A review of What if Reform Wins (Bloomsbury, 2026) by Peter Chappell.
You wake up on a cold, grey day in 2030. Six months ago, Reform UK won a slim majority in the General Election and Nigel Farage, party leader and MP for Clacton, became Prime Minister. The United Kingdom teeters on the verge of war with Argentina over the Falkland Islands. Bristol is practically wiped off the map by Biblical-style flooding (the fault of climate change, natch). As a consequence of defunding the BBC, Antiques Roadshow is cancelled – forever.
This is the dystopian nightmare imagined by Times reporter Peter Chappell in his new book, What if Reform Wins, published by Bloomsbury last week.
Naturally, all the usual suspects have decided this is chilling, visionary stuff. The front and back cover boast glowing reviews from the Guardian, and veteran political biographer Sir Anthony Seldon solemnly warns that “we all need to take this scenario very seriously, as Chappell’s invigorating book does”.
The trouble is, Chappell’s book doesn’t seem to take the prospect of a Reform government very seriously at all. Spoiler alert for the few among you who will read the book: Prime Minister Farage doesn’t make it past a year-and-a-half in No.10. His fictional government collapses after a convoluted series of events revolving around the UK’s withdrawal from the ECHR and Richard Tice’s proposed defence cuts mean that the budget fails to pass and – in one of the book’s two endings – Farage is convinced to resign. In the alternate ending, Farage refuses to go and is threatened with arrest.
If this sounds dramatic and implausible, that’s because it is. The book is equal parts sneering and hysterical. You get the sense that Chappell is genuinely horrified at the idea of the technocratic “grown-ups” leaving the proverbial room. Gone are Sir Keir Starmer (who has, in Chappell’s world, since been replaced by another faceless grey suit anyway) and his human-rights lawyers, civil-service mandarins, and policy wonks. Instead, we get a government led by “[military] veterans, self-employed accountants, professional landlords, driving instructors, pub landlords, farmers and call-centre managers”. The horror!
It’s perhaps no surprise, then, that Chappell finds such a scenario difficult to realistically imagine, despite this being the entire premise of the book. For a work that bills itself as being meticulously researched and based on “dozens of new interviews”, the scenarios it presents are almost entirely unrealistic. Take, for instance, the fact that Nigel Farage nearly ends up getting the Falklands invaded by Argentina, when Energy Secretary and newly minted baroness Andrea Jenkyns announces her plans to drill for oil off the coast there. (This forms part of Reform head of policy James Orr’s larger plan to “reverse Net Zero and reverse economic decline” to “fund a renewal of British Christian civilisation”.) Farage then decides to apparently send the entire British Armed Forces – including reservists – to defend the Falklands, thus leaving no troops available for when an apocalyptic-level flood threatens to decimate Bristol.
Why would Farage do this, you might ask. This is never really explained, but it also doesn’t need to be. Chappell, like many of his ilk, has no theory of mind for anyone who might be remotely Right-wing. As far as he is concerned, all those involved with the Reform UK project are simultaneously stupid and evil. It’s not important that the characters (and they are, for all intents and purposes, fictional characters with only a passing resemblance to their real-world namesakes) act in ways that are believable or sensible.
Chappell’s approach to writing What if Reform Wins can be boiled down to namedropping. While the scenarios he presents may be absurd, he clearly has done some research in that he knows his way around the Reform “inner circle”, as well as the broader Right-wing scene, decently enough for an outsider. Figures like Dan Jukes, one of Farage’s right-hand men, play a central role in the narrative, while names like Farage aide Jack Anderton, the Right-wing magazine Pimlico Journal, and the X-born concept of the “Yookay”are sprinkled in with sufficient frequency to suggest that Chappell knows vaguely what he’s talking about. Even Laurie Wastell, the host of the Daily Sceptic’s own Sceptic podcast, gets a mention – he is accused of mainstreaming far-Right activist Tommy Robinson by having him on as a guest to discuss, somewhat bizarrely, his mental health.
But this kind of insider wankery can only take Chappell so far, because he suffers from a remarkable lack of imagination. There may be nothing new under the sun, but you’d think Chappell could have at least given it a go. His vision of a Reform government feels oddly reductive, because practically all of his scenarios have played out before. Vote Leave mastermind and former Boris Johnson advisor Dominic Cummings, for example, reappears as a Reform strategist, but is fired after he criticises the Prime Minister. Sound familiar?
On the very same page, Farage is chucked out of a pub by an angry, plain-speaking West Country landlord, while visiting the scene of flood-stricken Bristol. Again, this might ring some bells, because almost the exact same thing happened to Keir Starmer in Bath, over a row about COVID-19 lockdown measures.
In a similar vein, Chappell’s Farage is constantly getting milkshaked – apparently the only liquid that anyone in this universe can think of to chuck at the Prime Minister.
All this makes for a confusing, inadvertently hilarious read. To give some credit to Chappell, he at least paints a colourful picture of a Reform government. Lee Anderson turns up to the election day count in a Reform-teal-coloured three-wheeled car that was used in the party’s anti-Motability campaign. Girlboss pornstar and unlikely Reform supporter Bonnie Blue pops up at one point to decorate the Earl Haig Memorial in Whitehall with a turquoise Hawaiian garland. There are t-shirt cannons galore.
