Former Vaccine Taskforce Chief Clive Dix has said the “vaccines were not designed to end transmission”. In a key confession that demolishes the Government’s strategy behind vaccine passports and vaccine coercion, the former Interim Chair of the U.K. Vaccine Taskforce writes in the Telegraph that “the vaccines will not stop the spread of the virus in the short or medium term”.
The battle over Covid transmission was lost some time ago. I am afraid that the vaccines will not stop the spread of the virus in the short or medium term – but that is not a disaster. Indeed the vaccines were not designed to end transmission. It was evident to me at the time I helped with the procurement of doses, as interim chair of the Vaccine Taskforce, that the intention was to stop people from getting severely ill or dying.
Blasting the U.K.’s current booster strategy for “sacrificing the care of elderly diabetes for the very marginal benefit of boosting the antibody concentrations of the young and healthy”, Dix writes he fears that we will be “inadvertently causing a lot of human suffering”.
Given that young and healthy people not only have a very low chance of suffering severe Covid in the first place, but also already have substantial immunity from severe disease thanks to the first two jabs, I cannot see how boosting them is more valuable for public health than doubling our focus on the most vulnerable and cracking down on the backlog of chronically sick patients, such as those with hypertension, diabetes or even cancer.
Worth reading in full.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
If someone wants a nice little conspiracy theory: COVID infection spikes shortly after another round of jabs are a well-known phenomenon, hence, hastily rejabbing loads of people after a new variant appeared is obviously intended to result in a huge, short-term boost of COVID infections, just what the lockdown proponents want.
Related, the reactivated policy (as of yesterday) of proactive emergency discharges of all patients the NHS can somehow get rid of will hopefully also boost the number of deaths.
If you can make it, you don’t have to fake it.
Was just logging in to say something similar.
Given that we know the first 14 – 21 days after the jab causes a drop in protection, I think it’s timed to create a huge amount of “positive” Omicron cases to peak over the Christmas holidays.
This will be followed by the inevitable lockdown because of the numbers and the threat to “our” NHS.
100% spot on.
These deliberate rolling winter lockdowns are devised to crush the British human spirit without using direct violence… They are a direct and consistent assault on our collective well-being and happiness.
This ruthlessly GPP stakeholder capitalist organised grind down is deliberate throughout the current lockstep nations.
Once more James delivers the why…?
https://www.bitchute.com/video/bgST9vrheoQt/
Meanwhile a lone German Prof. Günter Kampf dispels the myth of the pandemic of the unvaccinated.
https://www.thelancet.com/action/showPdf?pii=S0140-6736(21)02243-1
Yet another nudge unit lie to bed in this continuing medical apartheid.
brilliant image perhaps we should make up posters and stick up in bus shelters
If you don’t own your body, what do you own?
killing the elderly all over again, I wonder how many families will once again stand by and watch their Parents and Grandparents be slowly killed by our glorious NHS and Government, or will they this time rescue them from the “care homes”
Agreed! Fits the evil agenda perfectly.
Yes, I have been a bit mystified all along that literally no one has raised the point that, having been publicly stated by the authorities themselves that the vaxx suppresses the immune system for at least 2 weeks, that perhaps sticking a needle in everything that moves right at the peak of infections might be a rather dumb thing to do.
They’re crying here in NL that the infections, although falling, are still too high – the exact same thing happened after the January peak, they started jabbing and the infections stayed high for months, compared to the rapid decline after the first wave in March 2020. That penny still has not stopped.
I appreciate your point that the more infections and deaths due to denied health care, the better to keep the scamdemic going, but for those people who do believe the vaxx will help, it seems like they might have woken up to the fact that suppressing the immune systems of millions of people right when there are high rates of transmission might be illogical. But then, logic is so 2019 – to paraprahse Mandelson, we live in a post-logic world.
It has to tank the immune system in order to be “effective”.
Lol.
My favourite was reading comments in the DM when the jab roll-out had first started, so many people saying they had been quite unwell for days, some ended up in hospital for a number of days or even weeks, but thank goodness, if they got the lurgy without the jab it would be much worse – you know, they might have become really ill or have ended up in hospital.
Yep! With a destroyed immune system, that makes you “vaccine dependent” for life – to stand a chance of staying alive!
just think of the $$$$ Gates and Pfizer will make!
