Mary Harrington has written a must-read piece for UnHerd about the current Millenarian mood. She takes several swipes at the World Economic Forum and includes this juicy little nugget I wasn’t aware of: “Last year, the Sri Lankan government was awarded an “Oscar for best policy” by the WEF, for a decision to ban nitrogen fertiliser.” Yes, that’s right, the WEF thought the forced switch to organic farming overnight was a good idea. The resulting food shortages, economic crisis and loss of life led to the President being overthrown in a chaotic coup last week. But unlike my friend James Delingpole, I don’t think the WEF anticipated that consequence of the policy it was rewarding. Hanlon’s Razor applies: never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity. Here’s the best bit in Mary’s piece:
Can industrial agriculture survive decarbonisation? What will we grow? And who will own the land? Who will work it? Idealists dream of a small-farm revolution, in which hyper-productive smallholders replace pesticide-powered monocroppers. Pessimists, meanwhile, point out that even if millions of us somehow magically acquire the skills and the willingness to embrace agrarian life, land ownership is heading in the opposite direction: Great Reset boogeyman Bill Gates is now the largest owner of farmland in America, and caused outcry last month when he acquired another 2,200 acres in South Dakota. I struggle to imagine him volunteering to hand out his own property portfolio to allotmenteers.
Absent some kind of redistributive revolution, it seems more plausible that agriculture goes high-tech. Robotisation is already in use in some farms, while gene-edited crops are on their way to being waved through by the current Tory administration. And we’re forever being told that insect protein is the food of the future. But this, in turn, means even greater consolidation: fewer workers, bigger fields, larger parcels of land. In other words, more small farmers being forced out of business. And more tech implies an increasing dependency on Big Finance and biotech. If this is the future we get, those now fretting that we’re going to end up as a microchipped useless class, spending our meaningless, UBI-funded, AI-governed lives staring out of a pod home at hundreds of thousands of acres of robot-tended agroindustry while awaiting our drone delivery of insect protein, may be exaggerating only a little.
Worth reading in full.
Stop Press: A reader got in touch to point out that the “best policy” award was not from the WEF, but from the World Future Council (WFC), a sustainability-focused and UN-linked organisation based in Germany; and the award was not about removing nitrogen fertiliser, but about pesticide reduction and suicide reduction. He adds:
The WEF has launched a Food Action Alliance and is developing a New Vision for Agriculture. While these initiatives are linked to WEF climate policy initiatives, their main focus is on a stronger corporate role and “defragmentation” in agriculture in rich and poor countries (e.g. GMO agriculture in Africa etc.).
The nitrogen fertiliser issue in the Netherlands, Canada and elsewhere doesn’t seem to be driven by the WEF, but by climate policy goals. The issue is that excess nitrogen fertiliser is converted by soil bacteria into nitrous oxide (N2O), a greenhouse gas 300 times stronger than CO2.
The actual role/importance of greenhouse gases in modern global warming is yet another controversial question, of course. The current European heat wave is obviously not directly caused by gradual global warming, but by an Atlantic low pressure system that drives North African heat currents towards Europe. The Atlantic low pressure system in turn has been caused by Jet Stream oscillations. Whether these oscillations are caused by gradual global warming, man-made or not, or by something else, these are the real questions that few even ask.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
From what I’ve read, the WEF and advocates of the “Great Reset” are busy making my world a much worse place and the effect of their actions may lead to my freedoms being removed and impair my economic situation. Whether that’s their intention or whether they mean well, I don’t like them and I want to see them fail because they are arrogant, elitist and unaccountable.
But then I’m just a nutjob conspiracy theorist who thought in March 2020 that covid was unexceptional, the “vaccines” looked dodgy, lockdowns and masks wouldn’t work and that shutting the world down would screw the economy, health, education, and that the covidtards had no exit strategy and would end up pushing for restrictions forever. What do I know?
Indeed, whether or not one is a “conspiracy theorist” the last two years have already been awful, with their rolling states of emergency, heavy censorship, heavy state control of the media, restrictions on freedom of movement etc, and the WEF seems to think they’re only just getting started. No paranoia is required, because what the WEF and their friends such as the Tony Blair Institute have done already is very bad.
