Woody Harrelson has signed an open letter to Andy Burnham calling for an inquiry into the Covid vaccines amid concerns that the full impact of side-effects is not being acknowledged. The Telegraph has the story.
The American actor, who starred in Cheers and No Country for Old Men, joined scientists, campaigners and Pat Cash, the former Wimbledon champion, in asking the Prime Minister to reexamine the effectiveness and safety of the jab.
Studies have estimated that some 450,000 lives may have been saved by the Covid vaccine rollout in Britain, but more than 22,000 people have applied to the government’s vaccine damage payment scheme (VDPS), believing they or loved ones were injured by the injections.
Recent figures show the Government has paid out nearly £30 million to 249 people under the VDPS and vaccines now carry warnings of rare, dangerous side-effects.
The signatories have urged Burnham to suspend Covid vaccinations until an “independent examination” has been carried out.
“The Covid years divided families, communities, doctors and politicians,” Harrelson and others write. “Continuing to fight the same political battles will not heal those divisions.
“Finding out what happened might. You have an opportunity, at the beginning of your premiership, to approach this differently. We are not asking you to prejudge the evidence.
“We are asking you to open the door to its independent examination. If the concerns we and others have raised prove unfounded, a rigorous investigation should establish that. If they are justified, the public deserves to know. Either way, transparency is the only sustainable route to restoring trust.”
The Covid vaccines were developed in record time, with trials and analysis conducted in a few months when the process normally takes several years.
Experts insist that no corners were cut and that trials proved the vaccines were safe and effective, a finding that was then mirrored by real-world results that showed deaths plummeting after the roll-out.
Yet the jabs also triggered rare heart and clotting conditions. More than 2,000 people in Britain suffered myocarditis, inflammation of the heart, or pericarditis, heart lining, following vaccination, with young men particularly vulnerable.
Last year, Stanford University found that Covid mRNA vaccines, such as the Pfizer jab, could cause heart damage by triggering immune cells to go on the attack.
Scientists have been excited about mRNA vaccines because they can be altered rapidly to keep up with new or mutating diseases, simply by altering the blueprint they carry.
They instruct cells to make a part of the pathogen, but in rare cases, they can cause an overreaction from parts of the immune system, which search for foreign DNA or RNA, and typically come from viruses.
But they may also trigger a burst of immune cells called cytokines, which help sticky plaques of fat, cholesterol and calcium to build up in the arteries, which can cause blockages. …
Other signatories include Dr John Flack, the former senior vice-president for drug discovery at SmithKline Beecham; Dr Henry Goodall, former president of the Society of Occupational Medicine; John Vincent, the co-founder of the restaurant chain Leon; and Peter Fleming, the sports commentator.
Worth reading in full and read the letter in full here.
Discussion
Comments
This week across the site:
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to the Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
“…by real-world results that showed deaths plummeting after the roll-out.”
Firstly, any plummeting was pr9bably a result of herd immunity and the milder (released?) Omicron version and secondly 3xcess deaths rose after release of the gene therapy.
But then I’m preaching to the converted here 🙂
I remember being a bit shocked listening to this podcast. Rachel Johnson’s Difficult Women Podcast: On her own flagship LBC podcast, Rachel Johnson’s Difficult Women, she hosted Kate Bingham, the former Chair of the UK Vaccine Taskforce. In this episode, they extensively discussed the massive logistical undertaking of procuring and delivering the UK’s COVID-19 vaccine portfolio. [1, 2]
I imagine the logistics of executing a nationwide scam do have their challenges.
Covid-19 was the greatest hoax ever perpetrated on the world. We will NEVER forgive or forget. Meanwhile, seasonal flu disappeared. 😂
Net Zero is shaping up to being a worse, long running hoax.
Yes, that up there with ‘The man from Whitehall knows best’
Let’s suppose Burnham agrees to another inquiry, which then finds that the concerns of the many doctors and other professionals who signed the long submission (who include me) were correct. Where does that leave Hallett module 4? In ruins. It would acknowledge that Hallett was a frightful waste of money. Would Burnham’s advisers let that happen? Let’s see.
450k lives saved?
Foxtrot Oscar.
Oh and the idea that they were thoroughly tested with no short cuts, and proven safe, well i’s a blatant lie as we have known from the start.
On the one hand it was Operation Warp Speed. On the other hand, perfectly well tested, no short cuts.
They don’t even need to be consistent in their messaging to bamboozle the poor, dumb masses.
“Experts insist that no corners were cut and that trials proved the vaccines were safe and effective.”
