• Login
  • Register
The Daily Sceptic
No Result
View All Result
  • Articles
  • About
  • Archive
    • ARCHIVE
    • NEWS ROUND-UPS
  • Podcasts
  • Newsletter
  • Premium
  • Donate
  • Log In
The Daily Sceptic
No Result
View All Result

Vaccine Safety Update

by Will Jones
6 May 2022 6:56 PM

This is the 31st of the round-ups of Covid vaccine safety reports and news compiled by a group of medical doctors who are monitoring developments but prefer to remain anonymous in the current climate (find the 30th one here). By no means is this part of an effort to generate alarm about the vaccines or dissuade anyone from getting inoculated. It should be read in conjunction with the Daily Sceptic‘s other posts on vaccines, which include both encouraging and not so encouraging developments. At the Daily Sceptic we report all the news about the vaccines whether positive or negative and give no one advice about whether they should or should not take them. Unlike with lockdowns, we are neither pro-vaccine nor anti-vaccine; we see our job as reporting the facts, not advocating for or against a particular policy. The vaccine technology is novel and the vaccines have not yet fully completed their trials, which is why they’re in use under temporary and not full market authorisation. This was done on account of the emergency situation and the trial data was largely encouraging on both efficacy and safety. For a summary of that data, see this preamble to the Government’s page on the Yellow Card reporting system. (Dr. Tess Lawrie in June wrote an open letter to Dr. June Raine, head of the MHRA, arguing that: “The MHRA now has more than enough evidence on the Yellow Card system to declare the COVID-19 vaccines unsafe for use in humans,” a claim that has been ‘fact checked’ here.) Boris Johnson said in October that being double vaccinated “doesn’t protect you against catching the disease, and it doesn’t protect you against passing it on”. We publish information and opinion to inform public debate and help readers reach their own conclusions about what is best for them, based on the available data.

  • The U.S. FDA has limited access to Johnson & Johnson’s COVID-19 vaccine because of the risk of blood clots, making it available now only to over-18s who cannot take one of the mRNA vaccines for medical reasons or are not willing to take one.
  • A family GP practice in the USA has said it is not able to sign off vaccinated student athletes for sport without lab work to check their heart.
  • Data released by the U.K. Government show the all-cause mortality rate is substantially higher in those who have received one or two doses of the Covid vaccine than in the unvaccinated.
  • The U.K. Government has launched an urgent investigation into an increase in severe hepatitis amongst children. Hepatitis is a known vaccine side-effect, though any potential link of this outbreak with the vaccines would be indirect as almost all the children affected are unvaccinated (most are too young).
  • A study has shown that Covid vaccination can elicit a distinctive form of hepatitis (liver inflammation) which is “CD8 T-cell dominant”.
  • Case report on severe and fatal rhabdomyolysis (muscle tissue damage) after Covid vaccination.
  • A piece in Spectator Australia asks questions about adverse events in the country linked to the Covid vaccines.
  • Pfizer has submitted an application to the FDA for U.S. Emergency Use Authorisation for a COVID-19 vaccine booster dose in children aged five to 11.
  • A study has found significant menstrual issues related to Covid jabs including a massive increase in the previously rare event of “decidual cast shedding”.
  • Geert Vanden Bossche says he has informed the WHO of the dangers associated with continuing the Covid vaccine campaign.
  • Adverse events reported in the U.K. press: Mollie Brown, 21; Oli Akram Hoque, 26; Peter Jackson, 96; Dawn Wooldridge, 36.
  • Eudravigilance – the European version of the Yellow Card Reporting system – as of April 30th has reported 4,241,317 reactions from 1,755,775 reports of which 1,933,161 were deemed as serious. 44,161 fatal reactions were reported with an approximate actual number of deaths being 14,379. This is due to a 3.07 reporting rate in fatalities across multiple reactions.
  • VAERS – the American version of the Yellow Card reporting system – as of April 29th reports a total of 1,247,131 reports of adverse events following Covid vaccines, including 27,532 deaths and 226,340 serious injuries. For children up to the age of 17 there have been 48,033 reports, of which 4,296 were deemed serious and 106 fatalities. 
  • DAEN Australia – the equivalent of the Yellow Card reporting system – has logged (up to April 20th) 124,087 reports of adverse events, including 828 deaths.
  • Children (Under 18) Adverse Events U.K. – up to April 20th, the MHRA reports a total of 3,873 adverse event reports, comprising 3,558 Pfizer, 263 AstraZeneca, 26 Moderna and 26 unspecified from 3,613,500 children vaccinated with 5,926,600 doses. This includes 76 reported cases with Pfizer of myocarditis/pericarditis, suggesting a current reported risk of 14 cases per million first doses and 11 per million second doses for this age group.
  • Booster Doses – 48,612 adverse events have been reported across all vaccines up to March 30th from 39,108,473 people vaccinated.

Summary of Adverse Events in the U.K.

According to an updated report, as of April 20th the MHRA Yellow Card reporting system has recorded a total of 1,485,059 events based on 453,680 reports. The total number of fatalities reported is 2,096.

  • Pfizer (26.5 million first doses, 24.1 million second doses, 29.9 million third doses) now has one Yellow Card in 156 people vaccinated. Deaths: one in 35,475 people vaccinated (747).
  • AstraZeneca (24.9 million first doses, 24.0 million second doses, 56,000 third doses) has one Yellow Card in 102 people vaccinated. Deaths: one in 19,715 people vaccinated (1,263).
  • Moderna (1.7 million first doses, 1.5 million second doses, 9.2 million third doses) has one Yellow Card in 44 people vaccinated. Deaths: one in 37,778 people vaccinated (45).

Overall, one in every 117 people vaccinated (0.85%) have experienced a Yellow Card adverse event. Reported adverse events are not necessarily caused by the vaccine and further investigation is required to establish causality. The MHRA has previously estimated that the Yellow Card reporting rate may be approximately 10% of actual figures. Note that sometimes in Yellow Card reporting, the numbers of adverse events (including fatalities) will be lower than the previous week. The Yellow Card system is a passive reporting system, so in theory this should not happen as all reports should be cumulative. However, the MHRA says it analyses the data prior to publication, with deaths and pregnancy conditions being notably investigated. It does not state criteria by which reports would be removed and to date has not clarified why these data vary. It is therefore unclear how many reported adverse events have been removed from the reports since reporting began in February 2021.

  • Blood Disorders = 27,469
  • Anaphylaxis = 1,632
  • Acute Cardiac = 27,940
  • Eye Disorders = 24,602
  • Blindness = 529
  • Deafness = 794
  • Hepatic (liver) Disorders = 840
  • Infections = 35,268
  • Spontaneous Abortions = 797 miscarriages
  • Nervous System Disorders = 284,984
  • Strokes and CNS haemorrhages = 3,230
  • Gastrointestinal Disorders = 134,726
  • Immune System Disorders = 6,401
  • Seizures = 3,487
  • Paralysis = 1,525
  • Pericarditis/Myocarditis = 2,112
  • Psychiatric Disorders = 31,290
  • Respiratory Disorders = 56,167
  • Epistaxis (nosebleeds) = 3,609
  • Metabolic Disorders = 12,498
  • Nausea & Vomiting = 73,117
  • Guillain-Barré Syndrome = 620
  • Reproductive/Breast Disorders = 57,565

Further analysis can be found via the U.K. Freedom Project.

Source: Pfizer; Moderna; AstraZeneca; Unspecified. “F” denotes fatal.
Tags: Adverse eventsDAEN AustraliaEudraVigilanceSafetySide-effectsVaccinesVAERSYellow Card Reporting System

Donate

We depend on your donations to keep this site going. Please give what you can.

Donate Today

Comment on this Article

You’ll need to set up an account to comment if you don’t already have one. We ask for a minimum donation of £5 if you'd like to make a comment or post in our Forums.

Sign Up
Previous Post

Keir Starmer to be Investigated by Police Over ‘Beergate’

Next Post

News Round-Up

Subscribe
Login
Notify of
Please log in to comment

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

43 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Annie
Annie
3 years ago

There are NO benefits to children. NONE.