I don’t like the post-logic world. How do I get back to the old one? The one with some semblance of coherence?
I wish I had a time machine!
I’m hoping patience will do the trick. I went to get my hair trimmed this afternoon, as I’m pretty certain they will forbid me from tending to such things after January. The lass who was cutting my hair and I first started talking about our dislike of the face rag (she has to wear the horrid thing all dag), then got into how things are in general. She said that after several lockdowns, shutdowns that cost money (she was afraid they were going to shut the hairdressers again and was worried she could lose her job), vaxxing, etc., we were still in the exact same place we were 2 years ago. So people are starting to wake up. It was busy and I didn’t want to go in-depth into things like the vaxxes and apartheid app, but wherever she might stand on those issues, simply the fact that she realised taking measures that lead you nowhere is pointless so we need to get on with things is what everyone needs to realise. More and more people will eventually start thinking like her.
Having said that, covid1984 is not the only problem in the world. Cancel culture, the refusal to debate large-scale immigration and how this affects social structure, political representatives who think they are lords of the manor dealing with serfs, the rather bizarre push for as many young people as possible to be gay/non-binary – there’s a lot more crazy going on. It’s almost like a Chinse-style cultural revolution has been going on…
I’m absolutely non-binary as I don’t have two sexes, just one. That’s a point I must insist on.
Eh wot? Am I back in the Latin class by mistake again?
ask your hair dresser to visit your house for cash
If it was my regular hairdresser, that’s exactly what I’d do. I used to have a place in Barcelona and went to a small place there. As in normal times I go to Barcelona 2 or 3 times a year, I just kept going to the same place and know the owners quite well, and I’m sure they would be happy to oblige.
Now I don’t have one particular person do it, so wouldn’t ask. Not particularly important, I have long hair that I can just tie back if it’s looking particularly awful
But they are dumb as well as dangerous – how many real experts( who don’t work for Bill Gates) have warned about jabbing everything during an epidemic but they deliberately went ahead with it and now blame us the unvaxxinated for the emergence of mutant varieties when its the vaxxinated who are responsible.
Not dumb- just evil – this is all part of the plan staring you in the face for two years !
Fauci & Gates – see RFK J’s book: “The Real Dr Fauci”.
Gates is everywhere!
Quite right, and if they’re hoping to then somehow blame the unvaccinated, I think they’re walking a tightrope. How are they going to convince a triple vaccinated family that the reason they’re all ill with covid is the 10% of the population who aren’t vaccinated?!
“How are they going to convince a triple vaccinated family that the reason they’re all ill with covid is the 10% of the population who aren’t vaccinated?!”
By repeating it.
Through the mouths of respected figures.
Cult faiths don’t have to make sense members just have to fear saying something that gets them excommunicated.
Cult faiths usually require Human Sacrifice …so how many will it be Bill?
Like Whitty and A.Neil….. mmmmm…..
They will find a way – mark my words.
I’m already being semi-shunned in my neighbourhood because it is known that I am unjabbed. By people I would have formerly considered to be friends.
There’s a noticeable change in the behaviour of the vaxxxed. It really is like the movie The Thing, where there’s a very sudden total lack of trust in one-another – entirely due to the paranoia that an alien blob could be disguised as their friend.
Last week I had a disagreement with a colleague about the vaxports. He said that he disagrees with mandatory jabs, but those who refuse should understand that they should lose freedoms. It was on the same day PM Fat Fuk declared no-more working in the office, so when we were saying bye to one-another, he made a parting comment of “good luck, hope you survive”.
I guess he’d (correctly) come to his own conclusion that I’m unjabbed therefore of course I’m the alien who should be strapped to the chair, just like those in The Thing.
‘he made a parting comment of “good luck, hope you survive”.’
Wow! He should’ve been saying that to himself!
Looking at the garbage swallowed by moron MPs – don’t hold your breath!
And as more and more people refuse to take the 3 monthly boosters – and they will – the number of people who won’t have a vax passport will increase. We just have to hold firm and wait for this to happen. The whole pack of cards will then collapse.
I dare say they’ll tweak their rules…
20 million people are being deliberately set up to each suffer up to 10 days severely compromised immunity at the height of the winter bug season because one person might have died from another benign variant (there are hundreds of variants btw).
