In a recent article by regular Daily Sceptic contributor who writes under the nom de plume Eugyppius, in homage to a fifth century monk, the subject of people who deny the existence of viruses was brought up. In my experience of writing about these people in the Daily Sceptic and in other places such as CIEO and Country Squire Magazine, they object to being called ‘virus deniers’ (smacks of holocaust denial) and prefer to be referred to as ‘virus sceptics’. Eugyppius, who clearly has previous form for daring to challenge this fringe minority, concludes that “people who deny the existence of viruses won’t accept any arguments or evidence to the contrary, and these debates aren’t productive”. And Eugyppius is not far wrong.
Nevertheless, it is worth keeping an eye on what the viral sceptics are pushing. Of course, they are not pushing anything new; they have a series of points including that no virus has ever been isolated and that experiments purporting to show that they can infect cells are not properly controlled to account for artefacts. What they do, instead, is to repackage their points in increasingly vitriolic and increasingly long tracts where they preach to the converted in ever more strident terms. Enter the latest such missive from ‘virus sceptics central’ located in Christchurch New Zealand and the good offices of Dr. Mark Bailey, husband of the incomparable Dr. Sam Bailey. The document titled à la Hemingway, A Farewell to Virology and modestly sub-titled Expert Edition is 67 pages long. Where a scholarly publication would set out with the aim of investigating a phenomenon in order to arrive at a conclusion, the conclusions here are presented up front and the rest of the document is written to justify them.
Thus, the opening sentence of the abstract begins: “Virology invented the virus model but has consistently failed to fulfil its own requirements.” Later “‘viruses’ such as SARS-CoV-2 are nothing more than phantom constructs” which should be good news to the millions of people across the world – this author included –who have been struck down by a condition which floored them for a few days, made expensive wine taste like something that oozed from a compost heap and then gave the same condition to his wife. We watched the initial lateral flow test nearly explode with colour at the first dab of liquid but observed this fading away over the next 10 days in direct correlation with recovery. Presumably we were just imagining it.
The remainder of the abstract continues in the same way. The document is presented in three parts. In Part 1 we hear about the “failure of virologists to follow the scientific method”. In Part 2 “the fraud used to propagate the COVID-19 ‘pandemic'” will be examined, and in Part 3 we learn how the “virus illusion” is maintained through “information control”. Using one of their favourite tactics of ad hominem attack, after claiming that SARS-CoV-2 has not been found, Dr. Bailey launches into Dr. Souxsie Wiles of Auckland University, New Zealand who has been at the forefront of countering misinformation about the existence of COVID-19.
Roasting an old chestnut similar to one that Dr. Sam Bailey has also used, Dr. Mark Bailey refers to a blog by Vincent Racaniello, a virologist who has written about the imprecision of terminology in virology and the lack of a common understanding of terms such as ‘isolation’ which is pivotal in the investigation of viruses. Vincent Racaniello is clearly ‘coming clean’ regarding some laxity around terminology and he is also attempting to provide some clarity. However, Dr. Bailey erroneously, but possibly deliberately, pounces on this as proof that the whole field of virology is bogus. Racaniello provides a perfect definition of a viral isolate (the product of virus isolation) as: “a virus that we have isolated from an infected host and propagated in culture.”
The Baileys’ views on isolation and their selective use of information in published papers has already been discussed in the BioBlog from Waikato University, New Zealand. They consistently claim that there is no proof of growth by culture and isolation of viruses. On one occasion, to ‘prove’ their point, it is alleged they obtained information on a study via an Office of Information request which, specifically, did not ask for such evidence and then claimed that it was missing. However, as shown in BioBlog, the original study clearly explained how the virus was cultured and that it was grown in culture that had no other genetic material added to it. In the same vein, a major plank of the Baileys’ argument against proof for the existence of viruses is that the experiments are uncontrolled. However, in 2020 a study was published titled the “Isolation, Sequence, Infectivity, and Replication Kinetics of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2” where it is clearly stated that: “Relative to mock-inoculated cells, cells inoculated with both samples (SARS-CoV-2/SB2 and SARS-CoV-2/SB3-TYAGNC) displayed extensive CPE (cytopathic effects) 72 hours after infection.” If that’s not a controlled study, I am not sure what is.
