116195
  • Log in
The Daily Sceptic
No Result
View All Result
  • Articles
  • About
  • Archive
    • ARCHIVE
    • NEWS ROUND-UPS
  • Forum
  • Donate
  • Newsletter
The Daily Sceptic
No Result
View All Result

Is Trading With Russia and China Bad for National Security?

by Noah Carl
26 May 2022 11:11 AM

In his keynote speech at the World Economic Forum in Davos, NATO chief Jens Stoltenberg argued that “economic relations with authoritarian regimes can create vulnerabilities”, citing not only Russia, but also China – “another authoritarian regime that does not share our values”.

He went on to describe the idea that “we should have free trade in natural gas meaning we can buy as much gas from Russia as you want” as “wrong” and “dangerous” because “it provides Russia with a tool to intimidate and to use against us”.

As to trade with China, he acknowledged “there are huge benefits”, clarifying that “I’m not arguing against trading with China”. But he pointed out that “control over 5G networks is of vital security importance”, so we should not “just open up those networks”.

Stoltenberg emphasised that “we should not trade long-term security needs for short-term economic interests” because “freedom is more important than free trade”, and proclaimed that “our economic choices have consequences for our security.”

All these arguments make sense, and I’m not about to suggest Stoltenberg is completely wrong. (Limiting foreign ownership of critical infrastructure certainly seems like a good idea.) However, there is one major caveat I’d like to discuss.

Stoltenberg frames the issue as “short-term economic interests” versus “long-term security needs”, implying that trade with “authoritarian regimes” is good for the economy but bad for national security. Yet there’s reason to believe that trade with such regimes could be good for national security. How?

One of the most influential theories in the study of inter-state conflict is the ‘capitalist peace theory’, also known as the ‘doctrine of gentle commerce’. In short, it states that countries which trade more with each other are less likely to go to war.

The reason why is obvious: it’s costly to wage war against a country you buy things from or sells things to. When two trading partners go to war, they forgo positive-sum ‘gains from trade’, ending up poorer. As Robert Wright has quipped, “Among the many reasons I think we shouldn’t bomb the Japanese is that they made my minivan.”

While the relationship between trade and conflict is hard to pin down empirically, here’s what Steven Pinker says in The Better Angels of Our Nature:

The theory of gentle commerce is not only supported by numbers from international datasets but is consistent with a phenomenon long known to anthropologists: that many cultures maintain active networks of exchange, even when the goods exchanged are useless gifts, because they know it helps keep the peace among them.

I would therefore suggest that Stoltenberg’s framing is too simplistic: maintaining economic interdependence with countries like Russia and China could benefit our national security.

Take his claim that buying energy from Russia is “dangerous” because it gives Russia leverage over us. That’s true. But it also gives us leverage over Russia, since Russia needs our money just as much as we need Russia’s energy.

Imagine Europe had stopped buying energy from Russia years ago. Yes, we’d no longer be dependent on Russia. But Russia would no longer be dependent on us. They would have built new pipelines, and found other buyers for their energy – like India and China. And in that case, they might be even less vulnerable to Western sanctions.

We ought to remember what trade with other countries means: we have a stake in their economies, and they have a stake in ours. Which just might be enough to prevent war.

Tags: ChinaNATORussia

Donate

We depend on your donations to keep this site going. Please give what you can.

Donate Today

Comment on this Article

You’ll need to set up an account to comment if you don’t already have one. We ask for a minimum donation of £5 if you'd like to make a comment or post in our Forums.

Sign Up
Previous Post

Anatomy of a Scientific Witch-Burning

Next Post

Who Will be First Up Against the Wall if Civil Unrest Breaks Out?

Subscribe
Login
Notify of
Please log in to comment

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

51 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

NEWSLETTER

View today’s newsletter

To receive our latest news in the form of a daily email, enter your details here:

 

DONATE

PODCAST

Nick Dixon and Toby Young Talk About Nigel Farage Eating Ze Bugs, Elon Musk’s Lawsuit Against Media Matters and Argentina’s New Libertarian President

by Will Jones
21 November 2023
3

LISTED ARTICLES

  • Most Read
  • Most Commented
  • Editors Picks

News Round-Up

28 November 2023
by Richard Eldred

New Evidence That Covid Vaccines May Promote ‘Hyperprogressive’ Cancers

27 November 2023
by Igor Chudov

The Single Line in Sir Patrick Vallance’s Diaries That Reveals the Faulty Reasoning Behind the Lockdown Fiasco

28 November 2023
by Dr James Alexander

Three Graphs That Show There Is No ‘Climate Crisis’

26 November 2023
by John Staddon

World Apocalypse on Hold as TV Station CNBC Quietly Disbands Climate Desk

28 November 2023
by Chris Morrison

100,000 People Pack Central London to March Against Antisemitism

123

Lawyer Says BBC Ignored Her Warning Not to “Parrot Hamas Propaganda” When Reporting Gaza Hospital Strike – and Cancelled Her Scheduled Appearance Just After Story Broke

22

World Apocalypse on Hold as TV Station CNBC Quietly Disbands Climate Desk

18

The Single Line in Sir Patrick Vallance’s Diaries That Reveals the Faulty Reasoning Behind the Lockdown Fiasco

15

News Round-Up

14

Nine Witnesses Say They Heard Knife Attackers Being Anti-White – But French Prosecutor Claims “No Evidence Attack Was Racially Motivated”

28 November 2023
by Robert Kogon

I, Claudia: The Roman Emperor Who Suddenly Became an Empress

28 November 2023
by Steven Tucker

The Single Line in Sir Patrick Vallance’s Diaries That Reveals the Faulty Reasoning Behind the Lockdown Fiasco

28 November 2023
by Dr James Alexander

World Apocalypse on Hold as TV Station CNBC Quietly Disbands Climate Desk

28 November 2023
by Chris Morrison

How to Fix the Broken University System

27 November 2023
by Mark Ellse

POSTS BY DATE

May 2022
M T W T F S S
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031  
« Apr   Jun »

SOCIAL LINKS

Free Speech Union
  • Home
  • About us
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy

Facebook

Twitter

Instagram

RSS

Subscribe to our newsletter

© Skeptics Ltd.

No Result
View All Result
  • Articles
  • About
  • Archive
    • ARCHIVE
    • NEWS ROUND-UPS
  • Forum
  • Donate
  • Newsletter

© Skeptics Ltd.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Create New Account!

Please note: To be able to comment on our articles you'll need to be a registered donor

Already have an account?
Please click here to login Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
wpDiscuz
You are going to send email to

Move Comment