Sussex Community NHS Foundation Trust has produced a leaflet which tells young people that if they book a Covid vaccination appointment their parents will not be asked to give consent or even notified of their child’s decision. The Telegraph has the story.
A leaflet produced by the Trust asks: “Are you 12-15 years-old, living in Sussex, and want your Covid jab?” It invites children to get in touch if they have not yet been vaccinated, but would still like to have one.
“We will not usually inform your parents, teachers or anyone else if you contact us,” the pamphlet says. “We might inform someone if we were concerned about your safety but we would usually speak to you first.”
Children are invited to send a text message to a phone number and told they will be rung back with “confidential advice and support about how to get [vaccinated] in the catch-up clinics being set up across Sussex”.
Family groups have criticised the leaflet saying it is not appropriate for children to be encouraged to go behind their parents’ backs.
Molly Kingsley, Co-Founder of the parent campaign group UsForThem, said: “The choice about whether to vaccinate children absolutely must be left to parents. Children are not state property.
“The parents we represent feel incredibly strongly that this is not a matter for any arm of the state to get involved in. It is a private matter between parents and their children.”
Worth reading in full.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
Pusher on the street offers free goody bags to kids to get them hooked, tells them not to tell their parents – society says “criminal activity, kids, say no to drugs, lock up that pusher”.
Pharma pusher bribes health care officials to offer free goody bags to kids to get them hooked, tells them not to tell their parents – society says “if parents interfere they will have their kids taken from them”.
Health care workers participating with this in any form should crawl under a rock. But then, tearing apart the family unit is the best way to tear apart society itself.
So the next big protest will be at Sussex Community NHS Foundation Trust headquarters, and the homes of those who run it?
https://www.sussexcommunity.nhs.uk/contact-us/
https://www.sussexcommunity.nhs.uk/about-us/board/
^ That page lists the directors and those “who attend board meetings but are not board members”.
This page has the companies that the chairman of the board, Peter Horn, is known to be (or to have been) associated with. One of these is Avante Care and Support Limited, from which he resigned in March 2021. It runs 10 care homes for the elderly. First they came for the elderly…then it was the children…
Home education networks might be the answer. I’m saying this as a teacher.
Local Authorities are already moving to close down the option. Parents attemting this are getting ‘letters’.
Let’s not forget that you still need to give consent for them to be filmed for the school play.
Good point. The disconnect is truly amazing, with real assault and abuse being condoned.
RH, I would prefer to use Stalinist or Maoist or NSDAPist – what a “shock to the system”… and theTrust management/board members are in the business of “health service provision”?
Not certain of the dictionary definition of evil, but for me that is an evil act.
So basically our children are not ours but the state’s.
We have certain custody rights but that’s it.
And a whole lot of obligations.
And we’re all fine with this, right?
News flash, they never were yours, you were just the incubator, nappy changing, state surrogate, until they were old enough to fight their wars & plough their fields.
They don’t need you or the children any more, humans are obsolete now they have AI.
Some time in the 1980s, AI was extremely hot because DARPA sank truckloads of money into it in the hope of computer-controlled superweapons. After these consistently failed to materialize, funding was again withdrawn and the so-called AI winter began. It ended only when another entity with more money than brains – Google – chose the resurrect this idiotic old idea (dating back to the 1960s). Since then, AI consistently again generates headlines and dysfunctional software for the really gullible.
I mean, do you really believe the people who are incapable of producing a working system for cashless payments (or even a supermarket counter with working scales) will tomorrow succeed with creating a superhuman intelligence because that must be much simpler than getting a better calculator working?
I see this kind of naive
denialcomment all the time, wake up, AI & automation are all around you, it doesn’t need to be intelligent, just dumb down the people.100 years ago horses were still the main method of travel, farms employed 10s if not hundreds of people, now it just takes 1 or 2, the machine runs the man, “tractors” are preprogramed, the driver is just a passenger.
Are doctors treating patients, or just big pharma dispensers?
I think I have a pretty good idea of the practical limitations of both software and software developers as I happen to be one. AI is something which is being missold to you. It also wouldn’t be particularly useful as the first thing an intelligent computer would tell its would-be users that they can do their fscking calculations themselves until he gets a pay rise. Or something like that.
Computers are useful precisely because they’re not intelligent.