I now brace myself for a witty riposte from Drs Bailey like the previous one and the one before that. Perhaps they will issue a writ of libel like they did after one of my recent articles in Country Squire Magazine. I count among my friends several who are viral sceptics; I know that they won’t accept any arguments or evidence to the contrary. I don’t care, but they should not go unchallenged.
Dr. Roger Watson is Academic Dean of Nursing at Southwest Medical University, China. He has a PhD in biochemistry.
Kevin Corbett, Christine Massey and Mark Bailey have posted a response to this article on their website.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
Virus denialism didn’t imprison us for 2 years, they aren’t the problem clearly. There are all sorts of daft beliefs like Shakespeare wasn’t the bard, doesn’t matter. Ppl that are the problem are the ones who cry wolf avd demand collectivist action to profit themselves, like the bio state, war machine and carbon lobby.
‘Virus denialism didn’t imprison us for 2 years,’
No but arguably they muddied the water and perhaps discredited perfectly sound arguments about the ludicrousness and cruelty of the so-called measures.
No their existence had nothing to do with the insane response. Useful Scape goat but not cause.
I don’t recall anyone denying the existence of viruses (fullstop) in the early debate about COVID. All the push back was about the effectiveness of lockdowns, masks etc and whether or not vaccines were the devils work. Different things totally.
Team Toby, I presume?
Toby, Toby, Toby!
Go Team Toby!!!
Goodness! I hope its not catching.
Yes, I know perfectly nice people who are flat-earthers. Doesn’t worry me. Pure rationality is not a common feature in human beings.
Take Delingpole superb fellow, believes the barb was some earl when Ben Johnson a contemporary credits Shakespeare. Ppl, even very smart ones, believe the most stupid things, it’s whether it’s harmful that’s the issue.
As far as I am concerned anybody can believe what they like. They are also entitled to try and persuade me to believe it too. Right up to the point they start to suggest there is something wrong with me if I dont, and then use the government to bribe me with me own money or use the law to make me believe it. That’s the point where they turn into fascists.
It’s always struck me as somewhat of a red herring, the virus-sceptic strand of covid cynicism. A rabbit hole we could probably do without. Like the author’s experience, I ‘had covid’ – whatever that means – in summer 2021 which resulted in total loss of taste and smell, along with very mild typical viral (whatever that means) symptoms. The day this particular symptom surfaced I took a lateral flow test (against my better judgement) which came back positive. Very hard, even as an arch sceptic to argue with that.
I don’t need to refute the existence of the virus itself to conclude that the ‘pandemic’ was fake and the supposed ‘response’ was entirely fraudulent. If viruses do exist (and what exactly are they doing in those gain of function laboratories if they don’t?) then this was a run of the mill one that posed negligible risk to the overwhelming majority (or even all) of the population. The hype and deliberate fear mongering and criminal intrusions into our lives did far more damage than sars-cov2 ever could.
Beautifully put.
I don’t know whether viruses exist or not, certainly not from personal knowledge. Whatever I believe is based on what I’ve been told. And that is where all the problems stem from.
When those with knowledge and authority who we have been brought up to believe and trust behave in an outrageously untrustworthy manner and clearly lie or pretend to know things they really don’t, then it is quite natural to start questioning everything.
I don’t know about viruses in general, but I would say that whether the SARS-2 virus exists or not is pretty much academic. Scientific knowledge, as far as I’m concerned has practical value only in so far as it allows you to make accurate predictions. If you can’t make a prediction on something you think you know, then what you know is basically useless.
