On St George’s Day, Should We Feel Ashamed About Britain Profiting From the Transatlantic Slave Trade, or Proud That We Helped to Stamp it Out?

5 min read

We’re publishing an original essay today by Dr. Paul Jones, Head of History at an independent school, to mark St. George’s Day. Dr. Jones takes issue with the fashionable view that Britain’s history is an unbroken litany of oppression, exploitation and self-deception and points out that, while we bear some of the responsibility for the horrors of the Transatlantic Slave Trade, the British were hardly alone in participating in slavery, and, unlike other nations, we were at the forefront of abolishing that trade.

First, Dr. Jones focuses on the debit side of the moral ledger.

According to Martin Meredith, Britain was responsible for the trafficking of over 600,000 slaves from Africa to America between 1791 and 1807. The National Archives suggests that Britain transported 3.1 million slaves between 1640 and 1807, though some estimates put the figure far higher at 12.5 million and the UN suggests about 15 million people were shipped as slaves across the Atlantic. Conditions on board slave ships, known as ‘Guineamen’, were utterly horrific, with slave traders cramming as many people below deck as possible to maximise potential profit and offset the costs of those who died during the Middle Passage. From the 1500s to the 1800s, 10% to 30% of slaves being transported died in the cramped and insanitary conditions of their ships. As Olaudah Equiano’s account of his experience of the Middle Passage shows, treatment of slaves was predictably brutal as slaves were regarded as cargo rather than humans, with floggings and beatings being used to maintain control. Even worse things could happen. One infamous incident occurred in November 1781 when the crew of the British slave ship Zong threw over 130 slaves into the sea to save food and water and strengthen their case for an insurance claim. Arrival in America and living on a plantation was hardly any easier either. Disease was rife and one in three slave children died before the age of 10. Slave owners handed out all manner of horrendous punishments to those who resisted or tried to escape.

He then contextualises this by pointing out how many other countries and empires have been involved in slavery throughout history.

The truth of the matter is that England arrived relatively late to the slave trade. Slavery had existed for thousands of years before England engaged in the Transatlantic Slave Trade. Ancient Egypt relied on slave labour for construction projects, notably the pyramids, and ancient Greece likewise made use of slaves – Herodotus claimed slaves, known as helots, outnumbered free people by as many as seven to one in ancient Sparta. The Roman economy heavily relied on slaves too. Viking raiders enslaved people in any area they targeted, whilst Arabs began enslaving people from Africa from about the ninth century, establishing the trans-Sahara slave trade. Arab slave traders continued to be prolific in East Africa throughout the 19th century, and pirates from North Africa enslaved at least one million European people between 1500 and 1800. Slave labour provided the power source for the galleys deployed by Italian city states and the Ottomans for centuries and proved crucial in the Battle of Lepanto in 1571. Roughly 6.5 million people were enslaved and shipped across the Black Sea from 1200 to 1760.

English people were themselves subjected to the terror of slavery as the coastline of Britain was frequently targeted by Barbary pirates. So severe was the problem that it was stated in the Calendar of State Papers in May 1625 that “the Turks are upon our coasts. They take ships only to take the men to make slaves of them”. Raids by Barbary pirates became so problematic that Parliament established the Committee for Algiers in December 1640 to deal with the ransoming of those who had been taken into slavery. Edmund Carson was sent to Algiers by Parliament in 1645 to negotiate the release of English people taken captive and he ended up spending the final years of his life trying to secure the liberty of further English slaves. Yet, despite Parliament’s efforts, North African pirates continued to terrorise England’s coast until combined British and Dutch military forces finally stamped the problem out in 1816 and freed 4,000 slaves in the process.

Finally, Dr. Jones describes Britain’s efforts to stamp out the Transatlantic Slave Trade.

