How many readers have noticed this huge failing in so many longstanding, establishment conservative political parties around the democratic world? To start, the Left side of politics when in power will seed or remake some institution. Or it will enact some big-ticket legislative reform. Maybe it’s bringing into being a beefed-up, more potent and renamed Australian Human Rights Commission. Maybe it’s enacting a statutory bill of rights in Victoria, in Queensland, in New Zealand, in Britain. Maybe it’s the whole Tony Blair remaking (and noticeably worsening) of the democratic world’s longest-standing constitutional arrangements, the unwritten British set-up with parliamentary sovereignty at its heart. Or maybe it’s entering into some UN convention or treaty that clearly has the potential to hamstring future democratic decision-making at home. Or maybe it’s Canada’s public funding of ‘Charter of Rights challenges’, namely taxpayer-funded rights-related attacks by aggrieved groups against laws passed by the elected legislature (and which every sentient being knows will be used against conservatives vastly more than against progressive Lefties). Or maybe it’s the creation of taxpayer-funded writers’ festivals, portraiture prizes and the like where conservatives are so rare they call in Attenborough to do a documentary when one is spotted. Or maybe it’s even changes at the public universities to emphasise a litany of identity politics-related essentials – flying four, five or six flags each day; days, weeks or months dedicated to pick-your-favourite supposed victim group; endless land acknowledgements; posters put up to virtue-signal the institution’s tolerance of all DEI groups, while free speech is made a third-order concern.
You see it again and again. The Left side of politics aggressively seeds new institutions. Or it remakes ones already there. It enacts democracy-enervating legislation. Or it enfeebles the elected branches by signing up to supranational treaties and conventions that give unelected and unaccountable elites far too much power. And then, when the Right side gets back into office you get crickets. Nada. Nothing. They simply allow these institutions, laws, treaties, arts festivals, remade universities, every Lefty innovation to carry on. No bureaucracy is disestablished. No treaty withdrawn from. No statute repealed. No writers’ festival defunded. No public broadcaster’s budget slashed, or better yet the whole thing made a subscription service. No fight. No cojones. Just a quiet sort of implicit surrender.
Take the Australian Human Rights Commission (and yes, I know, the Fraser Government stupidly brought in an early, much weaker version of this – just as it was ScoMo who prevaricatingly signed us up to Net Zero). But we have now had decades to see this body in action. Indeed, for well over a decade I have been publicly calling for it to be dismantled. It does nothing for free speech in this country. It supports the s.18C hate speech laws. During what retired UK Supreme Court judge Jonathan Sumption rightly called the biggest inroads on our civil liberties in 200 years – the whole panoply of lockdown thuggery and made-up out of thin air irrational regulations – this body with its grotesquely overpaid commissioners never once objected to any rights-infringement. Not a single one of the thousands from which to choose. And in the Tickle vs Giggle case they supported and funded the trans activist. Not women. Yet nine years of Coalition governments and they did nothing. Heck, they couldn’t even find it in themselves to support Peter Ridd – who lost his job for telling the truth.
But why do nothing about the Human Rights Commission? Just close it down. It not only deserves to be made extinct, it would also be politically popular to do so (outside the corridors of Ultimo, that is). Or what about Queensland’s statutory Bill of rights, opposed by the LNP when Labor brought it in without taking it to an election? But once Crisafulli and Co get into power they just go quiet and leave it there. Exactly as we saw in Victoria with Ted Baillieu’s pusillanimous surrender on the Bill of rights issue. (Does anyone imagine a future Jess Wilson government – we’re imagining here – repealing it? Don’t make me laugh.) Likewise, we saw the same unwillingness to repeal theirs from 14 years of Tory governments in Britain after the Blair constitutional malfeasance. No repeal of the statutory Bill of rights that greatly empowered the unelected judges. No repeal of the statute that lets judges there pick their own successors. No withdrawal from the European Convention. Just abject surrender on all fronts save Brexit (so credit where it’s due). But even with Brexit, once it was half-accomplished the Tories refused to use their new freedoms to break free from the regulatory leviathan that is the European Union – the rich world’s slowest-growing economic area for the last couple of decades and the place Mark Carney wants Canada to somehow join. The same goes, yet again, for the Right side of politics in New Zealand. The Left brings in and the Right cowardly accepts these changes once it gets back into government.
Or look at the Paris Accords. Trump starts his second term and pulls out of Paris, out of the WHO, out of the UN Human Rights Council. Sure, we finally have a Coalition that promises to jettison Net Zero and is proposing detailed policies that will seriously hurt the climate doomsters. But it stops short of pledging to leave Paris. Why? If Paris is just symbolism, and everything that those of us who want much lower electricity prices can be achieved without leaving Paris, well, it’s still hard to fathom why we should stay. Why not cut the umbilical cord to this supranational monstrosity? Because the politics of staying are the politics of One Nation reminding voters that the Libs just look to be a lighter shade of Labor. Right? Meanwhile, if Paris is something more than just symbolism, tell me why we’re not leaving. It is pusillanimity wrapped in stupidity, enveloping a party room with far too many so-called ‘moderates’ who have to be bought off.
