The expert group HART (Health Advisory and Recovery Team) has delved into the Pfizer trial documents released following a U.S. court order and discovered that according to Pfizer’s own antibody data the vaccine efficacy in the trial was massively overstated and appears to be as low as zero.
While the official results found only eight PCR-positive ‘cases’ in the vaccine arm, Pfizer’s antibody testing shows that in fact 75 people in the vaccinated arm seroconverted (developed N-type antibodies), implying there were actually 75 ‘cases’ of Covid in the vaccinated, not just eight.
By itself that would cut efficacy in half. However, HART points out that it’s been shown with the Moderna mRNA vaccine that only around 40% of the vaccinated who go on to have a symptomatic PCR-positive Covid ‘breakthrough’ infection develop N-type antibodies, owing to immune imprinting (‘original antigenic sin’) by the vaccine to favour S-type antibodies (which target the spike protein). Assuming this also applies to the Pfizer mRNA vaccine, this means the 75 seropositive individuals are only around 40% of the total number who had Covid, giving an estimated total of 188 Covid ‘cases’ in the vaccine arm – more than the 165 in the unvaccinated arm, implying zero vaccine efficacy or worse.
How did Pfizer get away with claiming there were only eight Covid cases in the vaccinated arm? Mainly by excluding PCR-positives in the jabbed until seven days after the second dose. The problem with this is that, since Covid waves tend to infect only 10-20% of a population, evidently not everyone is equally susceptible to the virus. This means if those most susceptible to the virus in the vaccine arm catch it in the weeks before they are ‘fully vaccinated’ and so don’t count towards the vaccine arm ‘cases’, those remaining in the vaccine arm of the trial will be primarily those who are less susceptible to the virus, and so the trial will suffer from survivor bias, exaggerating efficacy.
HART explains:
Pfizer set out in its protocol that efficacy would be measured based on PCR positive test results in symptomatic individuals and, as a secondary measure, N-antibody levels showing who had been infected.
Pfizer chose to ignore PCR positive results, even in symptomatic people, if they occurred in the month before “seven days after the second dose”. However, the antibody testing is a measure of who had Covid for the entire period of the trial. Concerns about higher incidence in the early period after dosing, or an illusion of efficacy from a drug that caused cases to occur earlier rather than preventing cases, would be addressed by measuring the numbers who developed antibodies.
The original trial claimed there were only eight symptomatic PCR positive ‘cases’ in the dosed arm compared to 162 in the placebo arm. The graph always looked odd – how could the treatment arm have such a dramatic flattening to the horizontal?
There were 165 people who started with negative antibodies but became positive during the trial in the placebo arm. That is a pretty close match to the 165 who were positive by PCR testing. However, there were 75 in the vaccine arm, far more than the eight claimed by PCR testing. That would mean that treatment only reduced the risk of infection by about half the 95% claimed.
Only 40% of people who had been given Moderna produced N-antibodies after symptomatic, PCR positive infection. Moderna and Pfizer have products that are very similar in terms of mechanism of action, so it is not unreasonable to assume that a similar issue would be seen with Pfizer.
If that is the case, then the 75 figure would only be a fraction of the people in the treatment arm who had been infected. Assuming the 40% figure holds, that would mean that there was no efficacy from Pfizer vaccination against risk of infection when measuring the entire period from first needle to end of the trial.
Worth reading in full.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
Zero would be about the efficacy of these injections we’ve all observed in the real world. Should we be sending these findings to local doctors surgeries? If we can’t bring about change at the top, it will have to be bottom-up. This criminal enterprise only works because of the brainwashed idiots administering the poison. It’s probably them we should be approaching.
We should definitely try. I’m not sure doctors are going to be very receptive to the idea that their medical system is fraudulent, that they are the useful idiots of the pharma industry and that they may have in fact been causing serious harm to people. But I guess we have to try to wake them up.
