142493
Book your tickets here to the FSU’s live discussion with Matthew Goodwin about his new book. Book your tickets here to the FSU’s live discussion with Matthew Goodwin about his new book. Book your tickets here to the FSU’s live discussion with Matthew Goodwin about his new book.
  • Log in
The Daily Sceptic
No Result
View All Result
  • Articles
  • About
  • Archive
    • ARCHIVE
    • NEWS ROUND-UPS
  • Forum
  • Donate
  • Newsletter
The Daily Sceptic
No Result
View All Result

Name-Calling, ‘Fact-Checking’ and Censorship in the Covid Era

by Noah Carl
11 November 2022 9:03 AM

One novel feature of the pandemic, from the standpoint of public debate, is the fact that so much name-calling, ‘fact-checking’ and censorship was aimed not just at random dissidents but at credential scientists.

Academics who’d reached esteemed positions within their field were denounced as ‘Covid deniers’, accused of spreading ‘misinformation’, and subjected to multiple forms of censorship.

Renowned scholars had warning labels attached to their tweets, and found their articles blacklisted on sites like Facebook and LinkedIn. In one particularly egregious case, the Great Barrington Declaration was downranked by Google, so that when users searched for it, articles critical of the Declaration appeared above the Declaration itself.

Somehow, Big Tech firms felt they were in position to adjudicate complex scientific debates. This would be like two scientists having an argument at speaker’s corner in Hyde Park, but the groundskeeper keeps blasting an airhorn every time one of them speaks.

And it wasn’t just Big Tech that restricted one side’s freedom of speech. Academics who questioned the mainstream view on Covid faced sanctions from their universities, journals and professional associations.

In s recent paper, Yaffa Shir-Raz and colleagues analysed the tactics that were used against dissenting scientists, based on semi-structured interviews with some of the targets. Their findings have already been summarised by Carl Heneghan and Tom Jefferson, but it’s worth pulling out a few anecdotes from the paper.

One interviewee recounted that he/she was even censored on Google docs – a program for creating documents and spreadsheets (like Microsoft Office):

Google Docs started restricting and censoring my ability to share documents… This is not Twitter throwing me off like they did. This is an organisation telling me that I cannot send a private communication to a colleague or to a friend, or to a family member.

Another interviewee explained that his/her employment contract were re-written after he/she deviated from the narrative:

They offered me a new contract… we got some new terms for you, because my old contract was not restricted. The new one basically had like seven or eight restrictions of my First Amendment rights… basically I couldn’t talk to the press, I couldn’t speak in public… unless I said, these are my opinions not that of my employer… It was a relatively short conversation. I said that’s never going to happen, I’m never going to sign that thing.

A third interviewee described how he/she was cancelled by several organisations without any due process:

There was a whole series of actions taken again with no due process and no explanation… I received a notice from the [medical association] that I was being stripped from a committee position… I received a letter from a journal…where I was the Editor-in-Chief, being stripped of the editorship, again with no due process, no phone calls no, tractable explanation… I received a letter from the National Institutes of Health being stripped from a longstanding committee position.

Remember, these were all “established doctors and scientists”, not foreign spies engaged in subversion.

The point isn’t that dissenting scientists were right about everything (although they were right about a lot). It’s that we can’t have a proper debate if one side faces a barrage of name-calling, ‘fact-checking’ and censorship. Enforcing a narrative around Covid shouldn’t be the role of Big Tech companies. And it certainly shouldn’t be the role of academic institutions.

Tags: CensorshipGreat Barrington DeclarationThe Science

Donate

We depend on your donations to keep this site going. Please give what you can.

Donate Today

Comment on this Article

You’ll need to set up an account to comment if you don’t already have one. We ask for a minimum donation of £5 if you'd like to make a comment or post in our Forums.

Sign Up
Previous Post

41% of Climate Scientists Don’t Believe in Catastrophic Climate Change, Major New Poll Finds

Next Post

Covid and Climate ‘Misinformation’ From Scientists Targeted by the Economist

Subscribe
Login
Notify of
Please log in to comment

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

8 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

NEWSLETTER

View today’s newsletter

To receive our latest news in the form of a daily email, enter your details here:

 

DONATE

PODCAST

Nick Dixon and Toby Young Talk About Andrew Tate’s Confrontation With the BBC, Robert Kennedy Jr.’s Presidential Campaign and the Fall of Joe Biden

by Will Jones
6 June 2023
1

LISTED ARTICLES

  • Most Read
  • Most Commented
  • Editors Picks

Government ‘Counter-Disinformation Unit’ Targeted Oxford Professor for Questioning Lockdown Evidence

8 June 2023
by Will Jones

How We Know Flu Really Did Disappear in 2020 and 2021

8 June 2023
by Will Jones

“Vaccines Have Been Pulled For Much Less”: Dr. Aseem Malhotra Makes Waves in Australia Renewing Call for Withdrawal of Covid Shots

8 June 2023
by Will Jones

News Round-Up

9 June 2023
by Jonathan Barr

Just Stop Snake Oil

8 June 2023
by Toby Young

Just Stop Snake Oil

37

Government ‘Counter-Disinformation Unit’ Targeted Oxford Professor for Questioning Lockdown Evidence

36

How We Know Flu Really Did Disappear in 2020 and 2021

22

News Round-Up

50

“Vaccines Have Been Pulled For Much Less”: Dr. Aseem Malhotra Makes Waves in Australia Renewing Call for Withdrawal of Covid Shots

15

‘Climate Change’ is a Doomsday Cult That Threatens Us All

9 June 2023
by Andrew Montford

The Problem With the WHO is Not That North Korea is Leading It

9 June 2023
by Dr David Bell

How We Know Flu Really Did Disappear in 2020 and 2021

8 June 2023
by Will Jones

What Settled Science? Decades of Research Only Widen Guesses of Temperature Change

8 June 2023
by Chris Morrison

Who Destroyed the Kakhovka Dam?

7 June 2023
by Noah Carl

POSTS BY DATE

November 2022
M T W T F S S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930  
« Oct   Dec »

SOCIAL LINKS

Free Speech Union
  • Home
  • About us
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy

Facebook

Twitter

Instagram

RSS

Subscribe to our newsletter

© Skeptics Ltd.

No Result
View All Result
  • Articles
  • About
  • Archive
    • ARCHIVE
    • NEWS ROUND-UPS
  • Forum
  • Donate
  • Newsletter

© Skeptics Ltd.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Create New Account!

Please note: To be able to comment on our articles you'll need to be a registered donor

Already have an account?
Please click here to login Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
wpDiscuz
You are going to send email to

Move Comment