The Royal Navy was deployed to actively suppress slave trading and in 1808 the West Africa Squadron was formed under the command of Commodore Sir George Collier to hunt down and intercept ships involved in slave trading. Some £4 million was spent from 1870 to 1890 maintaining naval forces off the coast of East Africa for the purpose of suppressing slave trading. This would equate to £547 billion in today’s money being spent on efforts to fight for freedom, whereas the U.K. Government has perhaps spent anything from £310 to £410 billion on efforts to restrict freedom through Covid measures. Average GDP from 1870 to 1890 was £1.259 billion and defence spending during that period typically constituted £0.03 billion, or 2.38% of GDP (Britain has often spent about 2% of GDP on defence in recent years). Maintenance of anti-slavery patrols on East Africa alone thus accounted for about 0.015% of GDP or 0.634% of defence spending, and all done with just a fraction of the number of bureaucrats we have today. Whilst it may be true that only a small percentage of slave ships were intercepted by the Royal Navy, perhaps less than 10% by the West Africa Squadron, and some might complain that Britain should have committed more resources to the task, the fact of the matter is that Britain made a clear effort (and a far greater one than any other country) to suppress slave trading. That effort yielded results. Around 1,600 slave ships were intercepted by the Royal Navy between 1808 and 1860, liberating about 150,000 slaves. Liberated slaves often ended up joining the Royal Navy and were themselves involved in freeing other slaves. Between 1866 and 1869, a further 129 slave ships were captured and another 3,380 slaves were freed. Action by the Royal Navy in 1873 shut down the slave market in Zanzibar and British Governor-General, Charles Gordon, made concerted efforts to end the slave trade in the Sudan. It was after Khartoum was captured and Gordon killed by Mahdist forces in January 1885 that the slave trade grew again. British anti-slave trade operations continued into the 20th century, with British action suppressing the slave trade in Tanganyika in 1922. One simply cannot ignore or deny the fact that Britain was at the forefront of the anti-slave trade movement.

Worth reading in full.

Comments

This week across the site:

Email me alerts for this discussion
Notify of

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to the Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

210 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Mode RNA
Mode RNA
4 years ago

The Truth About England and Slavery
by Dr. Paul Jones
https://dailysceptic.org/the-truth-about-england-and-slavery/

An important and timely essay. Thank you.

Smudger
Smudger
4 years ago

Is there some potential for a very tasty stream of money in this for the legal fraternity?

Banjones
Banjones
4 years ago

I don’t think we’re allowed to blame the Religion Of Peace, are we?

Spirit of the wind
Spirit of the wind
4 years ago
Reply to  Banjones

Who still pratice slavery in North Africa.

concrete68
concrete68
4 years ago
Reply to  Banjones

Not for the Atlantic slave trade , no.

Spirit of the wind
Spirit of the wind
4 years ago

Point one, I don’t care, the sins of centuries ago are no longer relevent to us as individuals, no more than the Mongolians should feel ashamed for the exploits of Ghenghis Khan the real matter is no Western nation practices slavery anymore which is far more than can be said for practically the rest of the World.
The SJW’s should concentrate their shrieking at those surely?
And yes the UK was the Worlds first nation to stop doing it, shame?
Nah none.
Pride in our nation, yes.

marebobowl
marebobowl
4 years ago

Not really that different from what is happening in China under Mr. Xi. Only the numbers are a bit higher. Over a billion people, slaves. 26 million now locked in their apartments with no food, water, medicines for one month. Anyone in government of any country or the church of England or the Vatican or the Muslim community, Jewish community, Hindu community have any objection to this slavery? It appears not.

rtj1211
rtj1211
4 years ago

Let’s be clear, we wouldn’t have had to stamp it out if we hadn’t been making money from human trafficking.

There’s no choice involved, there’s one simple situation: we got rich doing something morally disgusting and then decided to become moral after having made the money.

Those that argue about this are simply saying, without saying: ‘We’re not going to pay back all the money we made trafficking slaves!’