No, I don’t think the doctors and medical facilities are going to suddenly say, “Damn. We were wrong. Sorry.”
The more I think about this the more I think the “key to the operation” is to get as many people and organizations to publicly “sign on” to the program and the authorized narrative. Once all these people and groups have publicly shown what “team” they are on, the odds these team members will later recant and impeach themselves is about … zero.
Said differently, there is “strength in numbers.” Too many people and revered organizations would be exposed if the truth somehow went viral.
As a friend of mine once said “Doctors doctor things Vets vet things.” No guesses as to which profession he was in.
£15 for every dose given = New BMW in no time.
Financial incentives trigger greed…
Indeed. They have far too much skin in the game, including liability. They cannot stop even if they wanted to.
Are you reading this report Bozo?
There ain’t no excuses, no get out clauses, you are guilty of mass murder.
Still a very important point: Someone with a similar track record re: deaths of victims as the vaccinators would be regarded as dangerous serial killer. Compared to the number of people in the UK, these only rarely kill them, too.
Do you think his baby and toddler will be getting the vaccine?
I’m not sure he’s ever shown any interest in the children he’s fathered.
That doesn’t exactly come as a surprise. Each so-called study of vaccine efficacy in the real world resulted in different numbers. And when trying to measure something reliably yields wildly differing numbers, one is probably measuring random fluctuations not at all related to the supposed cause of the phenomenon claimed to exist.
OTOH, that’s a bit like face masks: They’re not really good for anything but they’re soo reassuring to people who don’t understand this. Hence, one can also get a reassuring RNA injection every three months just to feel protected which only rarely kills people. Ain’t that great?
Yes. Minimal benefit, but significant risks to many. Perhaps what we are witnessing is a kind of psychological effect on large numbers of people, though. We are looking at a. typical political campaign, as much as anything.
I would fight my children to stop them getting my grandchildren vaccinated.
Please God we never get to that.
If what we’ve seen with adults proves to be the case with children, the “efficacy” of these vaccines will soon be negative. The vaccinated children will be much more likely to become infected (and then re-infected) than the unvaccinated.
Somehow I don’t think we’re going to have any follow-ups with the vaccinated that reveal this. Future visits to the pediatricians will show it though.The pediatricians will know this at some point … and they’ll all remain silent … and keep pushing boosters.
HART actually claims that the Pfizer trials for the most-recently envaccinated age group were massaged in order to hide negative vaccine efficiency for children.
Doctors Admit They’re Harming and Killing Patients
This happens to the tune of about 40,000 events every single day, with approximately 250,000 lives lost each year (about 1 in 10 patients), making it the third leading cause of death in the US. Worse, you don’t even need to be sick or do anything wrong to become a victim of this astonishing trend.
https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2022/06/17/medical-mistakes-leading-cause-of-death.aspx
Analysis by Dr. Joseph Mercola
Stand for freedom & make friends with our Yellow Boards By The Road
Tuesday 21st June 11am to 12pm
Yellow Boards
A329 Peel Centre
Skimped Hill Lane,
Bracknell RG12 1EN
Stand in the Park Sundays 10.30am to 11.30am – make friends & keep sane
Wokingham
Howard Palmer Gardens Sturges Rd RG40 2HD
Bracknell
South Hill Park, Rear Lawn, RG12 7PA
Henley
Mills Meadows (bandstand) RG9 1DS
Telegram http://t.me/astandintheparkbracknell
Crooks every man jack of them. They might as well be pedalling their dodgy wares in the Wild West. A stiff gaol sentence would seem appropriate and never being allowed near the pharmaceutical industry again. They’ve actually killed people and continue to do so. My contempt for them knows no bounds.
As an aside, the regulatory information for the U.K. version of Moderna- spikevax (apt name) – has been updated on 17 June 2022 to include a warning regarding the risk of flare-ups of capillary leak syndrome (CLS) in individuals who already have CLS.
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/regulatory-approval-of-covid-19-vaccine-moderna