Sussex Community NHS Foundation Trust has produced a leaflet which tells young people that if they book a Covid vaccination appointment their parents will not be asked to give consent or even notified of their child’s decision. The Telegraph has the story.
A leaflet produced by the Trust asks: “Are you 12-15 years-old, living in Sussex, and want your Covid jab?” It invites children to get in touch if they have not yet been vaccinated, but would still like to have one.
“We will not usually inform your parents, teachers or anyone else if you contact us,” the pamphlet says. “We might inform someone if we were concerned about your safety but we would usually speak to you first.”
Children are invited to send a text message to a phone number and told they will be rung back with “confidential advice and support about how to get [vaccinated] in the catch-up clinics being set up across Sussex”.
Family groups have criticised the leaflet saying it is not appropriate for children to be encouraged to go behind their parents’ backs.
Molly Kingsley, Co-Founder of the parent campaign group UsForThem, said: “The choice about whether to vaccinate children absolutely must be left to parents. Children are not state property.
“The parents we represent feel incredibly strongly that this is not a matter for any arm of the state to get involved in. It is a private matter between parents and their children.”
Worth reading in full.
Discussion
Comments
This week across the site:
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to the Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
This is state child abuse.
Any health “care” worker that goes along with it is also a child abuser.
The NHS trust need reminding that parents are LEGALLY responsible for 12-15 year-olds, so the MUST both get parental consent and inform them. Children are NOT owned by the state.
Child grooming.
How is this even legal? It’s like a dirty old paedophile grooming a child and saying “it’ll be our little secret so don’t tell your parents.”
Disgusting.
12 year olds have been terrorised. My niece was too scared to go back to school after half term and wouldnt wait until Monday when the school jabbing started. She got so distraught and asked her mother to take her to the drop in centre which she did and got the jab. Its horrendous what psychological damage they are doing to kids.
https://twitter.com/dempz8/status/1459640733498060808?s=21
Have a little listen Twitter and share it around. Watch this happen if we don’t wake up. Catherine A. Fitts on the vax pass and centralised control of all assets and taxation
Funny. Given that parents are also not allowed into schools anymore, to “stop the spread”. And “avoid mixing”. And my toddler is not allowed to bring toys into the nursery. Wow. It’s hard to believe we’re not dreaming this. Maybe that’s why so many is sleep walking.
All communist regimes always pursue the destruction of the church and the family. Britain’s “communitarian” regime is no different.
Now the communist regime in Britain has comprehensively smashed the social contract, people might want to start asking themselves how they can fight back before it’s too late.
I never signed up, whilst we’re at it, I never filled out a police consent form neither.
Hospitals in USA and in first world countries are refusing life-saving Ivermectin treatment even with court orders. Big Pharma doing everything they can to jab us no matter what, while alternative COVID cures EXIST! There happens to be heavy censorship who are looking for these treatments. The Research Is Clear: Ivermectin Is a Safe, Effective Treatment for COVID. Get your Ivermectin today while you still can! https://ivmpharmacy.com
There’s a tiny bit of sense in this, but only a tiny bit.
If a child wants medical treatment but their parents disallow it, then the child should be able to go to a suitably qualified adult, where they can be questioned about their maturity, their ability to understand rather complex medical information and to check that they’re not being coerced in some way / under peer pressure.
If they did all that and the child noted that they did want to get vaccinated, despite their being under no threat from covid, the vaccines offering negligible protection against infection and onwards transmission and the presence of vast amounts of social pressure to get vaccinated — then in that case I’d suggest that maybe they should. But I’d warn that very very few in the 12-15 age range would pass even the maturity test.
Thinking about it, perhaps this is a catch 22 situation:
Perhaps anyone under about 60 who wants to get vaccinated given the information we now have should be considered as insufficiently informed to make the decision and they should be considered as being unduly influenced by peer and social pressure. Hence they should be left unvaccinated…
But vaccines aren’t medical treatment, treating an existing condition.
FIRST, do NO harm!
the seniormost staff at Moderna, BioNTech, Pfizer & JNJ. Those involved in setting the technical parameters for the fraudulent vaccines knew what they were doing couldn’t work safely.
Choosing lipid nanoparticle technology as formulations (Pfizer / BioNTech & Moderna) was known years before to result in a drug product which accumulated in the ovaries.
