Emergency operators have been warned to ask callers how they want to be referred to rather than ‘misgendering’ them based on their voices. The Mail has more.
NHS 999 operators have been told to ask callers their preferred pronouns to avoid misgendering them based on the sound of their voices.
Call-centre staff should also not use ‘Sir’ or ‘Madam’, with one ambulance trust stating preferred pronouns should be sought even in emergencies so the experience is less stressful for trans patients.
Others say birth sex is often irrelevant to care, so operators can use patients’ self-identified gender.
The policies can be revealed today in the second part of an investigation into the spread of contested gender ideology in the NHS.
As the Daily Mail reported last week, hospital trusts are letting patients who only occasionally identify as women into female-only wards. Maternity staff also refer to ‘birthing people’ rather than women and mothers.
Lottie Moore, from the Policy Exchange think-tank, said: “To expect anyone to be thinking of preferred pronouns in a 999 health emergency is ludicrous.”
The MoS asked England’s nine NHS ambulance trusts if they had specific guidelines for handling calls from transgender people.
North East Ambulance Service provided a staff document on ‘How to best support our gender-diverse patients’. It advises a patient’s sex “has no bearing on someone who has toothache, for example” so the gender they identify as can be used.
It adds: “It’s not our place to ask questions about gender identity at birth unless it is appropriate to the clinical assessment.”
Staff are told to pass the call to a clinician if “gender will complicate the triage”. But it goes on: “No-one can reliably diagnose gender from the tone or pitch of a voice or from a name. Therefore, take a gender-neutral stance at the beginning of a call.
“Dropping gendered terms such as ‘Sir’ or ‘Madam’… avoids the accidental misgendering. Asking someone’s pronouns is a… non-intrusive way to determine gender.”
South East Coast Ambulance Service says asking for pronouns can make life-or-death calls more effective. Its guidance states: “Inappropriate pronouns do cause stress and may make an already difficult situation worse.”
Worth reading in full.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
Maybe. Maybe not.
However, government data is quite clear that their handling was in no way based on science, hence an assault on the nation.
ONS figures, Feb 2020 to Dec 2021, for deaths FROM Covid (not the meaningless “with Covid” figure, which was used for anyone dying from whatever if they tested positive with a test not designed to do what they wanted it and made it do).
<10k in 21 months
1 < age 14
c100 < age 50
This was not a Pandemic – rather a pandemic of authoritarianism
https://www.ons.gov.uk/aboutus/transparencyandgovernance/freedomofinformationfoi/covid19deathsandautopsiesfeb2020todec2021
I agree, they knew there was little science behind their actions….…try as they may they will NEVER convince me they did not know that the IFR/CFR was really low…because we know they did. They knew the PCR was manipulative. Whenever they had the clock ticking down the cases/deaths on TV, the stories in the MSM…they knew what they were doing.
They knew there was no such thing as asymptomatic transmission. Do we honestly think the entire medical establishment thought paper masks did anything to halt a virus? Seeing Rochelle Walensky recently saying the CDC still recommend them was an advertisement for sheer stupidity and doubling-down in the face of mountains of contrary evidence…if my two-year old still has to wear a mask because of her lies shouldn’t I be mad?
We are seeing the same manipulation and lock-step going on with the Zero Green Agenda…mountains of evidence that it can’t possibly work..so are they just blundering around again? Why do we have to put up with it?….and why do the population keep putting up with it?
Stupidity cannot be ruled out, nor a morbid fear of death. I have no fear of death, never have had, because it is unavoidable. I may as well fear the tides, or the sun coming up; not that the sun does that very often in Wales.
It doesn’t have to be either cock up or planned.
It can be both.
There, fixed it.
I really don’t get why people struggle with the idea that there are people out there with power who have a plan to accomplish something huge and are willing to inflict a lot of harm to many people to achieve it.
We know these people have existed throughout history. The very obvious ones we all know – Stalin, Hitler, Pol Pot, Mao, I would also add Bush Jr, Blair, Kissinger, but that’s just me.