They don’t need to be, press 1 for a vaccine, press 2 for lockdown!
It’s about control not intelligence, you’re preaching to the converted on the limitations of algorithms & microchips, i’m a fair weather naturalist/outdoors man 😉
“(J)ust dumb down the people” – @Anti_socialist, that’s not what you said, though. You said “humans are obsolete now they have AI.”
What they want is an enormous cull – of say ~30%-80% of the world population.
AI just means fancy instructions for tools. But I agree that the ideology of AI (“consciousness is a function of complexity” and so on) is anti-human. It is also deeply, deeply, ULTRA patriarchal.
Their useful function as workers in the ant colony is redundant, as AI & automation evolves the fewer workers & soldiers they’ll need to service the system, its a process.
Obsolete, in context to Stewarts post, they don’t need breeders any more.
True, but that same tractor technology would be bugger all use in a vehicle trying to take you to the supermarket if it came across a traffic jam and tried to figure out if it’s been caused by another road being shut, or a road accident, or broken down vehicle, and should it wait or turn round, then came across a diversion and had to work out if it was the best way to go or to take another route, it then had to decide which lane of the supermarket didn’t have 90 year old Auntie Mabel trying to park her car for 10 minutes and holding everyone up.
I’m sure we’ve all seen muppets driving the wrong way up a one way street because Mr Google Woogle told then to…
“AI” is just a set of instructions devices have been given for a set of known circumstances that are detected by sensors capable of measuring and normally accurately reporting them. The “AI” bit is supposedly being able to adapt performance based on experience.
Any failure of part of that system will likely cause it to stop completely, or “fail safe” into a very basic, pre-programmed, performance.
Increasingly complex car systems are a classic example of that.
The notion that any (usable) computer is anywhere near capable of matching the reasoning of a human about millions of decisions in a lifetime based on experience of living in the real world, about what actions to take, is currently and likely to remain science fiction for some years to come.
I mean, they can’t even program things like bloody Alexa to not act on words “it” hears in a conversation by error FFS!
As RW said, computers are useful precisely because they’re not intelligent.
Edit –
“..which lane of the supermarket didn’t have 90 year old Auntie Mabel trying to park her car for 10 minutes and holding everyone up.”
Should obviously be –
“..which lane of the supermarket car-park didn’t have 90 year old Auntie Mabel trying to park her car for 10 minutes and holding everyone up.”
Lol.
In the experience of our family, more the latter than the former. Having said that one GP who did us a great service bought into the Statin scam hook line and sinker and the current partner cohort have swallowed the SARS COV2/CV19 propaganda equally blindly such that it is extremely difficult to see them f2f..
Brave new world my friend
Marxist commie cunts. (sorry Tourette’s again)
Don’t be stupid. It doesn’t look good. Probably a majority of Tory voters, in fact.
Excuse me, the vast majority of health care lackeys are lefties, lefties pushing socialist values, socialists pushing for covid apartheid, it was a well aimed comment with lefties in my sights, I have different ones for Tory cunts.
The rulers want to eliminate a large part of the population precisely because it is not productive of surplus value.
Outrageous. I would personally go after anyone who injected my child without MY consent.
The NHS will not inform parents if their daughter embarks on a career in a whorehouse.
Strange, it’s a noble profession – after all, is that not the profession of a great number of scientists these days?
The hopeless and usually patronising NHS has been encouraged to become even more proprietorial and patronising. The tone of some of the stuff that arrives in the post is beyond vile, and my practice is to put anything with “NHS” on it straight through the shredder.
Missives from that organisation (if such it can be called) have replaced brown envelopes from HMRC et al in my infinite detestation.
I’m always fascinated by the language in missives I get from the NHS. One of their favourite words is ‘poo’.
Infantilisation seems to be the name of the game. The advice used to be to aim to write for comprehension by those with a reading age of 14. Now, we’re down to 6, it would seem.
I’m always fascinated by the language in missives I get from the NHS. One of their favourite words is ‘poo’.
That really bugs the shit out of me. I know- cheap gag- but it does. I am not a four year old child, for fuck’s sake.
Yeah, but ‘excrement’ is too long for an NHS doctor to remember, ‘faeces’ is Latin of which they are totally ignorant, and ‘shit’ is self-description.