166
-1
Draper233
Draper233
3 years ago
Reply to  Annie

And equally important, Covid is zero risk to this age group.

So why are they being vaxxed against it? To stop it spreading to others?

Err, nope, it doesn’t stop transmission apparently.

And haven’t those “others” been vaxxed anyway?

You have to be fully brainwashed or a retard to not see the naked fraud and profiteering here.

122
-2
Susan
Susan
3 years ago
Reply to  Draper233

Profiteering is the least of their sins.

36
0
BillRiceJr
BillRiceJr
3 years ago
Reply to  Draper233

Shouldn’t this story have mentioned how many UK children between the ages of 12 and 15 have died from or with COVID?

For context, compare this figure to the number of children who die in a typical flu season.

I’ve calculated the odds my healthy, non-minority children (ages 5 and 9) will die from COVID. They are about 1-in-1-million.

The odds they or I will be struck by lightning this year are 1-in-700,000.

Last edited 3 years ago by BillRiceJr
26
0
Annie
Annie
3 years ago
Reply to  BillRiceJr

Pfizer are working on an anti-lightning jab, I hear. To be administered every blue moon.

13
0
paul smith
paul smith
3 years ago

<checks watch, waits 18 months…>

24
-1
Lucan Grey
Lucan Grey
3 years ago

Filming of Mission Impossible 7 has been halted due to positive tests amongst the film crew.

At least now we know what the plot of Mission Impossible 8 will be…

22
-1
A Heretic
A Heretic
3 years ago
Reply to  Lucan Grey

but but but Tom insisted everyone wear 10 masks, how could they possibly have caught it?

40
-1
Julian
Julian
3 years ago
Reply to  Lucan Grey

This is the future – every activity/job/event potentially disrupted at the drop of a hat

19
0
Trabant
Trabant
3 years ago

“We have carefully reviewed clinical trial data in children aged 12 to 15 years and have concluded that the Pfizer-BioNTech Covid vaccine is safe and effective in this age group and that the benefits of this vaccine outweigh any risk,”
What utter, utter bollocks.
Drivel from a lying moron who doesn’t give a flying feck and is just parroting what they’ve been told to say without giving it any thought.

128
-1
leicestersq
leicestersq
3 years ago
Reply to  Trabant

I decided to write to the MHRA with a few questions. Did you notice the weasel words that they used in their press release?

…..There were no cases of COVID-19 from 7 days after the second dose in the vaccinated group, compared with 16 cases in the placebo group……

They only started counting cases from 7 days after the second dose, which means I think that there were cases before this time period.

I also asked about the seriousness of the placebo ‘cases’. I am betting that all 16 cases were just false positives and the individuals werent even ill.

What is going on here is just monstrous.

92
0
TheyLiveAndWeLockdown
TheyLiveAndWeLockdown
3 years ago
Reply to  leicestersq

Cherry picking the mouldy data cherries

15
0
AnnabelleG
AnnabelleG
3 years ago
Reply to  leicestersq

Well done….. but what are the chances of an honest reply??

10
0
KarlosFandango
KarlosFandango
3 years ago
Reply to  Trabant

With you totally – I think 9 under 15s died “with” covid in 2020 – so logic dictates we get to 10 vaccine related deaths and it is then too dangerous to continue…?

I want to see the actual justification…
Give drugs that don’t work to a cohort that doesn’t need it…

Definitely doesn’t set any alarm bells ringing

30
0
LePib
LePib
3 years ago
Reply to  KarlosFandango

I’ve been pointing out that in Scotland we have recorded just 69 deaths in the under 45’s with Covid since last March. I thought this was a pretty damning statistic in itself given the harms that have been unleashed on this age group through lockdowns . And then a friend pointed out – REMEMBER ‘within 28 days’ – many of those people could well have been suicides, misadventure, drug deaths. I was thinking – co-morbidities – stupid of me to not think about this. Makes it even more ridiculous that they’re advocating this (if it could get any more ridiculous).

19
0
cyclingnut69
cyclingnut69
3 years ago
Reply to  LePib

And how many deaths due to the lethal injections in that period?

2
0
CovidiousAlbion
CovidiousAlbion
3 years ago
Reply to  LePib

Stats up to Christmas Eve: https://www.edinburghlive.co.uk/news/edinburgh-news/two-scots-under-45-no-19531680

0
0
Rowan
Rowan
3 years ago
Reply to  KarlosFandango

The problem here is that Covid vaccination is the main plank of the depopulation pogrom that is now in full flow across most of the world. They won’t admit that there may be any problems until they have jabbed us all.

12
0
AnnabelleG
AnnabelleG
3 years ago
Reply to  Trabant

Absolutely Terrifying – I wonder if this numbskull or numbskulls would pass this as safe and effective for children if they were told that They (the person or committee members (not the drugs company ) could be sued if any of the Children have long term side effects from this experimental jab that is being used on an emergency licence …. Lets then see if they are prepared to put their money where their mouth is.. Somehow I don’t think so

26
0
cyclingnut69
cyclingnut69
3 years ago
Reply to  Trabant

A trial based on 2000 kids means it’s safe enough to roll out to millions of kids, wtf isn’t going on!!

Benefits outweigh the risks! They stand a nigh on 100% chance of surviving Covid! This is pure evil !

15
0
Kaffirharbin
Kaffirharbin
3 years ago

‘Why?’ What I find incredible is that the idea of vaccinating children has been largely communicated and even debated. But never after the question ‘why?’ has been answered. Surely any news item on this subject should start with e.g. ‘There is a plan to vaccinate children because. . .’ But why anyone wants to do this thing is never explained. It is a plan without any known purpose.

71
-1
Sandra Barwick
Sandra Barwick
3 years ago
Reply to  Kaffirharbin

On the contrary. It has a clear purpose. Pfizer profits. Control.

14
0
beancounter
beancounter
3 years ago

Please can somebody point me in the direction of the trials that involved apes, of any sort but preferably chimpanzees, that shows the impact of these drugs upon such mammals and their offspring.

32
-3
Richard Austin
Richard Austin
3 years ago
Reply to  beancounter

The only ones ever undertaken on mRNA type vaccines started in 2002 and in every single case they failed testing because all of the animals got sick and most died after being exposed to the actual virus. For the vaccines pumped into millions of people there have been no animal tests and, in fact, none have passed even second stage testing. Millions of people decided to be Lab Rats. Quite frankly I’ve given up trying to get them to see sense, fuck them, if they all die so what?

17
0
RickH
RickH
3 years ago

Proof positive of the pointlessness of the MHRA as a safeguarding institution operating on behalf of the public.

It’s merely a shameless shill for government – starting from the fact that there is no ’emergency’ to justify authorization.

Mengele is alive and well and working for the MHRA.

Last edited 3 years ago by RickH
91
-2
peyrole
peyrole
3 years ago
Reply to  RickH

Its the regulator of Big Pharma paid for and by Big Pharma. There was never any question it would support what they wanted. Now the question is, will the government actually do what a government is supposed to do, or will it too rubber stamp? I think we all know the answer to that unfortunately. And of course the majority of governments can just point to each other and say, we all did it.

30
0
George L
George L
3 years ago
Reply to  RickH

Its a shameless shill for Bill Gates and his parasitic cohorts.. The same has just happened in France. The bastards behind this really do need the ultimate punishment.

27
0
peyrole
peyrole
3 years ago
Reply to  George L

I am depressed but not surprised by France doing the same. And the conditions attached to the travel ‘traffic lights’ announced in France today are also depressingly predictable. No attempt to disguise the inducement to get vaccinated, all our fears in full view.

18
0
George L
George L
3 years ago
Reply to  peyrole

Absolutely.. its as plain as the nose on your face. I’m utterly sickened by people just not being able to put two and two together.

A couple of my French friends who should know better can think of nothing more than going on holiday again. I can’t find words to describe their stupidity..

19
0
AnnabelleG
AnnabelleG
3 years ago
Reply to  RickH

I am truly frightened by my government and the MHRA —-

31
0
ArtC
ArtC
3 years ago

You knew this was coming when the papers are full of stories of the spread of Covid in schools. Even though there are tiny amounts of cases, you’d think all hell had broken loose. The variants were just an excuse to get the kids jabbed. No doubt they’ll work their way down ’til eventually sperm are jabbed whilst still swimming in your balls.

