Shouldn’t the alarm bells be ringing? Why haven’t the authorities long since swung into action to assure the public that a full independent public investigation is well underway?
To a critical ear, the silence is as deafening as it is worrying. After 11 months of official reports of a sustained fall in the birth rate, the Swedish mainstream media have reacted. However, news reports omit any reference to a possible involvement of the elephant in the room: mRNA vaccines. So, what is the evidence that we should all have an opportunity to consider?
The number of children born in Sweden has decreased by an average of 8.6% over the period from January to November 2022. The largest percentage decreases occurred over the most recent three months of reporting (September-November 2022). Over this period, 11.7% fewer children were born in Sweden to women aged 18 to 45 years, based on the figure expected from regression analysis of data from the previous 10 years.
Although data are released monthly, comment from official sources is as absent as investigative reporting from the mainstream media. A German Government working paper has noted the correlation between the drop in fertility and birth rate in both Sweden and Germany and the COVID-19 vaccine rollout. However, the paper blamed behaviour change and drew no link with the exposure of women of childbearing age to novel mRNA vaccines.
Data represented in the bar chart above are based on data from Statistics Sweden and using the number of births per calendar month per 100,000 women aged 18 to 45 years from October 2011 to November 2022, to calculate expected and observed figures. Births per month were divided by the number of women in the population on December 31st of the preceding year, expressed as a percentage.
Swedish birth rates have followed a declining trend over the last century. Exceptional negative or positive changes (plus or minus 6% over the birth rate from the preceding year) have occurred, for example following the significant peak in the 1920s and after baby booms in the 1940s, 1960s and 1990s. Except for 1922, however, there has never been such a sharp decline in birth rate over a single year as occurred in 2022.
In previous cycles of birth rate boom and bust, a notable peak has always preceded a notable decline – until now. The drop in 2022 has been preceded by 20 years of relatively stable birth rates. Whatever the explanation, there is little hope that December’s data will prevent this ominous record from descending into the history books. The question that needs to be addressed, why is 2022 an outlier?
A similar pattern was not observed after the H1N1 swine flu epidemic in 2009, where about 60% of the Swedish population received the newly developed protein-based vaccine Pandemrix. The exposure of most women of childbearing age (18-45 years) to experimental COVID-19 mRNA vaccination started in May 2021, when rolled out for persons under 65 years without a risk factor.
On average, 4.6% of all births in Sweden are premature (under 37 weeks or 8.3 months of pregnancy from 2016-2021). Hence, an effect on birth rate due to mRNA vaccines would be expected from January 2022; the observed drop coincides unerringly with a possible side effect of COVID-19 mRNA vaccines.
If a stark correlation with an atypical decline in birth rate was the only signal, it should warrant an immediate halt to mRNA vaccination. However, both Pfizer and the regulators, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) in the EU, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in the U.S., and the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) in the U.K., amongst other national agencies, were aware that mRNA vaccines could lead to effects on fertility. So how did the regulators miss this signal and even more significantly, how did the regulators authorise these products without appropriate safety testing?
Pfizer’s application to the Japanese Patent Office in 2020 showed that intramuscular injection of modified mRNA with the same lipid nanoparticle carrier formulation as their COVID-19 candidate, dispersed widely through the body and away from the site of injection. The mRNA accumulated and was expressed in organs, including the ovaries of female rats.
This mRNA distribution and expression profile far exceeds that expected of a typical protein-based vaccine. Despite this, the EMA classified Pfizer/BioNTech’s mRNA product BNT162B2 as a “vaccine against an infectious agent”. Under regulatory legislation enacted in 2009, this enabled Pfizer/BioNTech to circumvent the more stringent regulatory framework of a Gene or Advanced Medical Therapy Product (GTMP/ATMP), which one may argue should have applied to all mRNA, DNA or viral vector vaccines expressing an intact, membrane-anchored spike protein, for which the full repertoire of biological functions is not understood.
Moreover, the EMA never publicly considered these products via its Committee on Advanced Therapies (CAT), which would normally deliberate over GTMP/ATMP status.
