chances are not good..

4
0
BS665
BS665
3 years ago
Reply to  George L

EXEMPT.

Merry Christmas!

3
0
George L
George L
3 years ago
Reply to  BS665

Exempt!!!!!!!! ……………………………… oh alright then..

Merry Christmas to you too..

4
0
Black Flag
Black Flag
3 years ago
Reply to  George L

Mr Trogneaux’s sub.

1
0
George L
George L
3 years ago

Ok.. how about some Christmas spirit..

NORMALS AND CONSPICS.jpg
39
0
huxleypiggles
huxleypiggles
3 years ago
Reply to  George L

Brilliant.

I’ve sent that to a few Pampers.

5
0
George L
George L
3 years ago
Reply to  huxleypiggles

Yeah.. cheer them up a bit..

1
0
amanuensis
amanuensis
3 years ago

This is almost certainly why we’ve got so many cases of covid at the moment (Omicron is the excuse).

It is also almost certainly why TPTB are so very keen to get everyone boosted — they know they’ve mucked up and that it is only by constant boosting that people won’t realise what they’ve done.

But people aren’t playing ball by rushing for boosting, and so we can see the reality of the situation coming through in the infection statistics. Eventually the tabloids will decide to sidestep the Trusted News Initiative and report on the mess that we’ve got ourselves into.

I’d say that our authorities were gambling on the next wave being as deadly as the others — it looks as though Omicron will result in people seeing what’s behind the curtain.

29
0
sophie123
sophie123
3 years ago
Reply to  amanuensis

I feel like you’re right

4
0
John001
John001
3 years ago
Reply to  sophie123

Moronic can surely only mutate in one way from now on, from a bad cold to … a cold.

To paraphrase Monty Python: ‘He’s not Covid, he’s a very naughty cold’.

Which UK paper is least affected by the TNI or the BMGF … would it be the Mail?

6
0
isobar
isobar
3 years ago
Reply to  amanuensis

Spot on, this could well be the curtain raiser and about time! That a coronavirus could cause a cold is nothing new at all.

3
0
Annie
Annie
3 years ago
Reply to  amanuensis

In other words, there’s nothing the Fascists long for as much as a really deadly variant that will kill lots of people and terrify the rest back into gibbering submission.
Happily, that isn’t how viruses work.

4
0
LovelyGirl
LovelyGirl
3 years ago
Reply to  amanuensis

I was happy but also sad to hear that a friend’s son couldn’t get his booster this week because the queue wad too long… It seems the propaganda is indeed working with many people. Three of my siblings and partners are all boostered already and a friend told me today she was banking on the booster programme to get us out of this…

2
0
Victory Gin
Victory Gin
3 years ago

…

FHCcSqTXsAk9rlz.jpg
16
0
Star
Star
3 years ago

Has there been a single confirmed case yet of omicron causing Covid?

Obviously that would have to mean negative tests for delta and “original” (because how are you going to know which variant caused Covid?), plus of course double pneumonia, a necessary requirement for Covid whichever variant may have caused it.

A single case? A single case of omicron causing Covid?

No variant so far has affected the lungs much for more than a tiny percentage of the under 70s. I’m hearing that omicron mostly doesn’t affect the lungs much even for the already chronically ill 70+.

Any “scientists” reading this who think this is a silly question should go and take a course in Logic 101.

Last edited 3 years ago by Star
5
0
Chris_uk
Chris_uk
3 years ago

I’m unvaccinated and never taken a test, although I may have had Covid last year. I’ve been in perfect health since then and never take any precautions, even around people with Covid. I’m incredibly healthy for my age, but tomorrow I will be spending Christmas Day alone for the first time in 65 years, because my triple vaccinated daughter says she can’t risk having me there. In this crazy upside-down, inside-out world, negative vaccine effectiveness is a perfect fit with tests that don’t work and governments that know less than nothing.

32
0
Star
Star
3 years ago
Reply to  Chris_uk

That’s so sad, Chris_uk. I hope you have a good time tomorrow, regardless.

18
0
Chris_uk
Chris_uk
3 years ago
Reply to  Star

I’ll be absolutely fine, thanks. I’m well aware there are millions of people in far worse situations due to all the craziness. My thoughts are with them.