What the WEF has engineered already is, in fact, an organised crime against humanity. This bunch of psychopaths are very nasty and dangerous indeed.
I’ll say this. Anyone who called you that certainly wasn’t being scientific. Or rational.
‘Hanlon’s Razor applies: never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity.’
Bonhoeffer’s Theory of Stupidity explains how stupidity is more dangerous than malice.
What about when stupidity is combined with malice?
The error of people like Toby is to think that there is a substantive difference between the two.
What do I care, really, if we’ve been plunged into a biotech tyranny.by stupidity or malice?
A group of people with inordinate power have made it happen, whether for their own personal benefit, out of stupidity or malice It’s happened.
They have such power that when they act it screws up our lives. Their base motives are sort of irrelevant.
We’re in and heading towards full-blown corporatist fascist oligarchies.
Hanlon’s razor seems to me to really be an invention of these bad guys and their malevolent helpers in science, politics, journalism and literature to deflect from their criminal intentions. And sadly, this ruse seems to work with many.
No matter how often the knights of the misused homonym ride to battle with this flag, the corporatism in corporate states has still absolutely nothing to do with capitalist (multinational) corporations and fascism is still national and nativist and never global.
In newer use, a corporation is some entity that’s legally encorporated, ie, a legal person. This can but need not be privately owned company supposed to generate profits by selling products or services. That’s why the BBC (and also the German public broadcasters) are corporations. In common use at the time of Mussolini, it was meant to be a trade guild or similar organization representing a certain sector of society. This is similar to a union except that unions are (or were) corporations of dependent workers supposed to enable these to bargain more effectively with the (capitalist) owners of the means of production. A fascist corporation would include both workers and owners who are supposed to cooperate to find solutions to more general issues of their sector of society, eg, worktime, pay and workplace safety issues.
Canada.
We know the WEF has “penetrated the cabinets”, we have Klaus’s own word for that, and Tony Blair has been very open about his teams embedded in the governments of over 20 countries directing policy during the pandemic, including in the UK where he is a deeply unpopular figure. But perhaps they are both conspiracy theorists.
We know the WEF is very keen on digital ID and central bank digital currencies, both instruments of tyranny. They are central planners, so they are not going to succeed in the goals they show to their supporters, such as protecting the environment, but they will do immense damage under the pretext of getting there, and a concern is that they might actually succeed with the tyranny part. They don’t really care how many people they kill in the process, otherwise they would advocate for cost-benefit analysis, a gradual approach such as not switching off fossil fuels until the alternatives are ready, and proper pharmacovigilance.
There was a video of Klaus Schab speaking with the president of Costa Rica – a western educated “high flyer”. The scene was like Schwab holding court and the young Costa Rican president sucking up to him, trying to impress him. It was stomach churning.
Insect based diet: insects have to eat.. what and who grows it and how? And which insects exactly?
A vast tonnage of insects will be required to replace meat and will require extensive processing. That vast number of low density protein units will require far more space than high density protein units – cows for example.
How many insects to replace a herd of sheep or herd of cows? Sheep and cows require little attention, mostly self-feeding on vegetation on land unfit for arable farming.
Insect farming will require much more intensive use of resources, as does organic farming hence high prices of organic foods, than current animal farming.
The above is true with respect to hilariously titled ‘plant-based foods’.
This is like EVs. The people promoting them have not filled in the background details, like what is the cost and practicalities of generating and distributing enough electricity to power then once they increase in number and replace the 39 million cars on British roads?
Nobody calculates quantity – how much of the new stuff is required to replace the old, or what resources and at what cost? And will this be more or less?
Not stupid Toby, psychopaths and evil.
Excellent points made.
I’m kind of between Toby and James, and either interpretation of the WEF could be correct – we will probably never know. However I have some observations about the way in which they operate which I find quite chilling:
No doubt most of our politicians have not engaged in this kind of analysis, which means we are at great risk as a free and open society in response to the manufactured threats we face – including climate change and pandemics.
Excellent post.
Very true that most politicians do not analyse or question what is going on. I certainly do not believe that the majority of them are in on some grand scheme, but as the last 2 years have shown, that is clearly not necessary. All you need is a small group of ‘leaders’ who do not tolerate dissent or debate and a bunch of yes-men and you can push through anything.