Reduced fertility due to negative effects on sperm may also contribute to the observed drop in birth rate. A study of sperm donors in Israel showed that the number and motility of sperm were significantly reduced five months after receiving Pfizer’s mRNA vaccine. The effect of further booster doses has not been reported on either male or female fertility.
It is unknown if or how mRNA vaccination is connected to the decline in birth rates seen since 2021, not just in Sweden but throughout the world. It is equally unknown what the long-term safety effects of mRNA vaccines are – these are only now being tested on a population. Correlation does not prove causation. However, never in modern history has such a synchronised decline in birth rate been seen across the developed world, precisely aligned with the massive roll out of a new and experimental medical treatment.
Sven Román MD is a child and adolescent psychiatrist and one of the founders of Läkaruppropet (‘Physicians’ Appeal’). Jonathan Gilthorpe PhD is a cell and developmental biologist and has been a member of Läkaruppropet since 2021.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
Another reason they didn’t want a control group of unjabbed, and yet another reason why the unjabbed have done a service to humanity.
Except we have the equivalent of the control group of the unjabbed. Every single OECD country has it and every single OECD country is wilfully hiding it. The vaccination status of the women who are giving birth is known and hidden. Why are doctors and scientists like Drs Roman and Gilthorp and Prof Norman Fenton having to struggle with incomplete data to try to work out what is going on? The authorities in every OECD nation will know precisely the vaccination status of new mothers and, beyond this story, for each cause of death category, yet unconscionably, they are hiding this data. It would be easy to debunk the sceptics and “conspiracy theorists” at a stroke. Yet they don’t, This tells us all we need to know.
Yes you’re right. All of the ‘died suddenly’ stories that we’re reading, or people having heart attacks out of the blue and in an age category where this is highly unusual, never report on the jab status. Remember how they’d be so enthusiastic about reporting if an unvaxxed person died ‘of Covid’, or how eager virtue signaling zealots would plaster their jab status ( plus selfie of having the actual jab ) all over FB, Twitter and the like? But now we have radio silence on this one, vital detail. Whether it is shame, guilt or what that’s stopping family share this detail in the news stories, I don’t know, but I think they have a moral duty to get the fact out somehow because otherwise they’re just complicit in perpetuating the lies. And are they really expecting people to think that it’s any other cause under the sun and we won’t be wondering and asking the obvious question? Their silence says it all, as you state. It’s actually offensive and insulting to people’s intelligence now.
Perhaps the conspiracy theorists are right – that the whole scamdemic + “vaccine” was engineered to reduce global fertility.
I don’t think it was deliberate for the simple reason that if you are a eugenicist and/or worry about global overpopulation your main target will be Africa, the only region of the world with a still rapidly growing population.
Unless the plan went wrong and African countries were supposed to get more jabs than they did. But it doesn’t look that way.
Did you forget about the tetanus campaign in Kenya whereby the vials were found to contain an anti-fertility substance? Can’t remember the details but I’ve shared links on this previously. It happened in India too and Africa more than once. So it doesn’t have to be only related to Covid jabs. Gates and the WHO have long-since used third world nations as their testing ground, with reducing fertility being a main focus. The evidence is all over the internet if you care to look.
Edit; The documentary linked in this article is a good one to watch.
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/infertility-a-diabolical-agenda-chd-wakefield-documentary-who-vaccines-global-population-cola/
Just to re-iterate information
Anti-fertility drug Found in WHO Tetanus Vaccine in Kenya Raises
Infertility: A Diabolical Agenda
Bill Gates population control Ted talk-vaccines to cut population
Bill Gates “Sadly Omicron is better than vaccines”
They want to reduce the populations that consume resources. It’s a cull of the middle classes.
I think the plan was to get more people injected in Africa. The WHO still have a target of 70% uptake for the continent. However, the African public appear to have rejected any more COVID injections. This might explain why Bill Gates has targeted the next pandemic, named “Catastrophic Contagion”, to begin in Africa during 2025 and primarily affect children.