Voters like me are just craving bravery and a willingness to repeal, withdraw, dismantle and undo all the Labor seeding of our institutions. Shut the taxpayer tap for the writers’ festivals that can’t find more than one token conservative per year. Ditto for the woeful arts festivals. Show some cojones. Start with shutting down the Australian Human Rights Commission. It is virtually always on the opposite side to me of every political issue going that can plausibly be characterised as a rights-related one. Why are my taxes (in this very high-taxing jurisdiction of Australia) going to pay for this body? It makes the country worse, not better. Heck, why not let Giggle’s Sally Grover decide if it warrants continued existence?
Look, it can be done. Trump has closed down, withdrawn from and defunded all sorts of the Left’s pet projects. There is every sign that Nigel Farage will be aping this approach. The longstanding, established parties of the Right need to start repealing and undoing – or get out of the way so that the Paulines of the world can have a go.
Dr James Allan is the Garrick Professor of Law at Queensland University. This article was first published in Spectator Australia.


Discussion
Comments
This week across the site:
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to the Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
YEEEEEEESSS!!!
This is a very important article, send it to all Tory MPs, those who can actually read.
The post Blair regime has split up authority into a myriad of power centres which can dictate to us, with no scrutiny or accountability. The postmasters, the elite who run the sewage industry, the justice system which can outrageously tell Mr Malkinson to pay his own legal fees spent in overturning the system’s false and ruinous attack on him. the grooming gang cops of the North, judges who fawn on rapist boys, the undebated net zero project ruining our economy, the threat to small landlords of an ‘unlimited fine’ if they fail to register the latest requirement, the thought police tellingi us what we can and can’t think, the prosecution of our soldiers, the ruining of our farmers…..Fair is foul and foul is fair.
MPs should read a bit of ‘administrative law’. Here is a summary of Wade and Forsyth’s textbook, stating principles which have been simply ignored and buried:
The central theme of Wade and Forsyth’s Administrative Law (widely recognized as the leading textbook on the subject) is the tension between efficiency in administrative action and the protection of individual rights. The book explores how the law… Read more »
Here’s some basic math for people who cannot do any:
Let’s assume I have a pound and then acquire a second. This makes for a total of £2 but 100% growth.
If I have £10,000,000 and get another £10,000, I have a total of 10,0010,000 but only 0.1% growth.
Obviously, the former is much superior and preferable!
If you think you have something to say, don’t mindlessy repeat things like “slow growing economies in the EU.”
^^
total of 10,010,000
I have been posting the following on various sites for at least a decade:
First the Right meekly accepted the language of the Left
Then they meekly accepted the objectives of the Left
Then they meekly adopted the Agenda of the Left
Then they meekly agreed to the policies of the Left
Finally, they implemented the policies of the Left for them
And that is why the Not-a-Conservative-Party was almost obliterated at the last General Election.
The emergence of the so-called ‘Woke Right’ is reflective of this, with factions of ‘Right’ and ‘Left’ mirroring each other. Countless examples of this on this site, which has become quite a safe space for people who hold these views. The lack of viewpoint diversity and how dissenting opinions are demonstrably not welcomed only emphasise this further;
”Like all entries in the culture war lexicon, the meaning of the term “woke right” has evolved rapidly. Konstantin Kisin, co-host of the Triggernometry podcast, has adopted the phrase to refer to those who identify as right-wing but whose tactics and perspectives mirror those of the woke left. “Every retardation has an equal and opposite retardation”, he writes. “The deranged worldview of the woke left, along with its disregard for truth, hatred of the West and falsification of history, is now being replicated on the right.”
The author James Lindsay has defined it in similar terms, as “a victimhood-based identity politics” whose “victim groups are whites, Christians, men, and straight people”. He argues that the movement is “roughly intersectional” insofar as it is obsessed with identity politics and a grievance relating to anti-white racism. “Like their counterparts on the Woke Left,” Lindsay writes,… Read more »
Some comments here reveal Reform supporters who are clearly ignorant of how it’s head office treats its supporters, not least its councillors; in turn it treats them with contempt, expecting them to toe the Party line and, despite the huge amount of financial backing that it has acquired, give them no financial support whatsoever. And they are expected to bow and scrape if their Leader decides to pay their area a visit. See Vox Populi interview with two disillusioned ex Reform Worcestershire Councillors.
In the case of the UK the explanation is clear. The Tories agreed with most of what the Blair government did. That is why their opposition was so weak and why they openly portrayed themselves as Blairites at the 2010 election.
It goes back further. The Atlee government nationalised vast areas of business, regulated all property development and destroyed families and SMEs through high death duties. It persisted with war time controls such on holding gold or foreign currency. rationing foodstuffs and building materials. The Tories for 13 years did almost nothing to change that.
Churchill’s government got rid of rationing. After that the party adopted soft left policies consistent with the social views of MacMillan and Butler and the lack of economics knowledge by them both. They adopted Keynsianism hook line and sinker.
