A study has found cardiovascular adverse effects in around a third of teenagers following Pfizer vaccination, and heart inflammation in one in 43, raising fresh concerns about the risks of vaccination for young people.
The preprint study (not yet peer-reviewed) enrolled 314 Thai adolescents aged 13-18, of which 13 were lost to follow up, leaving 301 who were monitored following vaccination. It found cardiovascular effects in 29.24% of participants, including tachycardia, palpitation and, in one participant, myopericarditis. Two participants had suspected pericarditis and four participants had suspected subclinical myocarditis. The most common cardiovascular effects were tachycardia (7.64%), shortness of breath (6.64%), palpitation (4.32%), chest pain (4.32%) and hypertension (3.99%).
The researchers noted that the “clinical presentation of myopericarditis after vaccination was usually mild, with all cases fully recovering within 14 days”. However, they added that “although clinical symptoms spontaneously resolved rapidly in all patients, the potential for cardiac fibrosis vaccine-related myocarditis remains unknown”.
The mechanism of the effect is unknown, they write, but it “may be related to the mRNA sequence that encodes for the spike protein of SARS-CoV-2, or the immune response following vaccination”.
Seven instances of suspected heart inflammation (pericarditis, myocarditis and myopericarditis) out of 301 people gives an incidence rate of 2.3%, or one in 43. Instances of cardiovascular adverse events more broadly were almost one in three.
A retrospective French study found that the rate of hospitalisation with serious myocarditis following vaccination among 18-24 year-old males was one every 5,900 second Moderna doses (CI, 4,400-8,000) and one every 21,100 second Pfizer doses (CI, 17,400-26,000). The new study shows how much more frequent subclinical cardiovascular events may be than these serious clinical events, raising the prospect of hidden heart injury occurring in a significant proportion of the vaccinated. It should be noted, however, that the new study lacks a control group or comparison to the background rate, though those with a history of heart conditions were excluded and each participant was examined prior to vaccination to establish an individual baseline.
One oddity is the study claims that the incidence of cardiac injury or myocarditis following Covid infection “is much higher, estimated to be 100 times higher than mRNA COVID-19 [vaccine]-related myocarditis”. It’s hard to know what to make of this. How can the risk following infection be a hundred times higher than one in three or one in 43? That’s not possible. The study gives two references for its claim, but one is a study from 2013 and the other looks only at myocarditis in those who have died and gives no indication of rates. Furthermore, a large Scandinavian study found the risk of severe myocarditis following Covid infection was negligible, with only around one excess event per 100,000 within 28 days of infection and a confidence interval that included zero. The risk following vaccination was considerably higher than this. In addition, vaccination does not reliably prevent infection, so any risks are likely cumulative.
Whether the authors of the new study really believe their claim that risk of cardiac injury is up to 100 times higher following infection than vaccination is impossible to say, but certainly they give no evidence for it, it doesn’t make sense given their findings of one in 43 suffering heart inflammation following vaccination, and there is also evidence elsewhere it is false. On their own figures, vaccination looks a much higher risk than infection for heart injury in young people, and anyway vaccination doesn’t prevent infection so the comparison is misleading.
Postscript: Since publication we have added the following sentence about some limitations of the study discussed in the article after they were flagged up to us: “It should be noted, however, that the new study lacks a control group or comparison to the background rate, though those with a history of heart conditions were excluded and each participant was examined prior to vaccination to establish an individual baseline.”
It has also been pointed out that medical experts who reviewed this preprint have noted that many of these reported “adverse effects” are actually not abnormal.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
All this for a disease that has an effective CFR of zero in this age group.
Quite — this is one of the important bits.
The vaccine doesn’t prevent infection or onwards transmission
The disease doesn’t cause problems in the healthy young.
The vaccine has a shockingly high side effect rate.
The above says — ‘don’t vaccinate the young’.
Yet you have various places around the world (eg, Washington DC) mandating the Covid vaccines for school attendance. This is completely mental.
This is completely
mentalcriminal. FIFYActual Bodily Harm (ABH), or Grievous Bodily Harm (GBH)? Take your pick. I wonder what the chance is of a few cases ending up in court, rather than using the “vaccine damage” procedure.
This is a crime in which the majority of society is complicit. So the most one can hope for is that a few token scapegoats end up behind bars.
But the chances of even that I would say are small to none.