Hugh
Hugh
4 years ago

I’ve said before, in the 18th century, English people were slaves in North Africa. That’s just how things were then.

concrete68
concrete68
4 years ago
Reply to  Hugh

You can say it as much as you like, where’s the documentary evidence?

lordsnooty
lordsnooty
4 years ago

I recommend a visit to the national maritime Museum in Liverpool, after which no-one could be in any doubt about the extent of Britain’s financial involvement in slavery.

If you claim to truly admire or even love your country it is necessary to expose and get to know its whole history, I expect many Britons admire and love the idea of Britain, without realizing the obvious fact that it is it is one of the greediest and most warlike nations on earth. Lying politicians today capitalize on this fact to allow them to start new wars in for example Ukraine.

Even patriotic Americans realize that it is lamentable side of Britain that they have inherited.Hence, it is sometimes said that, since world war 2, no US president has failed to start a new war. Trump might be an exception. In this country we still have much to atone for.

RedhotScot
RedhotScot
4 years ago
Reply to  lordsnooty

Did you just pass over the bit where the Royal Navy’s grossly expensive efforts to stamp out slavery is described?

Is the whole history of the UK documented in the museum, the enlightenment for example? Are the inventions and industry we exported to the world described there? The very computer screen you’re viewing this blog on is directly descended from the TV, invented by a Scot. The means of connecting it to the rest of the world was also invented by another Scot.

Is it also described there the efforts and expense Britain incurred exporting Democracy and the rule of law to lawless nations who were hundreds of years behind us culturally?

Greenwich is still used as the centre of the maritime world for timekeeping. The English language is the first language of trade across the world.

The Mongols and, Romans, amongst others, were waging continental wars long before Britain was.

Even patriotic Americans realize that it is lamentable side of Britain that they have inherited.

Like the English language and the Democracy they so fiercely protect to the point of allowing every one of their citizens to be armed?

Wha’s Like Us – Damn Few And They’re A’ Deid

… Read more »

Hugh
Hugh
4 years ago
Reply to  RedhotScot

Ironic, isn’t it, that (so far as I can tell) every country in the world uses time zones derived from Greenwich time (i.e. whole or occasionally half or quarter hours different).

Cristi.Neagu
Cristi.Neagu
4 years ago

Saying this as an immigrant: on St. George’s day you should feel proud of all of the achievements of your fellow countrymen. Lord knows, there have been many. And strive to be worthy of their legacy. Don’t waste it. Like Tom Hanks said: “Earn this.”

Dodgy Geezer
Dodgy Geezer
4 years ago

Little confused about this.

I understand that Whites are all guilty because a few of our ancestors shipped slaves to the new World.

But those slaves were typically bought in slave markets from African or Arab tribal rulers or merchants.

Does that mean that Blacks and Arabs are equally guilty? If not more so?

RW
RW
4 years ago

In my opinion, it’s advisable to avoid getting dragged into this discussion. Like so many things which unfortunately spook the so-called West, it’s really nothing but US domestic politics spilling over into other countries which are more-or-less independent members of the USA-led block. To certain US politicians hunting the black vote, nothing but so-called black history matters. Self-respecting people of any skin colour ought to look down on something like this with disdain: In the end, it’s about nothing but (hopefully) fooling people with flattery and about sowing discord because one hope’s to be able to reap something from that.

huxleypiggles
huxleypiggles
4 years ago
Reply to  RW

Where are the trolls on this thread?

Pink Moon
Pink Moon
4 years ago

“It takes no more research than a trip to almost any public library or college to show the incredibly lopsided coverage of slavery in the United States or in the Western Hemisphere, as compared to the meager writings on even larger number of Africans enslaved in the Islamic countries of the Middle East and North Africa, not to mention the vast numbers of Europeans also enslaved in centuries past in the Islamic world and within Europe itself. At least a million Europeans were enslaved by North African pirates alone from 1500 to 1800, and some Europeans slaves were still being sold on the auction blocks in the Egypt, years after the Emancipation Proclamation freed blacks in the United States.”
― Thomas Sowell, Black Rednecks and White Liberals

JXB
JXB
4 years ago

‘Britain’ wasn’t/isn’t responsible for anything, it is either a geographic or political expression but in either case it has no agency.

