Rayner Accused of Misleading Public Over Career History

2 min read
Subscribe to Listen

Angela Rayner is facing questions over whether she misled the public about her career history, after appearing to blur the lines between her work as a home help and her role as a union rep. The Telegraph has the story:

The newly reinstated Housing Secretary has said in the past that she spent 14 years as a council-employed “home care worker”, even though she spent 10 years working either full time or part time as a shop steward.

The Conservatives suggested Ms Rayner was contributing to a “credibility crisis” for Labour that began under Sir Keir Starmer.

Ms Rayner is the latest in a line of Labour Cabinet ministers to face scrutiny over their CVs, including Rachel Reeves, the former chancellor, and Jonathan Reynolds, the Business Secretary.

Earlier this week, Ms Rayner posted a picture of herself on social media, taken in 2003 when she was “working as a home carer for Stockport council”.

In a previous social media post she had said she left the council after “14 years service in local government as a home care worker”.

It prompted the BBC to challenge her on Radio 4’s PM programme about her true career history. In response she said her roles “kind of get blurred” by journalists because for some of the time she was “given paid time off to do trade union duties… then other times I was fully seconded” to union work.

She was employed by Stockport council from 2000 to 2015, yet when she was running for Parliament in 2014 she described herself as a “trade union official with Unison”.

The facts about Ms Rayner’s employment history are that she worked in the private sector as a home help from 1998 to 2000, then, according to freedom of information responses published by Stockport council, she worked full-time as a home help for them from August 2000 until April 2005.

She then worked part time as a home help until April 2011, spending some of her time on union work as an assistant branch secretary. Then until 2015, when she became an MP, she was on full-time secondment to union duties as branch secretary.

Ms Rayner was the Unison rep at the council but was not employed by Unison, meaning her official job title remained “home help”.

It means that she spent two years as a home help in the private sector, almost five years as a full-time home help for the council, then six years combining home help work with union work and four years on full-time union work, rather than the claimed “14 years’ service in local government as a home care worker”.

Worth reading in full.

Comments

This week across the site:

Email me alerts for this discussion
Notify of

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to the Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

6 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Seldom Seen
Seldom Seen
1 month ago

However long she was a care worker she still amassed enough money to buy several houses. Can all care workers boast the same?

Hound of Heaven
Hound of Heaven
1 month ago

BBC News this morning reports more questions being raised over the timeline of Nigel Farage’s decision to lead Reform. No mention of Labour lies, naturally.

JXB
JXB
2 months ago

Rayner Accused of Misleading Public Over _______________ *
*Choose from a long list.

Gezza England
Gezza England
2 months ago

More Labour lies – what a surprise.

transmissionofflame
transmissionofflame
2 months ago

I don’t really care how qualified or unqualified or honest or dishonest any of these people are. They are socialists, or pretend to be, who are implacably opposed to how I would prefer to live my life, so they are The Enemy. I’d prefer them incompetent actually.

GasBoy75
GasBoy75
2 months ago

Do you know what? I’m just bored of this now. It’s not as if any proof is required…

Thank you for reading. Please help us keep the Daily Sceptic going by becoming a donor.