Quamquam animus meminisse horret – Although my mind shudders to remember. So says Aeneas in Book 2 of Virgil’s Aeneid when he embarks on telling Dido the terrible story of the fall of Troy.
And that’s exactly how I feel every time I think back to the dark days of 2020 and 2021. Not because of the virus but the dizzying and reckless speed with which this country plunged into authoritarianism.
The revelations of Hancockgate are all over the news and on this website. There’s no need for me to recount them here. Toby has already pointed out it was the usual political clown show. No doubt there are plenty more revelations to come.
One of the common threads filtering through now though is the disgust with which the government presided over the creation of a totalitarian state. Rod Liddle is one, with his ‘Unmasking the truth about Covid’ telling us:
It was the authoritarian mindset which demanded that countervailing opinions should not even be heard and that the people voicing them should be silenced as ‘Covid deniers’. This totalitarianism was quite explicit, such as when the BBC ran a debate on herd immunity and agreed with one of the participants – [Susan] Michie, natch – that it should not be ‘even-handed’. As she said: “I’d got prior agreement from R[adio] 4 about the framing of the item. I was assured that this would not be held as an even-handed debate.”
Like Mr. Liddle, I used to work for BBC Radio News. I was proud of that job several decades ago. Not anymore: I was assured this would not be held as an even-handed debate – and said with pride and pleasure!
It’s amazing how many are emerging from the woodwork to join in the frenzy of condemnation. Some, of course, were indeed already looking on in horror. Among them were writers for this site. On May 11th 2020 I published ‘Britain’s Covid Reich’, shaken with horror at what was happening. I take no pleasure from the knowledge now that I and other have finally been vindicated. I wish more than I could say that it had never happened.
What I tried to point out back then was the totalitarian states aren’t usually deliberately created. They’re the result of the shambles that characterise most political systems, but usually only when they’re confronted with a crisis. I’ve quoted the Gene Kranz character in the movie Apollo 13 when he says: “Let’s work the problem, people. Let’s not make things worse by guessing.” (see ‘Climbing out of the Lobster Pot’). But then he was dealing with a spacecraft for which there were manuals and hundreds of specialists and engineers who had only a few days to come up with a solution.
What NASA pulled off was a magnificent achievement, but Covid was a wholly different class of problem – and whatever passed for manuals were singularly lacking in straightforward solutions. Guesswork was the order of the day, however it was dressed up, and it made things worse.
Covid was a crisis alright. It’s disingenuous to suggest critics would have necessarily done a better job. There’s no way a democratic system can ensure that the people in power are the people who ought to be in power, or that the people voted into power will be the right people to deal with the circumstances that materialise in the months or years after the election.
I am therefore not a believer in conspiracies. No-one standing for election in 2019 was planning to throw together a totalitarian state at the first opportunity. Nor were they expecting a pandemic. And when it hit, all our Government and any other government could do was a) panic and b) trigger whatever cack-handed Schlieffen-style plan it had in the filing cabinet, and then c) make up some new ones. Except it was already too late.
Caught with their pants down, and in some cases that turned out to be literally true, the Government and its flotsam and jetsam gaggles of advisors dived into the fray, desperate to be seen to be doing something or anything, and created a new type of revolution: Britain would become a state dedicated to a war on Covid. There was a behind-the-scenes frenzy, some of it well intentioned, but in amongst the floundering and the guessing it was a gift to control freaks and those who spotted an opportunity to promote themselves and others who saw they could make a huge amount of money.
One makes the revolution to establish the dictatorship.
George Orwell, 1984
To some extent the frenzy and panic was understandable to begin with. No-one knew what the hell was going on. What was unforgiveable was not considering the consequences of the extreme actions being instituted and the risk that they would make things worse, or not caring because the attractions of power were too great. Even if lockdowns and masks had worked, the economic and social consequences were going to be devastating. That was one thing even the Imperial College crystal ball gazers got right.
