Two teenage boys who suffered heart inflammation following Pfizer’s Covid jabs and then seemed to recover had relapses months later, Italian researchers have reported. Alex Berenson has more.
Both teenagers showed evidence of new heart damage from the recurrences, including high levels of proteins from injured cardiac muscle. Scans showed one boy had new lesions in his heart wall, and he needed nearly two weeks of hospitalisation.
The researchers could not determine why the boys suffered the relapses, which came eight to 12 months after the initial myocarditis episodes. They called for tighter monitoring of anyone diagnosed with mRNA-caused myocarditis – and more research to determine if young people who suffered it might face severe future complications.
Published in late May in the journal Vaccine: X, the paper appears to be the first case report showing mRNA jabs can cause recurring myocarditis, or inflammation of the heart. But public health authorities and the media, which since 2021 have played down cardiac side effects from mRNA shots, have ignored it.
Elsewhere, a study by a team from Yale Medical School published in Science has found evidence that vaccine-induced heart inflammation arises from a general immune system reaction to the mRNA vaccine rather than something specific to the spike protein produced by the Covid vaccines.
This may mean that people who suffer an inflammatory response in the heart have naturally more reactive immune systems, at least in terms of vulnerability to heart inflammation.
MIT health data expert Professor Retsef Levi wrote on Twitter that the study shows that vaccine-induced myocarditis is likely driven by the mRNA platform itself and not the spike protein specific to the Covid vaccines. The study also adds to the evidence of “sustained heart scarring and abnormalities”, underlining that “vaccine-induced myocarditis is not mild”, he said.
Stop Press: Former Tory and now Reclaim MP Andrew Bridgen has written to the Prime Minister to alert him to the new Swiss study showing heart damage at a rate of up to one in 35 following mRNA vaccination, calling on him to recall Parliament to review the latest scientific data and halt the booster programme.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
“Safe & Effective” parroted Fishy as he stood up in repost to AB in The HOC recently ! It will be interesting to see how this progresses !
Isn’t this the fundamental problem with vaccines?
They are based on the idea that every human is the same and so the juice will have the same effect on everyone.
But we know categorically that to be false.
We don’t do that with anything, literally nothing. Not with other drugs, not with food, not with exercise, nothing.
But for some reason that no one has ever explained, humans are all expected to react to vaccines in the exactly the same way.
Vaccines are a scam.
Sunak will do nothing, just as he has done nothing to stop bank accounts being closed, nothing to stop the erasure of cash, nothing to stop indoctrination in schools, re gender, and climate fear, nothing to stop the erasure of women, and nothing to stop the madness and impverishment of Net Zero. He is as useful as a chocolate tea pot, likewise Starmer, all talk no action, just collecting the cash and virtue signalling.
He’s less useful than a chocolate teapot. You can at least eat the chocolate teapot…
I don’t know if he wants to do any of those things or not. But I’m pretty sure that even if he did, he wouldn’t be able to.
The state bureaucracy is too big and powerful
The only way to make any meaningful change is to take a sledgehammer to the state bureaucracy. Anyone who thinks that they can change policy by redirecting the state bureaucracy should get ready to smash into a brick wall.
Nothing to stop the ongoing tsunami of illegal invaders breaking over the English south coast, nothing to stop the Ukraine war and the billions of taxpayers’ money being spaffed on it, nothing to stop the denial of Brexit and the handing over of Northern Ireland to the EU, etc…
Big Pharma are being absolutely roasted in the Aussie hearings and looking like corrupt fools. This one’s interesting though because I can’t believe that of all the stuff I’ve read and all the experts I’ve listened to in recent year I don’t remember ever getting an explanation for why Moderna’s death jab dose is 3X higher than Pfizer’s. They accomplish the same goal so how can they both profess to have found the optimal dose? I mean, people who had 2 Moderna jabs ( inc pregnant women ) had the equivalent of 6 Pfizer jabs, so this is pretty significant, especially in light of all the emerging data on harms we’re seeing.
I’m now even wondering ( not that I’m a depressive who likes to dwell on this stuff ) if, based on getting the equivalent of 6X Pfizer jabs when you’re pregnant, how probable is it that babies can be born with heart damage, i.e subclinical myocarditis, because I’ll bet nobody is even screening them for such a thing so when would it even manifest? They’d just put any infant death down to ‘SIDS’.
5min vid;
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZFVBWtAJ-U4&ab_channel=SenatorGerardRennick
Another example, this time from Pfizer, if you’ve not already seen this 10min vid, courtesy of John Campbell. Honestly, they remind me of politicians when they answer, evading the question, robotic, like stuck records reading their rehearsed lines and never deviating from them. Just insane how they can sit there and bullsh*t their way through a formal hearing like this, all the while being confronted by their own company’s lies, which the data have since proven as actual lies and fraud.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hN4o3lJR0yM&ab_channel=Dr.JohnCampbell
I now find myself carefully reading clinical trial results alongside press articles.
Malcolm Kendrick’s book “Doctoring Data” is a great intro to how they lie.
One of the more egregious lies is the use of a proxy endpoint rather than the actual endpoint they claim. In the case of statins, the lowering of cholesterol is the target, yet the publicised outcome is the lowering of cardiovascular events causing deaths – this endpoint was not tested in the trial. Similarly in covid, the claimed outcome of the jab to ‘save lives’ by “reducing severity” which was never tested, yet proclaimed loudly.
The latest wheeze is Wegovy, claiming to reduce the risk of heart attack or stroke, simply by reducing bodyweight. As far as I can see, neither strokes, heart attacks nor deaths were measured.
Other gems from Kendrick include:
The entire problem with both coronavirus and the vaccine is identical. This is hardly surprising as the common element is the spike protein which induces a hyperimmune state that is amplified in the genetically susceptible. As I have stated repeatedly since May 2020 coronavirus and its components are not unique in this and the treatment has been known for years. But governments concentrated not on stopping the virus from causing this, but on the futile task of preventing transmission, which vaccination doesn’t do.
The original version of the spike protein was highly immunogenic. Later mutations are not so bad, but it seems the current vaccines remain based on the original. In theory therefore vaccination now has a higher risk of causing systemic problems such as myocarditis, stroke and thrombotic thrombocytopenia than the virus itself. So why is it still being promoted?
If this train of argument is false, why has no one explained to me why it is false, and continuing silence leads me to conclude that I am right.
I have asked to give evidence to the Hallett Inquiry but have yet to hear anything…
The recent Scottish inquiry has found many harms with the covid vaccine program. Myocarditis is a lifelong injury to the heart with damage to the heart FOR LIFE. I cannot understand how these doctors said the boys heart inflammation went away and then came back. That makes no sense.