40
0
TheBluePill
TheBluePill
3 years ago
Reply to  ArtC

You think there will be viable sperm in the future after all the jabbing?

Last edited 3 years ago by TheBluePill
30
0
George L
George L
3 years ago
Reply to  TheBluePill

I think infertility is the general idea for those that survive that is. Death to all others..

19
0
DanClarke
DanClarke
3 years ago

The passports are the goal, for them to work you need complete families with passports, they want to control travel. If you refuse to get your child vaccinated they don’t have a passport so no travel.
They are evil

Last edited 3 years ago by DanClarke
71
0
TheBluePill
TheBluePill
3 years ago
Reply to  DanClarke

I am afraid that their goals are much more sinister and bold than some travel documents. No one knows what they are but all the remaining possibilities would be too dark for the Nazi party.

48
0
Susan
Susan
3 years ago
Reply to  DanClarke

Freedom to travel is a great incentive for many. (It breaks my heart to think I’ll never again visit your shores). But restrictions and control of travel is just the least sinister aspect of the “programme.”

15
0
leicestersq
leicestersq
3 years ago

First do no harm.

36
0
TheyLiveAndWeLockdown
TheyLiveAndWeLockdown
3 years ago
Reply to  leicestersq

They think (other) people ARE the harm.

15
0
WilliamC
WilliamC
3 years ago

The MHRA receives funding from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. The article above is from the Guardian. The Guardian also receives funding from the Gates Foundation. The Wellcome Trust cropped up in a story on LS earlier today. The Wellcome Trust receives funding from the Gates Foundation. Nothing to look at here, I’m sure.

76
0
RickH
RickH
3 years ago
Reply to  WilliamC

Anyone who isn’t deluded, corrupt or simply an idiot would know that a trustworthy safeguarding agency will not be in receipt of funding from private sources with an agenda..

23
-1
zners
zners
3 years ago

My word

2
0
TheBluePill
TheBluePill
3 years ago

The BBBC has just opened comments on this and (after a few days off) 77th were ready to pounce on it. Comments are utterly deluded, for example talking about how children have been shown to be super spreaders of the virus. Almost every comment is demonstrably the opposite of the truth.

65
0
TheBluePill
TheBluePill
3 years ago
Reply to  TheBluePill

This needs sharing everywhere…

Vaccine.jpg
36
0
OMatt
OMatt
3 years ago
Reply to  TheBluePill

Where’s Isildur when you need him…

11
0
Libertarianist
Libertarianist
3 years ago
Reply to  TheBluePill

This too.

2
0
Libertarianist
Libertarianist
3 years ago
Reply to  Libertarianist

This

20210522_102147.jpg
16
0
Woden
Woden
3 years ago
Reply to  TheBluePill

The extra B means .. Bastards……

4
0
I am Spartacas
I am Spartacas
3 years ago

Madness.

Well worth reminding people of what we are dealing with here in terms of fatality for those of various age groups who get the virus – this survival chart for covid19 gives some indication of chances of survival for those who contract covid19 (note : those between 10 and 19 years of age with no underlying health conditions have a 99.9996% survival rate) …

charta.jpg
23
0
Noumenon
Noumenon
3 years ago
Reply to  I am Spartacas

Branch Covidians care not for this. They only care that you martyr yourself to save the .2%.

19
0
BeBopRockSteady
BeBopRockSteady
3 years ago
Reply to  Noumenon

It’s worse. The argument I have seen today was that all kids would have to get vaccinate because 200 were sent home to isolate at their own kids school after a single case.

Thats it. That’s their line in the sand here. That’s their level of need to allow for mass vaccination of all children.

13
0
TheyLiveAndWeLockdown
TheyLiveAndWeLockdown
3 years ago
Reply to  I am Spartacas

Great stats.
It needs to add chances of dying or injury from the jabs (which is undoubtedly greater).

8
0
RickH
RickH
3 years ago
Reply to  I am Spartacas

… and you’ve got to catch it first – which is actually quite difficult, particularly at this level of general prevalence. Take out noscomial infection, and its very rare indeed.

13
0
PoshPanic
PoshPanic
3 years ago
Reply to  I am Spartacas

This is the risk/benefit that needs repeating. A less than 1 in 2 million chance of dying from/with C19. At best, from the data so far a 1 in 50-100,000 chance of dying from the Wuhan jab.

11
0
Sandra Barwick
Sandra Barwick
3 years ago
Reply to  PoshPanic

Yes. If you put selective poison in the water supply you know – and they do know this – will kill a percentage of those who drink it, there’s an intent to kill. You don’t need to know their names. You don’t need to know how many you will kill.

5
0
helenf
helenf
3 years ago

Try telling the parents of any child who has permanent, life changing side effects or who dies following the experimental gene therapy that the benefits outweigh the risks.

36
0
zoe
zoe
3 years ago

“You were born free. Don’t let them take your freedoms away from you. AND PROTECT THE CHILDREN. And (under) no conditions let them have that vaccine that kills people.”

Benedictine Nuns, London Freedom March March 29, 2021.

https://brandnewtube.com/watch/would-a-nun-lie-to-you-hugo-talks-lockdown_bquIpFPlBDaHtCo.html

29
-1
Mayo
Mayo
3 years ago

All very well moaning about it but less than 42k people have signed Ros Jones’s petition.

It won’t even trigger a debate in Parliament.

11
-3
Paul B
Paul B
3 years ago
Reply to  Mayo

Is that the one which says until trials are complete? Just kicking the can down the road.

9
0
Mayo
Mayo
3 years ago
Reply to  Paul B

In another 18 months more information will come to light. People will start to talk to each other and share experiences.

The petition raises the issue that the Trials have not been completed. Relatively few people know this.

Last edited 3 years ago by Mayo
7
-1
TheyLiveAndWeLockdown
TheyLiveAndWeLockdown
3 years ago
Reply to  Mayo

If they’re allowed to.

3
0
Mayo
Mayo
3 years ago
Reply to  TheyLiveAndWeLockdown

Ok – so just forget it.

If it is debated in parliament then it will at least make some MPs aware. I doubt they are fully informed of the facts.

4
-1
AfterAll
AfterAll
3 years ago
Reply to  Paul B

In any case the Pfizer and Moderna Phase III trials were effectively shut down after 6 months, when they vaccinated their control group.

5
0
Mayo
Mayo
3 years ago
Reply to  AfterAll

So what? That’s even more evidence that the vaccines haven’t been properly tested.

This petition is the only way the wider public including MPs might actually become aware of the facts.

4
-1
helenf
helenf
3 years ago
Reply to  Mayo

The “only way”? Bullshit.

1
0
RickH
RickH
3 years ago
Reply to  Mayo

Why the down vote? I often disagree with Mayo – but the observation is correct.

Bluntly, mass reasoning and morality is now corrupted beyond belief. I understand 1930s Germany far more clearly than I did two years ago.

22
-1
George L
George L
3 years ago
Reply to  RickH

And I’m afraid Rick that the stories/history of 1930’s Germany is brought to you via the same scum responsible for what’s happening now.

Modern history has been a passion of mine for the past three decades and I can assure you after extensive research that we have not been told the truth about both world wars, who was behind them, and their purpose.

As the old saying goes.. the winners get to write the history..

14
0
Helen
Helen
3 years ago
Reply to  George L

George , This is little bit of history about a near by ‘camp’ that might interest you. It confirms what you write, has relevance to medical experimentation that we are all witnessing, and shows medical ethics can become warped.

Camp King and the experimenter turned ethicist

Operation Paperclip

Operation Paperclip is the name of the US Government operation to bring senior Nazi scientists to the US to help with military cold war operations. Some of these scientists had been involved in the development of chemical and biological weapons and in medical experiments at Dachau and Ravensbrück. Dr Kurt Blome, for example, was the Third Reich’s deputy health minister but was acquitted during the Nuremberg trial, as was General Walter Schreiber, former medical chief for the Wehrmacht.

