In the summer of 2025, a group of Scottish schoolgirls in Dundee, aged between 12 and 14, faced harassment, sexual propositions, and physical assault from a Bulgarian migrant brother and sister. Ilia Belov, 22, made lewd comments such as “Hello sexy, I’ll show you a good time” before grabbing and pushing a 12 year-old to the ground. His sister Nadjedzha Belova, 20, dragged a 13 year-old by the hair, pulled her down, and punched her in the head. The terrified girls produced weapons in self-defence. A viral video emerged. Media outlets and authorities spun it as evidence of feral youths menacing innocent migrants.
Police Scotland issued a statement that portrayed the Bulgarian couple as the victims approached by youths. They charged a 12 year-old with offensive weapons possession and warned against misinformation. Many outlets, including centre-right conservative media, joined in. They condemned the girls and their supporters as racists or far-right agitators. Basic checks such as CCTV footage, witness statements, and the girls’ injuries gave way to the preferred narrative of migrant vulnerability vs native aggression.
Now in June 2026, Belov and Belova have been convicted. The court heard the evidence. It rejected the perpetrators’ self-defence claims and delivered justice. Police Scotland later admitted their initial information did not fully reflect the situation. Some apologies followed. Yet the damage remains. The girls suffered public vilification on top of their trauma. Public trust in institutions that should protect the vulnerable without fear or favour has taken another hit in a week where, frankly, it could not be lower.
What stands out is the default reaction of the media and establishment commentators when the story initially broke. It reveals much about our society and its biases that needs to be confronted. Many need to take a good, honest look at themselves. As I wrote in a tweet to Iain Macwhirter, it took me, an amateur journalist, about an hour of research to see that the narrative from the media and police did not match events. I argued this stemmed from class bias and contempt that the educated class in Britain holds for the working class.
Outlets and commentators known for incisive work and for challenging the centre-left consensus failed here. Iain Macwhirter in the Times, the Dundee Courier, Freddie Sayers of UnHerd, Julie Bindel (who have all subsequently apologised for their error) and Fraser Myers of Spiked (who has yet to apologise as of June 13th 2026)… all fell into line with the police account to varying degrees. Anyone questioning it, even if not overtly using it for their own narratives, was accused of spreading misinformation. These voices usually push back against establishment shibboleths. Some like Bindel have seen their careers suffer for doing so. Yet in this case they did not apply the same scrutiny.
Why did they fail? I suspect this comes down to good old-fashioned British classism. Now, I’m sure some who I’ve including on this list will claim to be members of the working class. What does a privileged son of the Scottish Establishment with his public school education mean by this? The thing about the class system is that it no longer reflects the old social class norms. The hereditary aristocracy has very little power compared to the comprehensively educated head of a government department. Our class system is rooted in education and in whether or not you are a member of the British nomenklatura. Michael Young, the sociologist and father of Toby Young, identified this emerging class in his 1958 satirical essay the Rise of the Meritocracy. To them I would say that your father may have been a toolmaker, but you’re a member of the meritocracy nonetheless.
Members of the meritocracy, myself included, would do well to spend actual time in the working-class communities torn apart by demographic tensions they never signed up for. How many of us have walked the streets of North and East Belfast, the estates of Glasgow, Newcastle, or Sunderland? These places are rapidly becoming dumping grounds for undocumented foreign men. The realities there differ sharply from the insulated worlds of university towns, London bubbles, and professional networks. We are all great at commenting on the situation, but we do so from our own ivory towers. Much of this happens because of the metro/urban/netizen-centric nature of our media. I note a distinct difference in default takes on scenarios from those who live outside these bubbles and those who don’t. Conversations with colleagues often require me to explain the situation outside, in the towns, estates and regions. I note how my perspective has changed since I moved to one of the poorest rural postcodes in England, here in upper Tynedale. Rod Liddle, for example, left the south for his native Teesside, in part to regain perspective.
This episode shows class contempt dressed up as sophistication. Our chattering classes are isolated from the gritty daily struggles outside the meritocratic oasis. They withhold the benefit of the doubt from working-class families dealing with rapid change, strained services, and a justice system quicker to charge a terrified child than to pursue the adults who provoked her. Instead, the instinct is to side with the approved victim group and attribute base motives to the natives.
In the Rise of the Meritocracy, Young coined the term ‘meritocracy’ as a caution, not praise. In his dystopia, society sorts people by IQ plus effort. The successful form a new elite convinced their status reflects how much talent and virtue they have. They create a classless society in name only. In practice, it becomes a pitiless hierarchy where the losers are not merely unfortunate but unworthy. Kindliness, courage and sympathy yield to a single metric of cognitive sorting. The elite’s arrogance grows complete. They look down with pity mixed with disgust.
