Premium

The Problem With UK Immigration Statistics

Statistics on the composition of the population are much more meaningful than those on the level of immigration per se. Unfortunately, we only get decent estimates of the composition every ten years.

3 min read
Subscribe to Listen

When people discuss the level of immigration into Britain, they almost invariably refer to the Office for National Statistics’ estimates of long-term international migration — that is, the number of people entering the country in a given year for a period of at least 12 months.

These figures clearly show the infamous Boriswave, where immigration rose massively from an already high level of 800,000 in mid 2021 to over 1.4 million by mid 2023. Immigration then assumed a downward trajectory, justifying the term ‘wave’. (It remains in the hundreds of thousands.)

There are two main reasons why discussion focusses so heavily on the long-term international migration figures. The first is obvious: these are the best measures of what people are actually discussing, namely immigration. A second reason is that they are published regularly (twice per year).

However, there are several problems with relying on the long-term international migration figures.

They are flows, rather than stocks, which many people find unintuitive. What you perceive as a member of the population is the stock of immigrants. You don’t really perceive the flow, unless you happen to work for Border Force.

What’s more, people concerned about immigration are not equally concerned about all types of immigration. Unsurprisingly, immigrants from countries like Canada, Australia and the US are far more popular than those from countries like Turkey, Nigeria and Pakistan. Hence immigration of 100,000 Australians would be far less concerning to most people than, say, immigration of 100,000

Keep reading –
Donate £5 monthly
(first month £1 for new subscribers)
or £50 annually

Subscribe today to get unlimited online access, as well as our Premium newsletters and podcasts.

  • Read paywalled articles
  • Comment below the line and connect with other users
  • Watch and listen to the longer Premium version of our weekly podcast
  • Listen to every article
  • Receive Premium version of our daily newsletter
DONATE NOW

Comments

This week across the site:

Email me alerts for this discussion
Notify of

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to the Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

11 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
JayGeeCee
JayGeeCee
13 days ago

And there was me thinking that every time I entered and left the country my movement was recorded on a database.
Why can’t they include ethnicity in the Border Force data and use that? After they have established an accurate population statistics.

sharon
sharon
14 days ago

As I was reading this, I was thinking, ‘that’s assuming all migrants fill in surveys or Census forms’… illegals won’t!

You only have to look along the street or listen to voices speaking in foreign languages to know there are ever more people from abroad! And certainly that has risen since the lockdowns! ie The Boris Wave!

Angelcake
Angelcake
14 days ago

Estimates of total population are available using supermarket, sewage data etc. As you know, Brits are largely law abiding and can be more accurately estimated. Subtract one from the other and you know roughly the numbers of foreigners here. I bet the Government do know this figure but will not publish their estimates.

Jack the dog
Jack the dog
14 days ago

A good proxy for the immigrant population is knife crime, rape and average size of rats.

JXB
JXB
15 days ago

Net immigration = the great lie. Net immigration is down they say. What they don’t say is it is down because the number of people leaving has increased to get away from inward migrants.

EppingBlogger
EppingBlogger
15 days ago

As FerdIII points out, the data is hopelessly unreliable.

It seems to me almost all official data is from estimates rather than produced as a by-product of administrative systems. If visas were accurately recorded and Border Force (sic) was to carry out its job properly we could know every week how many had arrived or left and on what basis they had entered the country.

In business I have never sampled files in order to complete Financial Statements, management information or government returns but instead turned to the data: accounting, contract or policy records, staff payrolls. I did not go round counting warm chair seats at 5:30 to ascertain how many employees we had not did I count the footfall at the main entrance because the payroll data was up to date and accurate.

And now again to the Border Force but why must we call such a weak organisation by such a name even as the police have been downgraded to a service. Their systems should record each arrival through passport control and illegal entries identified should be added. Each departure should be recorded using the passport number and if they are non-Brits their reason for arrival should be… Read more »

FerdIII
FerdIII
15 days ago

The Government has no clue. No systems track entry or exit.

3 million visas issued per annum, 250K non-Visa holders entitled to stay 6 months.

Visa fraud and overstaying is unknown.

They don’t know how many invaders/immgrants enter this country + the obvious channel boats invasion.

Any reasonable assessment would say that 400 K leave this country, over a million enter – few of them white, 250K probably overstay their visa.

We could be viewing a 800K negative swing in this country’s demographic every year x 15 years – the Boriswave is a spike but hardly unique.

Real pop in the UK is 81 million. Not 67 million. That means the White pop is no more than 2/3.

transmissionofflame
transmissionofflame
15 days ago
Reply to  FerdIII

You could probably get all the CCTV cameras to scan for whites v non whites and with a big enough sample size across the country the proportions would be fairly accurate

For a fist full of roubles
For a fist full of roubles
15 days ago

Not many CCTV cameras in rural locations, unless the STASI, sorry I mean our benificent government, legislate for all doorbell camera footage to be made available to them.

transmissionofflame
transmissionofflame
15 days ago

There are probably more than we notice, certainly some pointed at roads

Jack the dog
Jack the dog
14 days ago

They’ll be putting them in pubs, looking for labradors…

Thank you for reading. Please help us keep the Daily Sceptic going by becoming a donor.