Operation Artichoke 

Based at Camp King in Oberursel ex-gestapo officers Kurt Blome and Walter Schreiber (using the pseudonym Fischer) worked at a villa in the neighbouring town of Kronberg where they oversaw inhumane interrogations of Soviet defectors and double agents using drugs such as Benzedrin and Pentothal-Natrium.

Operation MK ULTRA 

The worst MK Ultra human testing was done in what would later be called ‘black sites’ – clandestine facilities such as Camp King out of sight and reach of US law. Camp King was previously the Luftwaffe’s “Durchgangslage Luft” interrogation center, then the after the war became the home of the US’s European Command Interrogation Center where, after 1948 the use of LSD was supervised by Dr. Henry K. Beecher, the Dorr Professor of Anesthesiology at Harvard University. In August 1952 Dr. Beecher began his decade long work on LSD drug testing subjects during secret interrogation at Villa Schuster later Waldhof Kronberg. Beecher, was aware of the drug’s painful effects from the Swiss manufacturer Sandoz report, all the same inflicted the trauma of paranoid reaction and acute panic on his human subjects.

Experimenter turned ethicist 

Except from the following paper published in the Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 2001, 

Laying ethical foundations for clinical research Jon Harkness,1Susan E. Lederer, & Daniel Wikler 

In his essay ‘‘Ethics and clinical research’’ in 1966 (1), Henry K. Beecher identified ethical lapses in research carried out by physician–scientists in renowned universities and published in the world’s leading journals. In this paper, which has rightly been deemed the most influential single paper ever written about experimentation involving human subjects (2), Beecher demonstrated that poor treatment of human subjects was not confined to the barbaric practices of Nazi doctors that had been documented by the Nuremberg war crimes tribunal after the Second World War. Beecher’s paper prompted a reconsideration of research practices that laid the groundwork for today’s ethical codes and review committees.

https://www.historyextra.com/period/20th-century/mk-ultra-secrets-cia-mind-control-programme-central-intelligance-agency-brainwashing/

https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/74765/vol79.no.4.365-372.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y

Last edited 3 years ago by Helen
0
0
helenf
helenf
3 years ago
Reply to  Mayo

I won’t sign it because it still endorses using children as guinea pigs in dangerous and unnecessary drug trials

10
-1
Mayo
Mayo
3 years ago
Reply to  helenf

Then you’re giving them free rein to carry on. Well done.

If the trials come up with unsatisfactory results (they won’t because we’re seeing the results NOW) The Yellow Card data will need to be analysed. It’ll take years to look into the 1K plus deaths.

The public think the vaccines have been tested. This petition shows that is not the case. It might start the conversation.

7
-1
helenf
helenf
3 years ago
Reply to  Mayo

There was absolutely no need for them to include the part about waiting for vaccine trials to be completed before making any decisions about the rollout of vaccines for children. It was giving mixed messages and detracted from the thrust of the argument. I have principles, and I stand by them. If you really think that me not signing that petition is me “giving them free rein to carry on” , you have a naive idea about the power of petitions, the toss government gives about drug/vaccine trial results, and you have no idea about the power of me.

4
0
crisisgarden
crisisgarden
3 years ago
Reply to  helenf

You’re right. Even testing them or making them any part of this charade is unconscionable. I’m writing notices of liability for anyone local in a position of authority that involves themselves with this. Others should be doing the same I think. Better than a pretend parliamentary petition.

1
0
James Kreis
James Kreis
3 years ago

Lest we should forget who’s pulling the strings, the MHRA has received over $7 million in ‘grants’ from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and in 2019 Dr Raine attended a BMGF conference in Seattle. She’ll be very near the top of the list of defendants when the day of reckoning comes.

Last edited 3 years ago by James Kreis
23
0
MikeAustin
MikeAustin
3 years ago

TOTALLY DISGUSTED!

17
0
Matt Mounsey
Matt Mounsey
3 years ago

These people had better hope there’s no risk or that we’re all going to be wiped out in some massive depopulation event.

Because if it comes out that there are dangers with these gene based vaccines that were known and suppressed, I think they’ll have a lot of people motivated to punish them and I don’t mean by going through the so-called official channels.

28
-4
George L
George L
3 years ago
Reply to  Matt Mounsey

There is risk and they know it. Thousands are dying and being maimed because of being injected with this shit. Look at the European figures below. What we’re witnessing here is an ongoing genocide, and this is just the beginning..

https://www.globalresearch.ca/12184-dead-1196190-injuries-european-database-adverse-drug-reactions-covid-19-vaccines/5746273

..

22052021-eu-injuries.jpg 12184 dead.jpg
15
0
MTF
MTF
3 years ago
Reply to  George L

Interesting that 75% of AZ reports were not done by a healthcare professional. There self-reporting systems are being widely abused as a result of vaccine panic.

0
-22
helenf
helenf
3 years ago
Reply to  MTF

Evidence please

1
0
MTF
MTF
3 years ago
Reply to  helenf

Eudravigilance break down reports by healthcare professional or not:

https://dap.ema.europa.eu/analytics/saw.dll?PortalPages&PortalPath=%2Fshared%2FPHV%20DAP%2F_portal%2FDAP&Action=Navigate&P0=1&P1=eq&P2=%22Line%20Listing%20Objects%22.%22Substance%20High%20Level%20Code%22&P3=1+40995439

0
-3
Mayo
Mayo
3 years ago
Reply to  MTF

I know for a fact that many healthcare professionals are not reporting adverse events. They should – even if they don’t suspect the vaccine caused the effect.

in any case the same or similar systems have been in operation for years. Anti-vaxxers are not a new phenomenon. The US vaccinates millions of people every year – yet there has never been anything on this scale before.

Last edited 3 years ago by Mayo
9
0
MTF
MTF
3 years ago
Reply to  Mayo

How do you “know for a fact” that many healthcare professionals are not reporting adverse events? Has there been a survey?

Similar systems have been in operation for years but with nothing approaching the same publicity. I don’t know if a similar proportion of non-healthcare professionals were reporting adverse events for previous vaccines. Do you?

0
-8
Ossettian
Ossettian
3 years ago
Reply to  MTF

“but with nothing approaching the same publicity.”

Nobody I’ve spoken to was made aware of the reporting system, let alone encouraged to use it.

Nobody I’ve spoken to has been contacted by the NHS or their GP after being injected to check whether they’ve had an adverse reaction. In contrast, I’ve had 3 letters, 6 texts, 3 calls on my landline and 6 on my mobile trying to get me to be jabbed. And 3 texts encouraging me to take the flu jab.

A friend spent 3 days in bed after her first AZ jab: when I suggested she report it she said that would be “ungrateful”

Last edited 3 years ago by Ossettian
12
0
MTF
MTF
3 years ago
Reply to  Ossettian

Are you seriously claiming that the Covid vaccination programme has not had massive publicity? People may not have heard of the yellow card system but the hype of the vaccination programme means they are far more likely to find out about it if something.unpleasant happens just after they take the vaccine.

0
-6
Ossettian
Ossettian
3 years ago
Reply to  MTF

“Are you seriously claiming that the Covid vaccination programme has not had massive publicity?”

That comment proves to me that you’re a shill: my comment was very, very clearly about the system for reporting adverse effects..

Last edited 3 years ago by Ossettian
11
0
Ossettian
Ossettian
3 years ago
Reply to  Ossettian

And you’ve changed your comment in response to mine without admitting it.

0
0
MTF
MTF
3 years ago
Reply to  Ossettian

I don’t know how to change my comments. As a matter of interest – is it possible and how do you do it?

1
-2
CovidiousAlbion
CovidiousAlbion
3 years ago
Reply to  MTF

There is a brief grace period, after you post a comment.

If you “mouse-over” your comment, a cogwheel symbol appears at the bottom right, level with the “Reply” link.

Last edited 3 years ago by CovidiousAlbion
0
0
MTF
MTF
3 years ago
Reply to  CovidiousAlbion

Thanks. I am always making typos which I spot immediately after posting.

0
-1
helenf
helenf
3 years ago
Reply to  Ossettian

There’s a few shills on here. Which is a positive thing as it shows they’re worried.

