Political Betting is a new weekly column by Mark Littlewood aimed at people who like gambling on politics.
If the opinion polls and the betting markets are right, Andy Burnham will be a Member of Parliament once again by the end of next week and be Prime Minister not long afterwards.
I rather fancied Reform UK at the start of the Makerfield by-election campaign. Even though I pegged the insurgents as very slight underdogs, the 3/1 seemed attractive. If you still think local plumber Rob Kenyon can pull off a surprise victory next Thursday, you can find odds of 5/1 or 6/1 today.
Trusted polling has been thin on the ground but the latest data suggest Burnham has extended his lead over Reform to 10%. The self-styled King of the North isn’t home and hosed, but he appears to have breathing space.
If he does get returned to Westminster, the commentariat seem largely agreed about what happens next. He will swiftly trigger a leadership election (if another Labour pretender to the crown has not already done so) and will triumph with ease amongst the party’s membership. He is so far ahead of the other challengers that we may even see a coronation rather than a contest. A pathway to the premiership which seemed very difficult to navigate – or even contemplate – a couple of months ago now looks like a cakewalk.
So, is there anything left that can derail Burnham’s path to No. 10 or should you snap up the 2/5 that you can still find with some bookmakers that he will be the next Prime Minister?
On the face of it, Makerfield would be a very comfortable pickup for Reform in any remotely normal by-election. But this is about the most abnormal by-election that one could imagine and three forces have combined to make this a far trickier task for Farage’s party than it would have wished for.
First, its highly effective approach of treating the May 7th elections as a referendum on Starmer paid off handsomely. Now, however, the typical Makerfield voter with a burning desire to see the PM removed from office may well conclude that the best way of achieving this is to vote for Andy Burnham. ‘Vote Labour to defenestrate our party’s leader’ is an odd clarion call – and it obviously doesn’t appear on official campaign material. However, it is the not-so-subtle subliminal message that the Burnham campaign has been keen to project.
Second, Rupert Lowe’s Restore Britain is putting in a sizable effort in its first Parliamentary election. It could well hold its deposit (5% of the vote being required to do so) and could perhaps do a few points better than this. It is entirely conceivable that its vote tally will be greater than Burnham’s lead over Kenyon. But that’s a rather binary way of looking at things. A serious effort from Restore has meant that Reform has had to fight on two flanks rather than concentrate all its fire on Labour – just because the final impact of such a diversion is hard to measure doesn’t mean it’s not real.
Third, Rob Kenyon comes across as a very decent, down-to-earth sort of chap. But this is obviously his first time under such an intense political spotlight. Had he not been up against Burnham, he would not have been thrown into the deep end of Question Time specials and the like. Instead, he could have taken a slower and steadier approach to building up both his media skills and his policy knowledge – but the circumstances of the contest have not allowed it.
I’ve therefore concluded that my 3/1 bet on Reform is likely to be a losing one. There’s still a chance it could pull off a narrow victory if it is able to seriously squeeze the Restore vote and if its GOTV (Get Out the Vote) operation is sensational on the day. It may benefit from higher levels of voter enthusiasm than Labour has and so find it easier to get its supporters from the sofa to the polling booth. So, Reform could still nick it but is now clearly the underdog.
If Burnham is successful, a leadership election is effectively a certainty. There may be some issues around the timing – as well as the ‘optics’ of any announcement. All the candidates wanting to succeed Starmer have been hoping someone else can take the rap for triggering the contest and they can then display some faux reluctance as they enter it. Maybe Wes Streeting is the stalking horse – but Burnham’s name is certain to go forward.
I suspect Keir Starmer’s insistence that he will fight any leadership contest will melt away. He has now already run out of any truly dignified way of leaving Downing Street but defeat in an internal party election really would be about the most humiliating way possible to be dispatched. Polls of Labour members indicate that Starmer does command some remaining loyalty but he would still face a likely defeat at the hands of Andy Burnham. If and when Cabinet Ministers depart and flock to the challenger’s banner, the odds will tilt still more against the survival prospects of the current Prime Minister.