Of course that’s not counting at least 800 or so deaths (1 in 24,000) that will inevitably directly result from tens thousands of vaxx adverse reactions.
Genius, sheer genius.
The people behind this are not stupid.
They may well put out a suitable variant of flu or some other virus during said season too.
The National Hoax Service is now suspending appointments to concentrate on getting yet another dose of the bioweapon into vulnerable people. Might be a case of third time lucky?
Karl Denniger AKA Market Ticker’s analysis says 2020 was 1 in 20 batches was a full barrel of russian roullette.
I did read somewhere that some pfizerbatches of the vaccines had vary high incidences of adverse reactions. As for Astra zenica see attached
The National Health, sorry, Covid service you mean..
And I used to work in it, briefly.
I don’t blame those at the sharp end.
Most of them know it ain’t anything to do with health.
If you’re ever unfortunate to meet one of the others just ask how they feel about them throwing everyone else under the bus eg cancer referrals, just to obey the covid zealots.
May they rot in Hell.
Notional Health Service?
The problem is that the public are so hopelessly gullible that there is no chance of any dawning realisation that this whole Moronic myth is a set-up based on what is, effectively, a moderate cold virus.
It’s been obvious for some time that the inching forward with absurdities would have no bounds unless sussed.
It is a depressingly circular reality … lather, rinse, repeat. We have to hold firm and work hard to live the old normal to show that it still exists and is still better ( despite the faults)
Spot on.
Exactly.
Not sure it’s entirely a conspiracy theory but cases in the UK started rising almost as soon as I got the second jab and haven’t really fallen since. It should have been clear to everyone that the vaccines did diddly squat to infections overall and clearly now are contributing to it with negative effectiveness.
Well, indeed.
It would rather appear that the vaxx (and its buddy the apartheid app) were designed to end Western democracy.
With the bonus of making a handful of people with shares in pharma companies exceedingly wealthy.
I’m feeling a bit naive / generous today.
Could it be that the politicians have no idea what they are doing and have been mind-fucked by the globalist pigs to do all their dirty work?
No it couldn’t.. sorry
Certainly some of them are thick tw*ts who don’t know what they’re doing. Now, I don’t trust Dutch PM Rutte, I don’t know whether he knows what’s going on, but he is acting on orders from Berlin/Brussels – as he always has done. But I’ve seen bits of debates in parliament, technical briefings with the medical experts where MPs can ask questions, and I think that a lot of them are mind-fucked and doing what they think is right. They can’t seem to understand that the fact that literally only one side of tackling corona is discussed – lockdowns, vaxxes, passes, with no opposing views, in itself requires further inspection.
There is one party in particular that is very critical, but they also present some of the more out there theories (I’m making no statement on the validity of the theories one way or the other), which makes them easy pickings to be torn apart and ignored. The slur of being anti-vaxx, anti-science is just as strong here as elsewhere, you have to have both a serious brain and a serious spine to stand up to it. Most of them just like asking questions in the hopes they’ll get their face on telly.
They are dumb as a bag of rocks and hubristic megalomaniacs almost to a man(/woman/other), so that is slightly plausible. However, they take their advice from a group of ‘scientists’, who are also hubristic megalomaniacs, but who are NOT dumb (mostly). However, to have 600-odd MPs who haven’t even got the wit to question any part of the narrative, or any of the provable lies from said ‘scientists’ is stupid (and wicked) beyond belief, and does not bode well for future governance.
We’re fucked until further notice.
Don’t forget the de-population agenda …how come everyone misses this most important element of all?
He looks like an elderly diabetic
Is that why he’s kicking of?
This Government and Parliament are liars, we know they are liars, they know we know they are liars, yet still they keep lying…
As GW Bush once said, fool me once……. fuck me I’m stupid. Or something like that.
. . . won’t get fooled again . . .
HA!
Thus just in. Anyone who has been following the story knows this was always the stated aim. The real issue is the horrendous damage they are causing to those foolish enough to roll up their sleeve.
I generally agree with his article, but as a commenter in the Telegraph pointed out, the claim that the vaccines were intended to prevent severe illness and death seems to be widely circulated revisionism.
I thought that when I first heard it, as reading the Pfizer trial report the primary metric was the number of cases, with severe illness being only secondary. In fact, Scott Atlas records how the President of Pfizer delayed the release of the rials until a higher number of cases came in.
