- “Belfast burns as protesters vow to ‘get the foreigners out’” – A bus and a house were set ablaze in Belfast last night as hundreds of protesters defied calls for calm from Government ministers following a brutal knife attack in the city, reports the Mail.
- “Hero bystander reveals how he tackled Sudanese knifeman in Belfast” – Matt McKiernan describes how he beat back a knifeman in Belfast using his son’s hurling stick after stumbling upon the attack on a trip to a petrol station, says the Mail.
- “First rioters jailed over Henry Nowak unrest” – Leon O’Leary, 41, who admitted violent disorder in Southampton and had nine previous convictions, is handed a three-year prison sentence in the first jailing to arise from the Henry Nowak unrest, according to the Times.
- “Nottingham, Southport and Manchester attacks ‘could have been stopped’” – Kemi Badenoch delivers a scathing attack on the public sector equality duty which she says has cost lives and fuelled “separatism and tribalism” in Britain, reports the Mail.
- “Badenoch: police must stop and search more black boys” – Kemi Badenoch blames the Equality Act 2010 for apparent police failings over the murder of Henry Nowak, arguing that officers must be prepared to stop and search more black boys, notes the Telegraph.
- “Only Kemi Badenoch offers Britain hope of a future free from racial grievance” – Badenoch first showed her mettle on race in 2020 by confronting the divisive ideology of Black Lives Matter, and she alone now offers a credible path away from racial grievance politics, writes Tony Sewell in the Telegraph.
- “Kemi’s equality reform proposals are long overdue” – In the Spectator, Ian Acheson argues that equality law should be built on treating people fairly and enforcing clear, comprehensible rules that everyone can understand.
- “Henry Nowak, racial justice, and the Church of England” – The murder of Southampton student Henry Nowak by Vickrum Digwa raises urgent and emotive questions about racial justice and the Church of England’s response, writes Ian Paul in Psephizo.
- “Andy Burnham: I’ll get a grip on illegal migration” – The Manchester Mayor says he would detain more immigrants if he replaced Sir Keir Starmer as Prime Minister, reports the Telegraph.
- “The real reason Keir Starmer is cracking down on social media” – In the Spectator, Gareth Roberts says Labour’s plan to give 16 year-olds the vote while simultaneously banning them from Instagram exposes an uncomfortable truth about the Government’s motives.
- “Equalities watchdog moves office after threats by trans activists” – The EHRC has been forced to relocate its London headquarters after it was targeted by Bash Back, the same group that launched a cyber attack on the Free Speech Union, says the Times.
- “Trans activism has turned Oxford into a toxic wasteland of censorship” – The shutting down of Michael Foran’s lectures in Oxford is proof that trans activists continue to threaten free speech on British university campuses, writes Max Thompson in Spiked.
- “Nigerians exploiting student visas to land social-care jobs” – International students are exploiting their visas to work in social-care roles for which they are unqualified and inadequately vetted, according to the Telegraph.
- “Trump vows furious revenge on Iran with chilling new threat” – Donald Trump has vowed the US will strike back at Iran after the regime shot down an American Apache helicopter patrolling the Strait of Hormuz, reports the Mail.
- “Trump says US will declare ‘total victory’ over Iran in two weeks” – President Trump tells South Carolina voters on a call that the US will declare “total victory” over Iran within a fortnight, says the Mail.
- “Tech Secretary attacks ‘Right-wing’ bosses of Palantir” – Liz Kendall hints that US tech giant Palantir could have its NHS contract cancelled after she attacks its bosses as ‘Right-wing’, reports the Telegraph.
- “Met defends use of Palantir tech after Sadiq Khan blocks contract” – The Metropolitan Police has defended Palantir’s technology as capable of detecting fraud and misconduct in minutes, as Sadiq Khan moves to block its contract, according to the Times.
- “Palantir software halves sepsis deaths at US hospital” – A Palantir-developed system that detects subtle changes in vital signs cuts sepsis deaths in half at Tampa General Hospital in Florida, reports the Times.
- “The English don’t know who they are any more” – In the Telegraph, John Lawrence says that attempting to define Englishness has become dangerously controversial in a multicultural age – at least in the eyes of the BBC.
- “VAT, school closures, and lies – don’t let them off the hook” – On her Substack, Isabel Paterson says the claim that independent schools could simply “cut their cloth” in response to Labour’s VAT raid – and stay afloat that way – was always a lie.
- “EU demands sweeping censorship to influence elections” – On her Substack, Pauline Voss reports that Ursula von der Leyen is pushing an Orwellian plan that would impose sweeping speech restrictions under the guise of a so-called ‘Democracy Shield’.
