The spike protein from Covid vaccination can persist in a person’s tissues and immune cells for months after vaccination and is associated with ongoing immune system inflammation and debilitating symptoms, a new study by U.S. researchers has found.
The study, currently in pre-print (not yet peer-reviewed), analysed blood samples from 50 vaccinated people who were suffering from persistent symptoms similar to those seen in Long Covid such as fatigue, brain fog and headache weeks or months after vaccination (an average of 105 days at time of study, ranging from 38 to 245 days). These samples were compared to blood samples from 35 vaccinated people who did not have such symptoms. None of the participants had had Covid, confirmed by antibody and T-cell tests.
The researchers found significantly elevated levels of spike protein in the blood immune cells of those suffering with symptoms similar to Long Covid post-vaccination compared with those without symptoms post-vaccination. This can be seen in the diagram below: the higher levels in the right-hand patient columns compared with the left-hand control columns signify higher levels of spike protein (S1) in two different types of immune cell.
In addition to elevated spike protein levels, the researchers found indicators of immune system inflammation in those with symptoms post-vaccination. Based on this they suggest a mechanism whereby the persisting spike protein in the immune cells triggers an inflammatory immune system response which causes the symptoms. The authors go into some detail about the particular biological pathways which could be involved.
The symptoms experienced post-vaccination were very similar to Long Covid symptoms post-infection, the authors note, save for not including shortness of breath and loss of smell and taste. In a previous study, published in Frontiers in Immunology, the same authors had performed the equivalent analysis on individuals experiencing Long Covid symptoms post-infection and found similarly elevated levels of spike protein in the immune cells and similar immune system inflammation. Noting that ongoing viral replication “may not be required for prolonged symptoms”, they conclude this supports their hypothesis of a common cause of the symptoms in both cases, namely the persistence of spike protein in immune cells triggering inflammation.
They add that spike protein persistence from vaccination appears to be a “major contributor” of symptoms similar to Long Covid post-vaccination, and further, that given the spike protein “alone delivered by vaccination can cause similar pathologic features”, that it may be a “major contributor” of Long Covid symptoms post-infection as well. In other words, Long Covid after infection may be being caused or prolonged by spike protein from the vaccine rather than the infection.
In the authors’ previous study they were silent on whether the samples came from vaccinated or unvaccinated individuals, meaning it remains open that they were actually picking up spike protein from the vaccines rather than infection. In that study the authors noted the spike protein identified was typically in the form of fragments, not whole virus particles, which is consistent with the possibility they in fact came from the vaccine.
The finding that spike protein can persist in the body for months following vaccination, apparently causing ongoing inflammation of the immune system and debilitating symptoms, is highly significant – and contrary to what the vaccine producers claimed would be the case. It suggests a possible mechanism for serious adverse events affecting the cardiovascular system, such as heart inflammation and blood clots, for some months after vaccination. In light of the high rate of deaths from cardiovascular causes in the last 12 months, the possibility that the vaccines may be involved should be investigated without delay.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
The judiciary needs to be put in its place. The people are sovereign. Withdrawing from the reach of the European Court of Human Rights is a necessary condition for the restoration of democracy in England.
BLiar’s UK 1998 HRA act embeds the German Empire’s HR and open borders. This is the ‘legal’ reason why nothing is being done. The uniparty does not care. They all make money from it.
And then put our Supreme Court in its place: no more overreach
No government can protect its people from something that doesn’t exist. This means that this is not about controlling the weather, so what is it about controlling?
“People and all their activities, including birthrates and population growth. resources including oil, coal and gas, rare minerals etc etc”. —–That will just about cover it for starters.
Of course my question was rhetorical.
You asked “so what is it controlling” and I answered. ——–You are correct it isn’t and never was about the climate. —–Infact I would go so far as to say it is about almost everything else EXCEPT the climate.
We’re basically going back to the dark ages.
Instead of witches and the devil it’s global warming. The thing pushed by religious fanatics and used by the sociopathic to crush people in their way.
Plus throw in the odd “pandemic” to ramp up the fear
This is just as crazy as the Canadian idiot suing the govt because he wants them to fund his fetish to have both a prick and a pussy. He can go f- himself (literally and figuratively)
No govt can singularly protect its people from something that, by definition, is global. This is patently absurd. Moreover, “One woman said she could not leave her house for three weeks during the summer.” is not a threat to her life.
What will they do? Provide the populace with Umbrella’s in the winter and parasols and fans in the summer?
Or maybe fairy dust, and lashings of wishful thinking?
As US Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas wrote in his dissent in the “gay marriage” case:
“The Court’s decision today is at odds not only with the Constitution, but with the principles upon which our Nation was built. Since well before 1787, liberty has been understood as freedom from government action, not entitlement to government benefits. The Framers created our 2 OBERGEFELL v. HODGES THOMAS, J., dissenting Constitution to preserve that understanding of liberty. Yet the majority invokes our Constitution in the name of a “liberty” that the Framers would not have recognized, to the detriment of the liberty they sought to protect. Along the way, it rejects the idea—captured in our Declaration of Independence—that human dignity is innate and suggests instead that it comes from the Government. This distortion of our Constitution not only ignores the text, it inverts the relationship between the individual and the state in our Republic. I cannot agree with it.”