What if Reform Wins tells us less about Reform UK than it does about the neurotic fantasies of its opponents. Chappell’s vision of a hypothetical Reform government is presented as frightening not just because of the repeated scandals, cataclysmic flooding, and possibility of all-out war. No, this future represents something much more terrifying in the mind of the liberal establishment – the idea that the people – those dreaded accountants, publicans and farmers – might one day get their hands on power.
Lauren Smith is a writer based in London.


Discussion
Comments
This week across the site:
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to the Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
‘Glowing review from Sir Anthony Seldon’. That would be the AS that has written glowing accounts of the success of the Conservative Party including the success of David EUrals Cameron and John ERM Major. The latest being on Liz Truss and how she ruined the economy and was ousted with the help of the Bank of England and the Blob for suggesting cuts in government spending. The voice of Blob.
As regards losing the Falklands, it looks like Rodney has already set that in motion. By annoying Trump with repeated anti-US policies such as refusing use of bases and undermining his peace negotiations, Trump is now favouring his friend Millei and the Argies are proposing talks on taking over the Malvinas and oil resources. Unfortunately we no longer have a navy, with only one frigate not rusting away and 2 aircraft carriers which are sitting ducks.
https://www.navylookout.com/another-warship-quietly-withdrawn-royal-navy-now-down-to-just-5-frigates/
I guess in Chappell’s arrogant world, only lefties should be allowed to win an election.
How very tyrannical of him.
‘What if Hitler had won WWII’ and other counterfactual history books make interesting reading because the fantasy they create is juxtaposed with what actually happened.
Whereas this book is just fantasy and sounds like a Leftie wish-list of masturbation material.
Sounds basically a book about Liebour to me with a few tweaks
Here’s a thought. Perhaps Nigel will not go to flooded Bristol because he has other people whose job is looking after flooding while he gets on with being Prime Minister. I would welcome far less of these ministerial photo ops – especially backed by a bunch of bored workers who have jobs to do.
“You wake up on a cold, grey day in 2030. Six months ago, Reform UK won a slim majority in the General Election and Nigel Farage, party leader and MP for Clacton, became Prime Minister.”
That would be “Oh Bright new day!”
‘Antiques Roadshow is cancelled – forever…’
Just picking myself up off the floor…the ribs…too good…!
Question time as well…?
“repeated scandals”… unlike this pure Labour government, then, or the tories before them
The real dystopian nightmare is that the twerp who authored this bed wetter’s saga writes for the once excellent The Times.
The highest point in Bristol is over 500ft above sea level and to wipe this city ‘off the map’ would require a considerable volume of water that doesn’t exist on this planet, because it would have to be 500ft elsewhere, or is there some enourmous flash flood where the amount of water falling from the clouds is greater than all the water behind the Three Gorges Dam. And to think this would happen immediatley we start drilling for oil and the Army has gone to teh Falklands.
Reform is often uncomfortable. If someone thinks their drinking or smoking habits need reform they may struggle to achieve it. If a politician thinks that there are too many illegal migrants they may struggle to reform the system that encourages them – in recent years many politicians have claimed they will achieve this but none have. Many attempt to reform themselves in some way every New Year. Every season of Lent Christians are encouraged to reform themselves – I usually fail. Reform is uncomfortable because we have to face up to what needs reforming but it should be worthwhile if we put enough effort into it.
I am puzzled about Bristol (about 3m above sea level according to topographic maps) has become inundated. My recollection of Bristol is that there are substantial bits of “up” in that city, so whilst small parts may be affected by flooding it is hardly likely that the whole city, or even large parts of it, could become so flooded.
“Comment is free, but facts are sacred” strapline of the Graun. So Sacred are facts, that they have to be rationed. Bristol has an average elevation of approximately 180 (55m) above sea level, History teaches us that the Somerset Levels act as a ‘safety valve’ protecting Bristol from oceanic floods. Guardian writers are unable to understand facts, or history, or do maths, which tells you all you need to know about their chances of making useful comment. The content of the book reviewed above, is useful only in so far as it gives an insight, into how unhinged the sufferers of ‘Farage/Reform Derangement Syndrome’ are;
And what’s wrong with wiping Bristol off the map? The place is full of racist bigots whose sole aim is to destroy British culture and history and wipe out any white people who get in their way.
the sheer cheek of this book that u will not be reading is that its happy to invent fantasy disaster scenarios for reform; yet it could have a best seller on its hands if it was about the actual disasters wrought by the current government, that it seems to see as a better alternative?
just crazy beyond belief!
”..far-Right activist Tommy Robinson.”
Labels are funny old things, aren’t they? They’re almost always placed on you ( or ‘you’ as a collective ) by others as opposed to yourself. For instance: who is calling who ”Right-wing extremists”, ”racists” or ”fascists”? It always comes from the one direction, doesn’t it? However, the literal ‘far-Right’ don’t get let off the hook because they’re the ones calling anyone who shows support for Israel a ”Zionist shill” or ”Jew”. I mean, what sort of cretin accuses people of being Jewish based purely on the person’s support for Israel?