So why is it so inconceivable that these people would be among us now, plotting some enormous transformation with terrible cost of life and wellbeing to others?
What exactly has changed in humanity that makes the existence of these people today unlikely? I would say nothing at all.
Indeed. I think the straw man argument often used by those who like to pooh-pooh “conspiracy theories” has left people with the perception that anyone who uses the word “conspiracy” means that every single thing was planned and organised and ordered from one place and that everyone involved is a member of a single secret organisation.
Exactly.
Thank your for this helpful addition to the debate. I think you’ve elucidated something at the centre of this, which is the nature of conspiracy. The problem we have all been struggling with is that over the last few decades, the term ‘conspiracy theory’ has been weaponised and put into the same category of wrongthink as highly unacceptable attitudes such as racism or sexism.
One of the main objections to conspiracies is that they seem to pre-suppose a detailed plan created in advance and shared widely between the various actors that have to implement it. The objection, of course, is that it would only take one person to rat out the conspiracy and it would all be over. However, that is not even how plans work. They work by creating common and agreed responses to unfolding events, such as, “if this hill is attacked then we will respond with this force”. This kind of planning has demonstrably been in place prior to 2020 – summarised very well by Igor Chudov here.
Thus the conspiracy was all accomplished in plain sight. The media, universities and other institutions were all primed with cash dependencies (such as to BMG Foundation) and a consistent pandemic theology that was unchallengable, such as that vaccines will save us and sometimes it is necessary to be authoritarian for the public good. Thus individual actors have multiple motivations to carry out the plan—to keep the funding coming, to keep approval of their peers, to save the world.
..very well put….I would add that it takes courage to say no, and we know that millions of people, particularly in positions of power, failed that test miserably….
As you say we are now watching the ‘common and agreed’ responses to a host of things including to Russia, China and the zero green agenda…just to name three..how do we stop them?
Well here’s a positive thought. Perhaps when people see the vindication of those who did swim against the tide, it might serve as an example to other for the other agendas you mention.
Perhaps when they all start dying off because of the ‘vaccines’.
Yes, aspects of the conspiracy were accomplished in plain sight. Either Whitty or Vallance (I think it was Whitty) had the legend ‘Upscaling Vaccine Opportunities’ on the topline of their Twitter account very early doors in the ‘pandemic’. If that was his self-proclaimed ‘in plain sight’ guiding principle you can probably forget about the rational application of good science. Unsurprisingly this statement didn’t remain on Twitter for long and was, to my recollection, gone by March 2020: it was too obviously a statement of fealty to the jabs and not the public’s health.
Another interesting aspect for further exploration is that of scapegoats and useful idiots. To my mind, befogged as it is, Hancock was purposefully shoved into the role of Health Secretary to unwittingly play the role of useful idiot/patsy, allowing Jeremy Hunt to slither off behind the curtain for a while.
Let us consider just a few of the unlikely events that played out around Matt Hancock: his ‘affair’ is conveniently caught on camera and released to the MSM (by whom), his resignation follows, his appearance on I’m a Celebrity (brokered by whom), his co-authored memoir (who commissioned it?), the appropriation/editing/publication of his WhatsApp messages (really???). Is this not a highly curious succession of events? Such a ‘curated’ succession of events leads me to suggest that Hancock has been set up as a patsy, and that these events, that have brought him to the pretty pass in which he now finds himself, are an important strand of the psyop(psychological operation) designed to exculpate as many others as possible. A carefully prepared excercise in damage limitation, a culpability off-ramp for the government, advisers, big pharmafia, academia, NHS, etc.
The puffs of smoke from the grassy knoll still hang in the air, but the government wants us to fixate on the Book Depository window.
You are right, but the biggest part of the conspiracy in plain sight, which I should have mentioned in my original post, is the profiteering by BMG. Gates made $500m from his stock in BioNTech and then, after he offloaded his stock, started making (accurate) statements about how the virus wasn’t as deadly as had been thought and how ineffective the vaccines were.