There are enough examples in history of the destruction megalomaniacal leaders and a handful of acolytes can achieve as long as every one stands around and lets them. Yet somehow it can’t happen here… that hubris will cost us dearly.
Since 2015 and that woman that the Germans ridiculously refer to as “Mutti” screeched “Wir schaffen das” I have believed that a lot of what was happening was absolutely intentional, crazy as it seemed. Why would any sane leader invite literally millions of people from a completely different culture, with an educational level by and large unsuited to that of Europe into their countries? That could only ever go wrong. To the extent they claimed to want to help developing countries, taking their best, strongest and brightest can hardly be called ‘helping’.
NL more or less followed the original pandemic protocol in March 2020, by December 2020 they tried to introduce the unconstitutional home incarceration that had already proven a failure in other countries. The reason it was necessary: so that people would understand how urgent the situation was. Then they closed the shops, which had stayed open in the first wave with no problem. That is when I believed the Dutch government was following an intentional policy to harm the country, there was no reason whatsoever to change the original course of action. To close again in December 2021, when the rest of Europe stayed open, merely drove that point home. Now the wholesale destruction of the farmers, not only the people who ensure we have food on the table, but one of NL’s major export sectors – Rutte is selling the country out at a most alarming rate.
Now we have the unelected politburo in Brussels demanding that all of Europe see their standard of living drop drastically within the next year, purely and alone to satisfy the megalomania of the eurocrats. That 15% reduction they want has zero to do with Russian gas and everything to do with Timmermans’ dedication to ensuring his continued coveted position of well-paid EU commissioner, regardless of how many millions of people he harms.
Listen to their acolytes – Trudeau, Arden, Rutte, etc – and you find a deliberate political monologue dressed in inoffensive cliches, which is merely repeated when challenged.
Ok. As an experiment, I’m now again pointing out that refering to Angela Merkel as Mutti is not and was never meant to be a compliment. The closest English equivalent to that is probably granny. I seriously doubt Therese May had been amused when somebody who’s not at all related to her had referred to as the nation’s prime granny and that anybody would have considered this a compliment.
Let’s see if it cause the wrong narrative of infantilized Germans refering Merkel as their mother with true affection to disappear. I’m not holding my breath.
Re insect protein – how would this work in practice, and why is it considered a ‘solution’? Billions upon billions of insects would be needed, 24/7/365, so large scale production facilities would be needed. A lot of insects – in fact I would say most – need a temperature well above freezing to survive, (nothing ‘green’ about having to heat vast and extensive indoor areas) and the ratio of size of creature/input needed to rear it/calories available in the end product, doesn’t seem worth the effort. Compared, say, to cattle, sheep and pigs, who don’t need heated quarters, and a single beast feeds many people for not much input other than feeding and simple husbandry.
Or are they expecting us to hunt for our supper with butterfly nets?
Some people would really like to stell this stuff. For want of a product that’s competitive in the marketplace, they have to rely on marketing its secondary goodnees to people who believe to be making moral choices when selecting what to buy in a supermarket. That’s all: Ersatzfood for those who are gullible enough to fall for the messaging.
If it was just about stupidity, the issues would be much more random; there wouldn’t be the relentless drive towards digital ID, for one. And they are actually rather good at rhetoric, getting large numbers of people to approve of or even demand their preferred policies, regardless of the damage.
Yep, the language is the same everywhere, the “reasoning” is the same everywhere, the carbon copy political leaders are the same everywhere. The unholy alliance of political parties to make up a “majority”, delivering something that about 90% of the population never voted for is also the same everywhere.
The rhetoric is indeed superb – no one can believe that someone would be as wanton and reckless as the current political leaders are, so they will believe their lies instead of question their actions.
Years back on the Daily Telegraph forum there was a guy who kept repeating the line: Don’t listen to what they say, look at what they do. Wise words.
Was Toby being ironic when he put the word ‘sceptic’ in the website’s name?