And also why President John Magufuli of Tanzania was ultimately whacked for not toeing the company line.
Correct.
LOL!…I don’t know that we can have a reasoned debate about what the psychos in charge believe or want….
What if they get rid of all the pesky Westerners first, I would….
with their annoying belief in their education and freedoms, and ‘rights’…because all you want ultimately, is drones to do the basic dirty work…and people in third-world countries might accept that much more readily if they are given just a little by way of reward!!?
Yes I am stroking a white cat as we speak…….!! LOL!
Africa’s got AIDS among the population snd the events of the last couple of years beg reassessment of where exactly that virus came from…
They test for AIDS by looking for HIV which is probably a benign virus and absent in many AIDS diagnoses. Fauci and Gates have spent decades concealing this and cancelled many who dare to go against them- their modus Operandi.
Africa has been their experimental home for years.
Read The Real Anthony Fauci by Robert F Kennedy – it’s all in there.
As Mogwai points out beneath, they were giving sterilising drugs to African girls hidden in ‘vaccines’. It’s been a while since I read the book so hazy on dates but I think this was in the 90s and Bill Gates and his GAVI operation were behind it.
True
The latest assault was 2014. It’s in the link I shared. A neo-natal tetanus campaign was the cover story, except the girls and women had to get several jabs of the stuff. Totally unheard of for tetanus. It was to ensure better efficacy of the anti-fertility stuff so they’d be rendered infertile.
It’s a heavy read and long but worth it – if you have a strong stomach and don’t suffer hypertension (which will go through the roof! ).
I think I’m right in saying that the aggressive marketing by infant formula companies like Nestle first convinced the western world of an expensive alternative to breastfeeding with a calculated intention that African nations would follow the trend?
“But overconsumption is the real problem!” cry the useful idiot degrowthers. (Except the overconsumption of the billionaires, of course, who just laugh all the way to the bank.) So of course they target the middle classes of the Global North, because “that’s where the money is”. Which doesn’t actually benefit the Global South one iota, as it is a negative sum game overall.
Strategically it makes sense to neutralize your most formidable adversaries first, preferably by surprise and in a plausibly deniable way.
Just a re-share for those that didn’t see it. A report looking at 18 European countries’ live birth data up until 25th Aug 2022. Part of the author’s conclusion;
“With reference to the Bradford-Hill criteria, a relationship temporality between the decline in births and the course of the initial vaccination campaign (doses 1 and 2) nine months earlier could be demonstrated. There was a very high analogy between the European countries. The uniformly observed decline in the number of births with a temporal connection to the start of the vaccination campaign is thus not an isolated national phenomenon. Some countries are still withholding their data. Norway has sent data for the second quarters, but is currently withholding data for the first quarters. • Given the considerable individual and social relevance of the link between vaccination campaigns and declining birth rates, the immediate suspension of Covid-19 vaccination for all persons of childbearing and reproductive age should be called for.”
https://www.initiative-corona.info/fileadmin/dokumente/Geburtenrueckgang-Europe-EN.pdf
BINGO
To maintain credibility I would suggest changing the title. ‘Undeniable’ is a pretty strong word and as the final paragraph states we only have correlation not causation.
It is however quite amazing how little attention the official health authorities are giving to monitoring and evaluating these novel therapies given the scale and breadth of the rollout, unprecedented for something which is new to the market.
Undeniable is right. It is clear what is going. Black is Black. Up is Up. Infertility is infertility.
Full throated totalitarian anti-human assault, within life’s entire spectrum:
1-Abortion – kill babies (oh sorry this is health care….)
2-Euthanasia – in places like Canada anyone can ask to be murdered (and the organs are sold, this is called compassionate health care….)
3-Midazolam – can’t have granny clogging up a bed now can we (this is called palliative care….)
4-mRNA poisons – infertility. Children of Men and all that. (this is called ‘pandemic’ care…). All part of the depop program, called out by whackjobs and ‘literally Hitler’ types a while ago.