It’s also worth noting that if you can imagine some way in which Starmer survives for another year – or even longer – the bet on Burnham isn’t invalid, the betting slip is still in play. This is why I think a bet on Burnham being the next Labour leader is preferable to the next PM market. I calculate there is a thin possibility that Starmer limps all the way to 2029 and the next party leader takes over in Opposition. That is hard to see at present but you may as well include it within your bet by explicitly selecting the ‘leader’ rather than ‘Prime Minister’ market.
I feel Burnham can be sure that Labour is ready and willing to support his pitch for the top job. Although I rarely take odds-on bets, I can’t resist the 2/5 available. The only thing that stands in his way is a plucky and determined plumber from Wigan.
Mark Littlewood is a former director of the Institute of Economic Affairs and the Director of PopCon.


Discussion
Comments
This week across the site:
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to the Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
Something feels ‘off’ to me about this election. It all seems too convenient for Burnham…
If all those that want to split the vote are happy with Burnham, then can only assume they are happy that grooming gangs operated with impunity , that he gave loans for expensive apartments using their money, wasted much more on a “ulez” scheme, and dont care that he’s using them as a stepping stone, if they’re happy with all that, then ……
There must be something in the water in Makerfiield. Who in their right mind would vote Labour?
Rupert Lowe has behaved disgracefully, putting his pride and ego above the interests of the country.
His selfish, egotistical behaviour will destroy our country beyond the point of salvation.
And his supporters here will wonder how such destruction happened, as they seem incapable of THINKING.
Hear, hear!
On reflection I think that changing the Labour leader will only reinforce the failure of the Labour party rather than improve it. At the moment people rightly blame an incompetent Starmer, but underlying that are actions of the government which are damaging people and damaging the country. The party of welfare and the public employee won’t change despite a change of leader.
People say Burnham is good at presentation and communication. But I think he is an ego who under pressure will show someone who is not up to being challenged in debate. Labour’s Boris Johnson, full of BS and waffle but additionally very dismissive of those he regards as lesser than him (most of us). Watch out for the petulance.
A gamble.
But what do I know, I’ve never even played the lottery.
Labour took 45% of a 52% turnout last time, Kenyon took 33% and on the numbers, would have to take both the Tory vote and the LibDems, which seems unlikely, particularly with Restore and the Greens acting as spoilers…
The key to this by-election is the stay at home vote. If Reform can get them out, they stand a chance. Hopefully, the Makerfield electorate will object to being told what to do and will turn out and vote accordingly.
Yes, totally unwinnable….just like Runcorn.
I’m not saying it’s unwinnable, Gez but, the numbers suggest that, if they’re to turn things round, they’ll need to do two things: get the stay at home voters out and, persuade a significant number who might vote for the infamous pig with a red rosette that they’re being taken for granted…
From their behaviour over the past year, Rupert Lowe (Restore Britain) and Ben Habib (Advance UK) have proved to be the very thing they accused Nigel Farage of being.
Habib shut down Advance UK, a party he once claimed was the most democratic in history, without consulting its members.
Meanwhile, Lowe spent eight months insisting the country needed a movement rather than a party, only to go ahead and form a political party anyway.
Just a small correction. He did consult the members. I know this as I am/was one🤔
That funny I got a vote as an advance member about the future of partie.
Polling at Makerfield:
Labour and Reform: each 38-40%
Restore: 7%
May Council Elections:
Reform: 1,400 seats
Restore: 0 seats
Advance: 0 seats
(Restore rebadged as “Great Yarmouth First” won the council there)
Restore Britain is not a credible option and it won’t be. No matter how marvellous Rupert Lowe is, we do not have a presidential system, so he would need a working majority in Parliament.
Restore is basically a one-mans band run by someone with a grudge, whose followers are Farage-haters. It will not garner widespread support, nor more importantly the funding it would need to build an infrastructure and become a credible option.
Rupert Lowe is acting exactly like a state asset. It doesn’t matter whether he is or isn’t. What matters is that Reform block Burnham’s path to No.10 and the Labour Party blows itself up. Why, then, is Lowe trying to get in the way? Obviously, he values his revenge above everything.