I’m doubting you, but how do you know he offloaded his shares?
I saw it on Russel Brand’s YT, but here’s a link to a substack that claims:
“In reviewing SEC filings, The Dossier has found that the Gates Foundation’s holdings in BioNTech went from 1,038,674 shares to 148,674 shares over the course of the third quarter of 2021, downsizing the Gates position in the mRNA vaccine manufacturer by 86 percent of shares held. “
Thanks. I meant to say “ I’m not doubting you”.
But very interesting.
$500m… although such a sum is not quite bedside loose change for these players I don’t see this as being a sufficient motive for the tectonic upheavals and blatant evils of the last few years. It is certainly in plain sight however, as is *Gates’* change of tune.
What is not in plain sight and remains largely unexamined is the US Dept of Defense and its global reach, its inextricable involvement with big pharmafia interests, including the hundreds of biolabs across the world, the decades long development of bioweaponry and the total impunity with which they pursue their opaque goals.
The buck certainly doesn’t stop with Hancock, nor parliament, not even big pharma but with the ‘defence’ military industrial complex and the billions or trillions at their command. Literally a bottomless pit.
The likes of Zuckerberg and Gates are merely a higher order of patsy / decoy / scapegoat, the creatures of this totally unaccountable monstrous Strangelove Deep State.
Blinkers are available in all sizes.
*Gates’* edited apostrophe!
Yes, you make a good point. Sasha Latypova has done amazing work uncovering the web of contracts that show the vaccines were a military programme. I suppose it is fair to say that Gates was not the prime mover, but he is, nevertheless, an important player, I would argue. What he was able to do was to spread the vaccine gospel dressed up as philanthropy, which is not something the DOD could do.
Interesting. Must look at Latypova’s output: thank you.
DOD presumably created/owned Microsoft et al from the start and so controlled/anointed/appointed the chief players.
Gates should be viewed as the Deep State Military Industrial gift that keeps on giving, whether we include possible Epstein kompromat as a significant driver or a side show or merely a billionaire’s ‘legitimate’ R&R.
The interface between eugenicists and DOD isn’t obvious to me. But Bill Gates Inc. as a scaled-up purveyor of death, the Tesco Extra version of the EXIT corner-shop in Geneva… that I can see. Philantrodeath. What a great cover! RFK Jr.’s book on Fauci is a good place to start.
I agree. There are hundreds of other actors in this Orwellian drama but currently everything is down to just one of them – Midazolam Mat. No mention of those above such as Bozo, Chunt, Govey and the parasites Whitty, Valance, Michie, Raine, Jabbit and the rest. So this little leak is just that, a little leak.
The truly dreadful events of the last three years in which many senior members of government and attendant taxpayer spongeing hangers on participated in mass murder and more cannot and should never be just brushed under the carpet.
Perhaps we should drop the use of the word ‘conspiracy.’ The wealth of evidence from across the world would now dictate that what we are living through is a carefully conceived plan. The ‘Lockstep 2010’ documents certainly gave notice of what those who considered themselves to be the real PTB had planned for humanity and since updated via Agenda 2021 / 2030. Much of what is occurring has been openly broadcast.
Billy’s event 201 in October 2019 was nothing more than a publicity show dry-run of the C1984 horror program. It wasn’t hidden, he told us what was coming.
Schwab has blathered on about his Great Reset and even published a book on the subject. Charlie Windsor is fully on board with the ‘re-imagining’ and ‘window of opportunity.’ Bliar is pushing digital passports – for our safety – although personally I would feel alot safer if Bliar was currently preparing his defence before God. Carnage Carney is pushing digital currencies to complete the enslavement.
In other news fifteen minute cities are coming in “whether we like it or not’ and personal transport will be taken away by 2030.
Hardly “conspiracies.” These are plans for the future of the world and instead of becoming bogged down in the titbits we should concentrate on what’s coming.
