On December 8th 2020, June Raine, Head of the MHRA, assured us all that “no corners have been cut” when the Government gave Temporary Authorisation to the Pfizer Covid vaccine. Based on the evidence from another of my FOIs to MHRA, it’s hard to see how that was an honest statement.
Before I go on, a bit of background. Most development trials in any sector use a product made using small-scale manufacturing facilities or a lab. You don’t want to invest in mass production (new machines and tooling and maybe a new factory) until you’ve got confidence in the design. On the other hand, scaling up production creates new risks. It’s a huge subject but to keep it simple just imagine scaling up from making a dozen cup cakes in your kitchen to producing thousands to sell in the shops. You’d encounter massive problems obtaining, measuring and mixing the large amounts of ingredients. They might have to come from multiple sources and you’d have to assure yourself they were equivalent. Mixing large amounts homogeneously in large vats is harder than in a pudding bowl and cooking them in your kitchen oven. You might have to change the actual production process and even add or substitute new ingredients. There’s a high risk that you’ll end up with ‘different’ cup cakes. So unless you compare test results from the first full production batch with the results from the cup cakes you made in your kitchen, you are flying blind.
For medicines, you’ll be relieved to know that there are strict regulations governing this scaling-up process. For example, here is one relevant document from the European Medicines Agency.
I became aware in 2022 of the potential ‘bait and switch’ issue with the Pfizer Covid vaccine – the suspicion that in December 2020 the MHRA approved a vaccine (made by ‘Process 2’) different to that tested in Pfizer’s clinical trials (made by ‘Process 1’) without any comparative data. Here is one example, by Josh Guetzkow, an Israeli academic, which drew on FOIs in other countries and the release of Pfizer documents enforced by the U.S. courts.
But one thing bothered me – his statement that: “To the best of our knowledge, there is no publicly available report on this comparison of ‘Process 1’ versus ‘Process 2’ doses.” As with correlation doesn’t equal causation, absence of evidence is not the same as evidence of absence.
Guetzkow’s article led me to Pfizer’s undertaking in October 2020 (bottom of p46 here):
The safety and immunogenicity results for individuals 16 to 55 years of age vaccinated with study intervention produced by manufacturing ‘Process 1’ and each lot of ‘Process 2’ will be summarised descriptively. A random sample of 250 participants from those vaccinated with study intervention produced by manufacturing ‘Process 1’ will be selected randomly for the analysis.
I therefore submitted an FOI to MHRA requesting a copy of the relevant Pfizer report. MHRA’s first response was to send me a link to the European Medicine Agency’s archive of reports and, in effect, told me to go and look for myself. Not very open and transparent, was it?
So I requested an Internal Review, and have now received a response in which MHRA finally comes clean – it does not hold such a report. Bombshell or what.
It also turns out that the promised comparison between ‘Process 1’ and ‘Process 2’ product remained a condition of authorisation until September 2022 when the EMA and MHRA eventually acquiesced to Pfizer’s argument that the promised comparison was unnecessary due to the “extensive usage of vaccines manufactured via Process 2”.
I draw the inexorable conclusion that June Raine was, how can I put this delicately, not being completely straight with us in December 2020 when she said that no corners were cut. Her agency didn’t follow its own regulations for production process validation. It was flying blind.
Until Nick retired a few years ago, he was a Senior Civil Servant in the Ministry of Defence responsible for the safety and effectiveness of ammunition used by the Armed Forces. He is co-author of the Perseus Group report on U.K. medicines regulator the MHRA.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
Wow. Good find. I bet they won’t be covering this in the Covid Inquiry. Yes, indeed, there has been “extensive usage of vaccines manufactured via Process 2”. Now, we find they are full of DNA fragments and an SV40 promoter.
That same type of crap reasoning has been used by the Dutch government. Lockdowns, night curfews, company closures without reimbursement, face rags – some in contravention of the Constitution, all now enshrined in law (quickly pushed through after upper chamber elections but before the new upper chamber was installed, in itself worthy of a banana republic). Not one single measure has been investigated nor evidence shown as to effectiveness. The reasoning: we’ve already implemented these things and most of the population is still alive, that proves they work.
DNA fragments, plasmids, bacterial contamination, SV40 – and that’s just the poor manufacturing quality, that’s not even touching on the toxic spike protein and what would appear to be the equally dangerous LNPs. All for something that doesn’t even work at the most basic level.
A pantomime dame, if ever there was one.
It always come as a shock when we find that people in positions of authority have been lying.
It’s just sooo unusual.