Every where you look. Black Boots stamping on your face, trying to erase your life. So much ‘health care’ going on.
There is a lot about modern man that is distinctly anti-human. I see it is a sickness of the mind created by a lack of purpose.
The extreme atheists like Dawkins are again scientists, who think they know what is best for humanity. Arrogant, closed minded prices who don’t realise they aren’t as clever as they think.
That’s more like it Ferd. Too many people on here are overthinking the depopulation issue. I have been banging this drum for months.
Every action currently being used by our governments and worldwide NGO’s is intended to harm if not immediately kill.
Going back to the C1984 Scamdemic, every single NPI was intended to seriously undermine national health. I will not list them again but nothing was intended to be beneficial.
At the present time there is a sort of lull but this hides the guerrilla tactics being used against us.
Energy crisis – complete bollox. High fuel / energy prices are intended to impoverish and for low income families seriously undermine their health. The whole issue could be resolved promptly by starting fracking, building nuclear, opening the pits and renouncing punitive taxation on oil and gas exploration.
Collapsing health service – deliberate and again intended to wreck the nation’s health.
Inflation – wholly contrived see fuel above.
Electric vehicles – wholly unworkable and government know this but intended to undermine confidence and create stresses and worry.
War in Ukraine – intended to cause upset and worry and further impoverish the country. It’s not our war.
Food supply disruption – deliberately engineered and likely to become worse this summer as fertiliser shortages kick in – see fuel above.
Immigration? This could be stopped overnight but there is no intention to. A deliberate means of stoking societal disruption and encouraging tribalism. A few riots and deaths is just what government wants.
Net Zero – a complete Scam and they all know it. What Net Zero stands for is Net Zero humanity = US.
The end game is depopulation. Not in the thousands but in the billions.
I am half convinced that the C1984 has not been the success that Billy and Klaus suspected so more covert means will now be employed against us, after all 70% of the world’s DNA must be on databases now so appropriate diseases are probably being worked up as I type.
Our food supply is next to be weaponised – ‘acheta’ or ground crickets now authorised as a food additive although its safety data will not be released – heard that before. I wonder what cancer inducing agents can be slipped in to our daily bread?
So let’s stop pretending. It’s depopulation, full stop.
Hux, my phone has been going mental today as my post was approved in a couple FB groups I’m in, plus I’ve been working my way through my contacts so still got some random people to contact. Long story short, not one single person who’s got back to me, whether Dutch or expat, has said they knew anything about this insect in the food supply lark. So what does that tell you? Well it’s not just that I haven’t seen anything on the news or missed something, *nobody* has seen anything on the news because it isn’t being covered!! Now don’t tell me that journalists are unaware. They wouldn’t be much cop as journalists if they weren’t keeping up to speed with all things EU related. Work in progress but so far people are surprised, horrified, confused and wondering why this would be happening. Not sure if JaneDoe is reading and can attest to the radio silence on Dutch news channels, but it’s a big fat zero from my contacts thus far anyways. So that doesn’t bode well does it? Because sneakily adding milled insects to everyday food items is just so terribly blah and inconsequential it’s hardly worth mentioning, evidently!
Many thanks Mogs.
I seriously believe the food supply will be weaponised against us both directly and indirectly. Crickets, Acheta in everything and obviously tampering with cattle feeds will be the indirect way and mRNA “vaccines” in cattle. Of course.
Obviously the Davos Deviants (DD’s) will be found out on this at some point but I expect their calculation will be that the required damage will have been achieved before that time. I am still convinced that their target date is 2030 so I expect some nasty surprises coming via the food chain and fairly quickly.
It is beginning to look very much as if we are in an ‘all or nothing’ situation.
I’ve no problem with insect food being introduced as a stand-alone, novel-type alternative food item, as I’ve seen several years ago with bug burgers. But to process the things then add them to foods that happen to be the most popular items that people buy every day, that’s just next level devious and smacks of nefarious intent. I’ve no doubt about the fact they’re nutrient-dense and are highly appealing…if you’re a Blue Tit or a Bearded Dragon!