Hancock is being hung out, he’s their sacrificial victim to cover for the hundreds, possibly thousands more guilty parties in this country, but that’s all he is. I wish him Hell.
Conspiracy or cock-up? We need to stop over-thinking and becoming bogged down in semantics.
More like a carefully co-ordinated and controlled Plan.
“4. Justice is done.” Not yet, not by a long way. He and they caused people to die. Let the punishment fit the crime.
As I mentioned on Toby’s article.
I can list almost every country on Earth, allies and enemies alike, East and West.
Was it a cockup in every one at the same time? Is there a string of Whatsapp like messages for every country? It is simply impossible that there was no guiding star here.
Sweden was an outlier because the politicians weren’t in control, despite their efforts to literally change the law to take over.
In the US the Federal Government set the rules, and it took a long time for the independant states to realise what was being done to them and resist.
Yes……read any of the decisions about jabbing under 12’s, anywhere in the world…they should all be made to explain, in clear scientific detail, how they came to the conclusion that they should be administered…
People did that…people in positions of power…people who could have made the opposite decision…..there’s no chance they cocked-up…they are evil, money grubbing monsters……
The US Federal Government has limited jurisdiction (which of course they like to try and expand). The stay-at-home orders as the US termed lockdowns came from the states or from local government.
I meant the ‘rules of the game’ such as you force masking to stop the virus, you imprison people to stop the virus etc. The Fed tried desperately to keep them in line when they stopped towing it, Vax mandates for Federal workers, companies over a certain size.
True. At least the states were able to ignore and/or push back on some of this. The states can sue the Feds.
Sorry to nit-pick but one ‘toes’ the line, not ‘tows’ it. There are several theories about the origin. Armed forces, boxing, etc..
“It is simply impossible that there was no guiding star here.”
A point I and many others on here have been making consistently for many months.
yes and Russia isn’t with the future financial system plan hence the war.
Rona was 10 years in planning. Every single year since 2001 there was a scamdemic or virusageddon. Transnational, actors, orgs and money. They meet every week it appears. G20-3. G20+4. G20-12. WHO, UN, Davos, Bilderberg, WEF, Climate Confabs every week.
What do people think these idiots are doing meeting every week? You can only discuss the ‘weather’ so often.
I feel that it is all about group think, and how difficult it is to be a contrarian, to go against the flow. Too many consequences if you are wrong. Much safer to go with the flow.
China started it by locking down. The idiots in Italy panicked and locked down. That produced a group think mentality amongst those who were thrashing around wanting to ‘do something’ but not knowing what to do.
And the evil grew from there, with people in charge prepared to double down rather than face up to admitting they had got it wrong. Instinctive conspiracy to cover up, I would say.
The concept of “group think” is not limited to professional activity (and related organisations) with regard to health. Think about how they react to major problems in other industries, such as the reactor explosion in Chernobyl, or the Clapham Junction incident in 1988, or aviation related accidents, the odd bit of crude oil pollution etc.
Psychologists will probably have a field day about these sort of things, but there is always a degree of risk of many of our activities. The challenge is how to balance one thing with another. “Lockdown” was not a balanced attitude to the matter in hand.
there was a massive social media campaign by chinese bots aimed at Italian decision makers.
I think this is the problem with the idea of conspiracy – for some people, like Toby and Eugyppius, it must mean a group of shadowy bond villains plotting together in a darkened room with some elaborate master plan to rule the world.
To be fair, there is some of that, but really what it is is a group of aligned interests, disparate but connected through overarching aims, who use their power and wealth to try to shape the world they see fit. Covid was an opportunity for them – they didn’t need to come together to plot the response because they’d already created the mechanisms for it – a compliant media reliant on their wealth and wholly bought into their ideology, corrupt and incompetent government full of people chosen for their adherence to the ideology, The Science and medicine funded and staffed with their people.