Apart from it never being tested against transmission. By Pfizer’s own admission. Which is kind of fucking key.
….deaths plummeting after the roll-out.…but they might have done so without it, or even more so? It may be that our automatic immune systems are even more safe and effective than some junk in the market, after all.
Well it is funny how often the ‘vaccinated’ keep getting covid…
A good example of how fake reality is manufactured in the modern world.
Step 1: decide what you would like to be true.
Step 2: conduct studies misusing scientific techniques and misrepresenting results to produce bogus evidence.
Step 3: deploy the full force of the establishment media to repeat the evidence until everyone is fully programmed to believe it.
No one regrets not taking it.
We know what happened. We don’t need any more investigations. The evidence is in general publicly available. Any more interesting evidence – for example knowingly covering up known side effects – will have been long since destroyed. A lot of people probably know all of this already and don’t want to be reminded of it. What we need are criminal investigations- but that would have to be done by the state, and the state was in on it.
Agreed. We’ve had a real life experiment, after all, so need for another bureaucratic exercise.
I scarcely know how to react to this. Obviously if there were any prospect of the British Government wanting to expose the truth about the ‘vaccines’ I would be all for it. But I can’t see any point in lobbying for an investigation. Burnham has more than enough problems that he hasn’t a clue how to alleviate, let alone solve. He’s not going to want to open that can of worms. Neither is anybody he’s likely to listen to nor, for that matter, anybody who can put pressure on him.
Football Shirt Boy is too stupid to understand what this means and would certainly avoid anything that requires him to actually make a decision.
It’s pointless launching an investigation into the vaccines before a thorough investigation of the existence of the virus. If there’s zero direct scientific evidence of its existence, coupled with failed contagion studies, the only conclusion is that there was no virus to begin with.
100%. Flying dead RNA…..yeah. So much ‘Science’. From the bat to the pangolin to Wuhu boy who had a snack at the non-existent ‘wet market’….
I’m absolutely 100% convinced covid exists, just as lots other viruses exist, and in 2020 and possibly 2021 before a lot of people had built up natural immunity it was worse for frail elderly people than normal winter respiratory viruses. Covid was probably pretty similar in terms of transmissability and infection fatality rate to Asian and Hongkong flu in the 1950’s and 1960’s. Obviously the government got it right with these outbreaks and the message was keep calm and carry on. Some focused protection from covid for the very elderly would probably of been a good idea but it would need to of been voluntary. A lot of care home residents who new they were approaching the end of their life may well of chosen to keep having face to face contact with loved ones even though there was some risk involved rather than having a miserable last 6 months of their life.
Absolutely.
I had Covid and it laid me low for over a week and I do not know what would have happened had I not cured it with Ivermectin horse dewormer and therefore anyone who claims it did not exist is a moron. Dr Campbell explained that Covid in some people caused a citokine storm that could prove fatal. Ivermectin shuts down the citokine receptors. From being really ill I was fine in less than 24hours after taking Ivermectin, and even I was stunned as to how effective it was as well as kicking myself for not dosing myself earlier.
Obviously Ivermectin should of been approved as a treatment as soon as doctors who were prepared to put their patients first rather than following the rules showed it was safe and effective. The “problem” with Ivermectin is that any company can manufacture it, the person who discovered it made sure this is the case, and it’s dirt cheap. This means big pharma doesn’t want it to be widely used so they can make loads of money from patented drugs/”vaccines”.
There’s various studies that show that in mice Ivermectin, possibly in combination with other drugs, can reduce the chances of certain types of tumours developing and/or slow the rate at which they grow. Will it ever be licensed as an anti-cancer drug or will big pharma prevent this from happening, possibly by conducting fundamentally flawed tests, as they did with Ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine for treating covid, to ensure they can keep selling far more expensive drugs.
Beyond roughly summer 2020 nothing more was really heard about hydroxychloroquine as a treatment for covid. Imo this is at least partly because it was fairly effective and initially it was the best known treatment but it was then discovered that Ivermectin was more effective.
It isn’t dirt cheap. I’ve looked online a few times in the past few years, and for a drug that used to be pennies per tablet, it is now hugely expensive. Pure profiteering from the demand of people who want to take it for the reasons you describe.
As soon as politicians demonised it, demand for Ivermectin shot up, as did the price. The price has stayed up (unless you can recommend where I look?)
It’s still a lot cheaper than a lot of drugs especially some anti-cancer drugs.
I’m guessing Ivermectin is Ivermectin whether it’s sold for humans, is it possible to buy it in human form in the UK without a prescription? or pets.