6
0
monica coyle
monica coyle
3 years ago
Reply to  helenf

That’s what I think, helenf. They are so obvious it is painful. All they do is make me even more convinced we are right.
Yesterday I shared the link to a petition in the Telegraph to stop children being vaccinated until Phase 3 trials are over, and some shill claimed I was spamming the comments and for the moderator to remove the link. It was removed but not until a good number of people had signed and shared it. And now I see it it on Lockdown Sceptics today, anyway.
Please everyone, sign and share. it could slow down the vaccination program on our youngsters who we must do everything to protect!

1
0
crisisgarden
crisisgarden
3 years ago
Reply to  monica coyle

Legal Notices of liability are a good idea too. I’m sending one to my boss (I’m a teacher) should the school become a ‘vaccination’ centre. I won’t be able to work somewhere children are being injected with something that might kill, maim or sterilise them. If adults are stupid enough to put themselves forward for this nonsense that’s up to them, but children need actively protecting from this. Enough is enough.

4
0
Ossettian
Ossettian
3 years ago
Reply to  MTF

“healthcare professionals” who are willing to inject people at negligible risk from the virus with experimental gene therapies are exactly the kind of people who would conceal the negative consequences of their actions.

10
0
Mayo
Mayo
3 years ago
Reply to  MTF

How do you “know for a fact” that many healthcare professionals are not reporting adverse events? Has there been a survey?

I know many healthcare professionals.

I don’t know if a similar proportion of non-healthcare professionals were reporting adverse events for previous vaccines. Do you?

Irrelevant. Vaccine rollouts have previously been abandoned when the death toll reached 50 – regardless of who was reporting.

9
0
MTF
MTF
3 years ago
Reply to  Mayo

I know many healthcare professionals.

So your only evidence is your personal experience?

Vaccine rollouts have previously been abandoned when the death toll reached 50 – regardless of who was reporting.

It is very relevant. If those 50 deaths were all reported by healthcare professionals and represented a significant proportion of the vaccinations that is very different from deaths reported by non-healthcare professionals during a massive campaign.

Incidentally I keep hearing about roll outs being abandoned when the death toll reached 50 but no one seems to be able to point to actual examples. Can you help? (I don’t doubt they exist but the context is important).

1
-3
Mayo
Mayo
3 years ago
Reply to  MTF

So your only evidence is your personal experience?

Yes. But I am confident the practice (or non-practice) is widespread. Doctors don’t vary too much in their general behaviour patterns

Incidentally I keep hearing about roll outs being abandoned when the death toll reached 50 but no one seems to be able to point to actual examples.

Swine Flu vaccine rollout was halted after 50 deaths were reported in the US. I heard this from Dr Peter McCullough who is both a practising doctor and a researcher. I have no reason to doubt him. Do you?

In any case, the burden of proof rests with those who are pushing the vaccines. It is not up to me nor anyone else to prove that the vaccines are not safe. It is claimed that the vaccines cause blood clots – some of which are fatal. We now know this is almost certainly the case. We even know why. The rollout needs to be stopped and the deaths investigated.

This interview with Professor Byram Bridle provides the broad details.

https://www.bitchute.com/video/nuM0G6PqgwIK/

8
0
MTF
MTF
3 years ago
Reply to  Mayo

In any case, the burden of proof rests with those who are pushing the vaccines. It is not up to me nor anyone else to prove that the vaccines are not safe. It is claimed that the vaccines cause blood clots – some of which are fatal. We now know this is almost certainly the case. We even know why.

But there is masses of proof. The original RCTs. An then all the observational studies based on the hundreds of millions of doses given so far. This article contains links to a few of the observational studies.

Yes – the monitoring process worked and the very small chance of a blood clot was identified and publicised widely. For most adults the risk is easily outweighed by the benefits. But the information about the risks is there and no one is being forced to be vaccinated. (You may be surprised to know that I agree that the case for vaccinating children is poor.)

0
-4
helenf
helenf
3 years ago
Reply to  MTF

evidence for your statement about the self-reporting systems being “widely abused as a result of vaccine panic”?

1
0
MTF
MTF
3 years ago
Reply to  helenf

I admit that abuse and vaccine panic were rather a colourful way of describing it – done in a loose moment. A more boring and accurate way of putting it might be:

There are an exceptional number of reports being submitted compared to other vaccine rollouts which are not due to an exceptional level of risk.

My evidence for this is:

  • The majority of the reports are from non-healthcare professionals
  • The number of reported cases exceeds other similar vaccine rollouts yet all the rigorous observational studies show that there are very few safety issues – a very small risk of blood clots and myocardial infarction – nothing like enough to justify this increased level of reporting
Last edited 3 years ago by MTF
0
-3
Susan
Susan
3 years ago
Reply to  MTF

I think I can guess what MTF must stand for.

2
0
MTF
MTF
3 years ago
Reply to  Susan

They are my initials.

0
-1
TheTartanEagle
TheTartanEagle
3 years ago
Reply to  Susan

Modulation transfer function?

1
0
Catee
Catee
3 years ago

Dr June Raine
Remember that name for Nuremberg 2.

33
0
Woden
Woden
3 years ago
Reply to  Catee

Susan Michie, mind mangler…

18
0
BJs Brain is Missing
BJs Brain is Missing
3 years ago

Only an ignorant fool or a totally evil entity would want to inject an innocent child with a gene altering substance. Surely the mass of the people will not accept this assault upon our children by this evil axis of Government and the Pharmaceutical industry?

This announcement has crossed the line.

Last edited 3 years ago by BJs Brain is Missing
31
0
Susan
Susan
3 years ago
Reply to  BJs Brain is Missing

“Surely the mass of people will not accept this assault…” You give the ignorant, lazy, impressionable, frightened masses way too much credit.

11
0
Londo Mollari
Londo Mollari
3 years ago

Beyond criminal. Beyond insane. Beyond criminally insane.

35
0
Ossettian
Ossettian
3 years ago

I just got immediately censored on the Spectator for pointing out that injecting us with experimental gene therapies has never been about protecting our health or restoring our freedoms.

42
0
DanClarke
DanClarke
3 years ago
Reply to  Ossettian

truth hurts

9
0
J4mes
J4mes
3 years ago
Reply to  DanClarke

Truth is illegal at Airstrip One.

10
0
LMS2
LMS2
3 years ago
Reply to  Ossettian

I’ve been over there posting like mad, just to make up for your censorship.
I’m getting very confrontational with one or two, mostly because they’re following the government line. 😁

8
0
BurlingtonBertie
BurlingtonBertie
3 years ago
Reply to  LMS2

Ditto!

2
0
BurlingtonBertie
BurlingtonBertie
3 years ago
Reply to  Ossettian

Ouch! You must have used a ‘trigger’ word & upset the bots…

3
0
DanClarke
DanClarke
3 years ago

There comes a point, where things go too far, and the sheep will wake up properly, this could be it for the majority.

8
0
Julian
Julian
3 years ago
Reply to  DanClarke

If you’ve jabbed, why wouldn’t you have your kids jabbed? Most people I know who’ve been jabbed seem to believe it’s perfectly safe so I don’t think they’d have qualms about giving it to their kids.

17
-1
DanClarke
DanClarke
3 years ago
Reply to  Julian

Well, hopefully not, just read quite a few comments saying I’ve had the jab but stay away from my kids, that they are not in danger, time will tell

9
0
Julian
Julian
3 years ago
Reply to  DanClarke

Well if that’s the case then that’s a small piece of encouragement.

8
0
wendy
wendy
3 years ago
Reply to  Julian

Yes, I stumbled across a covid vaccine zealot Twitter thread the other day and was shocked at the people wanting to get their children vaccinated as they were so fearful for them. A lot of the talk was about kids contributing to variants, but if they don’t get sick, they won’t be infectious so won’t be passing on to others, so no variants.

I can hide away as I am retired but what will happen if schools put pressure on to have children vaccinated so they can attend school? Very hard for parents.