- “Cold kills 9x more than heat – and it blows up the WHO’s climate health crisis” – In Climate Change Dispatch, Thomas Richard notes that the WHO is pushing climate change as a public health emergency, but the cold kills far more than heat while overall weather-related deaths have fallen dramatically.
- “Multibillion pound data centre project risks collapse over Government delays” – A major data centre developer blames the AI minister for failing to secure planning permission, putting a multibillion-pound project in jeopardy, reports the Telegraph.
- “BP drops Net Zero division in wake of boardroom turmoil” – BP has relegated its Net Zero division in an overhaul aimed at increasing its focus on oil and gas, just weeks after the company’s chairman was dismissed, according to the Telegraph.
- “Meet the Green councillor who demanded ‘heads on sticks’” – In the Spectator, Andrew Gilligan profiles Green councillor Michael Chessum, who has a long record of wild statements including a call for “heads on sticks”.
- “Bonfires of the batteries” – In Watts Up With That? Richard Ellenbogen argues that the apparent exemption of the battery industry from regulations applying to every other industry is now presenting major complications for communities in New York State.
- “Have I Got News For You needs putting out of its misery” – The BBC’s long-running panel show has become a complacent lapdog of the liberal establishment, and – like Ian Hislop himself – is well past its sell-by date, according to Spiked.
- “Reform UK councils take down Ukrainian flags from town halls” – Some Reform-run local authorities have taken down the Ukrainian flags raised across councils following Russia’s invasion in 2022, flying Union Jack in their place, notes the Mail.
- “ICC suspends its British chief prosecutor Karim Khan” – Karim Khan – the barrister who sought the arrest of Benjamin Netanyahu for war crimes – has stood down from his post after the court’s oversight body referred him for disciplinary proceedings, Reports the Mail.
- “Families with one breadwinner face £12k penalty” – High-income households with a single earner lose more than £12,000 a year due to deep distortions in the tax system, says the Telegraph.
- “The painful truth about Britain’s ‘world-class’ universities” – In the Spectator, Iain Mansfield reveals that in 15 out of 34 subjects, more than a quarter of graduates earned less than the National Living Wage five years after leaving university.
- “How is the Government planning to avoid scope creep when it comes to client-side scanning” – In the House of Lords, I asked a Government minister how she intended to safeguard against the risks associated with mass surveillance and mass censorship.
If you have any tips for inclusion in the round-up, email us here.


Discussion
Comments
This week across the site:
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to the Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
“Belfast burns as protesters vow to ‘get the foreigners out’”
Very interesting new information from this public comment from Northern Ireland:
“From what I have heard the victim was a man originally from Scotland. He settled in Northern Ireland and was living in a share house. I believe said house was a Hmo.
Victim has special needs with hearing difficulties.
The Government moved illegal migrants into rooms in shared house. Victim was very kind and helped them move in.
2 of those illegal migrants targeted him, attempted to behead him and gouged his eye out.
The only explanation being Anti-White.
This is what I have heard. I could be wrong in the details. Ps for some reason it has been covered up that there was another illegal involved. “
And another public comment:
“I’m a grandmother who was stabbed 13 time’s and left to die by 2 members of a SF protected minority group. It was covered [up] by SF who were paid £75..000 by the NIHE to house them in our Catholic communities.”
[SF is Sinn Fein. NIHE is Northern Ireland Housing Executive.]
And some others on the victim’s family statement defending migrants:
—” The family did not make that statement! The government put it out!”
—” They appear to be using the family just like they tried to use the Novak family. “
—” The government are threatening these families! ”
—” Seems like Sinn Fein had a hand in that statement. Migrant votes to push for a united Ireland… at the cost of lives.”
—” SF don’t speak for the Irish people! “
Keir Starmer blasts ‘shocking’ scenes in Belfast and ‘those who encouraged it’ as he threatens protesters with ‘full force of the law’ – story is in GBNews
What a wonderful country this is where a Prime Minister can decide to what extent and on whom the law is enforced.
If he really has that power he should not. My guess is he’s just a crass grandstanding bullshitter extraordinaire.
Allison Pearson writes Kemi underestimates how deeply the woke cult has infected Britain in
today’syesterday’s Telegraph.If we’re non-protected unlike others who are protected then we’ll just have to protect ourselves.
“Belfast burns as protesters vow to ‘get the foreigners out’” – “A bus and a house were set ablaze in Belfast last night says the Mail.”