The only time people end up behind bars is when the more powerful hold the less powerful to account. Everyone is in on this. There is no one left that is more powerful than the main perpetrators of this crime.
I hope actually that the culture of fear and safetyism and interventionism and lack of regard for basic human rights that made these crimes possible will end up in court.
I think politicians and public health authorities are going to throw the pharma companies under the bus – it’s not hard to turn people against lying, grubby companies that put profits over health. Politicians will plead ignorance, having trusted The $cience, and public health authorities will state they were under great pressure from politicians on the one part and were being lied to by pharma on the other (and not bother to mention their outrageously incestuous relationship with the pharma companies).
Having just read a few MSM articles from between April – September 2020, Trump is also going to be scapegoated for the warp-speed vax. They were setting him up for that then, after he ‘lost’ the election it was no longer necessary to vilify the vaxx. When the Dems deservedly lose biggly in November and probably at the next presidential election, they will completely pretend they were not the worst drug pushers, the most coercive mandaters, etc.
To be honest, he was told that warp speed with naff all safety data for an injected new technology was absolutely dangerous. He is all part of the global cabal. Dr Paul alexander was an advisor to him on health & was present when this information was told to him.
Trump isn’t stupid. He knew what he was doing.
The above certainly sounds incriminating, and if those responsible wish to defend their actions by saying they did not know this, really they should have waited until such information became available before collaborating, as indeed some of us have warned.
We know all this. We’ve known it for a while.
The question is why – a question most people don’t want to engage with seriously because it’s too big and daunting
One has to face very uncomfortable questions about human nature and the inability of our system to rein in some of the worst aspects of it. Too many of us in “civilised” countries think that Stalinesque type villains are a thing of the past or of less civilised places and couldn’t really exist in our societies any more
Just the facts that you expose in your post are enough to show that our society can be captured to a significant degree by truly villainous people.
The differences in study results can be attributed to the differences in batches.
Yeadon has studied this in depth.
Would it surprise anyone that a batch in Thailand would be loaded with more MRNA poison than ones sent to Scandinavia?
Different populations have different reactions to drugs also.
And there is a huge difference between a prospective study and a retrospective one.
The variation between humans isn’t large enough to go against the invasiveness and genotoxicity of these jab ingredients. It’s the content that matters.
Of course the health of the subject matters but youths between 13 and 18 won’t be that different between Thailand and Scandinavia.
CDC Batch variability analysis
https://www.bitchute.com/video/aW8pZWELmjlO/
Pfizer leaked docs show variability within batches up to 50% either way
https://www.bitchute.com/video/8tbOPuO0jyuV/
Actually it could be. Chinese/Japanese/Korean are more susceptible to influenza due to genetic differences. HLA differences.
The active agent is the spike protein primarily so it would need to be variations in the ACE2 receptors across racial groups in the age groups. It’s possible I suppose as we know children before puberty have very few ACE2 receptors relative to adults.
Reaction to the PEGs and or the NLP itself could also have variations I suppose.
However the variation is too large in my view to look at biological differences variations within the species.
Whatever the intrinsic dangers of the jabs are, there can be no doubt that the speed at which their production and distribution was ramped up makes production errors attributable to specific batches almost inevitable.
Anyone who has tried to scale anything up quickly and under intense pressure will know that mistakes and quality inconsistencies are pretty much inevitable.
My guess is that there are problems both with the jabs themselves and with major inconsistencies in their production and distribution.
I also see a risk that the vax pushers will, if forced to admit harms, will try to attribute it all to failures in the production process.
Yes, when the discussion of bad batches come up, I always think of the Cutter incident.
I just did a search to refresh my memory and I swear they have changed the info on various sites, because I cannot find the info that I do remember. I’m sure it’s there if I look hard enough, but I didn’t have to look this hard before.
In any event, for those who are not familiar with it, Cutter was a producer of what was supposed to be the inactivated Salk polio vaccine. In 1955 a batch of their vaxx was sent out and caused significant illness, paralysis and a number of deaths. This was after a public health scientiest, Bernice Eddy, had sounded the alarm that the vaxx contained live virus.
The bit I was looking for and could not find this time, was that the production process was to blame in the sense that whatever was used to inactivate the virus was based on multiplying the dose used in the trial batch to be used in a production batch (obviously I oversimplify). It turned out that more was required than just upping the dose of the inactivating agent.