The result was almost inevitable. Remorselessly, and seemingly almost unconsciously to begin with, our government and many others resorted to terrorizing the public and imposing a litany of haphazard, often contradictory, and largely ineffectual rules. These masqueraded as a solution to the crisis. But of course, some or even many were largely, and could only ever have been, a charade and a mirage. That’s what totalitarian states are: a vast con.
Alongside came the suppression of debate, the deliberate crushing of any dissent. “So long as [the masses] are not permitted to have standards of comparison, they never even become aware that they are oppressed.” (Orwell, 1984 again).
It ought to have been obvious within weeks and certainly months that an airborne virus had been lost control of from before anyone even realised it was there. But that didn’t matter. The rules had been invented, and new laws rushed through. A terrorized public had been led into believing the rules would save them.
And that’s where the second essential ingredient for an authoritarian state to develop of its own accord comes in: public compliance combined with active complicity. Like an accelerating snowball, the hysteria and the Government’s measures grew larger and larger and more out of control. The public egged the Government on, and the Government invested more and more of its effort and energy into the Covid laws.
As we now see, they deliberately and directly drew the police into enforcing those measures as part of the sleight of hand. They were helped by useful idiots in the BBC (with a few heroic exceptions) who didn’t waste a moment to join in the fun by featuring as much Covid death porn as possible and questioned nothing about the Government’s line.
Government and scientists alike delighted in the discovery that making most of the British public believe anything they were told, and meekly obeying, was the easiest thing in the world by copying China.
We soon reached the incredible situation where some police officers could forget the reason they originally were employed. Instead, they went out and about accosting and fining women harmlessly having a coffee out of doors or used drones to spot dogwalkers. This reached its horrifying and perverse climax in the case of Sarah Everard when a single deviant policeman was able to exploit the Covid laws and abduct and kill her, only for other police officers to follow that up by arresting and fining those who had the temerity to join in a public protest about her horrific fate (despite there being zero evidence to suggest open air transmission of Covid had any significant effect).
And plenty of freedom-loving Brits egged the police on, some jubilantly twitching their curtains and snitching on their neighbours. It would have been impossible without them, just as the Stasi’s job would have been impossible too.
The link with the virus had long since been lost. As Carl Heneghan has pointed out, the data behind the second lockdown was fatally flawed. It didn’t matter; his warnings were ignored. The government went ahead anyway. The rules and enforcing them had become an end in themselves without their protagonists or even many of the public apparently even realising. Hancock’s messages reveal a chaotic world of squabbling over policies, scoring points over one another, dodging spats with Nicola Sturgeon (whose name I’d like to remind you is an anagram of Contagion Rules), and bragging about their successes.
This tumble into totalitarianism wasn’t as deliberate as it might seem, though sometimes it looks as if it was. But it does seem to be an outcome that emerges far too easily in a modern state confronted with a crisis and armed with the tools of technology that make authoritarianism all too easy to enforce. And once a state discovers it has that sort of power it soon becomes difficult, even impossible, to relinquish, and even more difficult not to ramp up and push the envelope to see how far it can go.
One thing I got wrong was suggesting that Boris Johnson had the power and ability to see the danger and pull back from the brink. If he did, he did nothing or far too little. 2020 saw the Government drifting out of control, and things only getting worse for much of 2021. The crisis had moved onto a stage where it was constantly being reinvented in order to revive the terror, a convenient way of helping save face and justify the appalling way in which our society had been turned upside down.
In the end, we were saved by the crisis abating of its own accord. Omicron played a large part in finally undermining the mayhem, along with the news from South Africa. People like Susan Michie who had decided among other plans to save us from ourselves that we should wear masks forever, found their momentum fading away. And of course there was Sweden, whose far-sighted policies exposed an unpalatable truth to the UK Government and those of the devolved nations: that many of the measures, and certainly the laws, might very well have made no difference to the outcome.