And that is where we are with SARS -2. Their ability to predict anything with any degree of accuracy is effectively zero. Some people get ill some don’t. Some don’t feel it some do. They can’t predict whether someone is gong to pass it on or not. Whether they can or not. If it’s passed on they don’t really know how. Some people continue to suffer long term, others don’t.
How much of that can be said of other viruses, I don’t know.
What I would say to Dr Roger Watson, if he wanted to convince people like me that struggle to believe anything any “expert” says these days, then rather than tell me some random information about viruses that I just have to take your word for, make a solid verifiable prediction about the behaviour of a virus that has some real world implications.
If he can’t do that, then what he has to tell me is about as useful to me as what the Baileys have to say. Not very.
Spot on.
Just seems like a pointless diversion to me.
Let’s focus on the real enemies – God knows there are enough of them, and they are not hard to spot.
I agree, it is a red herring and it does discredit our movement. I read ‘Virus Mania’ and it makes a very good case that the role of viruses in disease is greatly mediated by ‘terrain’ and the impact of vaccines has been greatly exaggerated. However, the idea that there is no pathogen at all just doesn’t make any sense. All these arguments about whether a given virus has been properly isolated are an irrelevance; something has made people ill and has clearly been transmitted from person to person by some mechanism. Even Semmelweis could see this way before pathogens had been identified and we can all know from our own experience that it happens. Last week my wife fell ill on Monday with a stomach bug and two days later I did. That wasn’t a hysterical reaction on my part, but my body’s response to an invasive pathogen.
Unfortunately, the corruption and deceits which we have been subjected to have made some people question every truth, and some of those people have come to some erroneous conclusions. This does play into the hands of those who would seek to dismiss our legitimate fury about the way in which the pandemic has been manipulated to feather nests and advance other nefarious projects.
So having a loss of taste and smell and having 2 lines on a bit of plastic completely refutes the virus skeptics?
Let’s get rid of this ludicrous taste and smell symptom once and for all. It’s a subjective symptom, which means it depends wholly on believing what comes out of a person’s mouth. There is no blood test or any other test that can prove someone has a loss of taste and smell. It’s also a psychosomatic symptom, implant the thought in someones mind that they will suffer a loss of taste and smell when their bit of plastic has 2 lines and guess what, they miraculously start to exhibit that symptom!
If Covid caused people to come out in purple spots that would be a different matter but the only ‘proof’, symptom wise, is the dubious loss of taste and smell.
The symptoms of Covid are identical and virtually identical to many existing illnesses, colds, pneumonia, Sepsis, bacterial chest infections, other infections, COPD, Emphysema and Asthma the main ones that have been misdiagnosed by the doctors to convince us that we are experiencing a completely new virus.
Do a thought experiment, if someone had those same symptoms in, say, 2017 would they believe they are experiencing a ‘new’ illness? No, they wouldn’t bat an eyelid and put it down to what it really is, a cold or chest infection.
I’ve worked on a frontline Ambulance throughout the ‘pandemic’ and if ANYONE is going to see severe Covid it is us and yet I’ve still to see even a single solitary unequivocal severe Covid case. And no I don’t work on the Isle of Skye and no, I haven’t just been ‘lucky’.
The real reason is that they just don’t exist.
There was something going round , we went down with it in varying degrees last summer , our two sons in their 20,s were back home due to restrictions & the wife & myself all lost our taste & smell of which us older two find our smell is still impaired , I was in bed for a fortnight !.
Try and understand the role the mind is playing in all this. Medicine is 50% science and 50% human psychology. It’s not 100% science, That’s why medicine is the only science that has the Placebo effect and psychosomatic illness.
I’m not saying you weren’t ill I saying that you have subconsciously worsened the perception of you illness. I wouldn’t be surprised if you considered it “the worst ever” as that is the most common phrase heard about Covid.
In fact it’s a cold or a chest infection and it’s just confirmation bias persuading you that this illness is more severe than it actually is.