Conspiracy theory? Perhaps you should ask John Kerry, Joe Biden’s Climate czar. The Hill – a US media outlet specializing in US politics reported the following in December 2020:
“At a panel discussion about the Great Reset hosted by the World Economic Forum in mid-November, former Secretary of State John Kerry – Biden’s would-be special presidential envoy for climate – firmly declared that the Biden administration will support the Great Reset and that the Great Reset “will happen with greater speed and with greater intensity than a lot of people might imagine.”
https://thehill.com/opinion/energy-environment/528482-john-kerry-reveals-bidens-devotion-to-radical-great-reset-movement/
It’s not a conspiracy theory when the WEF tells us on it’s website what it plans to do. There are too many “coincidences” that happen to align with Great Reset objectives for this to be a theory.
If you want a conspiracy theory, ask yourself how WEF affiliate governments – remember “Build Back Better” – will impose the reduction in living standards the Great Reset will require on their reluctant electorates. John Kerry is convinced it’s happening and he should know.
Various high-ranking European politicians have been saying for over 2 months now that people need to accept that their standard of living will go down. Not that long ago, Diederik Samsom, former head of the Dutch Labour Party and current acolyte of Frans Timmermans, EU commissioner in charge of the green scam, said exactly that. I love getting told by a self-proclaimed ‘socialist’ on a tax-free salary of over 200,000 euros how I and the other plebs must accept a lower standard of living – as they vote themselves another cost-of-living increase.
Typical socialist, links lullen rechts vullen (pander to the left in words, while filling your pockets with your right hand).
Absolutely.
Toby is playing ‘wind up’ and Ms Hartington is a way from the full picture.
Critical remark to the leader: A coup (a recently seriously overused word) is when a fairly small, organized group, usually from the military, displaces a government overnight with a sudden act of violence. A president who flees the country before a mob of hungry people torches his former residence was disposed by a revolution.
Everything is a “paranoid conspiracy theory” until it isn’t, and then they just give it a different name. They do that so all the people who called others “paranoid conspiracy theorists” can still parade a delusional attitude of not being a complete and total fool.
Even more critical remark to the article: Run-of-the-mill Humans are killing the planet with climate change! And THEY are all in denial about it! tripe that’s decidedly not worth a read.
In Reading (I can’t speak for other parts of the UK), April was warm and fairly sunny. And then, it started raining, raining and raining until about two weeks ago. Since then, we had a spell of dry and sometimes sunny days. It started raining again on 40C apocalypse day
and yesterday, the next lengthy downpour followed. Today, it’s overcast and grey but so far, dry. That’s not something which can be incorrectly labelled (by the denialists!) as Just a warm sommer (when it’s really the total thermageddon apocalypse they alll just refused to accept!), it’s not much of a summer at all. And there was even more rain last year.
Like Richardw53 in this thread, I’m somewhere in between James and Toby on this. I don’t appreciate the slightly sneering attitude to people with ‘paranoid’ suspicions about what the miscreant windbags at the WEF are doing; how many more world leaders do we need to see mindlessly uttering the vacuous ‘Build Back Better’ slogan before we just accept that there is coordination (and therefore conspiracy) at work and a globalist agenda with murky intentions playing out before our eyes. This is not paranoia, it’s what they say they’re doing.
So enough already with the condescension.
Where I veer off Team James is that I can’t believe that the useless corporate class WEF windbags, with their lame slogans and laughable Yuval Noah Harari powerpoint presentations about AI have the wherewithal to control the world. The idea that China, the oldest, most populous and now wealthiest nation on earth with its vast and growing power is going to take governance lessons from a bunch of decrepit European ballbags seems ridiculous to me. So I have an alternative interpretation: That everything we’re seeing is in the context of a collapsing Anglo-American economic system and the WEF, (and Gates for that matter) are vultures feeding on its corpse, attempting in doing so to emulate the methods of their wet dream quasiCommunist China which they see as being extremely effective. In other words, the insidious power of the WEF is confined to Western puppets. I don’t think we should credit it with the power it believes it has, I think we should just relentlessly make fun of it until it goes away.
As to the slightly confusing Unherd article; I’m kind of at the point where I’ve given up trying to work out what ‘we’ should do about the future. The moment human beings realised that the rocks beneath their feet contained concentrated liquid energy, it became our destiny to burn the goddamn lot of it, and we either will or won’t run out of it in such a way that civilisation doesn’t disappear shortly afterwards. This will not be decided by Europeans with stupid slogans and agendas. It’ll be decided by China.