Was she really lying? “No corners have been cut” implies to me that they actually conducted research, simply not as extensively as is required. As it is now quite apparent that NONE of the regulatory agencies carried out any research either before or after poisoning half the world’s population, one could argue that no corners had been cut, as construction, as it were, had never been started in the first place. Cutting corners would have implied they at least attempted to do something, other than pocket backhanders.
All the agencies that have now ‘fessed up one after the other that they never tracked AEs, and not a peep from the media.
“So I requested an Internal Review, and have now received a response in which MHRA finally comes clean – it does not hold such a report. Bombshell or what.”
What’s the betting this went all the way to Westminster before permission was given to allow for the release by MHRA of a statement openly admitting that they had been lying.
Now why would government allow that?
Because it is a plan to kill people. The batch quality is deliberate and cannot be the result of a manufacturing issue.
The WHO have been granted powers to enforce mandatory jabs for the next Plandemic.
That is Zero, not the Green bollux, but when they bring this in.
The young need to wake up and take up the fight.
Too damn right.
The youth were the more compliant — Some did push a little fence down in Liverpool, apart from that, nothing!
Well done Mr Hunt
Jeremy “Isaac” Hunt?
I meant the author
Just realised reading that ! The Jabs were only green lighted for a short term emergency measure , where’s the emergency now ?
Not enough people have been killed by them? Try, try, try again?
Only over 60s now in the UK. Because they were so safe & effective.
But they stuck it in people’s arms anyway and then people got sicker and many died too. They didn’t care then and they don’t care now. They might make all the right noises but words are cheap: actions are what count. I’m so fed up with these types of people. They should never, ever be allowed anywhere near positions of authority. Heads should roll.
What is so frustrating is the almost total impotence of MSM. Just silence. They hold the confidence of the middle aged public, already sort of in denial about the efficacy of these bioweapons. Of course they are largely bought but the consequences of staying silent is more and more deaths. Likewise GPs, Medical regulators, medical Journals and politicians,running out of the HoC. What a load of cowards.
As has been proven by the DNA contamination bombshell dropped by Kevin McKernan earlier this year and subsequent independent researchers thereafter, the spike protein isn’t the only problem. The entire mRNA platform, including the LNP delivery mechanism, is the problem. And yet they want to manufacture other vaccines using this same tech? It’s a non-starter based on current evidence and the ‘enablers’ ( formally known as ‘regulators’ ) give us zero confidence that this will change going forward because they haven’t even been doing their job of keeping us safe and ensuring Big Pharma adheres to good manufacturing practices for the last 3 years. And what does June Raine have to say about why there’s still excess deaths *after* 2020 when we didn’t have these magic bullet vaccines that were meant to save us? Shouldn’t there be less deaths now not more?
Here’s a good, extensive article looking at the excess deaths worldwide as they relate to the Deagel prediction;
”The official narrative put forth by governments and health organizations has been that deaths in 2020 increased due to the outbreak of the alleged Covid-19 pandemic, with the response to it adversely affecting millions of people worldwide.
However, as the pandemic progressed and a vaccine was developed and distributed, the narrative shifted to focus on the safety and effectiveness of the Covid-19 injection as a means to curb the spread of the virus and reduce the number of deaths.
This narrative was reinforced through various propaganda campaigns, public statements, and official statements, with the message that the vaccine was “safe and effective” and would be “the key to ending the pandemic”.
However, the figures and official reports released by governments in the USA, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, the UK and most of Europe have shown that the opposite has happened, with millions of excess deaths being recorded since the mass roll-out of the Covid-19 injections.
This has led to many questions about the safety of the vaccine, the facts of the official narrative, and the integrity of Governments and Public Health bodies around the world.”
https://expose-news.com/2023/09/17/leaked-pfizer-data-death-rates-solidify-deagels-2025-prediction/
I have no doubt, at this stage that the jabs are not safe, but why is Sweden the outlier, when you consider they had no Lockdown but had the rollouts like the rest of Europe?
This is massive!
This is huge, Andrew Bridgen MP has finally secured a debate in Parliament on the 20th of October about the EXCESS DEATHS…..
Please people, email, phone, write to and knock on the doors of your local MP and DEMAND they attend the most important debate in decades. We want answers as to why so many of our loved ones are dying.
(We know, but they have to acknowledge it and cannot ignore this any longer).
Share this post and videos everywhere let’s make sure everyone knows about it.
Well done to Andrew Bridgen.
Although this is indeed excellent news is he liable to face the same walk-out situation as the last couple of times? Are they obliged to attend and participate? Or is it just the speeches they appear to have the blatant disrespect to all go AWOL for?