As I said if you had this illness in 2017 you would not have batted an eyelid or considered this a ‘new’ illness with a ‘new’ set of symptoms.
Put it this way, if I’d attended you on an Ambulance (yes people call 999 for colds!) in 2017 and again today I guarantee your observations, temp, blood pressure, pulse and oxygen saturations would be identical and normal for your illness.
The difficulty is explaining all this concept to people because they don’t want to believe that they have been fooled by the medical profession, or their own minds, and the usual response is just complete and utter denial that that is actually the case.
Still failing to see the bigger picture for lack of research. Now who is suffering from psychosis?
Not sure about this article, I can’t imagine that anyone who has been to this site over the last 3ish years actually deny that viruses exist.
I think the ideology we all share is disbelief against the abhorrent disproportionate economic, social, biological and mental impact of measures taken against human kind.
Whilst I agree with your sentiment I am sure there have been posters who deny the existence of viruses. I recall reading them. Sadly that and other more wild ideas, in my humble opinion, do detract from the very sensible science based approach most of us have in abhorring the total wreck of lives and economies made by almost, but thankfully not all, governments worldwide.
…I’m not really disagreeing with you as such….but is it any more ‘wacky’ than the reality of imprisoning elderly people in care homes to die alone and in misery?…..or thinking toddlers should be forced to wear masks…?
Is it any more ‘wild’ than making young people have a second jag, knowing they suffered heart-problems after the first? Is it any more ‘crazy’ than actually vaccinating six month old babies with a untested gene therapy that hundreds of studies have shown causes injuries and death?
All this and much more …not theories…but actually perpetrated on the masses by established scientists and doctors.
At this stage it beggars belief that any medic or scientist can ‘call-out’ any one else as a crack-pot after the real-life horrors they have taken part in.
I don’t think any of the things you mention are “wacky” or “wild”. I think they are one of the following; stupid, negligent or evil.
To be clear my mental and physical health was wrecked by lockdowns and I was very concerned about both my adult sons for different reasons. I used to be a non-violent person who deplored the death penalty but there was a time when certain members of our dictatorship would have met with a very sticky end if I had anything to say about it. Even now there are one or two of them that I still feel that way about.
..I did say I was not disagreeing as such…just making the point that it’s the ‘establishment’ that have genuinely horrified me with their perversion of science and medicine, and their evil and cruelty….
Particularly as Dr Sam was one of the few brilliant people who, from the out-set, was one of the few who put their heads above the parapet and explained and de-bunked a lot of what we knew about the scam….she’s an absolute hero to millions…….I’m ok with the fact that she isn’t perfect!?!
But it doesn’t matter humans will always believe very stupid things. That won’t change.
Emphasising the existence of an enemy promotes the sale of arms. To sell any product, the potential customer has to be convinced they need it – that there may be a problem without the product.
An extension to this sales technique would be, “How can you prove that this problem does not exist or will not arise? To put your mind at rest, shouldn’t you get this product, just in case?”
Whether or not viruses exist, the spreading of fear or uncertainty tends towards selling products to counter them. When such products are expensive and/or risky, caveat emptor. Check thoroughly. Know your own psychology. Know there are vested interests.
At a tangent to this, last week there was a successful challenge in court against council tax by Marc Horn of Peace Keepers. His underlying approach has always been to get the council to prove their claim in court and show an obligation to pay. They could not do this, so they cancelled their claim. But even still, there will be those willing to pay council tax because of the fear of falling foul of an obligation that is not proven.
I don’t know if viruses exist or not. But I see the attempts to increase fear and make profit from it. And that, above all, gives me the greatest cause to doubt.
Do viruses exist? No idea, but there was something that swept the globe in 2020 that was different to what had come before. Like billions of others, I caught the thing and experienced a quite bizarre complete loss of sense of smell and taste (and a bit of a head cold); it was definitely different in symptoms to anything I’d had before. What caused that I don’t know, but in trying to consider all arguments, I certainly wouldn’t be getting too excited about whether the justification came before or after the conclusion – to me, at least, that’s merely a distraction. What I do know, with 100% certainty, is that after spending 2 years down the deepest rabbit hole ever seen by man, there is no seemingly whacky idea that I’d completely dismiss.