‘Excrement’ is a reserved word, to be applied only to government officials and the Royal Family.
Coming next…the advert for the super-booster:
“All the teddy bears roll up their sleeves as soon as Nursy asks them. Then they all eat some nice tasty biscuits. Don’t you want a biscuit?”
PS The use of the word “doctor” for a medic infantilises the hell out of people. It’s very similar to saying “Ooh, he went to university, you know. That means he’s very clever, just like a schoolteacher or a vicar. If he gives you an ‘opinion’, you should be very grateful.”
…certain members of the latter, including those recently “self relegated”, for sure but not a blanket descriptor…imho, of course.
You are a funny lady – but then as with all comedy, more than a grain of verisimilitude..
@John Dee – “The advice used to be to aim to write for comprehension by those with a reading age of 14. Now, we’re down to 6, it would seem.”
You are almost certainly right about that.
If someone has the time, they should apply the SMOG test. This is the best readability test in my opinion. All you need to do is count the number of “long” words (defined as having more than 2 syllables, so a word like “together” or “afterwards” is considered “long”) in 30 sentences.
Take the square root and add 3 to get the “grade level”. Then you can add another 5.5 to get the age level.
But wait…maybe the NHS material will break the bottom of the barrel because even zero “long” words in 30 sentences will give an age level of 8.5.
I am not joking here, because they almost certainly ARE applying simple rules like this regarding syllables, and other ones too regarding vocabulary and sentence length. I know this happens in the US health sector.
It’s back to Gillick competency and it’s assessment. A 15 year old who is close to 16 is more likely to be considered Gillick competent than a just turned 12 year old.
Don’t forget the original Gillick case involved a 15 year old and the decision was that she didn’t need parental consent or even to have her parents informed.
You need to read the whole judgment, which basically says that as children mature then they have increasing autonomy away from their parents until they reach 16 when they’re considered to have capacity in the main to make all of their own decisions, there are obvious exceptions such as joining the armed forces and remaining in full time education or training until 18.
I’m assuming you didn’t write that last paragraph with a straight face – they can’t decide to join the army or leave school but can decide to take a potentially lethal clot shot.
I assume the same thinking was applied to the young girls in Rotheram who were and are continuing to be groomed by gangs of older men, they were in the eyes of the police and the politicians clearly able to decide for themselves that they wanted sex with all these men and fully understood the consequences of not doing so, that being doused with petrol and lighters held near to them.
I assume the same test can be applied to the girls who were trafficked by Epstein in order to gratify many of the sexual predilictions of elite men now instructing us on the new world order. They were clearly up for it too.
Obviously they were because neither Politicians, Police or the Elite give a damn about the serfs kids as is apparant from this neat little trick of injecting an experimental vaccine into children behind parents backs, as one of the guys on American ACIP who approved the vaccine for Children in America Dr Eric Rubin
said about giving it to children “we’re never going to learn how safe the vaccine is until we start giving it”
6 children died from Covid in the UK this is less than any other disease, but hey lets stuff em with the product because we are the lab rats, we are the proles whats a few thousand or more of our children dying if it allows the elites to see what it does.
See my response below.
Why not a straight face? That is the situation. What there is is inconsistencies across the different pieces of legislation such as the Children Act, Representation of the people act, sexual offences legislation, mental capacity act, armed forces legislation, education legislation and Gillick competency.
I think it’s just a case of saying “You really wouldn’t like your grandparents to die of Covid, would you, and, besides, all your school friends have had it” and then jabbing them in the knowledge that, by past experience, there are no angry parents turning up.
After all, the 12 year old and up have been jabbed for the past eight weeks, and not a single ‘jabber’ or headmaster have had to suffer any consequences.
You need to read the whole judgment, which basically says that as children mature then they have increasing autonomy away from their parents until they reach 16 when they’re considered to have capacity in the main to make all of their own decisions
Exactly- in other words, the Gillick judgement is based, not upon any pretence at objectivity, but upon pseudo-legalistic moral contingency. And what makes this contingency so attractive to the State is the enormous discretionary powers it confers upon them. We must understand that the constraints imposed by the tiresome legal objectivity of having to regard the Age of Capacity as being a fixed given age is very inconvenient for our masters. Thin end/thick wedge.