And choosing spike protein wasn’t a casual error. You don’t do anything casually in human healthy drug / treatment R&D. Where’s the internal reports showing they considered multiple alternative immunogen than spike protein? And isn’t it astonishing that all four companies all chose the same, inappropriate virus component to target?
Best wishes
Mike
I’ve been listening to Yeadon from the beginning totally agree with him, but think he made a mistake about openly discussing depopulation, it’s helped the establishment to discredit him, he should have played his hand better. We needed his scientific expertise, that is/was his strength.
Many months ago, I recall reading, but stupidly did not bookmark, a scientist making the point that the use of the spike protein in these jabs was known BEFORE the jabs were approved to involve post injection clotting. The person commented that had they used a different methodology – which was indicated to be available by said scientist – the inflammatory/clotting disaster could have been avoided.
Does anyone remember reading/seeing this?
Well the spokesperson for NHS Sussex Community Trust is wrong. They can’t be vaccinating children in line with JCVI guidance, because the JCVI guidance is not to vaccinate children! Furthermore, if JCVI had approved the vaccination of 12-15 year olds, this would still be out of line with the guidance as they are NOT seeking approval of the parents! This is a scripted response that is a blatant contradiction of reality.
https://theexpose.uk/2021/11/14/children-are-dying-because-bill-gates-funds-medicine-regulator-and-has-shares-in-covid-vaccines/
Because the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation is a primary funder of the UK’s Medicine & Healthcare products Regulatory Agency, and the Foundation also owns major shares in both Pfizer, BioNTech, and Moderna, suggesting the vaccination of children against Covid-19 has absolutely nothing to do with health, but everything to do with money, corruption, and power
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w6tPD4bDIIk&ab_channel=GlobalNews
Prominent COVID-19 activist Robert F. Kennedy Jr. on Saturday joined Italians protesting the “Green Pas
https://www.coffeeandcovid.com/p/-coffee-and-covid-saturday-november-4af
The Circuit Court in Duval County, Florida (Jacksonville) entered an order yesterday GRANTING our petition for mandamus. I want to give a special mention to heroic attorney Nick Whitney, who was crazy enough to buy into my theory that mandamus was a viable pathway, and who ably handled the Duval side of our jointly-filed cases. He’s been an amazing battlefield comrade.
Anyway, you’ll want to read about a few things the judge wrote. First, he noted that the school boards’ lame argument that they should be able to create their own tiny departments of health and do whatever they liked had ALREADY been “squarely rejected:
https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/bills/2021/a416
Seen this? Suspected contacts carriers cases can be rounded up and detained.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/eigzm5TchMHf/
Update from Anna de Buisseret
An opinion of an adult who knows what it’s like to be over-ruled as a child; maybe not acceptable to some adults but it’s time other point of view was given: –
Children are people. Only slave-traders believe they own and possess people.
Children are responsibility of those who brought them into being until they reach age of consent. That responsibility is parents’ whether or not they carry it.
There is no such thing as consent unless there is equally free access to word ‘no’ as there is to word ‘yes’.
Until they reach age of consent, children are not granted access to word ‘no’.
That inaccessibility of word ‘no’ makes them vulnerable to the predatory.
Irrespective of how competent they are, a child’s ‘yes’ is not consent.
Nor is ‘yes’ by adults consent if that ‘yes’ is coerced or not fully informed.
Medical procedures cannot legally be done without consent. If they are, it’s physical assault and that is what has been done to all who’ve been jabbed. And residents in ‘care homes’ were over-dosed with midazolam.
‘No jab, no job’ for carers and NHS staff is insufficient; each and all involved in jabbing should be totally excluded from society
Good comment, age should never take away your inalienable rights!
Doctors have no business involving themselves in personal vaccine decisions, it is not medical treatment!
The NHS probably won’t inform parents if their child wants to undergo hormone treatment and gender reassignment surgery either, so why would this be any different?
It’s a great opportunity to educate kids about the workings of the real world and its evils. A bit harsh to rob the young ones of their unconcerned childhood like that, but sooner or later they will have to learn anyway.
Actually, the sooner kids will understand how they are being lied to, the better people they will become.
https://www.reuters.com/article/factcheck-coronavirus-vaccine-idUSL1N2S31ML
says that tromethamine isn’t being added to the childhood version to prevent heart problems but rather to lengthen the shelf life. It seems to be the only vaccine ingredient except for mRNA, PEG and water that’s been disclosed?