What they didn’t say is that other sources described witness accounts of at least 100 masked men walking down a street full of Fake Asylum Seekers and kicking in every door, in order to send a strong, effective message about the wishes of the Indigenous Irish People, who never voted nor gave their consent for the Mass Third World Invasion of the Land of Their Ancestors.
Much better than attacking the police, who also never gave their consent to the Mass Third World Invasion of the Land of Their Ancestors.
As MP Rupert Lowe of RESTORE BRITAIN advised,
“‘Do NOT give Starmer what he wants… Stay calm. Keep your heads. Do NOT attack the police.'”
Those hundred Irishmen were demonstrating the real meaning of
“Voting With Your Feet”.
EU demands sweeping censorship to influence elections
It sounds like something out of the People’s Republic of China or the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea except that the EU does not intend to ‘disappear’ people or execute them – yet.
UvdL should consider what happens if/when her enemies do come to power and have this Democracy Shield under their control.
Imagine such a thing under the control of a Sharia court.
Surely they may as well be disappeared, given the censorship?…
Tony Sewell in the DT will be sorely disappointed if he sees Badcock as our sole hope of salvation. The Speccie meanwhile wrings its hands over the state of the country even as its former Editor tells media audiences all is well.
Can someone show these organs were actively pressing the Tory government (their government) in the 14 years, to do something different.
Jacob Rees Mogg called for the annulment of the Equalities Act. That was passed in 2010 – the same year Dave (heir to Blair) Cameron-Clegg took office. I like Jacob and I agree with almost all he says. He often acknowledges the failings of governments he and/or Badenock served as Ministers.
But we cannot allow them and their media friends to talk over us and over the issues. They seek to give the impression the Tories were out of office throughout the past 15 years when so much damage was done. They refuse to acknowledge their support for the Blair-Brown changes when they were HM Official Opposition.
There really is nothing the Tories can do to atone. As Norman Tebbitt once observed when asked by the media if he forehand the IRA for… Read more »
Hear, hear! Well said, Epping.
Politicians in general, certainly those in government, do not debate the issues we are facing. Instead they smear whoever does want to debate the issues. Instead they ban and control.
This has become their modus operandi.
As a result people feel unheard.
Issues don’t go away.
And it feels like a tinderbox situation.
My question is why do the political class behave this way?
Do they want to incite unrest?
Do they want to use unrest to increase surveillance and control?
I hear you, totally. Again and again, and again, I’ve started wondering “can they really be that tone-deaf? Can they really not listen to themselves and imagine the reaction?”
But, every time, again and again, they seemed utterly surprised – even shocked and disappointed – that people don’t stand up and give their latest outrage a standing ovation.
The truth behind this is beyond me. Whether stoking the rage is deliberate or not, they definitely seem to think that if anyone resists they can just slap them down from a great height – if there isn’t a law for it yet, pass a New Crackdown Law.
The one thing I’m certain of is that the political class absolutely loathe the British people. They wish we didn’t exist.
This latest from Matt Goodwin offers no solution, but might make you feel less alone: https://www.mattgoodwin.org/p/britain-has-entered-the-age-of-anarcho
“Only Kemi Badenoch offers Britain hope of a future free from racial grievance”
Absolute bullpoo! She won’t be allowed, and never even tried to stop it during 14 years in government, what crap Tony!!
“Andy Burnham: I’ll get a grip on illegal migration”
Different name, same Bullpoo, as above!
I wonder if the article is arguing explicitly or tacitly that she can achieve this because she’s black and not white.
https://www.dailymail.com/news/article-15885921/Labour-ministers-transparency-Sudanese-Belfast-attempted-beheading-suspect.html
They’ve been told multiple times, over many years through the ballot box and peaceful protests, to stop immigration and they haven’t, In fact it increased.
Quite simply this is the only response the public now has left to correct the situation.
So it’s no use for the authorities to describe:
‘groups of masked men burning families out of their homes is nothing less than disgusting cowardice’
THIS IS ON YOU.
The public has run out of options.
I agree with Pete here in that I don’t think violence and rioting is the best way forward, however this was always to be expected. I understand there must be serious anger and the feeling of needing to do something to express this and send a message to the government, but is it really worth screwing your life and future prospects up when you inevitably get caught? The sentence for arson is going to look a hell of a lot different to that for lobbing a wheelie bin at a copper, which is significant enough;
”I don’t condone any of what I’ve seen in Belfast. I mean, I’d go to prison if I did, but all the same, it’s not my preferred way of doing things. But then my preferred way of doing things (voting and public debate) hasn’t made the slightest impact on the decision-making of the state. As such, there was a certain inevitability about this. Moreover, it’s not really my place to judge. I am an extremely fortunate individual who happens to live in a 99% white area, miles from any “diversity” and thanks to my self-employed status, I don’t have to self-censor or live a double… Read more »
Well put but particularly the talk about not resorting to violence is ironic when you consider this highly abridged timeline:
2005 7/11 London bombings
2013 Lee Rigby decapitation
Multiple and various attacks, rapes murders between.