This has been the situation for thirty years predating the Mental Capacity Act and the changes to the education requirements. Not being able to fight on the front line under 18 predates world war 1, when the age of majority was at least 21, boys lied about their age in both world wars.
Gillick competency has absolutely nothing to consenting to sexual intercourse, and cannot be used as a defence as the age of consent is laid down in an act of parliament that again predates mental capacity act by a good few years. It has been amended several times, but the basic tenet that 16 is the age of consent has been consistent throughout.
Shame on everyone who still refuses to accept this is being done deliberately by evil psychopaths. Nobody can justify this, so why are we tolerating it?
Because… err… Boris is a ‘libertarian’?
You must learn to spell “libertine” correctly, EF!
It’s a short hitch from this to telling them it’s okay to inform on Mum and Dad.
“When did you last see your father (and what was he up to)?”
I have a feeling that that might already have started. From what a little boy (9-ish) who lives on our estate was telling me about his lessons at school, it rather sounded to me as if Miss Teacher was trying to ascertain attitudes at home towards the Climate Change agenda.
I know of a case from decades ago where schoolteachers extracted addresses of family members from a six-year-old whose parents had made it clear they were about to notify the school that they were withdrawing him from the school in order to begin educating him at home.
And I’m sure you’ll remember the long standing feature of primary school classroom life in the early days of each Autumn Term- this was, I think, more prevalent in the US than here- of inviting the children to stand in front of the class and tell them (and Miss Teacher) “What our family did in the Summer Holiday”.
How do parents respond appropriately if a child reacts badly to a jab. There is certainly no concern for children in this bunch of extremists.
A significant concern – some proportion of males, at least, will get myocarditis, and the neither the parents nor the hospital will be aware of the cause, and the child who went behind his parent’s back will be too shamefaced to say. You can bet your life it won’t be the school nurse sending off a yellow card.
Very sad but true.
Kinda takes the “Trust” outta “NHS Trust”, don’t it?
Fool me once, what a cuck i am. I never trusted the Nazi health service.
So no accountability at all then? Not only does the pusher man absolve himself of liability but they cut the responsible adults who might seek accountability out of the equation.
Presumably as these Sussex Councillors will be carrying out medical procedures on minors they will be of course fully compensating the child and family for any injuries or deaths created by the experimental injection whihc might occur within weeks, months or years of the councils actions. I would very much like to see the legal documentation they are producing accepting full liability as a part of the injection of each individual minor.
This petition to “Prohibit employers from requiring staff to be injected” is gathering steam. Please sign and spread the word.
https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/599841
Why sign another pointless petition? It would be much more effective to find out who these people are and go and harass them directly, if you disagree with their policies.
Signing on-line petitions is just virtue-signalling. And, of course, safe.
Why not just shut the f… up? Signing petitions is more than you’ve ever done. And doing bugger all is, of course, safe.
If that’s the case and a child gets injured or dies then I hope the parents find whoever gave it to them…
Kids have been jabbed for the past 8 weeks. Where is the list of those who did the jabbing? Not on this forum, anyway.
There’s still a news blackout on the deaths of two young lads in Newcastle-under-Lyme…and as far as I’m aware no newspaper has published anything about any response by the parents, which strongly suggests they’ve been “paid a visit”.
The post mortem and inquest systems take so long. That’s useful to Pfizer. Local journalists will know some facts and the whole school will have a view.
Sooner or later, maybe after dose two, we will see the first parents of a dead child go public.
8 weeks of jabbing kids in UK schools have gone by. Where are all these dead kids?
I’ve given my children enough information about the harms vaccine can cause. I’ve shown them videos of the people who have been injured by them. They won’t be having it.
#BoycottTesco
Problem, if we boycott all corporations that support the slave pass, we’ll starve. That’s what you get when you allow fascism to control money supply, food supply, health care, become dependent on the corporate state & you become their slave. Prove i’m wrong.
Benito Mussolini. I recall his retirement plans didn’t go so well.
I still have hope, what else is there?
Went belly up, indeed.
“Fascism is when you can’t put a cigarette paper between the interests of the government and corporate business interests”.
One person who used to cite Mussolini’s definition of fascism a lot was David Cornwell, aka John Le Carré, including in relation to the US government. What a shame he died last December. He also spread the term “Big Pharma”, and ripped the hell out of them in his novel “The Constant Gardener”.