Of course, no-one can prove it either way now. So much for science in such circumstances. As I have mentioned on this site before, “disappoint and opposition inflame the minds of men and attach them still more to their mistakes” (Alexander Hamilton 1774). The face-saving insistence that we are where we are now is only because of the measures taken, the warnings heeded, and insidious and brutal laws passed, will be a long-lived trope until the careers of those involved have long since faded into the past.
Some of the measures might have worked in some way but since many people were already isolating themselves, we’ll never be able to unravel true cause and effect. It’s even the same for the vaccines. It’s not long ago that many of us were being urged to get a fourth jab, but now the whole subject seems to have disappeared. The under-50s can’t even get a Covid jab unless they are especially vulnerable. In any individual case it’s impossible to untangle cause and effect. I know numerous people who have been jabbed several times but had Covid two, three or even more times. And I know plenty of people like myself who have had the same jabs and never had Covid before the jabs or since. And I’ve lost track of the claims made about the jabs that turned out not to be true, such as how it would stop you catching Covid, or passing it to someone else.
Either way, we have pulled back from the brink. But it was a close-run thing and we’re not out of the woods. In the summer of 2020 and during 2021 this country came closer to the end of everything it was supposed to stand for and all in the name of a floundering Government playing God and trying to pretend that with an arsenal of laws and an army of enforcers, aided and abetted by much of the media and many of the public, we could justify sacrificing everything dear to us on the altar of one evil spirit.
Few of us have not suffered in some way. To the Covid deaths we gaily added the destruction of education, the denial of core development of infants, the systematic exploitation of some workers for the benefit of those with the money and property to loaf around at home, the miserable closing months in the lives of elderly people denied contact with friends and families and sometimes even their spouses, imprisoned in their care home cells, and the fragmentation of families denied the most basic of human relationships. And all the while the Government partied when it suited, and its members jockeyed for position, while masquerading as saviours. We will be paying for lockdown for decades, and some of us for life.
That’s how totalitarian states come into being: a tumbling, ramshackle, panicked and self-serving government out of its depth, egged on by a terrorized population. And now we have the WhatsApp messages to illustrate the shambles as it unfolded in real time. It’s a lesson to every one of us. We all have it within us to be complicit in such disasters. But we also have it within us to be vigilant and realise that it takes a great deal of work, awareness, and education to hold the hell of authoritarianism at bay. For that we can be thankful for Hancockgate.
Facilis descensus Averno – Easy is the descent into Hell (Virgil 6.126)
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
There will never be any sort of acknowledgement by the government/TRPTB that any investigation is taking, or will ever take place.
The reason why is simple, – because to do so would adversely affect confidence in the jab and give ammunition to lawyers.
This has been the stance of bigpharma re all vaccines for the last 40 plus years. You have no idea as to the amount of power and influence the criminal element amongst them hold.
And, I use the word “criminal” deliberately and accurately –
Pfizer – Bextra.
Merck – Vioxx
Johnson and Johnson – Risperdal.
In winter 2017/18 there were 50,000 plus excess deaths and no investigation, just a whoops, picked the wrong vaccine.
Stuart McDonald seems to be part of the vaxapologist cadre. It’s a shame Freddie didn’t challenge him on his brazen misuse of statistics and standard use of indefinite descriptors like “rare” and “unlikely” and “the data (unreferenced) clearly…”
These people are either stuck in mass formation or financial beneficiaries of Pharma/state/globalist funding.
The data Prof Norman Fenton analyses and that is unclear, shows an inexplicably elevated level of non covid deaths in any given age group, in the unvaccinated as compared with the vaccinated, when you would expect to see at the very least the same baseline level (at least that was the case when he did his analysis). For this reason he, rightly, mistrusts the data. It is pretty sure the Vaccines aren’t improving outcomes for non Covid causes, so what explains this? This indicates either the data is being massaged by the ONS or there is something fundamentally wrong with the underlying data categories.