I don’t know how we here don’t feel this same fear of covid. I begin to feel it is me that is the odd one out. Being very sure I had covid in March 2019 I do not want a vaccine, and I don’t feel I am at any risk but 3 letters, 3 phone calls and 4 texts later I feel under so much pressure to be “a normal person” like all the other millions.

Last edited 3 years ago by wendy
13
0
Sandra Barwick
Sandra Barwick
3 years ago
Reply to  wendy

Stay strong. I long to get a phone call from them. They can phone me daily, the conversation will be cathartic for me.

9
0
Noumenon
Noumenon
3 years ago
Reply to  DanClarke

I don’t agree. I think the wake up stage will happen well after all the problems with the vaccines manifest even in kids. At first there will be an attempt to deny the problem and blame the victims. Only after substantial misery will it change.

25
0
J4mes
J4mes
3 years ago
Reply to  Noumenon

The eventual side-effects and deaths will most likely be blamed on another Chinese bioweapon. After all, the symptoms will be very similar to one another.

16
0
J4mes
J4mes
3 years ago
Reply to  J4mes

Should also add that this would lead them on to justify more jabs – a terrible vicious cycle.

12
0
LMS2
LMS2
3 years ago
Reply to  DanClarke

I doubt it.
Many believe children should be vaccinated.

5
0
scuzbert
scuzbert
3 years ago
Reply to  LMS2

My friend, a TA thinks the jab thing for kids should wait until there is a nasal spray. I hadn’t realised this but apparently the kids are all given a flu ‘spray’ every year, and she equates the experimental gene therapy with the conventional flu vaccine. Nothing will change her mind. She also believes all children are superspreaders, and for that reason alone is more than happy to have this happen to them.
She is a well-educated, middle class woman who, up to now I’ve always thought of as intelligent.

2
0
J4mes
J4mes
3 years ago
Reply to  DanClarke

I fully expect my sister will usher her son into the jab queue as soon as his age group comes up.

We’re dealing with a new global religion. People who never thought of themselves as being the “spiritual sort” never thought they’d find themselves bashing their faces with covid manuals in the streets while chanting stuff about staying safe. They really are experiencing something akin to psychosis.

19
0
Noumenon
Noumenon
3 years ago
Reply to  J4mes

More like myxomatosis…

3
0
DanClarke
DanClarke
3 years ago

They do NOT know the benefits, they do NOT know the negatives, this is a trial for many years
The Non Liability Clause must have helped their decision

Last edited 3 years ago by DanClarke
17
0
J4mes
J4mes
3 years ago

“We have carefully reviewed clinical trial data and swept it beneath a rug at an undisclosed location.” -Dr June Raine

18
0
nickbowes
nickbowes
3 years ago

If a group of illegal migrants to our shores can successfully sue our vile government for being placed in “inadequate” housing using taxpayers money through legal aid, no doubt costing millions, what is to stop a group of parents seeking human rights for their children not to be vaccinated by a novel gene therapy vaccine that doesn’t conclude it’s testing until 2023 and which has severe side effects including death?
This could affect millions of our children so surely legal aid could be considered.

16
0
TheyLiveAndWeLockdown
TheyLiveAndWeLockdown
3 years ago
Reply to  nickbowes

That doesn’t benefit the establishment through enhanced rents and subdued wages therefore it won’t be a “proper” entitlement.
Children are the state’s owners (that’s not you) future cattle, so you dont get to choose.

2
0
George L
George L
3 years ago

Lets remind ourselves of a little networking shall we..

tentacles.PNG
17
0
Trojan House
Trojan House
3 years ago

How can the benefits outweigh the risks when there is virtually no risk to kids under the age of 20 from Covid? I’m in Canada and the number of deaths under 20 is…wait for it…11. That’s in a year. The problem everyone is stuck on is this so-called “asymptomatic” transmission. I’m sure that is what they are weighing it against – kids giving it to their grandparents who do have way worse outcomes. That being said, there are studies showing that kids rarely, if at all, transmit the virus so really, there is no benefit to vaccinating kids against Covid.

15
0
Annie
Annie
3 years ago
Reply to  Trojan House

They very carefully didn’t say that the benefits to the children outweigh the risks.

15
0
imp66
imp66
3 years ago
Reply to  Trojan House

To quote Dr. John Lee: ” asymptomatic used to be called immune”.

8
0
PoshPanic
PoshPanic
3 years ago

If you haven’t done so already, get your sig on this letter…

https://twitter.com/UsforThemUK/status/1400802559741370372

3
0
Susan
Susan
3 years ago

“….vaccine deployment programme.” Does this not say it all?

11
0
AnnabelleG
AnnabelleG
3 years ago

This is Child Abuse – plain and simple — Why would and parent have this done to their child – It beggars belief

17
0
TheyLiveAndWeLockdown
TheyLiveAndWeLockdown
3 years ago
Reply to  AnnabelleG

We tolerated lockdown, our children were next.

10
0
crisisgarden
crisisgarden
3 years ago
Reply to  AnnabelleG

Fascinating how the vaccine has a pseudo religious subtext. It seems to pose the question “are you in or out?” It makes sense that parents who have joined the cult would want their children baptised into the new normal. We, as non-cult members, have a duty to protect children from their cult member parents just as much as from the state. The reckoning at the end of all this will be truly dreadful, but much worse for them than for us I think.

2
0
zners
zners
3 years ago

Theyre dialling up cases as we speak. Prepare for delay

11
0
yLivi.
yLivi.
3 years ago

“COVID Vaccine Injury Reports Among 12- to 17-Year-Olds More Than Triple in 1 Week, VAERS Data Show. This week’s data included 58 reports of serious adverse events in the 12- to -17-year-old age group.Youngest deaths reported include two 15-year-olds (VAERS I.D. 1187918 and 1242573 ) and a 16-year-old (VAERS I.D. 1225942).
Oh yeah, why not???

14
0
WeAllFallDown
WeAllFallDown
3 years ago

What worries me is that my (as yet unborn) grandchildren will suffer the effects of this. I don’t want my kids having babies with partners with mutant sperm and eggs. I have a friend who is actively hunting a sperm donor who hasn’t been jabbed because sperm and egg banks are reporting barren donors or unviable eggs being harvested from previously fertile and productive women.

Childlessness is already so heartbreaking. Miscarriages are incredibly distressing. You only have to look at the havoc being wreaked by long-life biocides, and forever plastics on the next generation. We don’t need this as well. So what will my kids do for partners? Will they be married to mutants, whilst getting pregnant by the “pure”. Are we heading for Handmaids Tale territory now?

21
-1
Sandra Barwick
Sandra Barwick
3 years ago
Reply to  WeAllFallDown

Are those reports from fertility clinics real? Do they check out?

2
0
Noumenon
Noumenon
3 years ago
Reply to  Sandra Barwick

Yes, is this since vaccination or as a result of generally falling fertility rates?

3
0
helenf
helenf
3 years ago
Reply to  WeAllFallDown

I’ve only just started watching The Handmaid’s Tale. What I previously dismissed as a ridiculous storyline, I now see as chillingly possible, at least some aspects, if extreme by current standards. Who would have thought 18 months ago that we would be living in this dystopian shitshow.

12
0
Health Seeker
Health Seeker
3 years ago
Reply to  helenf

And yet its author, Margaret Atwood, has been supportive of the dangerous deadly superspreading schools narrative being pushed by those who wanted to keep schools closed in Canada. An example of how someone can colourfully imagine how bad things could potentially become, yet not perceive how bad they are actually becoming when those making things bad are not perceived as the baddies.

0
0
crisisgarden
crisisgarden
3 years ago
Reply to  WeAllFallDown

Yes, and every other dystopian novel you can think of. Can’t help feeling we’re being set against each other; first the elites fund divisive protest movements, then society is set against each other like this i.e vaxxed vs unvaxxed. Divide and conquer a very time honoured strategy.

1
0
TheTartanEagle
TheTartanEagle
3 years ago

So what do we do? The government and its agencies are corrupt, the police are corrupt, the NHS is frankly evil, local councils corrupt, schools’ leadership incapable of independent thought, and the vast majority of the population easily manipulated and ignorant. Basically Britain has been undermined, invaded and taken over while we weren’t looking.