So they were, indeed, intended to reduce cases – and have failed signally in that aim. And you only reduce transmission by reducing cases, which was also therefore clearly an intention of the vaccines.
Exactly. But why why the revisionism?
I can only guess that these people have bought into their own claims of being experts and being in control of the situation, rather than just accepting that the vaccinations were a long shot and they didn’t work as hoped by the advisory committee. I mean, the vaccinations are working out splendidly for the pharmaceutical industry.
And one particular pharmaceutical company has muscled its way in front of the others.
You’re right.. they’re making it up as they go along, and then continuously repeating the new message to reinforce it..
The ‘prevention of severe illness and death’ line has been the stance for a relatively long time now, but you’re right, this was, as has necessarily been the case with virtually every step of this contrived drama, an ad hoc adjustment of the narrative based on the fact that it was obvious the initial claim of reducing cases/transmission was patent nonsense. I can distinctly remember the switch occurring.
Big Pharma may have been careful to watch its back regarding claims, but politicians certainly were broadcasting the impression that the snake-oil was a cure-all.
The Commons today was a disgrace to our history and our democracy- the level of ignorance on display was stunning!
Only 126 can hold their heads high – the rest are a disgrace to Parliament.
I thought the MHRA acceptance criteria for ‘successful’ vaccine candidates was ‘slight reduction of some symptoms in slight cases of the disease’. That fits in with statements that the clinical trial isn’t designed to answer questions about improved protection, reduced deaths, etc. The Phase II trails as published (before correction to account for 2 missing vaccinated deaths) showed similar performance to the placebo regarding deaths. The Phase II control group was quickly jabbed up once Phase III started so they cannot be followed up. They also seem very very keen to eliminate the informal control group in Phase III.
So far as I recall it was mainly the politicians who were claiming that it would reduce infections.
This is the same arse who only the other day in an interview with Spiked stated ….
“I think we should have kept mandatory mask-wearing right from the beginning. To wear a mask does not cost you anything. At the moment, we have to be careful to keep the transmission down. If this variant takes over and we have 50,000 infections per day, that is not a problem. But if we end up with 100,000 cases per day, it might start pushing the NHS a bit hard.
We should be careful for the next few months. I do not think we need to be locked down. Wherever we can, we should do simple stuff like wearing masks and trying to avoid crowded places that are not well-ventilated, and working from home if we can.”
“I think we should have a very strong public campaign to get the people who have not been vaccinated to get jabbed. There should be really hard-hitting adverts. For example, an advert showing a young person at home with granny saying they are not going to be vaccinated, and the next thing granny is in intensive care. We have got to shock some of these people into thinking about others rather than themselves.
If this strain sweeps through, many of the over-50s who have not been vaccinated are going to end up in hospital. And they are going to be jamming up beds in the NHS and stopping people with other illnesses getting in.”
“The vaccines are safer than any medicines. Most medicines have a whole list of side-effect profiles on them that we just accept. Aspirin causes gastrointestinal bleeding in quite a large number of cases and yet people use it. The vaccines cause tiny amounts of side effects in tiny numbers of people, yet people think they are unsafe. It is ludicrous. The facts do not speak to their hesitancy.”
“If you extrapolate it out, it means that the vaccine campaign in the UK has probably saved hundreds of thousands if not close to a million lives.”
Thanks – duly discredited.
So his script for his advertisement would be completely false then: no need for the young person to get vaccinated to save granny if the vaccine does not protect against transmission.
Also tiny amounts. Ahuh.
And one last thing, so they’re designed to reduce people getting severely ill and dying. So it’s a therapeutic, not a vaccine. It’s not giving immunity. It’s treating the disease that the recipient of the vaccine may or may not end up getting.
Etc etc etc. I mean, just look at his face, says it all.
Common asthma treatment reduces need for hospitalisation in COVID-19 patients, study suggests | University of Oxford
but this works better than the jab at reducing people getting severely ill and dying, so why continue the jabs?
they’re designed to reduce people getting severely ill and dying.
the Pfizer vaccine was shown to reduce covid symptoms and that is all. However, as only those who had covid like symptoms were tested it’s totally possible that the vaccinated group may have been asymptomatic.
Exactly.
And correctly described they are at at best:
experimental, temporarily maybe somewhat and sometimes effective, prophylactic gene therapy treatments.
