There is much outrage on social media this week about toddlers and school children being suspended from school for being transphobic. How did such madness come about and why does it continue? Therein lies a sorry tale, but one we need to understand in order to stop.
In 2019, the Conservative government introduced updated ‘Relationship, Sex, and Health Education Guidance (RSHE)’ for schools. Among other things it required schools to teach children about ‘gender identity’.
Five years later, this still feels shocking. There is no science and evidence behind the idea of gender identity; it is pseudoscience from beginning to end and with tragic consequences. Campaigners strive to articulate its dehumanising effect. The campaign group Transgender Trend says it well here:
It was the 2019 RSHE Guidance which opened floodgates for transgressive and unscientific materials to pour into schools. LGBTQ charities and sex-ed providers produced materials teaching children that “everyone has a gender identity”, “trans-women are women” and “sex is a spectrum”. They explained that children must be affirmed in cross-sex identities, that cross-sex pronouns must be respected and that boys should be allowed to use girls’ toilets at school. Worst of all, materials implied that puberty blockers, cross-sex hormones and medical procedures to align a child’s body with his or her inner gender identity are harmless.
The promotion of gender ideology in schools helped fuel the pipeline of thousands of vulnerable girls identifying as boys, queueing at gender clinics and accessing puberty blockers, cross-sex hormones and gender surgeries. These treatments are experimental, risky, irreversible and result in lifelong harm and pain.
Following years of extensive campaigning from grassroots groups and thousands of parents, in 2024 the repentant Conservative government produced new draft RSHE guidance which went to public consultation. The new guidance is clear that ‘gender identity’ should not be taught in schools:
But then Rishi Sunak called the General Election. The new RSHE guidance remains in draft form. Children continue to be taught quackery at school. The Labour government is considering its options.
Unfortunately this means that campaigners for science and safeguarding need to get back on the horse. We need to expose again the pseudoscience that is harming our children via school lessons. Indeed, is it perhaps possible that after all the years of whistle-blowing and the exposure of the harms of gender ideology – including the seminal Cass Report – that sex-ed providers will already be changing their ways?
Seemingly not, if we look at Brook.
One of the most established sex-ed providers, Brook provides “sexual health and wellbeing services” as well as RSHE lessons for schools. It has an annual income of around £14 million, £13 million of this taxpayer-funded via local authorities and health trusts. Like most RSHE providers, Brook’s RSHE materials are not publicly accessible but are available to schools via subscription. This ed-tech-enabled secrecy is a serious problem and a driver behind a wider degradation of the quality of resources being used in our children’s schools.
However, Brook’s broader views on gender ideology are free to view on its website. It is disturbing to see harmful pseudoscience so blatantly displayed.
Its glossary alone illustrates Brook’s cavalier approach to science and to safeguarding and is worth perusing in full.
Brook’s definition of ‘gender identity’ is bold even by ‘industry standards’, amounting essentially to the claim that everyone just knows who they really are.
Quackery is intoned seriously:
On ‘pronouns’ Brook boldly asserts into existence variations never seen before nor since:
Here is Brook’s cavalier approach to real harm.
Let’s look at that “More about transitioning”.
Firstly, Brook describes the mystical experience of coming out just to yourself. We may be tempted to laugh, but vulnerable people will read and trust Brook:
Here is medical advice provided by Brook. This, aimed at women, paints a rosy picture about taking testosterone:
And here is a cheerful gender surgery explainer, sort of a shopping list:
By way of contrast, this is from a whistleblowing GP who has seen the results of these interventions – also worth reading in full:
A female patient in her 20s on testosterone presented at my surgery with urinary incontinence and vaginal atrophy. Vaginal atrophy occurs when the tissue in the wall of the vagina becomes thin and fragile, which can lead to pain and bleeding. The incontinence was caused by the effects of testosterone on the bladder and urethra – it was unable to function properly. The patient was in distress. Together these symptoms are known as urogenital atrophy.
The treatment was topical oestrogen, the hormone which was being suppressed. Suggesting this treatment added to the patient’s distress as it increased her gender dysphoria, but after some discussion she decided to try it as her symptoms would persist without oestrogen.
The patient had not been told that hormone therapy could result in incontinence and vaginal atrophy. This made me question whether patients are giving informed consent. The patient had been lost to follow up by her gender identity clinic (GIC) so I referred her back.
Another for good measure:
Another female patient came to me suffering from painful chafing. She had clitoral hypertrophy due to the testosterone she was taking. The clitoris was firm and it hurt. Clitoral hypertrophy is not likely to regress if testosterone is reduced or stopped. The only advice I could give were common sense measures.
The British Menopause Society calls vaginal atrophy “a chronic and progressive condition due to oestrogen deficiency” and notes “the effect of lack of oestrogen on urogenital tissue quality is an intermediate effect, often taking three to five years to become apparent”.