I want my country back, I want to know who runs this place, and I want restoration of honour, integrity and honesty at all levels of local and national government. I want the state out of every day family life. I don’t want to have to spend the rest of my life keeping my family sufficiently under the radar to avoid the worst of the insanity, it’s hard work and expensive.

72
0
charleyfarley
charleyfarley
3 years ago
Reply to  TheTartanEagle

Very well said. Only 4 upticks? I wanted to give you 4000.

10
0
crisisgarden
crisisgarden
3 years ago
Reply to  TheTartanEagle

We can issue anyone we know who is in authority and involved with this crime against humanity with a notice of liability. Templates available online. It’s free, it forces them to acknowledge their criminality and it might make them open their eyes. And when the reckoning finally comes, which it will, it makes them culpable and unable to argue that they weren’t aware of the harm they were doing.

1
0
redbirdpete
redbirdpete
3 years ago

We have a government that is prepared to kill children to avoid having its policies called into question. This is – I would argue – even worse than some of the notorious fascist governments in the past century.

38
0
nickbowes
nickbowes
3 years ago
Reply to  redbirdpete

i think we are f**** !.

16
0
crisisgarden
crisisgarden
3 years ago
Reply to  redbirdpete

They will end up in prison. We need to be sure of this. We’re talking about a handful of criminals and an organised crime ring. They’re not superheroes and they are also opportunistic fuckwits who are all heavily compromised. What will be harder will be what to do with the zealots who carried out the programme (medical staff, police, politicians etc). That’s why serving them with notices of liability are a good idea at this point.

1
0
Cane Corso
Cane Corso
3 years ago

Now, after we have realised that certain named people have killed many of our population, should we not kill them? I mean we just murder them in justice. Let’s name them now on this site.

7
-6
Sandra Barwick
Sandra Barwick
3 years ago
Reply to  Cane Corso

Er, unlawful. Criminal. We don’t do murder. They do.

8
-1
Ossettian
Ossettian
3 years ago
Reply to  Sandra Barwick

He’s probably a Lance Corporal in 77 Brigade.

13
0
helenf
helenf
3 years ago
Reply to  Ossettian

Yep, I don’t recognise the name

2
0
DanClarke
DanClarke
3 years ago

There must be a lot of people who think they will be among the chosen few, including their families, extended family, friends. They think they will not be touched by their compliance.

10
0
DanClarke
DanClarke
3 years ago

Why don’t the legal profession fight for a Liability Clause, they have families too.

8
0
epythymy
epythymy
3 years ago

You would think that as there have been precisely ZERO deaths in healthy children and more than zero deaths from the vaccine, this would wake up more members of the public. Sadly that doesn’t appear to be the case.

11
0
Mayo
Mayo
3 years ago

Not sure if anyone has mentioned this but Kate Silverton (BBC Newsreader no less **) has tweeted this:

My Question: How can we know it is ‘safe and effective’ for children when there is no long term safety data ? UK approves Pfizer jab for use in 12-15-year-olds

https://twitter.com/katesilverton/status/1400758391631384577

** At least I think she’s still with the BBC. I haven’t watched BBC News since about 2016.

Last edited 3 years ago by Mayo
16
0
Noumenon
Noumenon
3 years ago
Reply to  Mayo

A lot of sceptical replies to the comment on there which is encouraging. Some of the nay sayers sound like plants. Someone with username ‘Serena’ keeps putting repetitive replies accusing people of getting info from Facebook and not trusting experts. Not convincing at all in my opinion!

4
0
LePib
LePib
3 years ago

This was posted earlier by Katherine Huwig on the Understanding Covid Stats Page Ohio. I haven’t had much time to go in-depth into this yet (and would welcome thoughts) – but even the studies they’re discusising are… well there are no words. I can’t post the screenshot of the email in question but you can find it through the FOI release.

“Sometimes it’s in the empty spaces where most meaning sits. Most people have been slicing away at the whole and complete emails from Dr. Fauci’s email FOIA release. And, admittedly, some of those intact emails are highly satisfying to read.

But what is far more interesting are the pages of greyed out redactions. Consider pages 1567-1572 from his emails. They are of his correspondence with Dr. Kenneth Bergmann, Senior Medical Officer in the Division of Neurology in the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research at the FDA that took place between April 4th – April 15th, 2020.

At first glance, they are frustratingly empty, and completely redacted except for the exceptionally intriguing subject line of “a thought on selective vulnerability to SARS-CoV-2” – something we all want to know about! Why would it be redacted? How in the world does such an important discussion get redacted? What was his theory that Dr. Fauci thought enough of that he said he had considered it and to then forward on to his assistant to follow up on?!

Infuriating!!

BUT

Sometimes….Just sometimes….We get lucky. Someone doesn’t do their job quite perfectly, and some breadcrumbs slip through the cracks. Please see the attached image (on page 1570) where the redactor missed the names of the attached documents in the forwarded email that Dr. Bergmann was referring to.

Whoops!

So we have some names of documents – already the names are highly intriguing. But the documents themselves make even more staggering reading. Specifically the following two:
https://www.nejm.org/doi/pdf/10.1056/NEJMoa063842… and https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6077196/

I believe Dr. Bergmann’s argument was that young children fight off SARS-CoV-2 with extreme efficiency because of the dominance of natural killer cells (NK) of their innate immune systems. While the activation of the adaptive immune system in adults can lead to an inappropriate and extremely dangerous inflammatory cytokine storm when faced with a similar threat.

In other words, the NK cells of the innate immune system are highly effective, while man-made (monoclonal) antibodies can create a highly destructive inflammatory response.

Paging Dr. Vand3n Bøssche – I believe you are owed an apology.”

14
0
TheTartanEagle
TheTartanEagle
3 years ago
Reply to  LePib

So, does that also mean the last 70+ years of messing with infant immune systems is, at best, nugatory, and at worst damaging if not potentially deadly.

As one would expect, nature and evolution have ensured that the biological systems are designed to be effective, given the right support via nutrition, maternal transfer of immunity and adequate care. Tinker with them at your peril.

8
0
realarthurdent
realarthurdent
3 years ago

Corrupt from top to bottom.

6
0
Norman
Norman
3 years ago

Nearly all current cases are between 10 and 19, which is why the admissions and deaths are low. There is the motivation to vaccinate them.
It is interesting that in my local area, cases suddenly shot up. A friend tells me that a load of youngsters who drink in a local pub have all been pinged by track and trace and that could well account for the increase.

Last edited 3 years ago by For a fist full of roubles
4
0
Chicot
Chicot
3 years ago
Reply to  Norman

Who cares if young people are a “case” when they are not getting seriously ill? This is just a nonsense and an excuse to vaccinate everyone which has been the intention all along.

13
0
Trodaire
Trodaire
3 years ago

The MHRA quite obviously have not reviewed the data, see the latest breaking news from Canada:

Canadian immunologist Dr. Byram Bridle is a pro-vaccine scientist with a serious concern about the COVID-19 vaccines, and in an interview, said that new research shows “we made a big mistake” with the mRNA spike protein vaccines.
We didn’t realize it until now,” Bridle said. “We thought the spike protein was a great target antigen; we never knew the spike protein itself was a toxin and was a pathogenic protein. So, by vaccinating people we are inadvertently inoculating them with a toxin.”
It’s a toxin that can cause cardiovascular damage and infertility, he added.
As an associate professor on viral immunology at the University of Guelph, Bridle is not an outsider looking in: He was awarded a $230,000 government grant for research on COVID vaccine development. And, after looking at the data, he concluded that the spike protein does not just sit in the shoulder muscle where it’s injected, but travels to the body’s organs, including the liver, as well as the spleen, bone marrow, adrenal glands and in “quite high concentrations” in the ovaries.
Lab animals injected with the spike protein developed cardiovascular problems and “Now, we have clear-cut evidence that the vaccines that make the cells in our deltoid muscles manufacture this protein — that the vaccine itself, plus the protein — gets into blood circulation,” Bridle said. “What has been discovered by the scientific community is the spike protein on its own is almost entirely responsible for the damage to the cardiovascular system, if it gets into circulation.”
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sis1Sddzbqk
https://twitter.com/i/status/1398367017258962944

These people need to find themselves in court for breaking the Nuremberg code and crimes against humanity.