Grooming gangs in multiple cities.
2025 Henry Nowak
2026 Belfast
The sheer amount of violence perpetrated on the British citizen by immigrants is astonishing.
Just how tolerant do we have to be before our tolerance itself is more harmful?
The trouble is citizens are stuck between a rock and a hard place. Kick off, as with Belfast, and you get caught and sent down for disproportionately long stretches, ( as was seen even with people posting spicy comments on social media after the Southport massacre), then the government use the unrest to justify moving in with more surveillance and then comes the digi I.D, meanwhile the immigrants just keep coming.
The only solution is a radical change in government who’ll put a stop to this. At this point in time I don’t think the general public can do anything other than vent their frustration in various ways, which are all ultimately futile. As nobody’s coming to save you the only real power you have is your vote. There is nothing else which will make any meaningful difference.
I agree that the anger is completely justified, but shouldn’t it be directed towards those that have caused this mess in the first place? Not condoning violence, but show up in numbers at the local council, the Houses of Parliament, Whitehall etc. where the root is because at the moment they have no fear and will change nothing as long as they’re safe from the consequences of their own actions.
Most importantly show up in numbers at the ballot box. On every occasion vote Reform. It is clearly the best chance we have, even if you find particular defects in its offering.
Rupert Lowe’s RESTORE BRITAIN is the ONLY chance we have.
The people causing this mess are the foreigners who’ve come here to soak up our wealth.
And they’ll keep coming as long as they’re let, often taxied, in.
I continue to think just silent protest would be very strong. No riots, no chants, no speeches, no placards, just tens of thousands of citizens, silently massed outside Parliament, watching.
The State has the monopoly on violence, only because we consent as part of the social contract that it will protect us, NOT use it against us. That’s what policing by consent means.
When the State breaks its contract with us, it loses its monopoly.
Well put but particularly the talk about not resorting to violence is ironic when you consider this highly abridged timeline:
2005 7/11 London bombings
2013 Lee Rigby decapitation
Multiple and various attacks, rapes murders between.
Grooming gangs in multiple cities.
2025 Henry Nowak
2026 Belfast
So that’s 13 yrs since Lee Rigby was beheaded in broad daylight and not a single thing has been done by anyone in authority to protect us from it happening again.
The sheer amount of violence perpetrated on the British citizen by immigrants is astonishing.
Just how tolerant do we have to be before our tolerance itself is more harmful?
Exactly.
I agree with that but people in NI perhaps recall how previous governments left them to the mercies of gunmen. Gunmen who were pardoned and then became Ministers.
The rule of law and protection of the public are the price governments must pay for our tolerance of their other defects. Fail on all fronts and the loyalty of the public towards the current regime must weaken and break.
I think violent protest is counterproductive at this stage. Larger numbers of non violent protestors will have a much better effect.
Of course it’s counterproductive. Does anybody with two functioning neurons seriously think the government is going to witness these riots and be like: ”Gosh, it’s looking like the peasants are revolting, they’ve finally had enough. This is terrifying stuff, so it seems only right and proper that we cease all immigration to Northern Ireland forthwith.” Yeah, exactly…..
”The IQ of a mob is the IQ of its most stupid member divided by the number of mobsters.” Terry Pratchett
Violence isn’t the best way forward? OK what is?
Here are the options: complete submission, compliance and serfdom, or fight. Which do you want?
Is violence going to change the government, who are the only ones able to bring about a change to the laws? Or is violence going to conclude with nothing more than destroying your own community and getting yourself banged up for a long stretch, life prospects down the swanny, all because you couldn’t control your emotions? I wonder how many women were out setting fire to people’s homes and cars…
”Jimmy Corry has lived on this Belfast street for 13 years. Now he’s homeless. He’s lost sentimental items forever, including his dad’s possessions. He told me that he shares the anger many feel about the attack on Monday night but that burning down houses won’t solve anything.”
https://x.com/CDP1882/status/2064662209762889814
At some point another incident will happen and the violence will spread like wildfire.
At this point your only option will be to pick a side.
Throughout the animal kingdom violence is the default means of conflict resolution. Are people unaware of wars?
However violence is costly, so in Humans at society level we have developed institutions, politics, voting, rule of law, equality and equity before the kaw, justice system and due process, to allow peaceful resolutions without violence.