Excellent post. Just because they don’t have the wherewithal to control the world doesn’t mean they are not trying and are not dangerous, and if they are influencing anything or anyone anywhere directly or indirectly then they are my enemy.
It is indeed possible to have a situation where there is a concerted effort by a group of greedy, power-hungry sociopaths, aided by gullible acolytes, to take what they can, which at the same time does not and will not have the overwhelming effect that some fear. But the devastation they can and, so it appears, will wreak is very real.
We are so spoilt in the West, we simply cannot conceive of things going bad. Apparently no one remembers Cuba was a different country prior to 1958 (flawed, undoubtedly, but probably better than what followed), the rapid decline of oil-rich Venuzuela under Chavez, the poverty throughout the resource-rich USSR for decades, indeed, China in the 1950/60/70s, through sheer political incompetence, arrogance and malice.
I believe that China – with the help of Prince Charles – is encouraging the WEF in its efforts to weaken the West and implement a digital control system infrastructure. With its huge economic power it will then roll out its authoritarian ideology as a way of cancelling our debt, and use our digital infrastructure as a means of implementing its control. Just look at what it is doing with the Belt and Road initiative in the developing world – it is a taste of what is to come.
“As to the slightly confusing Unherd article”
Funnily enough I reached the same conclusion. Strange
A world in which we have a choice between the WEF and China would certainly be better than one where the only choice is the WEF. But it still doesn’t sound very nice! A few years ago China and Russia seemed much more independent on policy, now not so much.
So …. you think a choice between Bubonic Plague and Smallpox is an improvement on just one of them?
I’d rather both were eradicated.
But … Re
Prudent tentative decision making should always be followed by the question “and then what?”, followed by another “and then what?” and on and on until satisfactory understanding of the consequences, intended or unintended are known and hopefully understood.
Proper “engineering” by engineers (vs. whatever it is that “scientists” do these days) would have anticipated the problem with banning nitrogen fertilizer. Engineers (unlike “scientists”) are required by ethics and law to not make such process mistakes to avoid catastrophes.
I can’t help but think that WEF (and Sri Lanka gov’t) had the resources to ask “and then what?” numerous times with numerous experts (including engineers) to evaluate … but did not. That’s not right, might be criminal, and surely unethical. Whether deliberate or not needs mind-reading or evidence, but there are indications of malfeasance.
What is blatantly obvious is that Rutte in the Netherlands is hell bent on destroying the farming industry in The Netherlands.
Why?
Well he cannot claim he is unaware of the negative, not to say devastating impact this will have on the Dutch economy. So again…
Why?
There are suggestions this is all about bankrupting a whole industry in order to steal land. For the life of me I cannot see another explanation.
Paraphrasing Kissinger – control the food supply and you control the world.
If people are starving they will be compliant. Billy is buying farm land in the USA by the thousands of acres, Indian farmers are being forced into debt and will subsequently lose their land. Which takes us on to depopulation.
Perhaps I am joining the dots, and their are lots more such as UBI, CBDC, etc, in the wrong way.
I don’t think so.
So it is, in my view, Rutte “engineered” this … knowing full well an understanding of the consequences he intended. Simple.
To get papers published, open challenge to the hidden actors isn’t possible. The subtext in this article is that the collateral from the actions taken could be predicted.
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4118910
Well, I’ve just read the article “in full” and I am none the bloody wiser.
It would appear Toby is playing one of his favourite games – Wind Up.
Mary Hartington (author of the piece) appears to be perhaps siding with we Sceptics, Toby to his cock-up theory.
Toby can see the dots but refuses to join them together. Ms Hartington is not yet aware of any dots.
Oh dear.
“Paranoid theories about the Great Reset”.
Toby, you are a legend in many ways but in this case the article completely contradicts the headline. The more we see of these malicious feudalist looters in the WEF, their ESGs, their ‘climate pledges’, their Common Purpose goals, their boasts about how “humans are now hackable animals” and the endless list of companies and institutions that are fully on board with it all, the more Dellingpole I become.
This is a slow motion smash and grab on our entire existence. A ram raid on our political institutions, economies, our fundamental freedoms and our lives – the only difference is these armed raiders aren’t even bothering to drive off. They don’t have to because the vast majority of people have either been rendered ignorant of what’s going on by the fully bought and paid for MSM, they’re useful idiots and they’ve been eco-guilt tripped with childish junk science into full compliance, they don’t care, they’re simply powerless to do anything about it or like you, they still cling to the idea that this all just one vast ramshackle global pantomime of Yes Minister style incompetence.