Will we ever know what the real reason is, unless some details leak from a more sceptical country, e.g. India or Japan?
I seem to be living in a science fiction film. Governments are telling, even ordering, people to get injected with a ‘magic’ substance. If anyone dares pass on samples of the substance to an analyst, and the sender’s name gets out, they may be threatened or killed. If a government sues the seller the government must pay the seller’s defence costs.
Wishful thinking on the part of the state. Do they really think a young person will use a phone to talk to someone to book an appiontment and have the means to get to where the vaccination is being given! If there are young people out there who can and are determined to negotiate all that then they are capable of deciding if they want one or not…surely. Let’s hope they don’t have a Mum like me who throws away the appointment letters before they find them!
Good for you! I did the same when the letter from school came home!
This disgraceful move by an NHS trust, a move in which the Department of Health and probably Cabinet Office propagandists too must surely have had a hand, needs to be taken to court.
There are likely to be other developments in the same vein.
Don’t forget the very peculiar “feed children at schools during the vacations” propaganda that was put out a while ago, including using a famous footballing celebrity as a front man. That carried a similar message between the lines, namely that even if parents have the money in their pockets you can’t expect them to spend it on food for their children, because they’ll prefer to spend it on slot machines or bags of smack instead. That is a truly vile insult against parents…but the question isn’t whether or not it’s vile; it’s where is this shift in state policy headed?
There are a couple of paths I can imagine for the near future which involve pupils being locked in schools day and night with no access by parents allowed. One involves plague; the other food shortage. Most likely they will braid together…
Many kids in Finland go to school with a can of ‘energy drink’ in their hands for breakfast. Not all parents are responsible.
Tomorrow is the 41st day of jabbing kids in schools in the UK.
….
A friend of mine runs a small charity helping to build/improve schools in a Himalayan country. He has twinned one of the schools to a local UK school. The children from the foreign country sent the local school a video to say hello. The video hasn’t been shown as parental consent is required for the local kids to see it.
Children can consent to have an experimental drug but parental consent is required to see a video of children saying hello to other children.
I hope I live long enough to see this insanity as a bigger joke than the Dutch tulip bubble.
It’s not insanity. It’s not bungling. It’s not incompetence. It’s not a joke. It’s not Johnson.
I think it is well past the time that the names of those responsible for such announcements and decisions are made public. Hiding behind a Trust or Corporation or Public Body cannot be allowed to continue. You want to jab my child without my consent? Then I want to know who you are? Where you work? What position you hold? What medical credentials you hold? And by what authority are you claiming ownership of my child? Also, I want to know who to instigate criminal prosecutions against, and/or sue for damages…
One of many!
At some point the policy shifted from the individual effectively owning his/her body to the state owning it. I don’t think it was sudden but I’d like to know what date the brave new world began taking shape.
Malcolm Kendrick’s 2014 book ‘Doctoring Data’ uses ‘dictatorship’ several times. He’s been an NHS GP 30 years so he saw it happen first-hand.
A friend’s brother (unmarried, 67) died of cancer in Sep. There was no written document available to the NHS so he endured over a month’s pointless suffering. He’d said to his relatives in summer that he was fed up of medics. surrounding his bed and just wanted to die. They complained to the NHS but the medics. ignored them and continued to behave as if his body was NHS property.
Are they now taught this in medical school, that the state owns us?
When Schwab said, “You’ll own nothing” – that included your body.
As soon as conscription came in, the state owned your body and could use it as cannon focder ad lib.
Be kind to Sussex Community NHS Foundation Trust, they are obviously unable to make their own intellegent organisational decisions as they are the victims, being a wholly ‘owned’ resource of Gates/Fauci/AZ/Moderna/Pfizer/Schwab/Soros etc and are ‘only following orders’.
Strange by comparison that 12-15 year olds usually require parental consent to go on a school day trip to the museum. However, consent is not required to inject a child with a controversial and untested experimental sequenced gene therapy concoction with certain undisclosed ingredients that is still undergoing human trials until 2023.
Children require parental consent to go to school in the first place.
The education of a child is the parents’ responsibility. Parents can discharge that responsibility either by sending them to school or by other means.
Parents have the legal right to stop their children attending school, so that they can be educated by other means instead, with immediate notice.
S8(d) of the The Education (Pupil Registration) (England) Regulations 2006.
This is the kind of ‘normal’ that the ‘leaked’ Whitehall document earlier on was talking about going back to.