I remember them going on and on about how fragile the mRNA is – that is why, supposedly, the extreme freezing temperatures required for storage/transport. If it is so fragile and the production process was so rushed and spread out across the world, and the samples presented to regulatory agencies were of small, high-quality batches, is it not to be expected that the production process itself, under these circumstances, may have led to poor quality products, in some cases with little by way of mRNA, hence fewer side effects, with others, perhaps encompassing far higher doses of mRNA than believed, causing more?
I am not making any statements about whether or not there has been intentional bad dosing – these days, nothing would surprise me, maybe there has been intent. But I certainly believe a highly rushed process will lead and has led to dubious quality product. Something that many believed in 2020, when there were lots of caveats from the MSM about Trump pushing so hard for the vaxx and how cutting corners could result in harm. Amazing how a rigged election turned that caution into an outright declaration of triumph.
While I think that it’s a possibility. There is also another possibility that I have seen in one analysis of the VAERS data plotted against the batches along an x time axis to when the batches were released.
This showed that about 95% of injuries were coming from 1.5% of the batches. Additionally the dispersions of the injuries over time were near regular time spaces. And even more bazaarly the injuries appear only in the Pfizer batches at first, then only in the Moderna batches and then lastly only in the J&J.
It appears, therefore, that the higher risk batches were tested out on the populations and separately through collusion between these three Pharmas.
Nope.
The “vaccines” were in production long before C1984 was ‘officially’ presented to the world. The problems now coming to the fore with increases in heart disease and aggressive cancers were built in to the “vaccine” recipes.
Defaulting to apparently logical cock-up theories such as unknown and unintended harms is nonsense. The maiming and mortality rates are on an inexorable climb upwards as per design.
It’s a bioweapon by design. Pure & simple.
The manufacturing quality control just compounded it.
10 days before the EUA was given by EMA emails from EMA to Pfizer listed 130+ production errors which needed to be resolved before an EUA could be granted.
10 days is insufficient time to rectify one production error….
The production process is all part of the fraud to get authorisation.
If they attribute it to production failures, which can be backed up currently by documentation which proves the production failures were known about & hidden to ensure EUA, then this is fraud. This means that the pharma can be sued for harms. Plus as the MHRA, EMA, FDA, CDC were all aware of the issues those individuals too are complicit.
Once the safety data was in the public domain ie high number of yellow card reports, VAERS etc the fact that nobody renders them guilty. Remember ignorance of facts is no defence in a court of law.
Finding an uncorrupted court is a bit of a problem at the mo… Especially as it’s just come to light that the Hague & ECHR are bought by Soros. Blair, Gates & chums.
Sasha Latypova also did a lot of research into this.
The older the batch, the less mRNA is in it – it is inherently unstable & decays quickly.
The way the batches are made & the vials filled means that the active toxin collects at one end of the vat (can’t remember which) & as the vials are filled from the bottom of the vat, there is again huge discrepancy between vials within each batch.
“it may be related to the mRNA sequence that encodes for the spike protein of SARS-CoV-2, or the immune response following vaccination”.
In other words, after nearly 2 years of injecting this toxic sludge into hundreds of millions of people around the world, they still have no idea precisely what serious adverse events it causes, to what degree or how and why said AEs are caused. Yet they keep on jabbing, even after it has been well-established that this poison has no added benefits for anyone under 60 (debatebly, for anyone of any age).
We do not know if it is the spike protein itself which causes the greatest damage, the antibody response to the spike protein or a combination of the two, what damage the LNP delivery system causes, what jabbing ad infinitum will mean in terms of immune exhaustion, immune tolerance to a highly harmful pathogen, or in terms of auto-immune disease in general. Yet they keep on jabbing.
We do know it does not stop transmission or infection and, to the extent it does provide any protection against serious illness, hospitalisation and death, this protection is exceedingly temporary, the duration is less after each jab, while the AEs remain the same or might even have accumulative effect. Yet they keep on jabbing.
This, ladies and gentlemen, constitutes $cience in the 21st century. How embarrassing – and we used to laugh at the superstitious practices of medieval times..
Their excuse was not having the advanced technology and centuries of knowledge we have – what’s ours?