Their tollerance of left wing policies and institutions was not an oversight or miistake but a genuine reflection of their left of centre views.
Many countries have proved that you can hit the ‘do something’ button and the problems are solved. Bukele in El Salvador resolved the crime problem by locking up criminals, Putin brought oligarchs controlling Russian assets to heel, Pakistan deported their Afghans.. all are controversial and maybe threaten the sensibilities of some but solve these issues they did. I am not sure Farage is the real deal to hit that button but it can be bashed.
That splendid photo says it all! Well done to Dr. Allan for this excellent article.
Never mind Farage, because MP Rupert Lowe of RESTORE BRITAIN has long advocated “The Great Repeal Act”:
The Great Repeal Act – YouTube
Reform have built up their following over years and Restore Britain’s support is miniscule by comparison. All it will achieve will be to split the right-wing vote and ensure that the left keeps winning. And all because of Lowe’s ego.
Rubbish! “Must’n’t split the vote!” has been the subversive nanny cry of the Uniparty all along, and has kept them in power for decades. We should listen to The Who’s great song: “We Won’t Get Fooled Again!”
We should also watch the powerful interview with Courageous MP Andrew Bridgen on the New Zealand Patriot Dan Wootton’s show:
Plot to BAN elections in Britain rumbled by Andrew Bridgen: “We can’t vote our way out of this!” – YouTube
What do you mean? It’s beyond obvious; Restore IS splitting the Right vote. I don’t see how anyone can deny this. I’m not saying don’t vote for Restore, but I am saying that votes shared between Reform, Restore and Conservatives WILL mean a Labour government, possibly in coalition with the dangerous lunatics who are the Greens, and also with Gaza politicians.
If there is no unified vote on the Right, then we are truly, truly effed good and proper. There will be no way back. These next three years decide the future of this country for the next century and more.
Democracy means that people VOTE FOR WHOEVER THEY WANT, not vote for someone THEY DON’T WANT just to stop someone else they don’t want. The whole idea is a betrayal of the true spirit and reason for DEMOCRACY.
I agree. However, you can cry those tears when a hard Left government, voted in after using those very tactics, is celebrating their victory. You and anyone else shouting that their victory wasn’t in the true spirit of democracy will be laughed at and ignored.
Left parties have been using the tactic of withdrawing their candidates to ensure the election of a Left candidate from another party for years. The Left are unified – the Right are not.
It worked so well when the Brexit Party stood aside for the Tories.. /sarc
Brilliant point! I remember Nigel himself declaring that he “deserved a knighthood” for that. But somehow he didn’t get it, did he?
Who will be crying or laughing remains to be seen, but people should vote with their hearts and minds, not as some sort of cynical ploy.
“You can’t always get (exactly) what you want.”
Restore supporters are letting “a significant step in the right direction” be the enemy of exactly what they want.
Great reminder of another great old song— I forgot all about the Stones!
But their lyrics do not apply in this case.
Only partly agree. Yes we should be able to vote for whoever we want without the need to worry about tactical voting to avoid a disastrous result. AV would have given us that and might well encourage more people to risk voting for a Restore candidate.
It’s not just open borders we’d have to worry about if their was a coalition of clowns headed by Liebour after the next election. I’m pretty sure the Goons and Loony Dims will have rejoinning the EU in their manifestos in 2029 and one of the things they’d insist on as part of a coalition would be a referendum. Given that some people who voted leave in 2016 may well of been brainwashed by the left wing media into thinking that leaving the EU was a bad idea I’m not at all certain remain (out) would win a referendum.
Reform arrogantly assume that Restore are stealing ‘their’ vote. A similar level of arrogance is being shown by Burnham in fighting a seat he’s not usually associated with simply as a stepping stone to becoming the PM.
Reform used to be accused of splitting the vote. And now…?
EppingBlogger, I’ve listened many times to Lowe’s words and have often applauded his actions. He says what he means and he does what he says.
Farage is a reed in the wind and I doubt his integrity.
I say game-on.
Hear, hear!
Rupert Lowe will not be able to influence any government policy. He is just an ego act.
Long advocated? He’s only been an MP for 2 years and he is acting as a wrecking ball for the Establishment Parties.
At least as long as he’s been an MP is long enough, and it’s fantastic that he’s a Wrecking Ball for the Uniparty!
To get this we have to elect enough proper conservatives to do it. The Leftwaffe likes to queer the pitch and make this harder than it needs to be.
I really hope that Britain wakes up and does what is needed, but I don’t have a lot of faith in it happening because so many people are not really aware of how Britain used to be and gradually that memory is dying out.
These “establishment conservative” parties are not conservative. They are fake and have been for a long time.
I’ve no idea about other countries but before Reform we haven’t had a proper conservative party since Thatcher.
Indeed – and Thatcher was just an interlude. What did any other post war Tory govt do to reverse the march of socialism?
Without knowing lots of detail, it seems like most rich world countries have had a Uniparty situation for a while. Trump was not at all liked by a lot of the Republican establishment.
I’m not even sure Reform is a proper conservative party.
There’s only one way to find out.