14
0
chaos
chaos
3 years ago

Lockdown Sceptics slowly morphing into mainstream media..

Looking more like and sounding more like the Torygraph each day..

There’ll be articles soon about how Michael Curzon or Toby Dung won’t have guests to dinner parties unless they are euthan.. I mean vaccinated.. and their babies are sterilise.. I mean vaccinated.

We even have the take a PCR test advert on the site for days now.

Last edited 3 years ago by chaos
4
0
sophie123
sophie123
3 years ago
Reply to  chaos

I’m ok with the test advert. I’m not going to get vaccinated until I am 85 or older at least, so if I have to travel, I’ll be needing a cheap PCR for the foreseeable. As pointless as it is….just being pragmatic.

3
-3
crisisgarden
crisisgarden
3 years ago
Reply to  sophie123

In my family not one of us has been tested, wore a mask, been track and traced, and certainly not ‘vaccinated’ . We’ve decided to forego travel until the leaders of this murderous death cult have been arrested and brought to justice! Their downfall is inevitable so it’s just a question of sitting it out.. realised early into the coup that I wouldn’t be travelling for a long time..

4
0
imp66
imp66
3 years ago

“It’s benefits outweigh the risks”! What risk are kids actually facing? Nada! What benefits? Protecting older people? Who have probably sold out to the government already and taken “the jab” anyway. This is purely totalitarian insanity.

7
0
wantok87
wantok87
3 years ago

Medicine is littered with good ideas and interventions which in the long term prove harmful. The epidemiologists and Public Heath along with SAGE are mainly Arts Graduates,Mathematicians or non practicing academics -grossly unsuited to making a decision to vaccinate a child with a background of their clinical experience.To demand or even suggest vaccination in Children who have no choice to refuse is Orwellian. Any parent must consider carefully as to how they would feel if their child developed a reaction. Would they accept it was just a coincidence or feel guilty. We asked children to sacrifice their freedom and education to “save granny” it is now up to the generations of Grannies to sacrifice their perceived risk by saving the children and stopping the Education Unions and Government promoting vaccination in Children.

10
0
Noumenon
Noumenon
3 years ago
Reply to  wantok87

I don’t think their educational background is relevant. Many leaders in the past were highly educated in the humanities and yet would have resisted this from the start.

2
0
Burlington
Burlington
3 years ago

“The benefits of this vaccine outweigh any risk,” said Dr June Raine. So who benefits from injecting children with an EXPERIMENTAL genetic therapy with no guarantee of efficacy, or long term safety. IMHO it certainly ain’t the children!

8
0
monica coyle
monica coyle
3 years ago

This is so evil it actually makes me feel sick. How can it be allowed? Unbelievable! It is screaming CHILD ABUSE

6
0
Newman20
Newman20
3 years ago

Fortunately, both my children are adults.

However, had they still been minors there is no way that I would consent to this Government and its scientific advisers practicing Nazi-style eugenics on them.

Vaccinating children is absolute nonsense, not to say criminal.

2
0

NEWSLETTER

View today’s newsletter

To receive our latest news in the form of a daily email, enter your details here:

DONATE

PODCAST

The Sceptic EP.37: David Frost on Starmer’s EU Surrender, James Price on Broken Britain and David Shipley on Lucy Connolly’s Failed Appeal

by Richard Eldred
23 May 2025
3

LISTED ARTICLES

  • Most Read
  • Most Commented
  • Editor’s Picks

Doctor Who Star Ncuti Gatwa “Axed” and BBC Show to be “Put on Pause” Amid Falling Ratings and Woke Storylines

23 May 2025
by Will Jones

News Round-Up

23 May 2025
by Richard Eldred

The Tweets Cited by the Judge to ‘Prove’ Lucy Connolly is “Racist” Do Nothing of the Sort

23 May 2025
by Laurie Wastell

Spanish Scientists “Were Experimenting with How Far They Could Push Renewable Energy” Before Countrywide Blackout

23 May 2025
by Will Jones

UK Welcomes South African Activist Who Chants About Killing White Farmers But Excludes French Philosopher Concerned About Demographic Change

22 May 2025
by C.J. Strachan

The Tweets Cited by the Judge to ‘Prove’ Lucy Connolly is “Racist” Do Nothing of the Sort

39

Doctor Who Star Ncuti Gatwa “Axed” and BBC Show to be “Put on Pause” Amid Falling Ratings and Woke Storylines

25

News Round-Up

25

Trump Slaps 50% Tariffs on EU – as He Tells Starmer to Get Drilling for Oil

24

We Were Too Polite to Stop the Woke Takeover

20

We Were Too Polite to Stop the Woke Takeover

23 May 2025
by Mary Gilleece

The Tweets Cited by the Judge to ‘Prove’ Lucy Connolly is “Racist” Do Nothing of the Sort

23 May 2025
by Laurie Wastell

Starmer Has No Intention of Cutting Immigration

22 May 2025
by Joe Baron

UK Welcomes South African Activist Who Chants About Killing White Farmers But Excludes French Philosopher Concerned About Demographic Change

22 May 2025
by C.J. Strachan

The BBC’s Mark Poynting Shows How to Spread Climate Alarm

22 May 2025
by Chris Morrison

POSTS BY DATE

May 2022
M T W T F S S
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031  
« Apr   Jun »

SOCIAL LINKS

Free Speech Union

NEWSLETTER

View today’s newsletter

To receive our latest news in the form of a daily email, enter your details here:

POSTS BY DATE

May 2022
M T W T F S S
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031  
« Apr   Jun »

DONATE

LISTED ARTICLES

  • Most Read
  • Most Commented
  • Editor’s Picks

Doctor Who Star Ncuti Gatwa “Axed” and BBC Show to be “Put on Pause” Amid Falling Ratings and Woke Storylines

23 May 2025
by Will Jones

News Round-Up

23 May 2025
by Richard Eldred

The Tweets Cited by the Judge to ‘Prove’ Lucy Connolly is “Racist” Do Nothing of the Sort

23 May 2025
by Laurie Wastell

Spanish Scientists “Were Experimenting with How Far They Could Push Renewable Energy” Before Countrywide Blackout

23 May 2025
by Will Jones

UK Welcomes South African Activist Who Chants About Killing White Farmers But Excludes French Philosopher Concerned About Demographic Change

22 May 2025
by C.J. Strachan

The Tweets Cited by the Judge to ‘Prove’ Lucy Connolly is “Racist” Do Nothing of the Sort

39

Doctor Who Star Ncuti Gatwa “Axed” and BBC Show to be “Put on Pause” Amid Falling Ratings and Woke Storylines

25

News Round-Up

25

Trump Slaps 50% Tariffs on EU – as He Tells Starmer to Get Drilling for Oil

24

We Were Too Polite to Stop the Woke Takeover

20

We Were Too Polite to Stop the Woke Takeover

23 May 2025
by Mary Gilleece

The Tweets Cited by the Judge to ‘Prove’ Lucy Connolly is “Racist” Do Nothing of the Sort

23 May 2025
by Laurie Wastell

Starmer Has No Intention of Cutting Immigration

22 May 2025
by Joe Baron

UK Welcomes South African Activist Who Chants About Killing White Farmers But Excludes French Philosopher Concerned About Demographic Change

22 May 2025
by C.J. Strachan

The BBC’s Mark Poynting Shows How to Spread Climate Alarm

22 May 2025
by Chris Morrison

SOCIAL LINKS

Free Speech Union
  • Home
  • About us
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy

Facebook

  • X

Instagram

RSS

Subscribe to our newsletter

© Skeptics Ltd.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password? Sign Up

Create New Account!

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • Articles
  • About
  • Archive
    • ARCHIVE
    • NEWS ROUND-UPS
  • Podcasts
  • Newsletter
  • Premium
  • Donate
  • Log In

© Skeptics Ltd.

wpDiscuz
You are going to send email to

Move Comment
Perfecty
Do you wish to receive notifications of new articles?
Notifications preferences