I’m pretty sure I know that problem is and it relates to the overall UK population figure. The ONS has (quietly) revised immigration figures no less than three times now (doubling them two out of the three), indicating they were probably lying to us in the past about the true picture, or, being charitable, avoiding investigating the truth until it became unavoidable. So the overall UK population figure is shaky at best.
Vaccination rates are based on a definite or positive data, whereas rates for the unvaccinated are based on the figure for overall UK population minus that definite positive data. If you don’t know (or won’t admit) what the overall UK population is you don’t know what the numerator is for the unvaccinated. If the numerator is higher than you are admitting, then the “rate of x occurring per 1,000” will be correspondingly falsely high because the numerator is lower than it should be. So the “inexplicable” difference in baseline isn’t actually so inexplicable at all and actually corresponds with a matter the ONS already has form for “mis-analysing.”
I think Norman Fenton probably knows this, but is also aware that as an academic he has already taken as big a bite out of matter outside the Overton window, as any academic can chew without being treated like he is the next Enoch Powell.
Don’t forget that vaccinated as a status only occurs two weeks after the second injection. As far as I’m aware that definition has not changed and would therefore sweep jabbed as unvaxxed deaths for anywhere from 5 to 12 weeks after the first jab.
Im not sure wether the booster 3&4 have affected this miscatagorisation.
Are you using numerator to mean denominator?
No. But yes I should have analysed the numerator and denominator the other way round as then the calculation would be clearer.
As I have analysed it I’ve made the numerator the overall population of unvaccinated. The ONS figure is I suspect artificially lower than the real figure.If the real figure is bigger, the denominator as a proportion of the real population will also be correspondingly bigger (in this case absolute number of non covid deaths). So then you have a denominator that is out of proportion and disproportionately large compared with the numerator (unvaccinated population) the ONS are using. The result actually gives the frequency of deaths which when expressed as per 1000 of the population will be artificially high.
Sorry for expressing it this way as I now realise it isn’t the easiest to follow.
‘It is pretty sure the Vaccines aren’t improving outcomes for non Covid causes, so what explains this?’
Vaccinated people were being included in non-vaccinated. Anyone second dose who became infected within 14 days post-injection was considered unvaccinated. That means anyone who died within 28 days of day 14 was an ‘unvaccinated death’.
Further: the same deceit was used on boosted people, so that even hitherto ‘fully vaccinated’ individuals were counted as unvaccinated if death occurred within 28 days of day 14 post-booster.
This therefore increased unvaccinated deaths and decreased vaccinated deaths.
It is also the case that during the 14 day period post-injection and individual is more susceptible to infection, serious disease and death because of the stress on the immune system caused by the product.
What was deemed a non-covid death during the Delta wave? When Delta hit, it became apparent that the vaxx had failed entirely. It is not unreasonable to assume that whereas before there was no hesitation to attribute any possible death whatsoever to covid in order to scare people into submission, when (at that time) 2x vaxxed were dying during the Delta wave, to attribute most deaths of 2x vaxxed to covid would have damaged the vaxx push, which at that time was still going strong – let’s face it, they still managed to fool a large number of people into getting the 3rd pointless vaxx.
In other words, maybe a lot of excess deaths during Delta were in fact due to covid after all, it was just covered up as much as possible until they could find a way of explaining why as many if not more vaxxed were dying as unvaxxed. That excuse turned out to be that the vaxx was not as good against Delta and then Omicron, and many people bought that cop-out, even after they had initially said it did still provide full protection against serious illness and death for all variants.
