94227
  • Log in
The Daily Sceptic
No Result
View All Result
  • Articles
  • About
  • Archive
    • ARCHIVE
    • NEWS ROUND-UPS
  • Forum
  • Donate
  • Newsletter
The Daily Sceptic
No Result
View All Result

New Emails Reveal Scientists Stifled Lab Leak Discussion to Protect “Science in China”

by Noah Carl
14 January 2022 9:12 AM

Back in June, Buzzfeed obtained a large cache of emails sent to and by Anthony Fauci. These included some amusing tidbits, such as when Fauci told his correspondent, “The typical mask you buy in the drug store is not really effective in keeping out virus, which is small enough to pass through the material.”

However, by far the most interesting item was an email sent by Professor Kristian Andersen of the Scripps Research Institute (see below).

Professor Andersen, a leading virologist, said of the virus that “some of the features (potentially) look engineered”. He added that he and several colleagues “all find the genome inconsistent with expectations from evolutionary theory”.

Such an admission would have been noteworthy coming from any virologist, but what made this one particularly revealing is that – mere weeks later – Andersen co-authored a paper stating, “we do not believe that any type of laboratory-based scenario is plausible”.

That paper then became the definitive ‘refutation’ of the lab leak theory, even though it accomplished no such thing. As Nicholas Wade has written, “Dr Andersen and his colleagues were assuring their readers of something they could not know.” So why did Andersen’s view shift so dramatically in such short space of time? We still don’t know.

What we do know is that Andersen was far from the only top scientist who entertained the lab leak theory.

Sir Jeremy Farrar, head of the Wellcome Trust, wrote in his book Spike that he initially believed there was a 50 per cent chance the virus had leaked from a lab. Of course, he then went on to sign the infamous Lancet letter, which dismissed the lab leak as a “conspiracy theory”.

Now a new cache of FOI’d emails has been released by Republicans in the U.S. Congress. These demonstrate just how much credence scientists were willing to give the lab leak in private, despite their efforts to stifle public discussion of the theory. The cache itself is worth browsing, as all the relevant passages are highlighted in yellow.

In one email (shown below), Francis Collins – former director of the National Institutes of Health – expressed the need for a “swift convening of experts”, or else the “voices of conspiracy will quickly dominate”. This, he feared, could do harm “to science and international harmony”.

Note that in the same message, Collins described the natural original as “more likely”, so even he wasn’t fully convinced of its truth.

In a later email (shown below), Collins explicitly referred to the lab leak as a “very destructive conspiracy”, asking his colleagues whether there was something the NIH could do to “help put [it] down”.

Interestingly, he also says that he’d hoped the Nature Medicine article (the one by Andersen mentioned above) would “settle this”.

In yet another email (shown below), the Dutch virologist Ron Fouchier states that “further debate” about the lab leak theory could do “unnecessary harm” to science in general and “science in China in particular”.

Yet it’s clear from the preceding sentences that he regards the lab leak as a possibility, noting that it would “need to be supported by strong data”.

What these new emails reveal, above all, is the way leading scientists view the scientific enterprise itself. Rather than something that involves reasonable speculation and open public discussion, they see it as something that’s carried out behind closed doors by credentialed experts.

The ‘experts’ do this thing called ‘science’, and other people just kind of get in the way. But that’s not how science really works. It’s a vast collaborative effort, comprising everyone from the head of the NIH to random commenters online.

As a matter of fact, nothing illustrates this better than DRASTIC – the loose collection of ‘internet sleuths’, academic scientists and others, who’ve pieced together much of the evidence we have for the lab leak theory. And they did all this through informal, online collaborations, with some members remaining anonymous.

One silver lining of the pandemic may be that more people recognise this: science isn’t pronouncements made by people in lab coats; it’s a process by which we gradually home in on the truth.

Stop Press: Matt Ridley (co-author of Viral) has written a good piece for Spiked, which elaborates on what the new emails reveal about the science of the lab leak theory.

Tags: Anthony Faucicovid originsFrancis CollinsLab leak

Donate

We depend on your donations to keep this site going. Please give what you can.

Donate Today

Comment on this Article

You’ll need to set up an account to comment if you don’t already have one. We ask for a minimum donation of £5 if you'd like to make a comment or post in our Forums.

Sign Up
Previous Post

The Demolition of the Principles of Good Clinical Practice

Next Post

No-Vaxx Djokovic Visa Cancelled Again in “Punitive” Late Move By Australian Government

Subscribe
Login
Notify of
Please log in to comment

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

65 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

NEWSLETTER

View today’s newsletter

To receive our latest news in the form of a daily email, enter your details here:

DONATE

PODCAST

Nick Dixon and Toby Young Talk About the Davos Elites’ Prolific Use of Prostitutes, Clarkson’s Fightback and the Government’s Bizarre Plan to Ban Discouraging Teens From Becoming Trans

by Will Jones
24 January 2023
0

LISTED ARTICLES

  • Most Read
  • Most Commented
  • Editors Picks

The Link Between the Massive Drop in Birth Rates and mRNA Vaccines is Undeniable

24 January 2023
by Dr Sven Román and Dr Jonathan Gilthorpe

Excess Deaths in Finland and Norway in 2022 Were Higher Than in Sweden in 2020

22 January 2023
by Nick Rendell

Affordable Electric Cars “Not Viable”, Says Kia Boss

24 January 2023
by Will Jones

News Round-Up

24 January 2023
by Will Jones

Temperatures in Northern Hemisphere Due to Fall Over Next 25 Years, According to Six Top International Scientists

23 January 2023
by Chris Morrison

News Round-Up

52

“My Son is Going to Be an Activist From Two Years Old” – Princess Eugenie at Davos Says Plastic Causes Climate Change Which Causes Modern Slavery

41

The Link Between the Massive Drop in Birth Rates and mRNA Vaccines is Undeniable

44

FDA Proposes Annual Covid Boosters for Americans

29

Affordable Electric Cars “Not Viable”, Says Kia Boss

26

Why the Lab Leak Theory is Almost Certainly False

25 January 2023
by Will Jones

A Manufactured Anxiety Crisis and the Attack on Freedom

24 January 2023
by Dr Mark Stephen Nesti

The Link Between the Massive Drop in Birth Rates and mRNA Vaccines is Undeniable

24 January 2023
by Dr Sven Román and Dr Jonathan Gilthorpe

Why 2022’s High Mortality is Real and Worrying

23 January 2023
by Will Jones

Is Mortality Unusually High in England?

23 January 2023
by Noah Carl

POSTS BY DATE

January 2022
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31  
« Dec   Feb »

SOCIAL LINKS

Free Speech Union
  • Home
  • About us
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy

Facebook

Twitter

Instagram

RSS

Subscribe to our newsletter

© Skeptics Ltd.

No Result
View All Result
  • Articles
  • About
  • Archive
    • ARCHIVE
    • NEWS ROUND-UPS
  • Forum
  • Donate
  • Newsletter

© Skeptics Ltd.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Create New Account!

Please note: To be able to comment on our articles you'll need to be a registered donor

Already have an account?
Please click here to login Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
wpDiscuz
You are going to send email to

Move Comment