The Covid Inquiry has been accused by doctors and medical professionals of suppressing evidence that calls into question the ethics of the vaccine rollout, with key contributions disappearing into a “black hole”. The Telegraph has the story.
Doctors and medical professionals who were asked to submit evidence have criticised the inquiry for failing to publish their witness statements on the jabs rollout during the virus crisis, claiming that their contributions simply disappeared into a “black hole” instead.
They had told the inquiry that there was “never any justification for authorising or recommending the use in healthy children of novel technology gene-based vaccines with no long-term safety data”.
However, these statements were not included in the Module 4 report into vaccines, prompting accusations that the inquiry is “completely closing its eyes to the inconvenient narratives”.
The Telegraph previously reported how the inquiry came under criticism for justifying the Government’s covert monitoring of lockdown critics as “lawful, necessary and proportionate”.
Dr Ros Jones, convenor of the Children’s Covid Vaccines Advisory Council, a group of health professionals and scientists who challenged the government over the vaccine rollout for children, was among those invited to give evidence.
She wrote in her witness statement that there was “never any justification for authorising or recommending the use in healthy children of novel technology gene-based vaccines with no long-term safety data”.
“To give such vaccines to children for the possible protection of vulnerable adults is a clear breach of our ethical duty,” she had argued.
However, her evidence was not referred to, nor was it published alongside the Module 4 report into vaccines.
Speaking to the Telegraph, Dr Jones claimed: “I think they asked us as a way to shut us up – I don’t think they really wanted to hear from anyone who had a different view.
“They just do not want the public to realise there is a body of knowledge and experienced senior professionals in the UK and countries across the world who have major questions about the safety of the whole technology.”
Dr Jones claimed the inquiry told her that it only publishes witness statements and documents “if they are formally adduced during the hearings and/or when the Chair is preparing her report”, adding: “Your witness statement does not form part of the adduced material and will not therefore be published.”
Dr Elizabeth Evans, Chief Executive of the UK Medical Freedom Alliance which campaigns for medical ethics and informed consent, also submitted evidence after receiving requests.
But she claimed that her witness statement, which raised ethical questions about the vaccine rollout, had disappeared into a “black hole”.
The inquiry has previously been threatened with legal action amid claims it is biased in favour of lockdowns and has a “predetermined view” of Britain’s pandemic response.
UsForThem, a children’s rights campaign group, wrote to the inquiry to demand that it alter its scope to ensure that harms caused by lockdowns are properly examined and that consideration is given to state censorship by the government’s disinformation unit.
Molly Kingsley, co-chairman of UsForThem, said: “I don’t think it looks good to suppress issues around vaccines, especially given the level of public distrust following the pandemic.
“You have to allow for a range of views – masking them and shrouding them in further secrecy is only going to increase mistrust. The inquiry is completely closing its eyes to the inconvenient narratives. It has been one-sided and wilfully blind from the outset.”
Worth reading in full.
Discussion
Comments
This week across the site:
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to the Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
The direction and probable conclusions of the enquiry were obvious from the very beginning. On day one it was requested that all attendees should wear a mask.
I have already had the same experience as Ros and have written about it too. See The Covid Inquiry Has Failed to Ask the Most Basic Question: Why Were People Dying? – The Daily Sceptic. After learning my Inquiry submission would not be put on the website – because I had not been called in person – I objected on the grounds that such a decision flew in the face of transparency. I was told it had been assessed by a “team” but that they could not possibly publish everything they received because there was too much. Not, however, a problem for the Epstein files release!. I demanded to know who the team members were so I could decide whether they were competent to assess it and was told I could not have that information. In passing note that Inquiries are not covered by the Freedom of Information Act, under which my complaint was submitted.
So we have yet another example of an informed, scientifically based submission being hidden from view. Mine is now online, but the Inquiry process is corrupt. If you look at the witness lists for module 4 there is not a single clinician on them. Quite… Read more »
The “Inquiry” is a blatant exercise in exonerating the Establishment.
They broke the Nuremberg Code; cancelled our Civil and Human Rights over a virus they KNEW would have very low mortality rates and presided over the worst tyranny in our history.
And they want the power to do it all again, when it suits them.
The enquiry cannot find any issues with MRNA. It would go against the “safe and effective” narrative. And limit it’s use for the next plandemic.
Yet amazingly our American cousins have found some very big problems with MRNA. Never mind that can be ‘solved’ by closing down all alternative sources of information to the people and two tier jabs, one safe for the top types and one not so safe for everyone else.
So, who is, or has had, his/her arm twisted?
And by whom?
Names please.
Scam pandemic followed by scam inquiry. And repeat…..
Even this is obfuscation. There is never any justification for authorising or recommending a novel medical product – in this case, little more than a poison – with only short-term safety data for anyone. There is not a single person that should have been injected with the muck. The fact that they did it to our children only highlights the evil that drives the machine.
Indeed, and the short term safety and efficacy data were both fiddled, the long term data never collected and the alternative treatments were aggressively suppressed.
All coincidence and cockup of course.
Coordinated cockup and plancidence across the G20….same plans, same messaging, same words, same propaganda = random chance and hard working guys just making mistakes….
If people are noticing this, it means that the “vaccines” didn’t kill the right people.
The purpose of an Inquiry is to hide the truth and to protect the guilty.
I think we all know that by now.
Lucy Letby is in jail for the same purpose.
Sadly, we can’t expect the truth to emerge from this country’s administrative machinery for many years yet. Probably not before all of the guilty parties are at least safely drawing their taxpayer-funded, index-linked, pensions.
They have an awful lot to cover up… may the dam burst in my lifetime!
So instead of a full and frank enquiry, we have a partial and partisan one. What a surprise!
Just another Warren Commission. Dulles former CIA Director who had Kennedy murdered, chaired a group who all benefitted from the assassination and political realignment. The magic bullet as truth.
This is no different. Their only conclusion published during minute 1 of day one from this £200 mn clown show was; ‘we weren’t medical nazi fast or hard enough, we won’t make the same mistakes when the next fake scariant arrives’.
Don’t worry… Lessons Will Be Learned™️.