Very few British citizens were involved in slavery; very few git rich, but that does not mean it was Government policy or popular business activity, no more than because some British citizens are engaged in illegal drug trafficking means ‘Britain’ is responsible or profiting from drugs.

And the people who made the transatlantic slave trade possible were African slave traders who captured and sold their own people to Europeans.

ImpObs
ImpObs
4 years ago

Britain was responsible for the trafficking of over 600,000 slaves from Africa to America between 1791 and 1807.

Britain owned the ships? Not the international traders/finaciers then?

How does that even make “Britain” responsible for the trade?

Alan M
Alan M
4 years ago

A few years ago at the museum of Liverpool I was berated by a curator / assistant for openly telling my children that we didn’t invent slavery and recognised it was wrong so abolished it – that is not the narrative they wanted to sell.

kate
kate
4 years ago

MY post is awaiting approval. Until then please see this link.
Human sacrifice in 1850s african kingdoms. Sarah Bonetta was rescued by an anti slaving ship and adopted into the royal family by queen Victoria.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sara_Forbes_Bonetta

Think Harder
Think Harder
4 years ago

We should be proud we were the first to stop it and celebrate that. Back then the whole world was at it, both first, (second) and third worlds as was.

But don’t worry it’ll be back within the next 5 years if the globalist agenda succeeds and there will be no discrimination based on colour, all colours will be enslaved.

DeeCee
DeeCee
4 years ago

I find that having read the article and thought about the titular question that I don’t particularly feel anything regarding the subject.
Slavery of any description is bad but I haven’t been responsible in any way for past slavery and the people of that time profiting from it. Neither do I have any connection to those who abolished it.

hippogriff
hippogriff
4 years ago

There does seem to be a concerted effort to rewrite history lately. I was just looking into the “Age of Enlightenment”, many of the ideas during that phase led to the Slavery Abolition Act of 1833. Granted not everything aout that era was good such as the rise of dictatorial regimes. History is complicated and messy and interpreted by different people to suit their political biases.

RedhotScot
RedhotScot
4 years ago

The UK had largely dealt with any racial problems we had in the country by the 2000’s. There were unpleasant individuals who were bigots, sadly that will never be eliminated, but for the most part, It was all but done and dusted.

Problems emerged from the huge number of, predominantly, black children who didn’t/don’t know what a father or a family unit is. Denzel Washington is outspoken about this as the underlying problem amongst black communities.

The children, especially males, are left to their own devices as their mother is forced to be the sole provider for her children. They end up on the streets and perpetrate a disproportionately high level of crime compared to their ‘white’ counterparts who are more likely to function within a family unit (nuclear family).

They get pursued and prosecuted by the police, then the accusation of racial profiling is levelled however, fortunately or otherwise, the colour of ones skin is a significant identifying feature of a crime participant. As the very least it eliminates 90% of the country from an investigation or, in fact, eliminates 10% of society if the perpetrators skin colour is identified as white.

Despite what we are led to believe,… Read more »

Vaxtastic
Vaxtastic
4 years ago
Reply to  RedhotScot

Forgive me, but this is naive. I agree with your conclusions about the Lawrence case, as well as your observations about blacks and racial profiling.

But things have moved on. Our problems now are caused by the volume of immigrants and by a steady drum roll from wokesters about us being racist.

The Lawrence case had its effect, but will be remembered as a minor blip on the radar. The colossal demographic changes and its impact on our culture, way of life and economics dwarf the points you made. We cannot cope with the numbers we have now never mind the millions yet to come. And in case you haven’t noticed, many are not assimilating. This is even talked about by the government who are reluctant to discuss any aspect of race or immigration. If we stopped now and imported no more we would still be looking at 50 to 100 years to assimilate what we have already. Some of us are simply asking if any of this is worth it.