None of them needed instructions from Blofeld to go about their work – they were already ideologically aligned to the idea of globalism, big government, daddy-knows-best oligarchic utopian fantasy. Or they were corrupt and saw the money and power supporting that ideology would give them: or both.
The conspiracy is the ideology and the power of the people who prop it up. They don’t need to sit in a room together to plan it out – it plans itself once everyone with any power buys into it.
Its an idea as a terror group – like Isis with billionaires. No single organisation; just a global network of cells with a shared ideology prepared to do what they must for the jihad. Only more dangerous than Isis could ever dream of being.
That’s true but this global network has been actively working to increase its power through new legal mechanisms such as treaties snd agreements snd 5 or 10 year plans and new international organisations cementing their authority to circumvent democratic processes.
Global technocracy. It is in itself an open conspiracy that drapes itself in the grievance politics of the left snd the global imperatives of the environmental movement using crisis or anticipated crisis to increase its authoritarian bind on the masses using technology and joining the largest corporations with the embedded bureaucratic arms of every state on the planet.
it helps to spend years propagandising and splitting the population into opposing ideological forces. But that’s more a cyclical generational effect than a conspiracy. However, the ideologues who espouse global technocracy know very well how civilisation all cycles operate and they utilise this by preparing for inevitable socio economic upheavals.
You know all this I’m sure.
Indeed
Yes, but it is not simply that politicians were conspiring amongst themselves, beginning in 2020, but that exercises simulating pandemics, involving ever higher levels of government machinery, had been indoctrinating national scientists, public health officials and politicians as to the correct response for two decades. Even when they were surprised by the ‘real thing’ and succumbed to panic as they began to contemplate the unthinkable (not only the perceived possibility of millions falling dead but of trampling over the very norms of western civilisation), contemplate these things they did.
It is still going on. The drafted WHO treaty, the new vaccines under development, the digital currencies, the digital passports, the continuing stranglehold that Big Pharma has over the universities, medical journals and media – what are these if not instances of the continuing phenomenon of authorities ‘conspiring’ to control thought and behaviour?
Excellent post.
There’s also the social media side of things. The pressure from the loud, naive blob who found the whole thing aligning with their political position. And I don’t mean the politicians, I mean the twitter clans, screaming and shouting for something to be done. I could see it ramp up, going from the batsh*t extreme left to the “normal” left, then to the mainstream… The American sphere was awash with people wanting something done.
That pressure bled into the actual media, who attacked politicians for not doing said something.
That pressure went from the national politics, to international politics. Not hard to imagine the one country in the West strong-arming another into following the same routines. Whether it’s to avoid looking stupid or cultish belief or orchestration from above.
Given the overlap between big money and governments, it’s easy to see how it went from there… but ultimately it was social media, to me at least.
And given how stupid the average person is on twitter, it’s also easy to see that a cabal could take the reigns and drive the entire blob wherever they wanted.
That was a long comment to say that it was the plebs what done it. Lol
“they should not be let off the hook just because we do not want to risk being called ‘conspiracy theorists’.”
Thats really the nub of it for MANY MANY people. Whether they are even semi conscious of it or not, the refusal to join the dots from the participants in Event 201 down to the present day gaslighting on Anything But the Vax (ABV) still going on now in the face of unprecedented injuries and deaths, is really down to the desire to stay within the pale.
No matter how farcical that has become.
Initially there may well have been a lot of panic and monkey see, monkey do behind what was going on. But certainly at some point, orders were coming from some central source.
My apologies to those who have heard me say this before, but I feel I need to keep repeating it, because it was such an inexplicable about-turn. NL’s approach was initially not that far removed from the Swedish one – shops and businesses stayed open, schools were supposed to stay open, no restrictions on movements. No masks until PM Rutte introduced them for public transport in May 2020 (and international media started shaming NL – something Rutte is very susceptible to), against the public resistance of the public health authority. Over the summer of 2020, a ‘Red Team’ appeared, with links to Brussels and the ECDC. This team did its best to undermine the OMT and the Dutch public health authority. They played up to susceptible politicians, like the moron health minister, who just like Wancock thought this would be his moment to shine and pushed for ever harsher measures just to show what a hard ass he was. I bet his text messages are a Dutch version of Wancock’s.