We are yet to see the enormity of the harms being caused. The longer a woman is on testosterone the more progressive her symptoms may become. As a GP this causes me great concern. This long term adverse effect presents itself years after transition, when there will be an accumulation of other long term irreversible harms, such as clitoral hypertrophy.
Brook’s willingness to so boldly present pseudoscience and a cavalier approach to safeguarding is astonishing.
So much for what is publicly available via Brook’s website. As above, the secrecy that is created via the ed-tech subscription model used by almost all sex-ed providers is a serious problem. Publish their pseudoscience into a textbook and it would be mocked – and they would be publicly answerable. Secrecy suits – and we need to work to remove this option.
However, a friend has provided some examples from a Brook RSHE teacher training course.
Welcome to men who are simply women:
Welcome to the trans-toddler:
This is irresponsible:
According to Brook, this is a problem!:
According to Brook, this is also a problem:
This advice from Brook is dangerous:
I could go on:
And on:
Our children are being taught this pseudoscience in our schools. Children trust adults. We are lying to them and we are betraying them. This has to stop. We need to start exposing the promoters of harmful pseudoscience again. Until there is new guidance and new practice about the teaching of gender ideology in schools vulnerable children will be placed on a pipeline to irreversible harm – and toddlers will be suspended for being transphobic.
Caroline Ffiske is a Director of Conservatives for Women. Find her on X.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
Climate Scares False – latest leaflet to print at home and deliver to neighbours or forward to politicians, your new MP, your local vicar, online media and friends online.
Start a local campaign. We have over 200 leaflet ideas on the link on the leaflet.
https://www.unison.org.uk/events/stop-tommy-robinson-stop-the-far-right-unite-against-racism-islamophobia-and-antisemitism/
‘Stand Up to Racism has called a unity demonstration against Robinson to show that we will not let the far right take over our streets.
Our message is clear: stop the far right, unity over division.
We’re asking every trade union, faith group, campaign, anti- racist and the thousands who pushed back the far right in August to join our demonstration on 26 October.
We are the many, they are the few. Together we can stop the far right.’
I thought it was a bit quiet on here today.
Who pays for these Unison protestors?
Oh!
‘UNISON is the UK’s largest union, representing over 1.3 million members who work in public services, utilities……
UNISON members can claim tax relief on their subscriptions, and the union has a dispensation with HMRC to reimburse expenses to its members and activists.’
We do!
Sensible words and advice from Liam Tuffs here. The last rally went off with no problems at all and there’s no reason today’s should be any different. It’s predictable that the ones starting any trouble will be the agitators that are planted there, so look out for anyone with face coverings, because it’s highly likely it’ll be them as patriots would have no cause to cover their faces. It’s a family-friendly gathering and celebration, no matter how the opposition haters and MSM choose to twist it. If anyone is going please report back how it went. Looking forward to the footage which will be posted online later. Do Tommy proud!
https://x.com/liamtuffs1/status/1849868692290687161
As with the first and second world war it started slowly and grew
We have actually been in the third world war for some time now, we just haven’t realised it yet!
Troops from around the world are now involved in foreign campaign’s, it can only escalate
If Trump wins he will have to hit the ground running to have any hope of stopping this madness
The absolute lack of leadership in the west is staggering!
I imagine that we will see police in full riot gear inciting the TR supporters to violence so that the MSM will get the desired headlines and Starmer will once again be seen as a hard man castigating the “far right”.
I hope with all my heart that it goes wrong bigtime for the authorities, and that their incompetence and stupidity manifests itself in their failure and the naked exposure of their agents.
Traitors and filth, every one.
The only trouble was in the opposing rally, with arrests made. Strange that, the large number of Police around Tommy’s rally looked pretty stupid.
Local early evening news Look East yesterday headlined with an extensive item on an EV that spontaneously burst into flames on someone’s driveway. I was surprised the item was permitted but good on them.
“Get your Progress Pride poppy”
Never again! F#£k the British legion
Machine guns didn’t differentiate on the battle fields, neither should this so called charity
Indeed. I won’t be buying a poppy this year.
When I see one of their poppy sellers I am going to give them the same message. Although I refuse to support charidees I make an exception for a poppy, usually just a quid. Even thaat’s now finished.
Why is ASI measuring non-dims in £billions instead of in numbers of people.
If the chart I. The useless DT is meant to represent the aggregate wealth of non-dims why not say so.
I assume we have yet another useless journo or ASI “researcher” juvenile so does not understand the units of measurement.
I wonder how many of these non-dims have, in past years, subsidised Labour, its charities and Net Zero projects. Oh how much they must now resent the time they spent rubbing shoulders with Blair, Mandeldlime and their mates.
As investors are not “working people” then why is Starmer so keen to invest our money in the state, which has a very considerable proportion of non-working people? Why are all the welfare scroungers, the non-workers etc. getting our money invested in them? Are Starmer and MPs working people? Simply questions to consider.