Well I’m off to buy a tractor and a gun..
“never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity”
I don’t believe that what we’ve experienced over the past two and a thitd years is anywhere near being adequately explained by stupidity.
An example from near the beginning: the rules were changed to make it much easier to overcount deaths from covid. Stupidity? Really?
Trying your hand at clock-bait titles or just looking to generate traffic and comment thread expansion Toby?
odd article for a sceptic considering comments like these:
” At root their cause is the defence of livelihoods that depend on the continuation of an extractive mode of production that feeds and clothes most of us, but is also slowly killing the planet. “
At times like these I feel for James, you really haven’t bothered connecting the dots. Indeed you don’t seem to have even bothered finding the dots. It would be a pointless exercise trying to dislodge you from what would be a hell of a case of cognitive dissonance.
When I read articles like this I often think of the senior crewmen on the titanic telling off the panicked people for thinking that the ship could ever sink.
As far as I can tell, this use of extractive (in addition to the killing the planet catchphrase) marks the author as card-carrying eco-luddite who secretly longs for return to a preindustrial paradise that never was. Weren’t it for improvements in agriculture, the rainy summer of last year had brought us close to famine last winter and a second of that kind – which seems to be materializing ATM – would have ensured a catastrophe this winter, at least for poor people (and the overwhelming majority of the people would be poor).
A saner perspective would be We will encounter yet unknown technical challenges in future (although probably rather different ones than the current prophets of doom envision, as predictions of technological developments in future tend to be way off even for periods as short as 50 years). But a few thousands of years of human history suggest that solutions will be found. In any case, it useless to worry about problems which didn’t yet materialize. Better work towards solving those which did.
Sure sure. Heads of governments, heads of giant corporations and global oligarchs go annually to meet each other at Davos because they enjoy each others’ company and have plenty of spare time to chill out in the Swiss alps.
They’ve been getting together for the last few decades to align their agendas and work out ways in which they can make things better for themselves at the expense of others.
The WEF is a networking club for influential people who have visions of how they would like to change the world. And they have resources to make some of their ideas happen. All of them, all the time, right away? Obviously not. But some of them, some of the time and over time? For sure.
That’s not a conspiracy theory. It’s a simple observation.
“Heads of governments, heads of giant corporations and global oligarchs go annually to meet each other at Davos because they enjoy each others’ company and have plenty of spare time to chill out in the Swiss alps.
‘Just doing their thing.’
Have people seen the costs of attending this “chill-out?”
As Jim Royle would say –
‘chill-out my arse.’
I wonder if the author of this piece has read “The Real Anthony Fauci” by Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
If he has not, may I suggest he does so as a matter of urgency
It may induce a much needed change of thought if I may say so.
Nevertheless I do thank him for this site!
Re the stop press: the issue is the draconian policy initiatives that the WEF members seem programmed to use once a ‘threat’ is identified. Fear is the source of power. In reality, do global temperature records show any effect from agricultural N2O emissions? Well they have enough trouble blaming CO2 emissions, so the answer is probably not.
in truth, all global policy organisations including the UN and WHO exhibit similar authoritarian traits to the WEF. The WEF is particularly effective at integrating business and political objectives – hence much of the output of global policy organisations – into its policies.
Quite a lot of people have told me that the WEF is just a talking shop of people who want to be important and we shouldn’t take them seriously.
But then I remind them that Prime Ministers and our Heir to the Throne are, in fact, important people. I’m told that this is just governments ‘making mistakes’, but every ‘mistake’ that gets made only goes in one direction of travel. Lockdowns, Net Zero, etc etc, all mistakes. All made in lockstep with each other. All heading down the WEF path to ruin.
What I would really like them to do, is rather than subject us to the creeping half arsed policies that will bankrupt us with electric cars and bug eating and such, is ‘What is the end-game of this ideology.?’, where are we heading, albeit in baby steps to try and mask what is going on. Are we heading towards some kind of world-depopulation, some romanticised vision of poverty, back to a time, say the 13th century when we all lived in harmony with the planet, (had miserable lives, died young…)? If we know which of our politicians are in on this then we will know who is working against the citizens of this nation.