I suspect that the serious sceptic, when faced with 2 1/2 years of lies, corruption and obfuscation, the likes of which I have never previously seen, may find it hard to draw a line under what is actually reality and what is a construct.
I have had to question the basic tenets of my medical beliefs in this context.
Whilst virus denial appears to be a belief beyond rational and sceptical thinking, I certainly sympathise with the process leading to that belief.
I don’t know the answer, but people’s ‘belief’ in scientists doctors and experts, their ‘belief’ in ‘the science’, their belief in ‘safe and effective vaccines’…all brought them to two plus years of fear, irrationality, totalitarian projects, psychological problems and a lot of vaccine injuries and even death….
Well done established science….way to go!
At this stage I’d rather have had the supposed ‘virus denying crazies’ in charge…..I don’t think they could have done a worse job….
Dr Watson would do better to question and challenge the medical ‘believers’….his fellow scientists and medics….who have caused long-lasting, irreparable and maybe permanent damage to what seems like the entire world….
Like many other people I would have laughed about this a couple of years ago…but frankly, fool me once….
The problem isn’t ‘fringe’ theories…..It seems to me that it’s the entire established scientific and medical profession who are the ones who need to apologise, and who need to prove their case if they ever want people to trust a word they say….
There’s possibly an argument that “virus sceptics” make the whole covid sceptic community more open to attack, but I think the whole business is profoundly unimportant in the scheme of things. We should be focusing on what unites us, not on our differences.
If I had to bet money on it I would bet that viruses do exist but I have no real idea and frankly don’t care much. What I would ask is has virology been a net positive for human civilisation? It may have been in credit before covid, not so sure now.
Quite patronising article to try, in a roundabout way, to attempt to convince us that the Sars-Cov -2 virus does actually exist and why it was completely justified to bring the world to a halt, and kill lots of innocent people in the process, to try and stop it.
It seems pretty clear that if the claimed isolation experiments were legitimate it would be in their interest to invite the virus skeptics to a lab for a demonstration and prove that they are wrong and shut them up, once and for all. The fact this hasn’t happened speaks volumes about their confidence in this area. Also, it’s ONLY the virus believers who use ruthless censorship, or condone its use, to counter the ‘spread of disinformation’ and that’s not good optics for them.
Their favourite tactic is always to try and drag down to the molecular level and then attempt to baffle with their BS before throwing up their arms in exasperation, that these skeptics are just not bright enough to understand the intricacies of molecular genetics.
They appear to win the loyalty of the public when the fight is on their turf but get them out of their comfort zone and they start sweating.
That’s done by simply pointing out the clear contradictions of their argument like why would a deadly airborne respiratory virus kill everything in its path in Europe but stop at the borders of Sweden?
Why did masks eliminate Flu but had no affect on Covid, both an airborne respiratory virus?
Why is the average age of Covid death ABOVE the UK average age of natural death?
Why was the PCR test 0% accurate in the 2006 Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical centre Whooping Cough outbreak but is 100% with Covid? Whooping cough is a bacteria, massively bigger than a virus and so easy to detect. And yet the PCR couldn’t even detect that?
Why wasn’t the Diamond Princess devastated by Sars-Cov-2?
Why do the Age Standardised Mortality Rate statistics show 2020 to be the 16th worst year for deaths in the UK since 1990?
It’s these questions that need to be simply explained but they can’t do it.