Exactly.
This is disturbing:
https://www.technocracy.news/warning-chatgpt-is-coming-for-white-collar-work/
“analysts imagine AI altering the employment landscape permanently. One Oxford study estimates that 47 per cent of U.S. jobs might be at risk.”
Such a large number of ‘useless eaters’ will obviously need thinning out.
Food supply perchance?
Shellfish allergy is the problem with adding crickets to processed foods. Shellfish allergy is a risk factor for cricket anaphylaxisWhether the EU is requiring warning labels on these foods is unclear. In the US, warning labels are required for crustacean additives but not mollusk additives.
I did see the cricket story yesterday and passed it on to some family members, mainly to point out the shellfish allergy connection. One kid with the allergy probably would have eaten crickets otherwise to SAVE the PLANET.
The question of what is causing this is moot
if tptb are not trying to find out!
In my opinion there are too many red flags with these Covid vaccines and these flags have been flying for quite a long time.
Efficacy is negligible and even thought to be less than that.
So it is prudent to halt these medical interventions and investigate.
The VAX control group (www.VAXcontrolgroup.com) was set up to provide the control group for this kind of research. Use it!
…whatever anyone’s view on the ‘effectiveness’ of the quacksines is, there is more than enough data and evidence to show that there are so many unanswered questions and problems that they should be stopped immediately…
I put this BTL yesterday…the latest figures on births in England, which only go to June of last year, clearly show a drop in birth numbers….as vaccinated mothers go from under 50% vaccinated, to over 50%…??
Jan 2021 …….41.949 births…
June 2022…….37.037 births
(@12% difference?)
…..why aren’t there more up to date stats?……what are they hiding…?
If it’s nothing, why aren’t they publishing the data….?
(table on page 25)
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1129789/Vaccine-surveillance-report-week-2-2023.pdf
Effect of Jabs on Birth Rate
UKHSA has some information on monthly birth rate in their COVID-19 vaccine weekly surveillance reports, Table 6. It relates the birth rate to jabs
Comparing June 2022 with June 2021 (the latest available), we see a reduced birth rate of 15.3%. During this period, there was an increase of jabbed women from 10% to 73%.
Everything else being equal, we could say that the 15.3% reduction was due to 63% jabbed women.
This suggests that the jab is responsible for a 24.3% reduction in birth rate.
Now this is very tentative, but we do not have a lot of data to go on. Indeed, this data (now in Table 7 of the latest surveillance report on 12 January 2023) has not been updated. It would appear that this sort of data does not suit their narrative.
I used to think Jehovah’s Witnesses were crazy to insist on no blood transplants. In light of the mRNA shots, I’d be concerned about getting blood from ‘vaxed’ people put in my bloodstream.
Damn right.
I donate blood every few months, and afterward the Red Cross emails to let me know where my blood went. I half wonder if it’s really being diverted or sold to some poobah who needs a transplant.
The article states: “A similar pattern was not observed after the H1N1 swine flu epidemic in 2009…”
Typo or not, if one look at the numbers, there were a decline in births approx 12 months after the swine flue mass vaccination in Sweden. Vaccination began in October 2009 and ended April 2010. As far as I can see from the statistics (SCB), there were a decline for the full year 2011 compared to 2010.
Same thing in Finland.
The drop in birth rates after swine flue vaccination would be very interesting to look into as it may disqualify behaviour change as an explanation. There were no lockdowns back in 2009-2010.
Conclusion: Also the swine flue vaccine may have caused some fertility issues, but in such case not in the same magnitude as covid-vaccines. If someone can help verify the numbers it would be great.
If verified, this leads to the suspicion that there are may be issues NOT ONLY with the covid-vaccines.
Don’t know exactly when fertile women got the swine flue vaccine but probably they were not the first ones to be vaccinated – which also may explain the slight delay in birth rates occurring mainly in 2011.
Analogous example: Covid-vaccines in France. Decline appears to have started a few months into 2022 (although we have only preliminary figures from France). Macron made an aggressive push towards the unvaccinated during summer 2021 as people were generally very sceptical to the vaccines in France with low vaccination rates. But following the push, many people (primarily young ones one might expect) were coerced to take the shot.