In addition, there was always the risk of ADE. Last time I looked at the EMA list of potential risks, there was at that time (some months ago) insufficient information to determine whether the real risk of ADE would materialise or not. When Delta hit Europe, most people were 9 months or more from their last jab, with minimal antibodies. The vast majority of people have no idea about ADE; we know they have little information about the vaxx in general, about the serious AEs. Just think how they’d feel about the knowledge that the stabbers knew full well there was genuine risk that the vaxx would in fact make them more susceptible to infection and serious illness if ADE were to occur. I mentioned ADE to a neighbour, he didn’t believe the concept, even though I told him it was a known phenomenon, hardly something I had managed to dream up.
Either the excess deaths were due to covid, which was obfuscated due to unwillingness to admit complete vaxx failure (and absolute reluctance to give up the fab cash cow), or the excess deaths are related in some way to the vaxx – ADE, immune overreaction due to excess antibodies from vaxx combined with previous or subsequent infection, or the vaxx itself is simply toxic sludge.
I’m going to try to post my own graphs of this phenomenon. First, 10 years of England and Wales deaths, adjusted for both growing and aging population. The dark blue line skimming above all the others mid year, is this year
(I made this a couple of weeks ago but pattern hasn’t normalised since)
And the excess compared to pre covid. I think you can clearly see how the death displacement effect after a peak lasts only 3 or 4 months, reminding us how old and sick most were that succumbed to the pandemic.
Hope this helps. A third way to look at this year is the standard deviation from normal range. This makes what’s happening look most alarming
No, folks – we’ve been barking up the wrong tree all this time.
It’s nothing to do with the vaccines at all; (and let’s give a resounding cheer that clever scientists – no doubt with very generous funding from some saintly philanthropic people – have developed another wonderful vaccine for those poor souls in Africa against malaria) it’s been artificial sweeteners all along!
Just seen it on Talk radio so it must be true.
Tsk! All our cardiovascular and cerebrovascular problems must now be attributed to this obvious cause. How did we miss that one?
I think they’re really scraping the barrel with regards to what they can blame these excess deaths on! It would be farcical if it weren’t so tragic and outright desperate to divert our attention to other causes. The absolute codswallop we are expected to swallow is just mindblowingly insulting. It just stinks of lies and corruption. How many are burying loved ones with no firmly established cause of death, having to make do with a mere “cause unknown” on the certificates? So you can test positive for Covid within 28 days of being ran over by a bus and your cause of death is put down as “Covid” ( because ‘with’ and ‘from’ were never distinguished ) but if you die within 28 days of being jabbed it’s labelled as ‘SADS’ or reported as a ”coincidence”?! The crazy double standards never cease to amaze. Peter McCullough is always relaying the information that most people die within 3 days of being jabbed, but a causal link is never considered or investigated.
See the graph here on the bottom right and how it compares to the flu shot. A massive difference in deaths immediately after the shot vs 1 week later;
https://www.openvaers.com/covid-data/mortality
Yes, referee whistles being my favourite. If that was true, Vinny Jones would be long gone!
OMG ref’s whistles? I haven’t heard of that one. From the not so sublime to the incredibly ridiculous..Basically a total piss-take then!
Not climate change then?
If the culprit is the spike protein, then most of the excess deaths will be caused by the ‘vaccine’ rather than the virus itself. This would be because the ‘vaccine’ has been shown to spread throughout the body. Also, with the arrival of Omicron, I thought the spike protein has changed significantly from the original virus.
I think paramedics will know whether there is a correlation between patients with cardiac problems and ‘vaccine’ status and if the ambulance services are collecting the data, they will know as well.
The virus is mostly active in the mucosal cells of the nasopharynx or if unlucky the lungs. Virus that become systemic are attacked and destroyed by antibodies. The protein spike attracts T Cells whose function is to destroy the cells invaded by the virus to prevent reproduction, but these T Cells do not attack the virus or the protein spike.
The mRNA ju-ju is active in muscle cells in the upper arm – it is not a virus – so if it escapes as apparently it does and can remain active at least up to 60 days, it is not attacked by antibodies but will invade cells throughput the body which then attract T cells to destroy them.
