News Round-Up

A summary of the most interesting stories in the past 24 hours that challenge the prevailing orthodoxy about the ‘climate emergency’, public health ‘crises’ and the supposed moral defects of Western civilisation.

5 min read

If you have any tips for inclusion in the round-up, email us here.

Comments

This week across the site:

Email me alerts for this discussion
Notify of

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to the Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

28 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
huxleypiggles
huxleypiggles
3 months ago

Ref Tommy Robinson…

“The far-Right activist was held by police at Heathrow Airport at the weekend under counter-terror laws before being released, reveals the Mail.”

Thanks Toby. Give it a bloody rest will you and change your tune. Tommy has done more to wake people up than ever you will achieve.

Disgraceful but I suppose you have to keep in with the establishment.

transmissionofflame
transmissionofflame
3 months ago
Reply to  huxleypiggles

Yes agree that use of term “far right” is poor.

Heretic
Heretic
3 months ago

“Churchill deliberately starved Indians, says National Portrait Gallery display”

Some excellent comments from the public on this:

—” Makes it sound like we were buried in a glut of foodstuffs, while there was rationing! It continued for some foods into the 1950s, vast numbers of Merchant Seamen died in sub attacks on convoys carrying supplies to the UK. The war was still happening, Liberty ships were sinking due to metal fatigue (not understood at the time) so exactly where was the food supposed to come from and how were we supposed to get it to India? The Germans were at that time starving the French, Dutch, Belgians, Russian prisoners, Ukrainians, Romanys, Jews, Russians and anybody else they felt like, oh, and not forgetting loads of Germans on the home front. Stalin had and was starving the Russians (by the million) and as for the Japanese, well enough said. My mother had the job of killing the family’s chickens as keeping your own meant they weren’t rationed, likewise the apples, potatoes etc. grown in my grandmother’s garden.”

—” If the National Portrait Gallery is really saying that, then it is a National Disgrace because that claim is UTTER rubbish. It TRULY… Read more »

Heretic
Heretic
3 months ago
Reply to  Heretic

Whoever approved this outrageously false display at the National Gallery should be SACKED.

EppingBlogger
EppingBlogger
3 months ago

The media is reporting that facial recognition will enable social media companies to determine the age of a prospective viewer. If that were so, how is it the Home Office cannot tell the difference between a mid to late 20s illegal immigrant and the teenager he claims to be.

Lockdown Sceptic
Lockdown Sceptic
3 months ago

If Churchill “deliberately starved millions of Indians” so did Clement Atlee, the deputy prime minister.

Lockdown Sceptic
Lockdown Sceptic
3 months ago

To sum up the above, the nation is being run by traitors from top to bottom.

huxleypiggles
huxleypiggles
3 months ago

Seconded 👍

GunnerBill
GunnerBill
3 months ago
Reply to  huxleypiggles

15thd.

Monro
Monro
3 months ago

UK seizure of Russian shadow fleet vessel ‘just the beginning ‘– Royal Marines are poised to take further action after commandos boarded an oil tanker in the English Channel, prompting six other ships approaching British waters to turn back’

Errr…does that mean deterrence actually works?
Clue: Yes
So, having established that…

Starmer: no more money for defence ‘– Sir Keir Starmer will not commit any further funds to the military’. Our PM decides that rebuilding our conventional deterrent comes in at mission oriented objective No 563, five hundred and sixty two places exactly below gerrymandering…

‘In an interview with the BBC, Keir Starmer said defence would be his ‘number one priority‘………..in the next spending review.’ And ‘Russia could attack a NATO country within four years according to western intelligence assessments, UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer warned’

Spending Review 2025…sets departmental budgets for day‑to‑day spending until 2028‑29, and until 2029‑30 for capital investment

Let me think…2026 plus four….2030…..so the next spending review 2027 will set budgets for 2030 and after….and Int. briefings indicate that Russia will attack NATO, the Baltic States actually in 2030….hmmm…..that bloke was right…We’re completely fecked….

huxleypiggles
huxleypiggles
3 months ago
Reply to  Monro

Russia, or at least Russia under Putin is not going to attack NATO or the EU although a couple of long range missiles lobbed into Brussels wouldn’t go amiss.

Monro
Monro
3 months ago
Reply to  Monro

The only true victory is deterrence.

‘Satellite images show that Russia is currently building and expanding military bases along the border to Finland, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, and Poland. A former high-ranking insider in the Russian ministry of defense has told the Danish broadcasting corporation, DR, that Russia has prepared for a war against Europe for several years and that an attack in the vicinity of Denmark within a year, especially the Suwalki corridor, would be realistic. He also claims that there is no resistance to opening a new front among Putin’s top officials. Furthermore, Russia is upgrading brigades to divisions and rearranging military districts in the north-east which indicates preparations for war.’