Even the Bayer Pharma CEO thinks so.
Also never forget that they were approved by the FDA incorrectly under the vaccine protocol instead of under the gene therapy one, which, among many things, resulted in far fewer toxicity studies having been necessary and made.
“they were approved by the FDA incorrectly under the vaccine protocol instead of under the gene therapy one”
Really. Purely by mistake I guess, and now it is too late to correct it (/s).
“The vaccines are safer than any medicines.”
Yes, they are the safest thing in the whole world, much safer than eating an apple or walking along the pavement, and only someone who only thinks about themselves and doesn’t care whether their granny snuffs it doesn’t agree.
I suspect this arsehole really is as stupid as he appears.
I think we should have kept mandatory mask-wearing right from the beginning. To wear a mask does not cost you anything.
This amazing example of reality disconnect wouldn’t even be true if the government was handing them out for free. The people would still end up paying for them.
What a w*nker he is!
Anyone who thinks that masks do anything useful and think that they are cost free is very,very stupid.
Or very, very evil.
That’s the ones who claim to believe it because it suits their purpose, even when they know it’s bollocks.
……”many of the over 50s who have not been vaccinated are going to end up in hospital”….. hey most of the over 50s I know are fitter than any 20 somethings !
Well, that’s a large box of whoppers.
https://alexberenson.substack.com/p/urgent-a-huge-israeli-study-shows?token=eyJ1c2VyX2lkIjo0Njk4NzM0NCwicG9zdF9pZCI6NDUzNzk0MzQsIl8iOiJJT0NwbSIsImlhdCI6MTYzOTUwNDc3NiwiZXhwIjoxNjM5NTA4Mzc2LCJpc3MiOiJwdWItMzYzMDgwIiwic3ViIjoicG9zdC1yZWFjdGlvbiJ9.GkjrwCxkO1kL6ZQ5N8boIR9EeLVT4VHJPic1LcC2_Wc
https://alexberenson.substack.com/p/urgent-a-huge-israeli-study-shows as the token doesn’t seem to be needed (i have JS off by default)
Perahos the statement of most concern is this one:
well we know the “negative protection” once the immune fatigue kicks in and the absence of T cell production in the jabbed (which is why just antibody testing seems to be done, its a sales ploy!)
Surely that is the idea? They then become totally dependent on vaccines ‘for life”.
($$$$$$$$$$$$$$)
‘It was evident to me at the time I helped with the procurement of doses, as interim chair of the Vaccine Taskforce, that the intention was to stop people from getting severely ill or dying.’
And how’s that working out, sausage?
Ask Sergio Agüero how well it stopped him from getting severely ill or dying.
Too little too late. Another professional drone rat deserting the floundering ship of state to try and avoid the inevitable future reckoning for being complicit in mass vaxx murder.
Wouldnt trust any one them, they’ve all talked about de population too much
Funny how Gates has gone so quiet on his favourite theme.
Just a thought…
Priceless!
Thanks, i needed a laugh
So why did he do nothing to support the use of ivermectin and Chloroquine, which has saved the lives of many Covid sufferers but which Fauci has now banned and in conjunction with the major Pharma industries and their backers burned and removed the product from over the counter sales.
This man has been a contributor to death, he is guilty, he has the blood of many on his hands
RFK J makes what you say as clear as day in his devastating book “The Real Doctor Fauci”.
The question must be, who is protecting Fauci?
The real Dr Death
Wake up and smell the coffee. mRNA vaccines are experimental therapies that would’ve taken years and billions to get anywhere near approval but conveniently rolled out for C19 when Pfizer et al could’ve developed a traditional vax like Sinovac and Sputnik
more quickly and safely.
Biontech developed it .Pfizer are doing the marketing
And what a job their marketing department is doing! Every “expert”, every politician, every “journalist” – all repeat the exact same script, even Andrew Neil’s pathetic article in the DM sounded like some marketing junior at pfisser wrote it. The most ridiculous argument is the absolutely mind-numbing “well I don’t feel safe being around people who haven’t been jabbed” – they are literally saying the vaxx doesn’t work, or only works if you encounter someone who is not infected (as the script also insidiously included making unvaxxed synonymous with infected).
It’s clear they are all reading from the same script and I’ve thought for a long time that the script came straight from pfisser’s marketing department.