29
0
Noumenon
Noumenon
3 years ago
Reply to  Chris_uk

I’m very sorry to hear that, it is indeed crazy. This kind of scenario is happening to a great many people. I’ve a friend who is spending Christmas alone because someone he normally has Christmas with has cancelled due to covid. I almost had Christmas cancelled on me by my grandmother because she’s been in contact with someone who’s daughter allegedly has it. Fortunately she saw sense and said I can come anyway, although it was touch and go because she watches TV and half believes the narrative.

9
0
artfelix
artfelix
3 years ago
Reply to  Chris_uk

No consolation but she will come to regret that decision until the day she dies

7
0
isobar
isobar
3 years ago
Reply to  Chris_uk

Really feel for you, so hope that you have a good day irrespective of the decision of your daughter.

5
0
Annie
Annie
3 years ago
Reply to  Chris_uk

You won’t be alone. Our thoughts will be with you.

10
0
gone_loopy
gone_loopy
3 years ago
Reply to  Chris_uk

Fuck that makes me so angry. The government have a lot to answer for

8
0
shrenkssedge
shrenkssedge
3 years ago

I suppose they will focus on the hospitalisation and death figures and ignore the infections/cases. Its what happens in those 2-3 weeks after a jab that interest me when the jabbed are classed as unvaccinated.

5
0
artfelix
artfelix
3 years ago

Is it time to laugh at “the vaccinated” yet or do we wait until they start dying?

6
0
Black Flag
Black Flag
3 years ago
Reply to  artfelix

Don’t laugh at them, they’ll get dangerous when they realise they have nothing to lose and you’ll make yourself a target. Just quietly make plans for a swift exit to a remote location when the cities start tearing themselves apart. And remember to pack some PPE. You‘ll actually need it when the place is littered with corpses and you’re on a raid for supplies.

And you won’t be laughing then.

Well, ok, maybe just a little.

Last edited 3 years ago by Black Flag
3
0
peyrole
peyrole
3 years ago

Thank you Will, for continuing to produce meaningful reports during Christmas Eve. You deserve a break.

25
0
isobar
isobar
3 years ago
Reply to  peyrole

Seconded!

5
0
Susan
Susan
3 years ago

“and booster effect starts to wear off.”
Let’s hope it wears off! Its detrimental effects, that is.

3
0
Victory Gin
Victory Gin
3 years ago

lol

Screenshot 2021-12-24 at 22-19-17 Lee Hurst - Anti-vaxxer (apparently) ( LeeHurstComic) Twitter.png
7
0
LonePatriot
LonePatriot
3 years ago

Our healthcare system is about to experience a tsunami! Potential side effects of jabs include chronic inflammation, because the vaccine continuously stimulates the immune system to produce antibodies. Other concerns include the possible integration of plasmid DNA into the body’s host genome, resulting in mutations, problems with DNA replication, triggering of autoimmune responses, and activation of cancer-causing genes. Alternative COVID cures EXIST. Ivermectin is one of them. While Ivermectin is very effective curing COVID symptoms, it has also been shown to eliminate certain cancers. Do not get the poison jab. Get your Ivermectin today while you still can! https://ivmpharmacy.com

2
0
David Beaton
David Beaton
3 years ago
Reply to  LonePatriot

The truth is still struggling to break through the tissue of Politicians’ lies and media censorship!

Last edited 3 years ago by David Beaton
0
0
Evison1
Evison1
3 years ago

Is that death by or with Covid and why doesn’t the vaccine reduce all cause deaths (I am thinking of Professor Norman Fenton’s group’s study)?

2
0
Black Flag
Black Flag
3 years ago

-75%? Hahahahaha!