Maybe a more appropriate question to pose is “Are viruses exosomes?”. To my understanding the Germ vs. Terrain debate that we’ve inherited from Pasteur vs. Beschamps was never about EVs existing or not but more about the chicken vs egg thing in that EVs(extracellular vescicles like viruses/exosomes) are a cellular response to toxicity in terrain theory…even EMF toxicity…which circumstantially is a novel universal toxin these days.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8580522/
Most viral pandemics have coincided with novel global emf rollouts including the Spanish flu which quickly leaped the ocean when radar installations first appeared. Check out “The Invisible Rainbow” by Arthur Firstenberg. Microbiology, especially protein synthesis, is a very sensitive exchange of electrons that has evolved/been designed within the parameters of earth’s emf afterall…and if we mess with that? Well, wouldn’t one expect things to go sideways? and we’ve been well led away from that discussion. I like the goldfish analogy…if your goldfish is sick and the water is murky, do you clean the tank/water or vaccinate the fish?
Meanwhile question that which you are not allowed to question!
Erm, right. Thanks for that. I think.
Not all of us on here are bloody scientists.
Not sure why Dr Watson has such a bee in his bonnet over the Baileys. Whether you agree or disagree with their conclusions, it seems to me they have raised some valid evidence-based points. One thing we should have learned over the past two and a half years is that science is not always “settled”. Consensus is not proof of correctness. There was once a consensus that the Earth was flat and that the sun revolved around it. It is often the outliers who ask the awkward questions, regardless of whether they are correct or not, who help establish the truth. We learn by asking questions and challenging hypotheses, not by following narratives.
My understanding of the virus sceptics is that they agree there are small particles which we call viruses. They are sometimes seen in electron micrographs, but their role in causing disease is not as well-established as we think. Try to find the definitive study or scientific paper which conclusively establishes HIV as the cause of AIDS and you won’t find it because no such study exists. That doesn’t mean HIV doesn’t cause AIDS but it does mean there is room to question the hypothesis, and the search for alternative causes is reasonable. Closed minds are not enquiring minds and science is all about enquiry, not dogma.
Spot on.
I agree. As sceptics we can’t sweep these questions – about the identification of a single cause/specific disease – under the carpet. We all have a tendency towards reductionism, ie wanting to keep things simple, but – as Bret Weinstein often says – biology is about complex systems.
Worth reading The Real Anthony Fauci chapters on the HIV/AIDs link and how the uncertainties have been covered up and manipulated to benefit corporate and corrupt political interests. Sadly most of our medical establishment are at best willfully blind to the difficult questions that remain unanswered.
If the sping-20 cvd19 epidemic was due to a virus, it was a virus unaware of EU free movement. Check out the Euromomo graphs. In Germany (Hesse or Berlin) there was no dramatic Gompertz hump in average all-cause mortality. In fact, no increase at all.
Whereas, just west in Netherlands, and north in Scandinavia, the same transient surge in deaths occurred as in the UK.
Is anyone seriously saying that viruses stop at frontiers?
If not, a non-microscopic-pathogen cause for the spring-20 mortality must be posited. Let’s think about differences in patient management in Germany. Aha, here’s a thought. In Germany, there was no bulk pre-ordering of midazolam for use in care homes, no aggressive intubation of the frail-elderly ill, and not much DNR.
Persuade me those weren’t the real causes of the first cvd19 epidemic, if you can.
You’re right to put this information in bold italics – it’s very important! Denis Rancourt comes to mind; try telling him there’s been a pandemic! I always wondered whether the criminal shyster Drosten simply found a genetic sequence that he and his paymasters knew was constantly in circulation, and could be found in varying degrees around the world all the time?
Agreed…they did…it’s usually called a cold..or common respiratory virus….…
I have absolutely no doubt that if you had done the same PCR tests in hospital from, say, 1999 to 2002, (any period actually) and called whatever you found by a new name…i.e CONVID……then CONVID would have been found in increasing numbers and, of course, would have overwhelmed the NHS!!
Is anyone seriously saying that viruses stop at frontiers?