If that picture is recent he hasn’t changed his diet in order to lower his personal COVID risk in the simplest way.
He’s a mere shadow of his former self.. some say painfully thin.. undernourished..
You need to know that the smallpox vaccine was suspected in causing myocarditis, a group of eight Finnish conscripts out of 260 developed sub clinical myocarditis two weeks post smallpox vaccination in 1978. Smallpox vaccination was still administered to the military in America in the early part of this century (it may still be), and there were reports of myocarditis developing. Hepatitis B is administered to children in some parts of the world and there have been cases of thrombocytopenia developing. Neurological disorders and rheumatic disorders have also been reported following other vaccinations references below:
Cheng et al (2016),”Post-vaccination myositis and myocarditis in a previously healthy male”, Allergy Asthma Clinical Immunology, 12,6
Dilber et al (letter) (2003), “Acute Myocarditis Associated WithTetanus Vaccination”, Mayo Clin Proc, 78, pp1431-1433
Eckart et al (2005), “Comparison of Clinical Presentation of Acute Myocarditis Following Smallpox Vaccination to Acute Coronary Syndromes in Patients <40 Years of Age”,The American Journal of Cardiology, 95, pp1252-1255
Engler et al (2015),”A Prospective Study of the Incidence of Myocarditis/Pericarditis and New Onset Cardiac Symptoms following Smallpox and Influenza Vaccination”, PLOS One
Helle et al (1978),”Myocardial complications of immunisations”, Annals of Clinical Research, 10,5, pp 280-287
Kim et al (2019),” Acute fulminant myocarditis following influenza vaccination requiring extracorporeal membrane oxygenation”, Acute and Critical Care, 34, 2, pp165-169
Kuntz et al (2018),” Myocarditis and pericarditis are rare following live viral vaccinations in
adults”, Vaccine, 36, pp1524–1527
Mantdakis et al (2010), “Thrombocytopenic Purpura after Measles-Mumps-Rubella Vaccination: A Systematic Review of the Literature and Guidance for Management”, The Journal Of Pediatrics, 156,4
Murphy ey al (2003),”Eosinophilic-lymphocytic myocarditis after smallpox vaccination”, Lancet, 362, pp 1378-1380
Polat et al (2008), “Severe thrombocytopenia after hepatitis B vaccine in an infant from Turkey”, Vaccine, 26, pp 6495-6496
Ronchi et al (1998), “Thrombocytopenic purpura as adverse reaction to
recombinant hepatitis B vaccine”,Archive of Disease in Childhood, 78, pp 273-274
Saurina et al( 2003), Myocarditis after Smallpox Vaccination: A Case Report”, Clinical Infectious Diseases, 37, pp 145–6
Schattner A. (2005),”Consequence or coincidence? The occurrence, pathogenesis and significance of autoimmune manifestations after viral vaccines”, Vaccine, 23, pp 3876–3886
Woo et al (2011), “Thrombocytopenia after vaccination: Case reports to the US Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System, 1990–2008”, Vaccine, 29, pp 1319-1323
I suppose there was never this scale of jabbing up in the past.
“Nevah, in the field of human medicine, have so many been jabbed in so short a time with such an unfortunate outcome”
Absolutely.
Liar, liar…
I notice that trend since a while, in all countries: the ‘experts’ are trying to cover their backsides now by claiming that they never said that the gunk would reduce transmission, only the politicians and journos irresponsibly did so.
The problem is that this is patently untrue, many of them claimed they would provide almost sterile immunity, for a long time, and that one would not or only very rarely catch Covid if one got vaxxed (Walensky, Lauterbach, Dorsten, Wieler etc.).
The gene therapies weren’t just sold that way and the population understood them that way.
No, they were actually approved on that basis.
The 95% efficiency or relative risk reduction concerned the positively tested cases, 162 to 8 out of 43000(:2)!
Only 10 people in total became severely ill, far too few for statistical relevance. That by chance also around 90% relative risk reduction (9 VS 1) was not the basis for their approval, it’s barely mentioned: https://www.pfizer.com/news/press-release/press-release-detail/pfizer-and-biontech-conclude-phase-3-study-covid-19-vaccine
“Primary efficacy analysis demonstrates BNT162b2 to be 95% effective against COVID-19 beginning 28 days after the first dose;170 confirmed cases of COVID-19 were evaluated, with 162 observed in the placebo group versus 8 in the vaccine group.”