Indeed – the most talked about disease in the history of the world, on which the most money has been spent, and almost nothing useful has been learned. Almost as if they don’t want to know. The most useful thing to know about “covid” is that it is not very important – something that nutjob conspiracy theorists on the Lockdown Sceptics website, and others, could have told you for free in early 2020.
They definitely don’t want to know and it is now patently obvious that they are ignoring ( when they aren’t slurring it as “mis/disinformation” ) any data which contradict their narrative. Nothing must get in the way of The Agenda it would seem and we all know that science, real science, has been cancelled or suppressed since early 2020 and dissenting voices with it.
This is why the upcoming winter will be interesting as I feel we’ve now reached a tipping point as ‘tptb’ try and start up the circus for a third consecutive year. How will the public react compared with previous winters? As long as the majority are now fed up to the back teeth with the whole shebang then we might be OK. Non-compliance, as ever, is key. The PsyOp continues….
They learned something all right – that Goebbels or whoever said it was absolutely right:
Repeat the lie often enough and it becomes the truth.
The bigger the lie, the more people will believe it.
Goebbels and Hitler both had a take on it. In Mein Kampf, Hitler said that because most people tell little lies sometimes but do not often tell huge whopping lies so they struggle to believe that others would keep telling enormous lies.
Its easy, if they float then they are witches ..just follow the science.. with apologies to Monty Python..
The only conclusion can be that they’re deliberately not looking.
Don’t seek, don’t find.
Yep. Except I truly believe they have indeed looked and that they do know, which is even worse.
To not study something so vital is criminal negligence, to have studied it and then concealed and lied about your findings – simply criminal.
Last week there was some news about the CDC claiming they did not know about the link between myocarditis and the vaxx until October 2021.
Do people really have such short memories? I remember distinctly that the CDC was supposed to have an ’emergency’ meeting about this in June 2021, which was postponed for the new US public holiday that goes by the ridiculous name of ‘Juneteenth’ – that was not actually going to be a public holiday until June 2022.
When I saw the article last week I did a quick search and plenty of MSM articles made mention of the fact that the CDC had postponed its ’emergency’ meeting into the vaxx/myocarditis issue. Yet now they claim that they didn’t know until October 2021 and no one in MSM questions it, even though the lie can be proven in 30 seconds.
“the potential for cardiac fibrosis vaccine-related myocarditis remains unknown”
That’s why we used to do long term safety trials before approving medicines for general use, before the Satanists seized the chance to bypass all that using fear.
I suspect that one of the objectives of this entire corona madness has been to shift mindsets on how long is really required to produce drugs and in particular vaccines.
There are numerous instances of industry insiders discussing their frustration at the lead times for production of new drugs and what they consider unreasonably cumbersome regulation.
They seem to me to be trying to sell the covid jab as an unprecedented success that proves that you can produce new jabs very quickly without long cumbersome safety tests.
And in particular, I think they were stuck with the introduction of mRNA vaccine technology which supposedly would cut down development times massively. Once they could establish the ‘safety” of the delivery mechanism, then the messenger genes supposedly be tweaked easily for any range of diseases.
I genuinely think this is probably one of the big drivers of all this insanity. Fauci, Gates and the rest of psychos are rich ageing guys who probably fear their mortality as much or more than anyone. I wouldn’t be surprised if they see mRNA vaccine technology as a promising route to life extension and just can’t wait around for the technology to develop at normal development speeds. So they’ve either instigated or used this crisis for that purpose.
That’s my “conspiracy’ theory.
Yes, Fraudci made it quite clear in 2019 that he wanted mRNA to be ‘explode’. I believe they said new flu vaxxes will be mRNA, also that no testing is required for modified covid mRNA vaxxes – as the current ones have already proven to be safe (snort).
A new saying for the ages: Vaxx in haste, repent at leisure – if you live long enough.
If I wanted life extension, I wouldn’t start with a technology that marks your own tissues as non-self, that’s a recipe for disaster as we are seeing.
A huge Israeli study found no evidence at all of myocarditis or pericarditis after COVID. The study was based on health records, so fewer cases would be picked up than in a study based on screening. They did find myocarditis and pericarditis after the vax https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9025013/
This athlete study (study period was before the vax campaigns) found that most (factor of 7.4) cases of myocarditis after COVID wouldn’t have been found without screening, which may be one reason for differing study results.