So consider the mRNA gets into your heart muscle, for example, your own immune system is now going to destroy those invaded cells and thus destroy your heart muscle dependent on to what degree the muscle has been invaded by the mRNA.
The effectiveness of the mRNA is measured by antibody production, yet there is no measure of T Cell production which is front line defence.
T cells are preventative to stop viral load building, antibodies are mop-up, if you will, to kill virus that reproduced before the T Cells got control.
If the T Cells fail, it is unlikely antibodies will be of much use. For every one virus the antibodies miss, 100 000 copies will be made, likely to be a losing battle.
The whole way the so-called science of this is presented is questionable and seemingly calculated to mislead.
Thanks. Are T Cells the same as lymphocytes? If understand Dr Bhakti correctly another place in the body the mRNA products are likely to accumulate is in the cells that line blood vessels, which might be the cause of blood clots. So for people injected there could be damage created by spike proteins and immune reactions to previously healthy cells producing the spike proteins. In addition there is a suggestion the lipid nano-particles element of the injections could be adversely affecting fertility (Dr Malone) and any damage accumulates with each successive dose. I’m a lay person, but you seem to know you stuff. I’d be happy for any correction to anything I’ve got wrong.
Vaccine or virus?
I’d rather lay the blame on lockdowns; both the direct effects on people’s health (mental, physical, it’s all connected), and the indirect effects on their health from things like GP closures, interruptions to established prescriptions, cancelled surgeries and then the wider economic impact on people’s lives… the list goes on and on.
I know a lot of people who have become seriously depressed by the realisation of how authorities and their experts have ridden (and continue to ride) roughshod all over our basic human rights. This plays havoc with our health.
https://www.ohchr.org/en/human-rights/universal-declaration/translations/english
No doubt the effect of lockdowns is a cause of very many deaths, directly or indirectly. However, the harmful physiological effects of the LNPs and spike produced by having had the vax are indisputable, as evidenced by many scientific studies. I would stick my neck out to say that now we are in Omicron times, the likelihood of dying directly from a virus which is on a par in severity with the common cold, ( so not even flu. That was the original or Delta. ) is highly unlikely. If people were going to succumb then they would have done so way before now due to the increased pathogenicity of previous variants. And this is taking account of the fact that everyone ( and how could this not be the case, unless you were living like a hermit and avoided ALL contact with fellow humans and animals? ) has had Covid in one of its forms by now, therefore people will have some form of natural immunity to varying degrees ( because we know that in fast-mutating viruses such as the cold, you cannot build up immunity to just one strain then expect to not catch another cold, hence we can catch several colds within a 1 year period ). I think I’ve read that seroprevalence is >90% in the UK, if not other countries by now too. One could hardly call Omicron and its offshoots lethal.
There is also the question of just how damaged vaxxed people’s immune systems have become due to an onslaught of billions of LNPs over the course of several injections, which does presumably put them at a disadvantage when compared to an unvaxxed person who’s encountered the virus in the wild and generated a much more robust immunological response to the whole virus, not just the toxic spike part, therefore their body reacts to the repeat exposure as nature intended. So perhaps some of these disadvantaged multi-vaxxed will now be killed off by something as benign as a cold that they would never have been threatened by had they not had any mRNA injected, because their immune system cannot even cope with a mild exposure of pathogen and is now rendered dysfunctional. No doubt they will go down on the books as having died *of* Covid, when the jab was the culprit all along, because the symptoms will just be the same and nobody will be interested in reporting their vax status, thereby inflating so-called ‘Covid deaths’ and confounding the data.
I think the most frustrating thing is that we may never know just what, in terms of %, was the cause of these excess deaths. I mean, if you could produce a pie chart for excess mortality, what would it look like, in terms of our best guess? I don’t think we’ll ever truly know. The vast majority of excess deaths will always be blamed on the virus because that gets the authorities off the hook in terms of restrictions and coercion to get jabbed being a massive factor. They will always feel justified in their diabolical and hugely damaging public health proclamations because they’d just fall back on the old “It would have been so much worse had we not….”. Great we have Sweden as a handy control for the restrictions but pity we don’t have an equally handy country which never injected anyone, thereby acting as the ultimate control group in this global experiment, still ongoing. Now that would have been interesting.