You have to start somewhere. I expect UKIP started small.
Good grief. Can you really not understand the larger issue here? I have just spelled it out. There is no need for Rupert Lowe to “start” at the one single by-election that it is critical for Reform to win. If he loved our country as you seem to think he does, he would step aside with his useless 7% or whatever it is today, and “start” at a less strategically critical place.
At the election before last, Nigel Farage strategically stepped aside, amid much criticism from the “tactical” thinkers, to ensure that Johnson would have the best chance of winning, as Johnson was resolved to “get Brexit done”, after Theresa May did her best to sabotage it. Johnson did so, with an imperfect but best deal possible, given the intransigent nature of the EU.
We are at war with an evil elite. You win a war by thinking strategically; you seem only capable of thinking tactically. That guarantees defeat.
If you don’t believe that Reform are what this country needs then it seems perfectly logical to found your own party/support a party that you can get behind. That’s what democracy and politics is meant to be about. Opting for the least bad party likely to win is what gave us 14 years of Fake Conservatives. I am not saying that tactical voting is wrong, just that it’s not for everyone and that it undermines democracy, in my view, especially if the least bad “mainstream” party crosses red lines for you.
Anyway, you can question Lowe’s motives, but ultimately if people are choosing his party over Reform then it means that they are offering something that some people want. That’s democracy. I am sure that many of those planning to vote Restore understand all of this perfectly and are prepared to take the consequences.
I’ve no idea why you or anyone else thinks it’s critical for Reform to win this by-election. To stop Burnham? He would have popped up again had he lost here. We need to defeat Socialist ideas, but that seems almost impossible. We require a more severe collapse to wake people up and that is not going… Read more »
Why should he?? Political parties stand candidates.
Exactly
Spot on in all respects. Pure selfishness from Restore.
Given the help they have provided I wonder if Rupert Lowe is a Tory asset.
Badenough admitted yesterday that she “had an arrangement” with Lowe.
He who wields the knife rarely wins the crown as they say if Burnham is forced to take on Starmer alone. And the members decide in the Labour Party not like in the Tories where the leftie MPs filter who goes forward.
Restore funded and given airtime just in time to ensure Burnham gets his seat.
Am surprised this co-ordination is not visible to more peeps.
After a brief gasp of frsh air Reform and Restore now appear to be just 2 more facets of the Uniparty.
So where do political refugees head to now? Heritage party still genuinely independent?
I think Kurten is great and I like their policies but independent of what? What are Reform and Restore NOT independent of?
So if Restore skew the result it will indeed be a victory for extreme right hatred – Lowe’s for Farage.
Lowe knows that he has no chance of winning, so why contest the election. it is indeed
And yet if Burnham wins the byelection and becomes Labour Leader the Labour Party become hostage to the risk of new revelations about his time as Manchester Mayor. Perhaps there will be nothing to see… or perhaps there will be far more people looking.
So Burnham wins the by-election, takes over the leadership of the Labour Party and becomes Prime Minister and then…. everything continues the same as always.
Same policies, same direction of travel, same establishment people deeply entrenched in power.
At least we all got to witness and be entertained by a meaningless horse race we like to call “elections”.
Indeed. Apparently people find him more convincing than Starmer, at least for now. So things could get worse as he will have more scope to do damage.
I think there is a good chance it will get even worse because while Burnham’s delivery style is better than Starmer’s – not hard eh? – but he is just as much an ignorant moron and will be in hock to the backbenchers that made him leader. And they are some of the worst dross you can imagine and firmly believe going even more Far Left is a winning strategy.
Yep, not sure why people are getting obsessed over him.
Meaningless horse race. Precisely. Sadly. There aren’t even any nice hats.
I wonder if the people on the left saying a change of leader needs a general election, like last time tories did the same, will still feel the same this time?…
I find it so frustrating that a personality clash on the Right looks likely to produce a PM who will take the Government even further to the left than it already is.
I find it frustrating that so many people seem to want Socialism. That’s democracy.