Otherwise and also, none of their strategies, from zero Covid to herd immunity via high vaxx rate (slavishly following the Roy Anderson ‘study’, even now, despite its mathematical and practical impossibility, see Bartram), to vaxx passports, 2G, 3G, tests and quarantines for the unvaxxed only and child vaxxing would have made and makes ANY sense anyway.
That they are sticking with and doubling down on all of them, despite the transmission efficiency story now having collapsed and them trying to distance themselves from it, is another, totally different, absurd and absolutely criminal development and story.
Thankfully, GlassHalfFull provided us with the background on this particular chap below.
To me, only Solshenitzyn now comes to mind when I read this and about him.
It’s certainly true that much of the campaign leafleting bears all the hallmarks of a typical political election, not the promotion of public health improvements, or anything like that. They’ll probably defend themselves by referring to the published paperwork to us. E.g. in March they said to me: “We do not yet know whether it will stop you from catching and passing on the virus” – NHS ‘A guide for adults’ March 2021.
Ivermectin not only cures Covid/Flu like symptoms but recently researchers found that Ivermectin inhibits Esophageal Cancer! Search “Ivermectin induces apoptosis of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma via mitochondrial pathway” on googl. This is great news. No wonder they say wonder drug. Buy Ivermectin while you still can! https://ivmpharmacy.com
Vaccine Taskforce Ex-Chief: “The Vaccines Were Not Designed to End Transmission”
I’ve been saying this to people from day one of the vaccines – but its so difficult to get them to grasp this fact and because of this automatic association between typical normal vaccines and immunity I am endlessly reminding them that these new vaccines do not stop you getting the virus or transmitting it – they were never designed to do this but people seem to think that they are safe and immune once they get jabbed.
If vaccines were never designed to end transmission then how does Austria, Australia, New Zealand, France, Germany, Belgium, Ireland etc etc etc and the UK to a certain degree justify policies that deliberately set out to discriminate against those who had not taken up the offer to be jabbed? Governments must have known this vital piece of information yet witheld it from the public in order to use it as a tool to deliberately manufacture hosility and persecution toward the unvaccinated.
These are crimes against humanity – each and every politician who colluded with this deliberate attempt to opress those who were within their legal right to refuse the vaccine must face Nuremburg style trials and expect the severest punishment.
Calling the drugs a vaccine is a cynical marketing ploy. The general public assumes total immunity because that is sort of what you get with real vaccines. The promoters can say “we never said they provided total immunity, as they only provide symptomatic relief’ and here is the paperwork. We are sorry about you misunderstanding the position. But let’s move on”
Hhhhhmmmm… …So we were lied to?
The incredible Pfizer criminal record thread by Architects For Social Housing:
https://twitter.com/9thfloor/status/1358825646294769664
Spoiler – Big pharma don’t want you to be well. They can only make money out of you if you are sick, or if you are scared of getting sick. Why would they even contemplate creating a vaccine that prevents transmission?
And now the Revisionism starts. This is the beginning of the end.
Maybe they watched Dr. Peter Mc Cullough on Joe Rogan, maybe we could get our Toby to watch it on the road to Damascus.
https://ussanews.com/dr-peter-mccullough-schools-joe-rogan-on-plandemic/
Why is this newsworthy? It was already known and reported upon Q4 2020.
If they were not designed to prevent infection and transmission, why did the suppliers claim in their test results that they did by over 90%. More recently the methods and results of these tests have been brought into question although at the time we were supposed to belive them and they were heralded as the answer to ridding us of Covid. Most competent scientists knew this to be unlikely, but some idiots still think its possible to have a policy of trying to achieve zero Covid, instead of allowing the least vulnerable of the population very unlikely to have serious symptoms to build up immunity against it. As I am recovering from the really unpleasant cold that is doing the rounds I suspect Covid will be just as resiliant to elimination as the cold virus has been after several decades of scientific attempts to rid us of it without success. How Fauci can still be in post when he is one of the key finaciers and instigators of bringing this virus that has killed thousands into the world is beyond me. What are the Americans thinking of?
On further thought, I can answer my own question; Its clear that if the American government sacked Fauci they would be admitting their own part in developping this horrible virus and lets be in no doubt they are at least partly responsible.