The “vaccines” certainly have a lot to answer for, agreed.
It’s the variety of pathologies which tells me that, for a vast array of reasons (e.g. fear of “the virus”, fear of the rise of a totalitarian state) people have become terribly depressed, frustrated and anxious. This has a very detrimental effect on the immune system, resulting in an enormous range of new and exacerbated health problems.
I’ve said this before, but the key question is pretty simple: has there been a change in the age profile of the people who are dying from cardiovascular and other related conditions? If the age of death is unusually young relative to the last few years (i.e. the share of cardiovascular deaths is greater than it should be in the young), then we pretty much have our answer. It could just about be plausible that the virus would result in heart damage that we would then see playing out in deaths later on, but highly implausible that this would result in proportionally more young people succumbing.
Latest NSW data showing only 10 percent of Covid deaths in the past week being unvaccinated, and 80 percent having had 1 or 2 booster shots.
These figures change little week by week. Being an actuary (or doctor) doesn’t automatically mean one is immune to propaganda.
https://www.health.nsw.gov.au/Infectious/covid-19/Documents/weekly-covid-overview-20220903.pdf
Thanks. Perhaps I’m missing something here, but 10% deaths being unvaccinated plus just one unvaccinated patient admitted to hospital and zero admitted to ICU doesn’t seem to square with the statement ‘However, people who are not vaccinated remain far more likely to suffer severe COVID-19’.
40 years in medicine and I can’t figure that one out either!
all data relating to ‘covid’ are suspect. there are no pathognomonic clinical features of ‘covid’ – it cannot be differentiated at the bedside from many other respiratory infectious illnesses. the fundamental diagnostic fraud is that ‘Covid’ is medically diagnosed on the basis of a fraudulently upcycled PCR test, the ‘positive’ results of which are overwhelmingly false. the rare genuine positive PCR results cannot give any information about the origin of the amplified nucleotide sequences, which can come from any old fragment of goat or papaya (R.I.P. John Magafuli, Hero of The Resistance). while all cause mortality appears to be the single most reliable statistic, we must remember that with our British government and their venal World Economic Forum friends worldwide, we are dealing with egregious criminal psychopath fraudsters. the placing of all data relating to ‘covid’ under suspicion of criminal falsification accords with Lord Denning’s famous 1956 judgement that fraud vitiates everything it touches.
Can you imagine a “Scientific” process, by the same people who imposed the Lockdowns and coerced an experimental jab on millions of people who didn’t need it, admitting that the jabs are not as “safe and effective” as they continually told us they were?
No – neither can I.
Prof Bhakdi and other virologists, who weren’t bought and paid for by Big Pharma, warned them that the jabs were dangerous and predicted precisely the outcome we are now seeing. Prof Bhakdi specifically said that the jabs would cause blood clotting and said if you have one, don’t have a second. And for goodness sake, don’t have a third. HE has been proven right.
But Fauci, Ferrar, Whitty, Vallance and all the rest of the evil people will never admit it. And neither will the politicians who empowered them.
Lloyds Banking man eh? You can bet your bottom dollar that somewhere along the line there’s something fishy going on. Any connection to B&MGF, vaccine investment anyone?
Sorry don’t trust this guy he’s too near the establishment.
It’s only the five year average. Are there any excess deaths if you look at the 10 year average or the 20 year average?
There is another potential explanation for the excess deaths of course, which is that they resulted from the lockdowns. Possible mechanisms could be reduced exercise levels and increased loneliness.
Let’s say “best” case scenario, it’s not the jibby jabs. Do I now want one of those in my body? Hell no.