When these institutions have been captured and corrupted, are used as weapons against us in order to protect those within them and prevent us benefitting fro them, then as akwqts happens when systems fail – return to default.
Sure, but for violence to achieve its goals there has to be sufficient support for it. I am not sure we are there, yet.
“Dawn Butler ✊🏾💙
@DawnButlerBrent
I join colleagues in calling on the Government to take urgent action to end trade with illegal Israeli settlements in the occupied West Bank.
Settlement expansion and forced displacement continue unchecked. The UK must uphold international law and act accordingly.”
A tweet from Dawn Butler, concentrating on the important stuff, while the streets are burning at home… I particularly like the emphasis on ‘settlement expansion and forced displacement’.
She doesn’t do irony, does she?
A bit like watching your home town turn brown/muslim over a period of 20 yrs.
The English don’t know who they are any more
‘Magna Carta…was proclaimed in English…had helped create the tax-based parliamentary state. It was a real watershed between lawless and lawful rule. ‘It is chapters of Henry III’s Charter of 1225, not John’s of 1215, which remain on the Statute Book today.’
Englishness is the right to liberty, equality and fraternity, asserted in 1225. British governments, since 1945 at least, have whittled away at the freedoms of the English. The conservative party has recently paid a price. The labour party has also recently been given a serious message.
‘Smile at us, pay us, pass us; but do not quite forget;
For we are the people of England, that never have spoken yet.
There is many a fat farmer that drinks less cheerfully,
There is many a free French peasant who is richer and sadder than we.
There are no folk in the whole world so helpless or so wise.
There is hunger in our bellies, there is laughter in our eyes;
You laugh at us and love us, both mugs and eyes are wet:
Only you do not know us. For we have not spoken yet.’
Indeed. I am half English and I know who I am. Englishness is part of me but it doesn’t define me. One thing that does define me is not liking people telling me I don’t know who I am.
English and Englishness are not the same. The former is a distinct ethnicity, the latter is a distinct culture.
Since culture is language, morals, values, manners, ethics, outlook, laws – if it doesn’t define you what does?
Half English is like a woman being half pregnant. .
Born and raised and lived all my life in England, ethnically German mum born in Germany, ethnically English dad born in England. I class that as half English, half German. Whether I have “Englishness” is another matter as people’s definition will differ probably. I think I have a fair degree of “Englishness”.
If you know you must queue, if you use please and thank you,if you’re polite and thoughtful and treat strangers and friends with a smile and a pleasant hello, if you have morals and values and you don’t try to saw someone’s head off on the pavement,..you’re English!
No, Dinger, because ANY ETHNIC INDIAN SUBCONTINENTAL could say that, but they would still be Ethnic Indian, not Ethnic European = White member of the English Tribe.
Just as you are an Ethnic European= White member of the Irish Tribe.
Of course you are right! You are half English with English ancestors on your dad’s side, and half German with German ancestors on your mum’s side of the family. Both are just different Tribes of The World’s Smallest Ethnic Group: Ethnic Europeans = White People.
Small but perfectly formed. We punch above our weight but sadly some of us are intent on self destruction. Very sad and very frustrating, such a waste.
No, because ANY ETHNIC INDIAN OR AFRICAN could claim to be “Culturally English”, which is rubbish!
If you have English ancestors, you are an Ethnic European – White Member of the English Tribe.
You could dress up as a Japanese Samurai and claim to be “Culturally Japanese”, but you would never be Ethnically Japanese, and would never be accepted by them as such.
Magna Carta established no taxation without consent, not a tax-based Parliamentary State. The rôle of Parliament is supposed to be to prevent taxation being imposed at the whim of the Executive. Since it now imposes taxes, it cannot be both poacher and gamekeeper.
Magna Carta did not establish the House of Commons:
‘…the Charter did not merely reflect social divisions: in places it was designed to reinforce them. Having asserted that taxation required the common consent of the kingdom, the assembly giving that consent was to be attended primarily by earls, barons, bishops and abbots. There was no place for London and other towns, although the Londoners thought that there should be. There was no place for knights elected by and representing the counties. In other words, there was no equivalent of the house of commons.’
But it did help create a tax based parliamentary state:
‘The Charter had also effected a profound change in the workings of monarchy. Stopping up many arbitrary sources of revenue, and insisting that general taxation required common consent, it had helped create the tax-based parliamentary state. It was a real watershed between lawless and lawful rule. It had established the base…’
As for English ethnicity, in strict terms it refers to ‘Angelcynn’, the Angles. I very much doubt that anyone is of pure ‘Angelcynn’ extraction.
You might find some in Jutland…