Young predicted this new order would fracture society sometime around 2030. The underclass, stripped of dignity based on birth, community, or simple human decency, would grow resentful. He warned that this new aristocracy, mostly made up of those who inherited their status in the meritocracy, would lack the learned respect the old aristocracy had for the underclasses – a lesson learned by periodic revolts where the consequences of treating the commoners with contempt usually involved a mob, pikes and your head. The satire is brutal. It forces us to confront our own privilege.
The only reason why I am a member of the meritocracy is because my great grandfather restored the family fortunes, lost when Clan Gregor was proscribed in 1604. He went to night school and got a degree and left the grinding labour of the Clackmannanshire steel mills behind for a stellar career in adult education, all before the First World War. I might kid myself that my career and education is merit – some of it is – but I had a serious leg up thanks to the social and financial capital acquired by my family. The opportunities I have are due to them. Yes I capitalised on them but like many, my membership of the meritocracy was by default. I learned 20 years ago that the accident of your birth, your qualifications and education does not give you the right to assume moral superiority over others and it is a lesson in humility others would do well to learn.
However, this moral hubris is rife in the UK and across the modern west. We see it in the distrust of those who voted for Brexit, Trump, populist surges, and in the feeling that elites apply one rule to themselves and another to everyone else. In the Dundee case, the girls became disposable in service of the diversity narrative. From Hillary Clinton sneering at the ‘deplorables’ to Professor AC Grayling arguing that those without a degree should be denied the vote after his side lost the Brexit referendum – since 2016, whatever mask of decorum and latent manners once displayed by such was discarded in favour of open contempt. The working-class reality in places like Lochee clashes with elite stories of harmonious multiculturalism. Doubting the victims proved easier than questioning policy failures. Disgracefully, the police as well as politicians like Humza Yousaf and First Minister of Scotland John Swinney were front and centre here – the latter two have yet to apologise for hanging the girls and their families out to dry.
The centre-Right’s role here disappoints most. Conservatives should defend ordinary citizens against bureaucratic excess and cultural fads. Too many swallowed the police line without question. This appeared to be their default reaction, revealing how deeply meritocratic thinking has spread even into conservative opinion. Class bias poses as anti-racist and pro-migrant. Contempt for the less lettered appears as enlightened cosmopolitanism. The educated withhold sympathy from those less fortunate in life’s lottery. For the establishment Left, acknowledging their grievances would require examining the open-borders and technocratic consensus that props up elite status – the policies they enact that rarely impact them or their families. It is rather less easy to explain when it comes to those of us on the Right who should know better, and it holds up a mirror to our own assumptions and biases.
The convictions of Belov and Belova bring a small victory for truth, but the broader scandal persists. How many more incidents stay unreported or misreported because victims know the script: native equals aggressor, migrant equals victim? Police forces that prioritise optics over facts lose public confidence. Media that choose narrative over evidence forfeit credibility. A ruling class that views fellow citizens through a lens of meritocratic superiority risks fulfilling Young’s darkest warnings.
Apologies after the fact cannot restore trust. We need a reckoning with the classism embedded in our institutions. We must grant the working class the same presumption of good faith we extend to favoured victim groups. Until then, the Dundee Girls remain a stark parable. In our meritocratic society, some victims count more than others. The wrong sort of British child stays forever suspect… as these girls have, and as Henry Nowak tragically experienced at the hands of Hampshire Constabulary.
C.J. Strachan is the pseudonym of a concerned Scot who worked for 30 years as a Human Resources executive in some of the UK’s leading organisations. Subscribe to his Substack page.
Discussion
Comments
This week across the site:
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to the Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
An interesting read in the light of the recently unmasked government Stasi propaganda unit that was behind the word salad spewed out by the Nowak family and the Ogilvy family.
When I was working as an NHS consultant I wrote many letters suggesting that government ministers should spend a couple of days with me so they could meet real, underprivileged people. None did (though one hospital manager plucked up the courage). Medicine is a great leveller. What I found interesting however was that even disabled middle class, wealthy people failed to understand that the fantastically well designed modifications to their houses were out of the reach of most of their fellow patients.
Meritocracy is not bad but must be accompanied by compassion, understanding and common sense.
Whilst I agree – esp in Bindel’s case – there’s more to it. What really motivated the MacWhirtards was Elon Musk. That friend of the ghastly Trump and his disdain for Ukraine and Saint Zelensky. It’s the same mental illness that afflicts the Spectator and the Telegraph. Direct causal effect. Everything on the right of the media is seen and judged through the lens of Ukraine.
Fraser Myres.
I love Spiked but Myres is the establishment plant.
Utter gype.
Fraser Myers is why I’ve cancelled my Spiked! subscription.