Brussels, annoyed at how every nation state did what they wanted, tried to grab back power in November 2020, issuing a set of EU-wide recommendations, which included curfews and masking (the coercion tools that were necessary to have people begging for the needle – the needle that would cost EU taxpayers over 40 billion euros in a secret deal Von der Leyen did with Bourla – conspiracy, graft, what’s in a name?). At this point NL did close to a 180 degree turn, closed all the shops 2 weeks before Christmas, keeping them closed for months, introduced the constitution-violating night curfew and the constitution-violating face nappies. Things that had all proven to be of zero use in terms of public health – Italy, France, Spain had used these in spring 2020, yet by autumn 2020 were in the same boat as NL. They KNEW from previous and recent experience that these measures made no difference, so why did NL decide to implement them?
NL’s change in course was not because the OMT had gained new insights – they knew the original plan, to carry on as much as possible as normal, was the right plan. Someone pulled some strings somewhere and that political whore Rutte jumped to attention, with the assistance of a morally corrupt judiciary, who believe their job was to back up every possible violation of fundamental rights the government could come up with on the basis of zero evidence.
Imo, NL changed course because the government was ordered to change course.
Whether or not it started as a conspiracy, whether or not everyone was in on it – there was too much cooperation and alignment for this to be simply panic and monkey see, monkey do. To this day I still cannot belive that I saw a government of the Netherlands behave so abominably toward the people and a sector of public health and medical professionals so gleefully engage in something they knew was unconscionable. Oh, and the current Dutch health minister, first claiming there were no records of the OMT meetings that discussed what measures to take, then when these records miraculously appeared, has refused to share them with parliament. Rutte, a little smarter than Wancock, deletes all his Whats app messages and text messages. If they believed they did the right thing, they would publish the records.
I hope you never tire of repeating all that. It shouldn’t be forgotten and it’s not going to be part of any official history as things currently stand.
Seconded.
From a government which shoots demonstrators with live rounds, I am not surprised.
Global Totalitarianism is a world conspiracy. It is not about money but
power. Money only factors in as form of power. There are two objectives:
1. The direct subjugation of human individuals.
2. The abolition of all national regulation.
To control each human body two bio-weapons have been released. Covid-19
and its “vaccine”. Your range of action will be curtailed by digital
currency. Your mind will be controlled by the domination of
communication, the media.
John D. Rockefeller made no bones about the fact that he would do away
with nations. He saw them as an impediment to progress. The more all
nations are seen to be corrupt, incompetent or buffoons then the more
the populace will accept their world control or dissolution. Hancock is
propelling objective 2.
The ground is being prepared that a new “saviour” will emerge
triumphant; decisively sweeping all aside.
“The more all nations are seen to be corrupt, incompetent or buffoons then the more
the populace will accept their world control or dissolution. “
Very important point. Biden is similarly doing a bang up job of showing the dangers of idiot/mentally ill politicians running nations. If he succeeds in escalating the war with Russia to go nuclear, the masses will be begging for a global government offering everlasting peace.
(See Revelations)
Thanks for that. I must also correct myself. It was David Rockefeller not John D.
“For more than a century ideological extremists at either end of the political spectrum have seized upon well-publicized incidents such as my encounter with Castro to attack the Rockefeller family for the inordinate influence they claim we wield over American political and economic institutions. Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as ‘internationalists’ and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure–one world, if you will. If that’s the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it.”
― David Rockefeller, Memoirs
WEF and WHO are big pies and most of the worlds governments have got their fingers pushed into them in a more or less way!
Why did the government suppress effective treatments ?
Why were PCR tests performed using an excess number of cycles causing 99% false positives ?