Treatments for parasites in birds contain Ivermectin. A 5ml bottle that contains 0.35% Ivermectin costs £20 from Amazon. I’ve no idea how many doses this would be for a human, the amount of Ivermectin you need might depend on what you were treating with it. There might be other pet medication that contains Ivermectin such as Beaphar for small animals.
Obviously you take pet medication at your own risk. In spring 2020 it was claimed that someone in the US died after taking medication sold for tropical fish that contained hydroxychloroquine to try and cure covid. Did this actually happen or was it made up to try and stop people curing themselves rather than waiting to be jabbed?
Indiamart
It looks really cheap even though postage will be a lot. Are they trustworthy and actually send what you order?
Oh, so you had seasonal flu? Got it 👍
“Studies have estimated that some 450,000 lives may have been saved by the Covid vaccine”. Modelling, it was modelling, about scenarios, possibilities and what might have happened in certain scenarios. No actual data was involved, and they cannot point to even one actual life saved. On the other hand the injuries and deaths are real.
The reality is that there is literally zero evidence that those monstrous jabs saved a single life. Not even one.
Actually there is good reason to believe they might not have helped anyone, given that, based on their own data, some people with jabs still went on to die of covid. Or “with” covid.
Did anyone ever hear of someone dying “with” polio after a polio vaccine? Or of tetanus, or of small pox.
Those who can’t smell the bullshit have just lost their sense of smell.
I believe the Polio vaccine has caused Polio in some people. I don’t have a reference to share though.
No vaccine is absolutely 100% safe and effective. I’m convinced that the risk of having some vaccines is orders of magnitude lower than not having them. Obviously this doesn’t apply to the covid jabs and probably some other jabs that have been introduced in the last 15 or so years.
For example I’m now old enough to have a flu jab every winter but don’t because on the balance of probabilities I think the risk is likely to outweigh the benefits. However if I booked a holiday abroad I’d have a lot of the recommended vaccines such as hepatitis A and yellow fever, this is mandatory to be allowed into some countries.
One thing is a vaccine that isn’t 100% effective. A whole different thing is a jab that doesn’t stop infection in anyone.
Every single person I know that got that jab went on to get ill at sone point and test positive for the disease.
It’s as you say, like the flu jab, where the claim is that it reduces the intensity of the disease.
My question is, how exactly can they prove that assertion?
The weakened live virus caused polio in fewer than 1% of recipients, ( Vaccine Associated Paralytic Polio, VAPP ), due to the use of a weakened live virus, and for this reason, Inactivated Polio Virus ( IPV ) is now used in order to eliminate this possibility.
Modelling from Imperial college…. say no more.
Yes, it’s a shame when places which used to be centres of excellence, such as IC and of course Cambridge University, become the opposite.
I’m not sure whether Burnham was a Cheers fan, and celebrity involvement is usually welcome only when endorsing the official line, which was and is ‘safe and effective’.
(But only because those words, like many others have been bastardised out of recognition).
Yes, and five years on, the ironically named Healthcare Professionals are still administering the death jabs and still calling them safe and effective
DT is happy to continue the deception that “vaccines” saved lives. Also to perpetuate the myth that side effects from the “vaccines” are rare.
Until and unless a Prime minister is prepared to face down all those with careers and reputations at risk as well as those who would become exposed to claims for damages, no real progress will be made.
I wonder if anyone in the know really had the jabs themselves.
150.000 dead after the 3 major stab programmes. For the data-challenged this is fully available on many sites and from ONS data.
50.000 murdered during the lockdowns.
There was no virus. They don’t exist.
Bio agents and Fascist Governance by contrast, do exist.
The stabs didn’t save 1 god damn person.
I’m guessing 150,000 dead from the jabs and 50,000 dead from the effects of lockdowns are mostly based on the number of excess deaths since the lockdowns and jabs.
It used to be easy to see the number of excess deaths each month in the ONS data because they used a simple way of calculating them i.e. the total number of deaths in any given month compared with the average for that month during the previous 5 years.
The fact that there were loads of excess deaths every month was inconvenient for the government so the ONS came up with a very complicated formula for calculating excess deaths, applied it retrospectively and it now looks like there’s been very few if any excess deaths.
The only way to see the truth is to look up the figures for the total number of deaths in a month for the last 6 years and apply the basic formula the ONS used to use.
No doubt there’s sites that do this but I don’t know of them. Therefore I’ve no idea if a lot of people are still dying from jabs they had in 2021 or if the chances of dying… Read more »