Premium

Bluesky Is Dying: But Should We Try and Keep the Woke Twitter Rival Alive For the Good of Wider Public Safety?

We all like to take the piss out of Bluesky, says Steven Tucker. But it serves a valuable function as a containment zone for angry Left-wing scolds and we need to do what we can to stop it collapsing.

10 min read

Imagine if there was a place where you could safely seal away such dangerously Left-wing figureheads as Chris Packham, Stephen Fry, Carol Vorderman, Alastair Campbell and Jess Phillips forever. Some may say there already is, and it is called Hell. Others may say there already is and it is called Bluesky, the Twitter/X rival microblogging site which temporarily boomed in popularity following the Elon Musk-aided election of Donald Trump in November last year. Not wanting to add to Elon’s profits, and desiring to escape the alleged ‘toxicity’ he’d unleashed onto the platform by allowing woke-dissenting viewpoints to be expressed more freely, Left-wing users like those listed above joined a so-called ‘X-odus’ towards its new, kinder and more progressive, rival instead.

Even the Guardian announced it was leaving X for Bluesky for good in November last year, offering the following rationale: “This is something we have been considering for a while given the often disturbing content promoted or found on the platform, including far-Right conspiracy theories and racism. The US presidential election campaign served only to underline what we have considered for a long time: that X is a toxic media platform and that its owner, Elon Musk, has been able to use its influence to shape political discourse.”

So did Twitter’s previous owners, of course, except they sought to “use its influence to shape political discourse” along a Left-wing path, not a Right-wing one, which presumably is okay. In practice,

Keep reading –
Donate £5 monthly
or £50 annually

Subscribe today to get unlimited online access, as well as our Premium newsletters and podcasts.

  • Read paywalled articles
  • Comment below the line and connect with other users
  • Watch and listen to the longer Premium version of our weekly podcast
  • Listen to every article
  • Receive Premium version of our daily newsletter
DONATE NOW

Comments

This week across the site:

Email me alerts for this discussion
Notify of

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to the Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

8 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Simon MacPhisto
Simon MacPhisto
1 year ago

I do enjoy Tucker’s articles. They’re always well written, factual and entertaining.

Hoppy Uniatz
Hoppy Uniatz
1 year ago

This article has just sent me down a rabbit hole of a different sort. Viz, “Gosh, is Fat Boy Friday now a meme?” Because it is something I started saying, maybe 20 years ago, when I worked in a West End property firm and on Fridays the young men would head out at lunch time to drink and stuff their faces. I was quite gratified when they started saying it to one another without me prompting!! Is that how it started? If so, reading, above, what it has come to… ugh

Tyrbiter
Tyrbiter
1 year ago

If this service is sufficiently valuable for its users, it will survive. If not, it won’t.

I can see no problem with that.

If those with left wing views have to engage with those they don’t like or not engage at all then they have a choice. That same choice applies to libertarians as well. If you’re not into debate then don’t do it, but don’t expect to be able to change the world without it.

Purpleone
Purpleone
1 year ago
Reply to  Tyrbiter

Exactly – all these platforms are businesses, primarily funded by advertising, they can do what they like, within the various laws of the countries they operate in… other than that, I really couldn’t give a monkeys what they do or if they go bust. The MSMs obsession with social media has always seemed odd to me – I’m guessing it’s because they’ve grown addicted to harvesting ‘stories’ from there, vs having to employ too many journalists

DiscoveredJoys
DiscoveredJoys
1 year ago

Given this lamentable fact, perhaps it would be best if Bluesky survives after all, in order to serve as a far-Left containment zone, as Barro says.

It’s the debate about mental health hospitals versus Care in the Community – gone digital.

Me? I subscribe to neither.

Alan M
Alan M
1 year ago

Always interesting to see how nasty the people who ask us to “be kind” can be.

Gezza England
Gezza England
1 year ago
Reply to  Alan M

The Far Left excels at hypocrisy making these ‘kind’ people some of the most evil scum you will ever come across.

transmissionofflame
transmissionofflame
1 year ago

I don’t want to “contain” anybody’s speech. I just want to “contain” the power of the state to intefere in my life, including its power to take my money away.

Thank you for reading. Please help us keep the Daily Sceptic going by becoming a donor.