Just bringing some thought/data to the table. Do we have any Sherlock’s here who can help verify/falsify any of the above – please do! This is extremely important to look into, in my view.
But surely it must be the virus, or climate change, or Gaia’s revenge, or something, right? It could NEVER be the “safe and effective” jabs, right?
If it drops any further, we are headed for Children of Men territory.
The one silver-lining of COVID is that people are much more critical of the conflicted experts.
Covid Jab: Birth Rates Plummet. It’s as if that was the plan all along.
Stand in the Park Make friends & keep sane
Sundays 10.30am to 11.30am
Elms Field
near Everyman Cinema & play area
Wokingham RG40 2FE
There is an international control group which one can volunteer to join; aptly named “vax control group” .
The only thing missing from this article is an explanation as to whether or not the decline in birth rate is within the vaccinated population only, or the decline is also seen in the unvaccinated as well. Only then would we really know that the mRNA gene therapies were the problem.
A close family member aged 34 decided to have a baby. She went for a check up and found all was well, egg production and other aspects of fertility were all
optimal, this was February 2021. By august 2021 she had not conceived and discovered her egg production had collapsed totally. In this 6 months she had had 2 Pfizer vaccines.
They were advised IVF was the only available route. The NHS waiting list was too
long so they had to go private. Now £45k later she is pregnant and has two spare frozen embryos. Are there any data on use of IVF NHS and private during the vaccine period? All I see is alarming stats on still
birth, but how many women’s ovaries were damaged by the MRNA vaccine? Does anyone know – is anyone collating those stats?
I’m dubious about this. Simultaneously across the Western World we have seen a European war, a huge spike in energy prices and rises in interest rates. And all this coming out of a pandemic. People of child bearing age are less likely surely to think they can afford to have children right now. Many are wondering whether they can or should bring new life into a world they believe is going up in flames, where they can’t afford decent housing for it and aren’t all that keen on the sacrifices involved. If there is a vaccine effect, it would be hard to spot with everything else that is going on.
I cannot accept this claim based on the historical record. Birth rates have been declining in other countries before Covid arrived.
Clear correlation in this article based on same data……
https://boriquagato.substack.com/p/swedish-birthrate-data-november-update
It is wise to be sceptical, but not investigating a possible link between new genetic therapies and fertility before unleashing them on humanity is utterly irresponsible, if not down right evil IMHO.
Particularly true in this case, where similarity between the the biological properties of SARS-CoV2 Spike and our own Syncytin protein, which is essential for placenta formation, makes it even more urgent to understand possible side effects BEFORE licensing medical products – not afterwards.
The placenta is seen as perhaps and ‘ideal target’ for contraceptive vaccines. According to this paper from University of Science and Technology, Wuhan published in 2016 ‘Targeting the placenta may have contraceptive properties and may avoid the adverse effects seen in other contraceptive vaccines.’ They got very good results!
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26847794/
Interesting then, that much of the research into the function of Syncytin in mammals was conducted in Wuhan by the lead author in the SARS-CoV2 identification papers and Secretary of the Party Committee, Deputy Director General of the WIV, Gengfu Xiao.
http://english.whiov.cas.cn/About_Us2016/Directors2016/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15883002/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17105734/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17762178/
Sure its just a coincidence though – nothing to see here – move along please.
If you wish to believe the correlation between drop in births and vaccination is implausible – then you need to explain the correlation between the timing of vaccine role out and adverse events related to childbirth in VAERS – both from a historical perspective,and days since injection. This data speaks for clear correlation and likely causation.
https://www.openvaers.com/covid-data/reproductive-health
The Australian data published at the end of 2022 was perhaps not complete – since the drop in birth rate was unbelievably dramatic at 67%. Does anyone have up to date data from Australia?
https://worldfreedomalliance.org/au/news/whats-causing-a-67-reduction-in-australian-birth-rates/