The ethnic groups we are bringing in famously have a strong in-group preference, a strong preference for their own kind in all walks of life. This distorts the society… Read more »

RedhotScot
RedhotScot
4 years ago
Reply to  Vaxtastic

The moment you fail to distinguish between legal and illegal immigration you have conceded the debate.

Quite apart from your final paragraph being entirely racist, where do you intend to “deport” them all to?

Send them back to France? How, precisely? Rent a ship and sail them into Calais, to be met with a gunboat? Or do you train them to jump out a plane and parachute them into a country of your choice?

Didn’t we try that sort of thing with the Windrush community?

How long did it take the UK to deport a single Imam back to Jordan, whilst he was living a lavish life here and preaching hate. Ten years? I forget now.

David Beaton
David Beaton
4 years ago

I think we have had enough of this constant Guilt Trip psyop being politically mounted against the West by those who seek to destroy it.

Every single human being involved in the transatlantic slave trade has been dead for over a hundred years. This country abolished it as an abomination earlier than all others. This achievement was written around the iron legs of the Britannia tables used in all British pubs!

Meanwhile, the ‘Modern Slavery’ involving all races – especially from Africa and Asia to the Middle East -continues – as does so we hear the sex trafficking from the Ukraine…… as does the large scale child sex trafficking no-one even wants to talk about.

MrTea
MrTea
4 years ago

The subsaharan slave trade was going for centuries before any European showed up.
The Arabs always cut the nuts off the African male slaves as soon as they bought them.
The Arabs always killed any children born as a result of them raping their female African slaves.
The Arabs weren’t stupid, that policy meant their future generations avoided no end of grief.

Vaxtastic
Vaxtastic
4 years ago
Reply to  MrTea

As they say on some forums, the Americans imported about 300,000 African slaves of which only 40 million of their ancestors survived. The Arabs imported over 8 million and none survived.

Don’t see BLM banging on about that 😉

MrTea
MrTea
4 years ago
Reply to  Vaxtastic

But for mass immigration and multiculturalism we wouldn’t even have to think about this shit.

Vaxtastic
Vaxtastic
4 years ago
Reply to  MrTea

Well it is driven by woke whites. So the colonial aspect, which is what they are really after, is behind all the angst.

I am against mass immigration but I can’t really blame them for this. In fact I know a few well educated Asians quite concerned about where it is all going. They know enough history to understand how crazy we can be, and they are well aware this is coming from the over educated, over socialized groups in society who don’t represent the majority.

I think they are right. This will cause a backlash and that is maybe no bad thing.

artfelix
artfelix
4 years ago

I – along with many others – have made this argument for years: that the only unique things the British Empire did in regards to conquest and oppression was to end slavery and instil democracy in the countries it gave back.

In terms of conquest and bondage; we were just doing what everyone else in history did, and what was accepted as legitimate for all that time. The only reason it stopped being legitimate was due to Western European moral philosophy. There’s no doubt in my mind that the British Empire – while far from perfect to modern minds shaped by our own concepts of human rights – was overwhelmingly positive on a global level. Everything we think of as freedom, human rights, equality etc stems from European thinking catalysed by British action.

MrTea
MrTea
4 years ago
Reply to  artfelix

‘Everything we think of as freedom, human rights, equality etc stems from European thinking catalysed by British action.’

Which is all being rapidly eliminated by the globalist cabal.

Smelly Melly
Smelly Melly
4 years ago

Why, as far as I’m aware every civilisation in history was or has been involved in slavery at some time. African chiefs sold their own people into slavery for profit. As far as I’m aware there were 3 main African slave trades, internal, Arabic and Western. If I was a slave I’d be grateful I was sold into the Western market. The internal market, slaves were cheap and expendable. The Arab market slaves were cheapish, the males were castrated before being force marched to be sold. About 1/3 died from the castration process and another 1/3 died on route. Children were killed as they had no economic value. Women had to abandon their child as they also had to carry goods and couldn’t carry goods or a child. The western slave market the slaves were expensive and needed caring and looking after. (In many instances slaves got better treatment than “free” poor).