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamacardiology/fullarticle/2780548
Spike protein binding to ACE2 is racially specific, least at risk are K26R, the Israeli population contains a significant number who are K26R.
https://onedrive.live.com/view.aspx?resid=34225D6F64DEA848!4693&ithint=file%2cdocx&authkey=!ALIv0ZPDXE80cmc
Whilst not denying the probability of the vaccines inducing cardiovascular problems, I have read the paper critically as I have done in the past for nursing course assignments, and I think that there are some items that should have been included for clarity.
The paper states that baseline vital signs were taken after the first injection. These are not given in the paper. Having a table of ranges is not useful. There is no indication of what constitutes hypertension or hypotension.
This is the paediatric early warning system for over 12’s https://ihub.scot/media/8315/pews-form-12-years-national-0-4.pdf
This is the adult early warning score https://www.rcplondon.ac.uk/file/9434/download
One of the older patients has a history of thyrotoxicosis, which means their thyroid is overactive. This can lead to tachycardia and palpitations, was this taken into account or whether they were on medication.
Thalassaemia can also cause shortness of breath and palpitations.
Asthma can obviously cause shortness of breath and salbutamol can cause tachycardia and palpitations.
Fever can lead to tachycardia and tachypnoea.
Fever can also trigger certain channelopathies, were these considered?
Any family history of Brugada or other genetic heart conditions?
It is known that the hormonal changes associated with puberty can trigger Brugada.
Was the possibility of coinfection considered, e.g. Epstein Barr Virus?
These are just the short-term adverse effects. They have no idea what the medium to long-term effects are.
It’s like playing Russian Roulette with your health.
The same is true for any medication
SSRI
“Common or very commonAnxiety; appetite abnormal; arrhythmias; arthralgia; asthenia; concentration impaired; confusion; constipation; depersonalisation; diarrhoea; dizziness; drowsiness; dry mouth; fever; gastrointestinal discomfort; haemorrhage; headache; hyperhidrosis; malaise; memory loss; menstrual cycle irregularities; myalgia; mydriasis; nausea (dose-related); palpitations; paraesthesia; QT interval prolongation; sexual dysfunction; skin reactions; sleep disorders; taste altered; tinnitus; tremor; urinary disorders; visual impairment; vomiting; weight changes; yawning
UncommonAlopecia; angioedema; behaviour abnormal; hallucination; mania; movement disorders; photosensitivity reaction; postural hypotension; seizure; suicidal behaviours; syncope”
“The same is true for any medication”
Well yes in very strict sense that we cannot see forward to the end of time. But the covid “vaccines” were authorised for emergency use (still not approved in the UK AFAIK) long before the standard long term safety trials were finished. I think they were due to finish in 2023 but are now pointless as the control group have been “vaccinated”.
“SSRI”
Is there strong statistical evidence that indicates SSRIs increase all cause mortality, such that a detailed investigation is warranted? Perhaps there is, and perhaps such an investigation is happening. Whatever is happening with SSRIs doesn’t make what’s being done with the covid “vaccines” right.
If someone had come along with a new flu drug, would it have been authorised so quickly, with indemnity to the makers, usual saftey protocols by-passed, imposed on people, spent trillions on worldwide?
The only defensible course of action now is to stop “vaccinations” for covid immediately pending some serious reasearch, that lasts years not months, preferably undertaken by multiple, diverse bodies across the world.
You were talking about medium to long term effects. That is why I referred to SSRI, what are the long term effects? The BNF only reports on short term effects. If something happened 10 years down the line how can you possibly show a causal effect to a medication you’ve been taken for that length of time or to a vaccination of any type that you had as a child?
I have seen one case of angioedema in a patient who had been on the same ACE inhibitor for years without a problem. Angioedema is a known problem for ACE inhibitors so we were able to say that this was the probable cause. Interestingly, angioedema from ACE inhibitors is more prevalent in black people, so not everyone reacts to the same medication in the same way.
Why bother doing any studies at all. The vaccines are safe and effective pharma says so. They will just blame all heart damage on Covid infection, they have from the start why would they stop now.
This is a very graphic video of cardiac surgery to remove clots from the heart & blood vessels in a fully injected individual. Surgeons have not been seeing anything like this until the toxin started to be injected.
Draw your own conclusions
https://www.bitchute.com/video/2jGJx2qRnrYY/
The horrific side o f this story is the truth….they were never at risk of serious illness nor death. When will the government admit their massive error. The data was right in front of the.