But with millions sucking on the teat of benefits provided by rinsing taxpayers it is not a great surprise they want it to continue, too stupid to understand that eventually the money will run out.
Sadly true – a flaw of the unlimited government power that we have here in name of “democracy”
The sad thing is, the Restore obsessives will celebrate giving Labour its new communist messiah because it will “get Farage”. The language which is circulating around Restore is now reaching a fever pitch I would expect of Green voters but lacking any hope of a majority in anything.
So the right is split as usual and the Left can agree on how much to steal off us later.
The left is also split – Labour, Lib Dems, Greens, SNP, Plaid Cymru, Sinn Feinn, arguably Tories pre Badenoch. If Restore push Reform further right maybe that’s a good thing. If you are unconvinced about Reform then you should be looking at Restore, just as UKIP voters did electoral damage to the Tories despite not having a chance of winning, and arguably helping the Left in the process.
The left is split but not quite as much and the Restore split of is guaranteeing a Reform loss.
In terms of party positions, the only difference between the “stated policies” of each party (I don’t think Restore actually has a published set solidly) is that Restore admits an intention of mass deportations (but only mentions illegals and criminals) which Reform also intends without (stating open intention to deport millions) and will bring back the death penalty which I do support and Reform MPs raised this in parliament recently anyway. Reform is very anti Net Zero which is one of my biggest issues of support.
The difference between the two parties is simply one of fervour in rhetoric, whilst the actual differences are paper thin.
Restore puts itself at the losing disadvantage of being too zealous, or attracting those who are, and it is only realistic to realise they won’t get over 15% of the vote.
I had an interesting discussion with an American acquaintance recently, who complained the border wall hadn’t been completed quickly enough, I pointed out that basic changes in policy had produced dramatically better results then a wall ever did and saved billions but he couldn’t… Read more »
I find Lowe more convincing than Farage but I would probably vote Reform in a GE tomorrow. We shall see. The left is massively split- thank goodness.
Apparently anyone who isn’t white has a target on their backs now in Belfast. Student nurses had their place burned down just because they were black. This guy’s just walking down the street, minding his own business but see the disgusting level of harassment he’s having to endure by this scumbag chavvy local. I don’t find this behaviour justifiable at all. The guy’s a racist pr*ck;
”Immigrants are being harassed on the streets of Northern Ireland by racists. Warning: Disgusting and dehumanising language is used throughout this video.”
https://x.com/5Pillarsuk/status/2064999198617928145
No matter his view on the levels of immigration over the last few decades, no matter how much he wishes it was a completely white country again, you don’t behave like this fellow.
This guy is a complete low-life, one of the worst the country has to offer.
I have strong views on immigration/culture/race etc, but I don’t blame decent individuals, especially people just going about their business. This poor black chap was probably shitting himself, understandably.
With luck, this guy will be caught and receive a severe punishment.
”The IQ of a mob is the IQ of its most stupid member divided by the number of mobsters.” Terry Pratchett.
I don’t condone this behaviour either. There’s no need to play the victim card when you’ve got lunatics like this preying on you just because you’re ‘brown’. This dickhead couldn’t care less that there were kids in the house. I’m afraid you don’t get to say: ”The government made me do it” as your defence, which is mainly the sentiment I’m seeing online, as if these yobs have no accountability for their actions whatsoever;
”Masked Thug Firebombs Family Home In Bolton. The shocking incident took place around 9:20pm on Wednesday evening on Eastgrove Avenue in the Sharples suburb, leaving a family, including four terrified young children shaken to their core and fearing for their lives in what police are treating as a targeted and potentially lethal strike.
The CCTV footage circulating online shows the hooded suspect calmly approaching the driveway. He pours petrol from a container onto items near the front of the house, sets an initial blaze, then smashes a front window before spraying more petrol through the broken window.
Imam Hassan Patel, 42, a principal for Islamic… Read more »
Perhaps if we hadnt had communitys destroyed by uninvited ,unlimited ,unwanted illegals, people wouldnt feel that way, its easier to scream racism at people that take genuine concerns into consideration. Where I live am now the minority, thats with less than 10 years, taken everything.