Same here. When he came out with a ton of crap about covid vaccines and how people should have to take them, I asked myself if I wanted to continue funding that website. The answer was no.
The DS site is very slow.
Excellent article.
I would coin a new term mediocricy to describe the entire modern political class.
Compared to their predecessors churchill thatcher, enoch powell, even tony benn, michael foot the likes of starmer lammy reeves even badenoch are empty vessels.
I suspect Farage wouldn’t have achieved what he has, and appear quite so head and shoulders above the rest (apart from Lowe) if he were in a parliament with that lot.
The wonderful photo (adapted from Jimmy Sime’s 1937 Toffs and Toughs) says it all. “Look at me!” the lanyarded classes bray to the unwashed. “I’ve followed all the rules of education and been rewarded with this shiny laminated photograph of myself. Why haven’t you done the same?”
But what they’ll never understand is that most of the working classes have no interest in these baubles. “I’ll work eight hours a day to earn a living wage, but you can eff off with the rest of it. I’ve got some living to do” is their very sensible creed.
How many of the “Meritocracy” work in productive economic activity that is wealth creating?
How many work in Government national and local, quangos, in the public services as administrative staff, in businesses as HR, climate change/DEI compliance, in charities, NGOs, activist groups, academia, environmental bodies, etc?
It is the working class – which I define as those in productive, wealth creating activity – paying for that lot.
It was revealing who was ‘furloughed’ during lockdown and those that had to work to keep the wheels turning – the white van drivers, supermarket staff etc.
It’s unlikely that these offences will result in a custodial sentence, more likely the Bulgarians will get a community order & a fine.
I would chew his balls off.
Paul Embery’s 2021 book ‘Despised – why the modern left loathes the working class’ goes into various relevant issues mentioned here. It is well worth a read.
Look at this image from the recent ”anti-racism” rally in Belfast. I wonder how many of these ”refugees welcome” dweebs are legitimately working class. All I see is a load of virtue-signalling, likely public sector oikophobe nobheads who apparently hold non-white stabby, rapist Third World-imported scum in higher esteem than fellow white citizens who happen to be working class and usually end up as victims of the aforementioned dirtbags. Most likely many of this lot aren’t even local and have been bussed in from further afield, as is classic strategy with this type of socialist rabble.
Why aren’t they protesting in support of Stephen Ogilvie, who is apparently still in a coma and had his eye gouged out, and who will now face life-long physical disability on top of his existing learning disabilities? Because Stephen had the misfortune to be white, that’s why. Disgusting, enabling asshats, they are;
”Not one of these people will ever have to live next door to a HMO full of feral African men, and most will retire on comfortable public sector pensions. They are class traitors bribed by the state to prop up the regime.”
https://x.com/FUDdaily/status/2065899207001506125
Great photo, and excellent article defending working class children, as Tommy Robinson, Rupert Lowe, and Nick Griffin before them continue to be vilified for doing.
Unfortunately, since the judge won’t be sentencing the Evil Bulgarians until August, they may be long gone before then, back to Bulgaria.
Speaking of whom, Tommy Robinson was again arrested under the Terrorism Act on his way back into the country today.
What???!!! Unbelievable— the Communists never stop, do they?
Wait a minute— I just found the news item on the Daily Mail, and was shocked to learn that Tommy went to Russia with ERROL MUSK, Elon’s father, who has done nothing but publicly malign his own son Elon, in order to draw attention to himself.
Please stay away from him, Tommy— ERROL MUSK is one of the CREEPIEST men on the planet. He’s a nasty piece of work, who looks like an actual OGRE.
Did Errol Musk Really Marry His Stepdaughter? Inside the Controversial Claims About Elon Musk’s Father | IBTimes UK
“Errol Musk has also faced serious allegations of sexual misconduct involving family members. Reports allege that several children and stepchildren came forward with complaints that span back to the early 1990s.”
“Public records and widely reported accounts confirm that Errol Musk fathered two children with his former stepdaughter, Jana Bezuidenhout. Their first child was born in 2017, followed by a second several years later. Jana was an adult at the time of both pregnancies.”
“Elon Musk has previously spoken about his difficult relationship with his father, describing their estrangement in interviews over the years.”
You’re off target. Maye Musk is the one to examine. Explains a lot about Musk’s character.
Errol and Elon’s sister, Tosca, seem to be the only “normal” ones in the family. Elon’s brother, Kimbal, is batshit.
I’m not saying Errol is totally kosher, not exactly your regular straight bloke down the pub, let’s say. But to say Maye is very controlling would be an enormous understatement.
Manchurian Candidate.
No, I am directly on target.
Do they ever actually use the Terrorism act against terrorists?
No. It was badly drafted. It was intended to be called the “Hack Passwords Act.”