Exactly so.
Obama called the Constitution “A document of negative Liberties” . he said “It says what the government cannot do to you, but does not say what the government can do for you”. ———–No doubt protecting us all from climate change would be one of those things Obama and the democrats would want to do for people—-to “protect us”
When St Barry says ‘do for you’ he means ‘do to you’. And that’s what Common Law and Constituions are for, to stop Governments being actively engaged in deciding what you must have.
And in deciding what other people must have, that will be taken from you.
Thanks. I didn’t realise he had said that. No surprise to learn that’s what he thinks, but interesting he was happy to admit to it publicly.
wink
The architectural ugliness of the ECHR building, which resembles a pair of slurry silos, is a metaphor for many of the decisions they take.
“have to protect people from climate change”. ———-Which ofcourse means everything that is contained in NET ZERO. ——We will remove your petrol car to protect you from climate change. We will take away your gas boiler to protect you from climate change. We will take away all the cheap energy and give you expensive energy, we will force you to have a smart meter all to protect you from climate change. ——Basically we will just get the entire GREEN BLOB force you back to preindustrial times with it all to “protect you”———————-ha ha ha ah a jeezus. ——Why am I laughing, because it would only be funny if it was not so utterly PATHETIC
As opposed to protecting ppl from freezing to death in this ice age in which we live.
Doesn’t harm have to be proven?
I have not read up on the three cases. I imagine the complainants have made some vague references to anxiety which makes it all your* fault.
*’Your’ being a reference to whoever they’re complaining about.
Presumably the judges will take their bench down to the beach and get cross when the incoming tide makes their feet wet.
Surely you are not suggesting they are as stupid as a certain king, long ago? Then of course there is the present one. Does nothing ever change?
It is a rather bold assertion that a government has a duty to protect against the natural ordering of things. They might have a duty to protect you from a criminal or an enemy state. This can clearly be seen as part of the social contract. But I don’t see how it could ever be argued that a government has a duty to protect its people from climate change. You might say that any government is duty bound to examine any crisis that might come along or any activity which might be detrimentally affecting the weather but they are attempting to say something different. They have violated logic in the attempted persuance of a scam. Thankfully the whole world is starting to get it. It is as if we, the masses, are some sort of pustule and they will inject needle after needle into it in the hope that it might go away.
They forget they work for us.
Oft quoted here (although phrasing escapes me) “we cannot vote our way out of this”
I’m not completely convinced. So many of the constituencies in the last GE were won with turnouts well under 20k. FPTP is an obvious impediment, but anger is a fabulous motivator, so campaign to make people angry (if they’re not already). Likely we’d be called conspiracists, deplatformed or insulted but I’m politically homeless right now and really pissed off…
I think FPTP should go. Even though countries with PR seem to be doing no better, at least there’s a chance of getting a voice.
“Oft quoted here (although phrasing escapes me) “we cannot vote our way out of this”
Would it be…
Our salvation will not arrive via the ballot box.
My advice would be listen to some music and read some poetry because thereis no space in their universe for either. Like Bob Marley him say, we chant down Babylon.
We all know and can feel that something really big is about to happen. And so your humanity should drive you towards how we manage that situation and its aftermath because it will probably mean the end of a lot of things. If we are true Brits and really care about reality then we need to be fine tuned to the reality to come.And given the scale of loss that is going to occur over the next few months there won’t be any room for insincerity. We have achieved a lot on these islands in the last two thousand years and well before and we need to look after each other. That will be the main measure when we are sized up.
We are moving into different times. Lets say you got a suden urge to build a boat in your front room – you and your son. This is where we are at so lets develop an understanding based on humanity because of what is to come. This isn’t going to be the way things were in the past on a lot of levels. This time is very bad for women and girls especially given the progress over the last two hundred years. We aim to keep it together and as men we will protect the female realm I’m sure. All I can say is that I devote my time to keeping things together. I put my life in the way of any attempt to destroy it.
“I put my life in the way of any attempt to destroy it.”
Please explain what you mean.
Physical life is by its nature temporary and inevitably ends in physical death.
On the other hand spiritual life is eternal and cannot be destroyed.
So what are you ‘putting your life in the way of any attempt to destroy it’?
“yet another attempted ideological power grab on the part of a self-selecting and self-serving elite out of touch with reality”.”
Could equally apply to the U.N. NATO and the WHO. Hope she’s noticed though I doubt it.
As many of us have said on this site and others Covid was the test run for Locking us up and taking away our freedoms in preparation for the big one, tyranny and a new world order under the auspices of Climate change and emergency. These people are dangerous and are the enemy of freedom and all that is good about western society. We let them rule us and take notice of their directives at our peril.
Seconded
How is it they get to tell us what to do from inside two large water tanks on stilts?
3 words – Burden Of Proof
What is it, provide it unredacted and be prepared to debate it. We want the raw unsullied empirical data, so we ourselves can apply the Scientific method ourselves, with all necessary rigour, and see if we can replicate their claims and finding.