The blacks now who are complaining about their ancestors being slaves. Where are the descendants from the internal and Arab slave trades, there aren’t any as they didn’t have any. At least slaves in the western trade had descendants.

7941MHKB
7941MHKB
4 years ago
Reply to  Smelly Melly

Interesting to ponder, also, whether you would prefer to be a Haitian or (say) a Barbadian?

Or a Liberian, or a Nigerian?

Or Citizen of the USA or any of the above?

If we start forking out (even more than we already have done, for generations), how long will it be before we start getting dunning letters from those whose ancestors were NOT sold by African chiefs for transportation to the New World?

MikeHaseler
MikeHaseler
4 years ago

Slavery has been around since before recorded history, we are not responsible for slavery but we did lead the world to get rid of slavery.

MrTea
MrTea
4 years ago
Reply to  MikeHaseler

A total waste of money.

MrTea
MrTea
4 years ago

To be fair the brown people pack themselves more tightly onto a rubber dinghy to cross the channel so perhaps being ram packed into boats is just a thing they like doing?

As undocumented illegal immigrants they will probably end up working as slaves in Asian owned garment sweatshops in Leicester or in other foreign owned businesses, so are you a slave if you decide to be one?

Leicester: Up to 10,000 could be victims of modern slavery in textile factorieshttps://news.sky.com/story/leicester-up-to-10-000-could-be-victims-of-modern-slavery-in-textile-factories-12027289

MrTea
MrTea
4 years ago

I agree to paying compensation but only if it consists of a one way ticket back to the paradise that is Wakanda.

MrTea
MrTea
4 years ago

You know when you read something and you belly laugh, a laugh that you just can’t stop?

I read this back in 2017 –
Migrants from west Africa being ‘sold in Libyan slave markets’https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/apr/10/libya-public-slave-auctions-un-migration

So it turns out that Obama, the brown Messiah, in bombing the snot out of Libya and destroying Gaddafi had resulted in the return of open slave trading.

The evil white man put a stop to it only for the brown Messiah to bring it back, the irony is simply dripping everywhere.

Sontol
Sontol
4 years ago

We neither should nor can feel genuine shame for what anyone else does, only for our own harmful actions (and even then only until we feel remorse and stop doing whatever it is, the whole point of having a conscience).

The sheer ludicrousness of the concept of feeling shame (or indeed pride) for the behaviour of long dead human beings who just happened to live in the same artificially sectioned off geographical area as us is one of the best ways of highlighting the nonsense that is nationalism.

That does not, of course, mean that we cannot either condemn or praise others’ ideas and actions (including historically), simply not ascribe them to ourselves.

At a more practical level I agree with comments below that any discussions about slavery should overwhelmingly be focussed on the abolition of its contemporary manifestations (although historical investigations are interesting and valuable).

jingleballix
jingleballix
4 years ago

Not only did it cost Britain £squillions in treasure to crush the slave trade, it also cost the RN thousands of lives lost to tropical disease.

“Beware, beware the Bight of Benin,
Only few come out where many went in”.

kate
kate
4 years ago
Reply to  jingleballix

The most successful anti slaving ship was “The Black Joke” which was nothing to do with race, but referred to a bit of female anatomy.

Vaxtastic
Vaxtastic
4 years ago
Reply to  kate

A great little historical factoid is the reports of British and American captains on freeing slaves. Many remarked how indifferent the freed Africans were when returned to their homelands.

We pretend people yearn for freedom, but most just want a more benevolent master.

Fingal
Fingal
4 years ago
Reply to  Vaxtastic

Yes, although it was extremely rare for them to be returned to their own village or district (for practical reasons). So their life was not going to be straightforward.

Vaxtastic
Vaxtastic
4 years ago
Reply to  jingleballix

1568 able seamen.

Thank you for reading. Please help us keep the Daily Sceptic going by becoming a donor.