Quite often they do, yes. The March-April 2020 outbreak was highly regional https://twitter.com/Humble_Analysis/status/1321904472168177664 Outbreaks are localised and in the case of COVID or flu only affect maybe 15% of the population at a time. One of the issues with the Imperial College model was that it assumed perfect spread throughout the whole population, which is not what’s observed. Regarding mortality rates, COVID mainly kills the very old, and in the March-April 2020 outbreak there were strong signs of mortality displacement depending on the level of excess deaths in the previous 1-2 years, accounting for the relatively high COVID mortality in Sweden, the US and the UK, the middling COVID mortality in Germany and the super-low COVID mortality in much of Central/Eastern Europe, which then caught up in the following season. https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1281170193708806144.html
Good points, but you are wrong to characterize the German covid mortality as middling instead of as zero.
https://euromomo.eu/graphs-and-maps
Euromomo shows Germany as low excess but not zero for 2020 week 16.
Germany Hesse, yes, but not Berlin. Would you say that either graph shows a signal that a pandemic is around?
A much more pressing question now might be: Will the ‘Pro-Jab Pharmafia Pimps’ and their legion camp followers Ever Accept the Evidence That Proves Their Jollop Ineffective and Dangerous?’
Attacking tiny minorities might be seen as a bullying and wholly diversionary tactic.
As far as I can see this article is one giant straw man and seeing as the author lives and works in China it’s definitely eggy.
I seriously doubt many of the people Watson mentions don’t believe in viruses. If that’s the case, as Crisis Garden below points out, why all the sceptical outrage over the covered up gain of function research in ground zero Wuhan?
The bottom line is, unlike swine flu and every other failed but lucrative hyped up pandemic, this one worked because it was highly organised and the psychological terror campaign was complex, involved multiple big tech gimmicks, was swift, well co-ordinated, and pitched perfectly by the Chinese-run WHO, alongside the FDA, the CDC, SAGE and the rest of our Neo-Feudalist Gates/Fauci/pharma/Davos cartel.
They bought off the media, they re-wrote the official definitions of ‘pandemic’ and ‘natural immunity’ and they funded regional behavioural psychology campaigns to force their populations to cover their faces in order to embarrass and terrorise each other into taking highly lucrative experimental drugs they were told would protect them from a virus that was never a threat to them. Blackmailing populations into taking useless, dangerous, untested drugs us that are now tearing their way through the hearts of millions across the world and at the same time massively increasing virus transmissibility, enabling the perfect conditions for future genuinely deadly virus variants that could potentially wipe us all out.
Oooh another middle aged healthy friend we know’s just died of a heart attack.. and another…and another sports star .. oooh look, and a famous drummer… Ooooh look there’s a British Heart Foundation ad with a teenage girl collapsing on a football pitch from heart attack – like they do. That’s normal. ‘Computer Games might cause heart attacks in children’ recent headline reads. Yeah of course they do.. The haunting years I spent as a child bouncing between my Commodore 64 and the cardiac wing of our local Royal Infirmary don’t bear thinking about.
Dangerous drugs, testing kits and PPE swamping landfill and our oceans – all theatrical virus paraphernalia that’s made The Cartel trillions and opened up a chasm of groupthink and psychological weakness they’re now swiftly trying to exploit by legislating to turn the internet into their personal propaganda platform. All bringing us ever closer to total digital global dictatorship.
Do you not think this is what you should be writing about Dr.China?
Brilliant…….
I feel your anger…..people underestimate the cathartic pleasure of a good rant, especially one that’s spot-on…!!
Many thanks for this. It needed to be said.
Out of interest, author, how many viruses have actually been isolated?
Note to the Mods:
Can we just pack in all this having a go at the Dr’s Bailey, it is tiresome, negative and pointless.
Furthermore, I think Dr Sam Bailey is ixquisite.
I note the Virus Sceptics seem to concentrate on the covid virus.
What are their views on earlier viruses? Presumably they won’t be allowing their children to be vaccinated against Measles, Smallpox, Polio, Mumps, rubella etc?