News Round-Up

A summary of the most interesting stories in the past 24 hours that challenge the prevailing orthodoxy about the ‘climate emergency’, public health ‘crises’ and the supposed moral defects of Western civilisation.

6 min read

If you have any tips for inclusion in the round-up, email us here.

Comments

This week across the site:

Email me alerts for this discussion
Notify of

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to the Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

22 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
JohnK
JohnK
6 months ago

Good to see that GBN published this: https://www.gbnews.com/health/covid-jab-vital-safety-checks-german-covid-inquiry They did not use the term Emergency Use Authorization (EUA), although they almost did on the basis of short time being available. Not a surprise to some of us here, and I wouldn’t be surprised that there is little advertising about this enquiry either.

soundofreason
soundofreason
6 months ago
Reply to  JohnK

I was pleased to see that unlike Hallett the German inquiry actually listened to someone saying the ‘vaccines’ were not tested enough.

Alan M
Alan M
6 months ago

Jimmy Carr’s point about 16-year olds in pubs has a validity. Back in the day, when my mates and I would go into the pub underage, we were asked how old we were and said 18. Then we behaved because if we didn’t, we got thrown out. We learnt.

soundofreason
soundofreason
6 months ago
Reply to  Alan M

The number of 18th birthday celebrations we had down at the Red Cow! It had a jukebox, pool and darts in the back room, separated by a long bar from the ‘lounge’ (with actual upholstered chairs) and a side room which we referred to as ‘the office’ – that last was where my peers used to gather. If it got too noisy Tony the landlord would look in and say something like ‘You wouldn’t want people to notice you now, would you?’. He’d never get away with it now, of course.

transmissionofflame
transmissionofflame
6 months ago

“French gendarmes have been spotted standing idly by as a boat crammed with migrants launched into the Channel, according to the Mail.”

In the long term and looking at the bigger picture it may be better for France to stop the crossings and thus make France less attractive as a route. In the short term if you are a local gendarme, would you not be happy to get rid of them?

stewart
stewart
6 months ago

Britain tolerates praying in public – but only when engaged in by Muslims in Trafalgar Square, not Christians outside abortion clinics.

Muslims are perhaps better strategists. They first take over the country through invasion and public displays of strength – like praying en masse on the streets – then when they have fully taken over, they put an end to abortion.

It’s not as if they embrace abortion in Muslim countries. So once Britain becomes a fully Islamic country, that’ll be the end of easy abortions.

At that point people will miss the gentle Christians silently praying for the souls of aborted babies.

Dinger64
Dinger64
6 months ago
Reply to  stewart

They are pretty good at public execution in the street as well, that tends to stop any dissent from the infidel! This is the future Britain has to look forward to.
Imagine a rural village, instead of a copper you’ll have a dabit shurta (no doubt openly carring a weapon) or local controller who will keep the population under sharia law and will regularly check in with his bosses, if he doesn’t, a thousand members will be ordered to go and repress any uprising by the locals by any means nessasary!
Sounds ridiculous? I’m not so sure 😕
Oh, and why go through all the trouble of creating your own nuclear weapons when you can just take over a country that already has them?

Dinger64
Dinger64
6 months ago
Reply to  Dinger64

The Muslims are pulling the tablecloth out very slowly without disturbing any of the silver!

Monro
Monro
6 months ago

Why did we learn of missile raid from US not ministers?

‘Our assessment is that Iran poses no threat at the current time to the UK’ Defence Minister Lord Coaker

That is why. No threat, no threat at all…

“NATO’s ballistic missile defence system was designed to deal with precisely this type of threat,” Defence Minister Lord Coaker

Oh! Hang on….

We didn’t learn of the attack from ministers because they didn’t know. They didn’t know because Britain has no means of detecting such an attack in the area. Had Britain purchased twelve Type 45 Destroyers, it might have had a warship on patrol that could have detected and intercepted such an attack.

We cannot rely on NATO. Of course we cannot rely on NATO. Britain must take responsibility for its own security. We also rely on Norway for gas and we rely on France for 10-15% of our electricity. What an absolute shambles!

No wonder decisions on Britain’s domestic and foreign policy are now dictated from overseas. An absolute disgrace in which every government of all the major parties since 1990 has been complicit!

transmissionofflame
transmissionofflame
6 months ago

I don’t care what the BBC “needs”. We “need” to stop having to pay for it in order to watch live TV legally. Aitken is deluded if he thinks it can be saved. Anyway the state has no business running a media empire, or acting as enforcer for its revenue collection.

pjar
pjar
6 months ago

“Labour hires zero apprentices despite pledge to abolish youth unemployment” – The Treasury recruited zero apprentices last year…”

To be fair, the idea of The Treasury being staffed by a load of YTS kids, with poor GCSE results, accounts for a lot…

Jon Garvey
Jon Garvey
6 months ago
Reply to  pjar

This week’s apprentice – next week’s Chancellor of the Exchequer.

Old Arellian
Old Arellian
6 months ago
Reply to  Jon Garvey

What? A whole week?……

Dinger64
Dinger64
6 months ago
Reply to  pjar

Let’s not forget Rachel “the economist” 🤣🤣

Purpleone
Purpleone
6 months ago
Reply to  pjar

How would we notice a difference to this lot?

pjar
pjar
6 months ago

“Why did we learn of missile raid from US not ministers?”
Because, when they were asked about its likelihood, they scoffed at the idea. The last refuge of the scoundrel is silence…

pjar
pjar
6 months ago

“When is prayer in public a crime in Britain?”

I’ve always considered myself pretty tolerant of others, and the way they wish to live their lives but, along with those Muslims who find they can’t get to a mosque, so drop to the floor in the middle of the street, disrupting everything around them, I found this to be performative, political and provocative.

They are testing the boundaries, and there are none…

Free Lemming
Free Lemming
6 months ago
Reply to  pjar

Exactly. If there was ever a more transparent show of intent then I haven’t seen it. Unless the police (laugh loudly) or the people (laugh a little less loudly) resist, this will spread like a cancer across our cities. They have announced themselves.

AbsolutelyNot
AbsolutelyNot
6 months ago
Reply to  pjar

I can’t help but wonder whether the police would intervene if Muslims choose to pray within the buffer zone of an abortion clinic…

soundofreason
soundofreason
6 months ago
Reply to  AbsolutelyNot

Ah, well, you see… as long as they’re not trying to influence anyone who was considering going in… The fact that anyone considering going in would not get past them is not relevant. It’s the wrong-thought that counts…

Western Firebrand
Western Firebrand
6 months ago
Reply to  AbsolutelyNot

Except perhaps that their rape victims and those carrying female foetuses are the ones using the “service”?

soundofreason
soundofreason
6 months ago

Babies.

But, yes.

Thank you for reading. Please help us keep the Daily Sceptic going by becoming a donor.