Once again for the fuckwits in the cheap seats at the back:

The Only Immunity These Experimental Treatments Provide Is Immunity From Prosecution For The Manufacturers

11
0

NEWSLETTER

View today’s newsletter

To receive our latest news in the form of a daily email, enter your details here:

DONATE

PODCAST

The Sceptic | Episode 53: Starmer’s Bizarre Bid to Brand Reform Racist, the Real Danger Posed by Labour’s Digital ID and the True Cost of Net Zero

by Richard Eldred
3 October 2025
2

LISTED ARTICLES

  • Most Read
  • Most Commented
  • Editor’s Picks

News Round-Up

8 October 2025
by Richard Eldred

Sir Lenny Henry Wants £18 Trillion of Slavery Reparations

8 October 2025
by Sallust

Hugh Grant Teams Up With Climate Activists

8 October 2025
by Charlotte Gill

Hundreds of Pro-Palestine Students Sing Antisemitic Chants on October 7th Anniversary

7 October 2025
by Will Jones

Scientists Are at Last Uncovering the Links Between ME, Long Covid and Long Vaccine

7 October 2025
by Patrick Ussher

Sir Lenny Henry Wants £18 Trillion of Slavery Reparations

53

News Round-Up

31

British Steel Industry Faces “Existential Threat” as EU Hikes Tariffs to 50% Despite Starmer’s ‘EU Reset’ Giveaway

20

Two-Tier Justice on Full Display as Epping Protesters Get Longer Sentences Than Sex Attacker Whose Crime They Were Protesting

16

Hundreds of Pro-Palestine Students Sing Antisemitic Chants on October 7th Anniversary

21

The Fightback Against Politicised Art Has Begun

8 October 2025
by Ferro

Upon This Ice I Will Build My Church, Says Leo XIV

8 October 2025
by James Alexander

Sir Lenny Henry Wants £18 Trillion of Slavery Reparations

8 October 2025
by Sallust

How Representative is X of UK Public Opinion?

8 October 2025
by Noah Carl

Hugh Grant Teams Up With Climate Activists

8 October 2025
by Charlotte Gill

POSTS BY DATE

December 2021
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  
« Nov   Jan »

SOCIAL LINKS

Free Speech Union

NEWSLETTER

View today’s newsletter

To receive our latest news in the form of a daily email, enter your details here:

POSTS BY DATE

December 2021
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  
« Nov   Jan »

DONATE

LISTED ARTICLES

  • Most Read
  • Most Commented
  • Editor’s Picks

News Round-Up

8 October 2025
by Richard Eldred

Sir Lenny Henry Wants £18 Trillion of Slavery Reparations

8 October 2025
by Sallust

Hugh Grant Teams Up With Climate Activists

8 October 2025
by Charlotte Gill

Hundreds of Pro-Palestine Students Sing Antisemitic Chants on October 7th Anniversary

7 October 2025
by Will Jones

Scientists Are at Last Uncovering the Links Between ME, Long Covid and Long Vaccine

7 October 2025
by Patrick Ussher

Sir Lenny Henry Wants £18 Trillion of Slavery Reparations

53

News Round-Up

31

British Steel Industry Faces “Existential Threat” as EU Hikes Tariffs to 50% Despite Starmer’s ‘EU Reset’ Giveaway

20

Two-Tier Justice on Full Display as Epping Protesters Get Longer Sentences Than Sex Attacker Whose Crime They Were Protesting

16

Hundreds of Pro-Palestine Students Sing Antisemitic Chants on October 7th Anniversary

21

The Fightback Against Politicised Art Has Begun

8 October 2025
by Ferro

Upon This Ice I Will Build My Church, Says Leo XIV

8 October 2025
by James Alexander

Sir Lenny Henry Wants £18 Trillion of Slavery Reparations

8 October 2025
by Sallust

How Representative is X of UK Public Opinion?

8 October 2025
by Noah Carl

Hugh Grant Teams Up With Climate Activists

8 October 2025
by Charlotte Gill

SOCIAL LINKS

Free Speech Union
  • Home
  • About us
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy

Facebook

  • X

Instagram

RSS

Subscribe to our newsletter

© Skeptics Ltd.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password? Sign Up

Create New Account!

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • Articles
  • About
  • Archive
    • ARCHIVE
    • NEWS ROUND-UPS
  • Podcasts
  • Newsletter
  • Premium
  • Donate
  • Log In

© Skeptics Ltd.

wpDiscuz
You are going to send email to

Move Comment
Perfecty
Do you wish to receive notifications of new articles?
Notifications preferences