I have said numerous times on this site that Charlie (traitor) Windsor is working towards the achievement of a bucolic, Turner re-invented vision of England. A countryside nicely denuded of citizens but with enough rosy-cheeked peasants sprinkled throughout his estates to be able to doff their caps as he trundles through in his cheese powered Aston Martin.
Evil firkers the lot of them.
As far as I’m concerned, he’s as mad as George III, who also had delusions that he was a farmer and created an idealised rural retreat. History repeating …..
For him it would be relatively nice. 13th century kings lived well compared to the peasants. I don’t think he thinks much deeper than that.
Schwab’s comment “you will own nothing and be happy” is neither conspiracy theory nor reassuring. Neither are actions of schwab lickspittles such as trudeau when seizing bank accounts of people who disagree with him. These are all facts not theories. I would say that to dismiss the disturbing signs of where things are heading is naivety.
I believe in examining the evidence to reach a conclusion.
The evidence is that the WEF is an unelected, unaccountable and (for the little people) untouchable organisation which has spread its tentacles across the world. In many western democracies, it has had sufficient “influence” to get its acolytes installed as Presidents or in senior roles in Government with Adherne, Trudeau, Macron and Zelensky amongst many others.
These acolytes then duly apply the policies the WEF advocates and signal their compliance by parroting the WEF’s slogan “Build Back Better.”
“Better” means better for the WEF and Globalist Elite and they don’t care how many “unimportant” lives they ruin in order to achieve it.
It IS a conspiracy. It is being imposed on us. And I, for one, believe that Klaus Schwab and his groupies, including Prince Charles, are EVIL people.
The Sri Lanka saga – ‘the forced switch to organic farming overnight’ – is remeniscent of the HCQ saga, in which it was (falsely) demonstrated that HCQ offers no benefit (under the incorrect usage). In the same way, the organic solution will now be deemed unrealistic. An organic approach can certainly not be implemented overnight – it can only be effective with a structured re-orientation for skills and organic matter, phased in during months, if not years.
Given how many of the so-called “conspiracy theories” have come true over the last two years, I think a period of silence from those using this term would be welcome.
Off the top of my head we have the following, now confirmed to be true, “conspiracy theories”:
“The virus came from a lab”
“The virus will be used as an excuse to enact totalitarian controls”
“One vaccine won’t be enough, people will be asked to sign up to multiple vaccines”
“Vaccines will be made mandatory”
“The vaccines don’t prevent infection or transmission”
“The vaccines are causing adverse effects on an unprecedented scale”
“Repeated vaccination will render people’s immune systems less effective”
“The spike protein doesn’t remain at the vaccination site”
“Vaccines will be used as an excuse for introducing a need for digital ID for everyone”
Regardless of whether the WEF is competent, the fact that it has placed its young graduates into such prominent positions in politics and business over so many years needs investigation. At one time to have Angela Merkel, Sebastian Kurz, Emmanuel Macron, Jacinda Arden, Viktor Orbàn, Justin Trudeau, Pete Buttigieg, Gavin Newsom and Matt Hancock almost all fanatically enforcing lockdowns, who all happen to be WEF graduates when Schwab is pushing his deranged global reset fantasies, while WEF graduates Bill Gates and Jeff Bezos are making a fortune out of the lockdowns. Are they working primarily for their countries or for Schwab’s deranged cult? The boss of ‘vaccine disinformation fact checkers’ Reuters is a WEF member and also on the board of Pfizer. And one only has to watch Yuval Noah Harari’s WEF lectures on ‘hacking’ human beings and abolishing free will, in order to shudder and be reminded of Nazi eugenicists.
The last 21 years have been dreadful: from the moment 9/11 happened, we’ve seen the expansion of the security state and huge over the top national and global actions, be it nationalising banks in a financial crash, grounding flights across a continent because a volcano erupted (putting more of the trace gas CO2 into the atmosphere in a few weeks that humans manage in a couple of years), SARS panic, swine flu, bird flu and finally COVID-19 with lockdowns and mass vaccinations.
The WEF are murdering scumbags, shock horror, who would have thought it, hold the front page…