We can at least let our MPs know that we see them.
They don’t care, they do what they’re told by the Party. The Party always gets voted in.
I’ve emailed my MP – a Pretendy-CONservative and waste of space, but I like to let him know that I’m watching, despite the fact he (now) ignores me.
No point in writing to your MP….They are a bunch of spineless Fifth Column who’s interests are the Globalists. I have written to mine in the past but sent a nasty email regarding Nuremberg2.
Thanks BB, I’m going to write to my MP – I’m not holding out too much hope but your post has inspired me to give her a prod!
Please try to ignore Naomi Wolf’s magnificent cleavage (as a well endowed woman, I’m not sure how you just show up in a low cut top without being very well aware of it!) and focus on what Ed Dowd says about the data signals.
https://rumble.com/v3juj5w-ed-dowd-reveals-astonishing-death-rates-in-the-uk.html
My pleasure! Important information to know.
Bless this Professor of Virology over in Japan. Seems his red pill has taken full effect, so much so he’s now on the streets trying to get people’s attention and warn them of the dangers but everyone’s basically ignoring him and treating like a manic street preacher. Huge respect for putting himself out there though. You can see how passionate he is in this 2min video. Meanwhile here are some points he tweeted regarding the death jabs/scamdemic;
”Despite being a pro-vaccine doctor, his recent doubts on COVID-19 vaccinations that has set Prof. Miyazawa apart. Understanding the potential consequences he faces, he fearlessly takes to the streets, driven solely by his desire to share vital information and empower the public with knowledge. There is no personal gain or profit in his actions, only a burning passion to disseminate the truth.
Professor Miyazawa recently tweeted nine points challenging the official government COVID narrative.
https://www.aussie17.com/p/breaking-professor-miyazawa-takes
A wise list of bullet points. Maybe the term “tweeted” could be replaced by ‘X-rayed’ (using the phonetic alphabet) given the renaming of the platform?
God Bless Him. That takes real courage and I can feel his desperation.
So several years have past and the bordem has set in..
The conversation is exhausted, what is being achieved by these constant thresds and posts… Nothing, in fact it’s designed to subdue…..
This is achieving nothing whatsoever… Nothing
Care to explain what’s its achieving??
I’ll not wait too long..
Armchair protesting??
Digital ID’s and CBDCs round the corner… Thars years of threads on this forum… More armchair protesting…
What’s it achieving??…. Anyone care to answer…. Nope
If this site is not meeting your needs the obvious thing to do is Foxtrot Oscar.
“I draw the inexorable conclusion that June Raine was, how can I put this delicately, not being completely straight with us in December 2020 when she said that no corners were cut.”
Why don’t you call a spade a spade and not a bloody shovel?
June Raine is a liar – simple really.
PS mind you she’s not the only one.
Call her a liar, maybe she will libel you, or maybe not!
Perhaps this could be used as one more piece of evidence when Andrew Bridgen is given his day in Parliament to discuss excess mortality. 20th October 2023. Perhaps daily sceptic could get behind Mr. Bridgen’s efforts to bring the truth to the citizens of this country.
If you were dishonest in your job, in my case as a family nurse practitioner on something this important, I would no longer be employed. It really is that simple.
Not only did they fail to test the successive batches, the 15 minute observation time post jab was removed, in order to process as many people as possible.
Unforgivable
According to AB they added the 15 minute observation because of a change of vaccine product that, previously didn’t have the anaphylactic element. Though, how would they know at the time with the hidden trial data.
It’s news to me that the 15 minute obs period was reinstated, as the jabs were considered ‘safe and effective’ for most everyone- children, young adults, middle aged and seniors, including pregnant women.
Looking at the latest update -19/09/23 – of the children / young adult recommendations:
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/national-protocol-for-covid-19-mrna-vaccine-5-to-17-years-of-age
I can’t see where in this age group, the observation period has been reintroduced.
The main changes I can see are that they have now reduced the previous 2 jab baseline to a 1 jab, followed by a booster.
I admit, I haven’t checked the other age groups / pregnant women guidelines recently.
They NEVER EVER had ANY interest in Safely NOR were allowed a choice. It was ALL systems Go for ALL Pharma. Crimes
It was a mass medical experiment. The Authorities weren’t going to do anything which might possibly disrupt the experiment, or prevent it from being completed.
No-one who participated gave Informed Consent. By rights, every organisation and individual who promoted or participated in the conduct of the experiment should be prosecuted …. but I predict that no-one will EVER be held accountable for the deaths and injuries they caused.
The 20% or so who resisted the coercion to participate in this mass medical experiment have been fully vindicated.