‘…much of Russia’s nuclear arsenal was located on the Kola peninsula, a short distance from the Norwegian border, including nuclear submarines, land-based missiles and nuclear-capable aircraft…it’s still an option for Russia to do that in order to make sure that their nuclear capabilities, their second strike capabilities, are protected. That’s sort of the scenario in the high north that we plan for’

jeepybee
jeepybee
3 months ago

‘Gender gap’ threat to electric car sales?

Let me guess, they’ll bend over backwards to cut prices specifically for women. God forbid they do a little bit of research if they think that it’s an issue for them! 😂

Mogwai
Mogwai
3 months ago

It’s doom-monger Pete North, with his usual pessimistic outlook and dreary forecast. He’s hypercritical of all political contenders and comes across to me like a man who’s devoid of optimism and all out of hope. I can’t relate to people with this attitude, though he does make some astute observations and good points along with it.
Ultimately, though, nobody’s going to change anything by just chronically complaining online, taking no action on their part, because they’ve essentially given up;

”In my view, the era of stable government is over for the foreseeable future.
This has been my settled view for some time now. What’s changed, though, is that I don’t feel quite the same animosity towards Reform for its abject incompetence. I’ve reached the conclusion that fixing this mess would be far beyond the abilities of a competent elite (if such a thing even existed).
What seems more likely is a state of low grade civil war which loosely follows recent patterns in Belfast, where migrants will be encouraged to leave by the natives, using shall we say, unsanctioned methods.
There won’t be much that an overstretched and demoralised police force can do about it. While the state will clamp… Read more »

Rose Madder
Rose Madder
3 months ago
Reply to  Mogwai

His dad is a good read and one of the original climate skeptics. Booker and North, Scared to Death chapter 14 Saving the Planet – Global warming the new secular religion. 2007.

huxleypiggles
huxleypiggles
3 months ago
Reply to  Mogwai

As I have posted many, many times…

Our salvation will not arrive via the ballot box.

Mogwai
Mogwai
3 months ago
Reply to  huxleypiggles

Does that mean you aren’t going to bother voting? Just because you’ve given up and admitted defeat doesn’t mean everyone else has or should. Especially as you know the Islam/Left alliance will all be showing up to vote in their droves. Voting for a right-leaning party in greater numbers than that lot is the only real chance of bringing about change that you’ve got. Anyone not bothering to use that power is handing them yet another victory and doesn’t have the right to moan about the state of the country and sitting government when they did absolutely nothing to try and change the outcome.
Nothing’s written in stone and nobody’s got the gift of foresight. What’s the alternative? Going out and burning some buildings? Peaceful protests? Or maybe complaining and putting the world to rights on this site for the foreseeable, because misery loves company? Learned helplessness never accomplished anything.

GunnerBill
GunnerBill
3 months ago
Reply to  Mogwai

I recently heard the term “untidy” being used to describe riots.

“Renewable energy is quite popular” – you sure about that?

NeilParkin
NeilParkin
3 months ago

“Andy Burnham ‘to launch immediate leadership challenge after victory’”

Of course he should. At this point the best thing for us all is to replace a vacuum in a suit, with another vacuum in a suit.

Old Arellian
Old Arellian
3 months ago
Reply to  NeilParkin

Won’t the replacement be in a black T shirt under a [possibly creased] jacket?

NeilParkin
NeilParkin
3 months ago

“EV charging companies threaten to axe £2 billion investment if Starmer softens Net Zero targets”

The EV market is being skewed by public money to achieve a political end. It can’t go on. If these companies can’t find a compelling case for people to buy from them, then we should absolutely turn it off.

pjar
pjar
3 months ago
Reply to  NeilParkin

Call me a cynic but, when you allow a man to bank a personal fortune of £100m, basically from subsidising his business plan, you’re probably not getting the great deal you think you are?

huxleypiggles
huxleypiggles
3 months ago
Reply to  NeilParkin

Just turn it off.

JXB
JXB
3 months ago
Reply to  NeilParkin

EV charging companies need electricity to charge… soon there won’t be any.

NeilParkin
NeilParkin
3 months ago

“Starmer: no more money for defence” 

So, presumably the incoming Defence Secretary will be resigning this morning..?

pjar
pjar
3 months ago
Reply to  NeilParkin

It’s possible, if improbable, that he has a master plan that will allow him to get them to make better use of the money they get?

It’s pretty clear there’s scope for savings in procurement, and elsewhere. But, then, you could say that too about the NHS, welfare, quangos, local government and, well, everywhere really…

EppingBlogger
EppingBlogger
3 months ago
Reply to  pjar

Bureaucracies are inherently inefficient and wasteful. Add in the various woke obligations and a lack of direction from the government and waste is inevitable.

For example, how can a weapons system be procured cost effectively when Ministers direct which manufacturer or components are to be used but the budget changed (downwards) from anticipated levels.

huxleypiggles
huxleypiggles
3 months ago
Reply to  NeilParkin

Now that might actually achieve something.

Thank you for reading. Please help us keep the Daily Sceptic going by becoming a donor.