Government Minister Will Quince claimed the MHRA is "globally recognised for requiring high standards of safety and effectiveness". That is palpable nonsense, says Nick Denim.
U.K. drugs regulator the MHRA has been refusing to disclose key information relating to the safety of the Covid vaccines of late, repeatedly claiming the requests are "vexatious". What has it got to hide?
Back in February 2021, MHRA promised to do a whole range of routine population-level data analysis “to quickly detect a potential safety signal” for the Covid vaccines. So, where is it?
The blame game starts as MHRA passes the buck, writing in an FOI reply that "all the Covid vaccine authorisation decisions were taken by the Government Minister". Time for MPs to turn up the heat on the regulator.
UK drugs regulator the MHRA has responded to an FOI request about the Covid vaccines but redacted crucial safety data. What is it hiding?
Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla was found by the medicine regulator to have misled the public over the Covid vaccine, yet will be fined just a few thousand pounds. The system is broken and needs an overhaul, says Dr Alan Black.
Pfizer's Covid vaccine has been authorised in the U.K. for infants aged six months to four years-old, the medicines regulator confirmed today, despite a study showing nearly 1 in 500 are hospitalised with side-effects.
One in five jobs in the department of the MHRA that authorises vaccines for public use are currently vacant. Should we be worried? Yes, says a safety expert. If vacancies climb above 15%, safety is compromised.
In the spirit of Mrs Merton we might ask: "So why were healthy children and young adults coerced into receiving unnecessary multiple Covid vaccinations from a $1.4 trillion global pharmaceutical industry?"
Read the powerful speeches made by MPs on Monday in Parliament in the debate on vaccine safety, where they tell the Government it is "in denial about the risks of these vaccines".