Tommy Robinson’s views are the ones that most align with mine. He’s a divisive figure because he’s hated by both the ‘hard Left’ and the ‘hard Right’. The former hate him and wrongly call him a racist ( as well as ”far-Right thug”, because EDL ) due to his opposition to mass immigration as well as his anti-Islam stance. They hate Jews so they also hate him for his solidarity with the Jewish community.
The latter hate him ( and here’s the irony ) because he’s NOT racist, he’s emphatically stated he opposes ethnonationalism and doesn’t want every non-white person and Jew deported because… Read more »
Indeed. Tommy Robinson is actually a patriot!
This reminds me why I gave up on The Times years ago. Full of wannabee Guardian scribblers.
There is a lot of Farage Derangement Syndrome about.
This is not just another example of the illiberalism and intolerance of the self-regarding liberal and tolerant classes. It is antagonism to anyone who threatens their supremacy.
They need to get used to it otherwise elections for the coming days and years will be a needless trial for them.
Sounds like condescending drivel. Thank you for reading it so we don’t have to
Recall Granada Television’s The Great European Disaster Movie of 2015.
Featuring Angus Deayton as a character travelling in an airliner, this traveller explains to a child what the European Union ‘paradise’ was before some disaster unravelled it all. The disaster is suggestive of the upcoming Brexit.
Chappell’s novel is of the same genre. Britain has fallen off the edge of the world. Of course, in reality nothing happened as a result of Brexit. There has neither been a great liberation, nor has Britain entered a netherworld.
The Great European Disaster Movie – billed as a documentary with some fictional scenes – was followed by a solemn discussion by ‘experts’ on BBC’s Newsnight (before it became the cut-price chat show of today) as if this film were the prophecies of Nostradamus.
DS’s Laurie Wastell, having been bigged up this novel, could write his own: Starmer – My Part in his Downfall.
Well I’m voting for Lord Nigel of Clacton.
I only occasionally read the Grauniad, mainly for a laugh and wouldn’t waste my money on the Times (or any other so-called newspaper to be fair).
When Iran kicked off, I was chatting to someone who only reads the Guardian and the Independent. She didn’t mention the atrocities taking place there, but expressed deep concern about the poor people living in America under Trump and how awful it must be for them. These people are nuts.
Recall Granada Television’s The Great European Disaster Movie of 2015.
Featuring Angus Deayton as a character travelling in an airliner, this traveller explains to a child what the European Union ‘paradise’ was before some disaster unravelled it all. The disaster is suggestive of the upcoming Brexit.
Chappell’s novel is of the same genre. Britain has fallen off the edge of the world. Of course, in reality nothing happened as a result of Brexit. There has neither been a great liberation, nor has Britain entered a netherworld.
The Great European Disaster Movie – billed as a documentary with some fictional scenes – was followed by a solemn discussion by ‘experts’ on BBC’s Newsnight (before it became the cut-price chat show of today) as if this film were the prophecies of Nostradamus.
In Chappel’s book are there any imaginings about how a Reform government eliminates the things that the left wants to avoid – antisemitism or the activities of the rape gangs? Still, if Chappell thinks that Farage’s mediocre civic nationalism is bad, what of the right-wing alternative?
DS’s Laurie Wastell, having been bigged up this novel, could write his own: Starmer – My Part in his Downfall.
We seem to be in the period of chaos between the old guard Global Liberal Elite and the forthcoming National Popular Elite. As such this book (I’ve not read it) may be one of the last hurrahs for the old guard.
See who applauds the book and you will see a supported of the outgoing Elite. I wonder who sponsored this book?
There surely cannot have been a book advance?
does whoever gave the advance want their money back?
‘Alternate’ ending? The adjective in English English is ‘alternative’.
Hooray for pointing that out.
She seems to love a split infinitive
I’d sooner have a Reform gov than any of the usual suspects again!
Today Reform is promising only to put detention centres for illegal migrants in Green controlled constituencies or areas. Vote Green get a detention centre.
Already happened at Crowborough in East Sussex.
And in addition to the “dreaded accountants, publicans and farmers”, the established Civil Service and other professionals will hold on and keep a grip on many things. It could take a long time to implement the advertised alterations, if a significantly different politician has a go at a major change of any kind.
You know you’re over the target when you’re taking flak.
Sounds like ample evidence to get the author sectioned.
Real fascists calling normal people what they see in the mirror. I guess the idiot boy author is okay with open borders, muslims raping white girls, unlimited welfare fraud, massive crime surges, the erasure of this country and its history. I pity the moron who reads such a pile of dog shyte and agrees with it. No, rephrase that. I will deport any moron who reads this book and finds it to represent reality.
It sounds like ample evidence to sanction the author by the electoral commission* for publishing in the run-up to an election. I wonder, perhaps, if that’s a coincidence. And yes, I know Thursday’s elections are regional, not general, but it’s still suspicious timing.
*Sorry, what was I thinking? They’d never do something like that, would they?
Take a work of fiction, and review it as if it was factual – idiots!