Orders from the globalist ngos. It is a pity Trump was nobbled. He wanted to withdraw from some of them. That is what the uk needs to do to fix this.
I’m with Dr Alexander on this. Overarching super-conspiracy orchestrated by a central genius? No. A series of mutually effective mini-conspiracies having the appearance of a super-conspiracy? Yes. And in the end, what we’re left with is…a conspiracy. Gates, WEF, Hancock, Ferguson, Sage… f**k them all, the bastards.
Get in
Also Trudeau v Truckers , Artur Pawlowski,s treatment , Baton wielding Robo Cops in Trafalgar Square , Australia , NZ , Canada, Farmers being persecuted , food shortages , energy costs rising , gender hype , etc the list goes on & on !!! NO cock up ! It’s all on purpose !!
It’s a conspiracy in as far as all the oligarchs, Pharma, bureaucratic and medical establishments and politicians think the right answer is more money and power to them at the cost of less freedom and choice (lockdowns, masks, jabs) for us no matter the costs (as long as we stay in our box). Those costs are cost of living crisis and side effects.
The same policies were applied throughout the G20, the Anglosphere and most of the EU area.
What is the likelihood of ALL their Governments, Public Health Mandarins state bureaucracies (and Mainstream Media) being equally dumb and incompetent and somehow landing on exactly the same policies to control their people and “beat Covid?”
There are obviously different levels of dumb and incompetent but all these people are neither: they are all clever and at least reasonably competent in achieving WHAT THEY WANT to achieve or they would not have been in the positions they were in.
No likelihood at all that they would have imposed policies in lockstep …. without collusion; agreement and someone/some people first creating those policies and at the very least pulling the strings.
There undoubtedly were some elements of cock-up: Handcock being caught on camera groping his SpAd for a start. But the POLICIES were and are part of a conspiracy.
I don’t see the so-called pandemic being planned and caused, but certainly the response was.
As usual people see only Britain, but everywhere did the same (except Sweden) with a synchronicity, and uniformity never before seen between Countries with respect to some global event. When was the last time Britain and France agreed about anything, for example?
Are we to believe that spontaneously, overnight all the officials and politicians round the World became Matt Hancocks?
Then there is the Pandemic Plan, which the UK certainly had and evidently so did many other Counties, and there was even a generic copy of it on the WHO website until it disappeared.
It wasn’t ‘cock-up’ not only to ignore everything it said to do, but to do everything the plan said not to do.
That took conscious, deliberate thought and action since the plan made it clear that lockdowns would cause widespread medical problems, particularly for mental health, and dire economic affect, and the outcome would be worse than letting the pandemic run its course.
Doing that deliberately IS evil, and can only be seen as part of some greater, evil purpose.
In the Third Reich a lot of evil people did evil. But most of them were just ordinary, unremarkable until an evil conspiracy took over at the top and attracted those with the potential like moths to the flame and gave them the context, justification and permission to do evil.
We see the same deliberate harmful behaviour with respect to climate change/Net Zero, where Human well-being, life, and prosperity are deliberately being destroyed in pursuit of politics and ideology, all coordinated globally by conspiracy or if you prefer, confluence of interests.
Evil done supposedly in a good cause, is the greatest of all the evil.
If two or more agreeing on something is a conspiracy, then the term is valueless. “Evil” is more to the point. And everyone is evil to some extent, which is why there need to be brakes on political power, such as parliaments and constitutions.
And many think that the military industrial complex is powerful and evil well the pharmaceutical health care industrial complex is much more powerful and just as evil. Healthcare spending in US represents about 40% of GDP where military spending is less than 10. The WHO is totally controlled by this industry and are currently seeking enormous new budgets up from 3.8 billion to 31 billion with dictatorial powers to proclaim pandemics and to control censorship against their policies. This essentially is a corporate entity with global government dictatorial powers that is controlled by the pharmaceutical industrial complex. People need to be worried, this is equivalent to the perpetual war of the military industrial complex.