A mass boycott – 20 per cent would be well enough – would have an impact at this stage.
20% will starve.
“I get paid more than $90 to $100 per hour for working online.”
In your dreams.
“I get paid more than $90 to $100 per hour for working online.”
In your dreams.
Exactly- you have to sign up for the 77th Brigade to get paid that much for malicious trolling, everybody knows that.
This is almost criminally wrong. Firstly, if the JCVI are so conflicted they cannot recommend vaccination to this group, then how can a child have sufficient judgement yo consent?
And secondly, what if the child goes home and then gets a vague chest pain? Would the child be able to tell their parents, or would the parents know enough context to get them to hospital asap?
Deeply unethical and divisive.
Fortunately Pfisser has added tromethamine to its vaxx now it’s going to be pumped into 5-year olds. It is a heart attack drug, Pfisser claims it is being added as a stabilising agent. True story, look it up.
Tromethamine can apparently be used as a stabilising agent, but it seems odd that they’ve only started adding it now, a year down the line, after the myocarditis issues in young males and kids occurred, despite Pfisser’s best and shameless attempts to underplay them. It is also rather extraordinary, surely, that an emergency use drug can be modified without what would appear to be any further trial of the altered drug.
Worldwide Vaccine Failure
Offering dangerous drugs to schoolchildren used to be a crime.
Now it’s government policy.
Persecuting minorities used to be a crime.
Now, in most countries it’s …
Inciting hatred against minorities used to be a crime …
They are ghettoising us unvaccinated ones. That much is clear. They are building walls around us and they will move them in.
From tomorrow, those in Latvia who are unvaccinated, even “for medical reasons”, won’t be allowed to go inside supermarkets. They will have to get other people to do their shopping for them, buy all their food by mail order, or buy it only from small shops where ranges are restricted and prices high.
Eric Clapton Tells RFK, Jr.: ‘This Has Gotta Stop’ – childrenshealthdefense.org
This type of stuff is something I really do not get.
Fine, lots of people got the vaxx and are fine, good for them, I am genuinely pleased. But why attack someone who has suffered from the vaxx? If you want to prove that your vaxx is so great, be open and transparent. All drugs can have side effects, so why try to deny it and seek to vilify someone telling his story? The only explanation is a combination of paid shills and a lot of people with buyer’s remorse wishing to shoot the messenger.
It’s denial again, ‘They can’t handle the truth’! If they dismiss it as anti-vaxxers, they can carry on with their delusions.
Correct, it’s a defence mechanism to ward off uncomfortable thoughts and feelings.
They’re going to push this until there’s blood on the streets. These f*cking murdering peadophiles will get their come-uppance, mark my words.
Hey, stop that, you’ll hurt the feelings of paedophiles!
“Non-Binary” Assistant Professor Calls For “Stigma” Of Pedophilia To Be ‘Delegitimized’
You know what comes next, lowering of the age of consent.
‘Paedophobes’ would fit both lots much better.
I think the latest on-line petition will stop them in their tracks. Have you signed it?
This is the kind of ‘normal’ that the ‘leaked’ Whitehall document earlier on was talking about going back to.
Be kind to Sussex Community NHS Foundation Trust, they are obviously unable to make their own intellegent organisational decisions as they are the victims, being a wholly ‘owned’ resource of Gates/Fauci/AZ/Moderna/Pfizer/Schwab/Soros etc and are ‘only following orders’.
Strange by comparison that 12-15 year olds usually require parental consent to go on a school day trip to the museum. However, consent is not required to inject a child with a controversial and untested experimental sequenced gene therapy concoction with certain undisclosed ingredients that is still undergoing human trials until 2023.
Children require parental consent to go to school in the first place.
The education of a child is the parents’ responsibility. Parents can discharge that responsibility either by sending them to school or by other means.
Parents have the legal right to stop their children attending school, so that they can be educated by other means instead, with immediate notice.
S8(d) of the The Education (Pupil Registration) (England) Regulations 2006.
At some point the policy shifted from the individual effectively owning his/her body to the state owning it. I don’t think it was sudden but I’d like to know what date the brave new world began taking shape.
Malcolm Kendrick’s 2014 book ‘Doctoring Data’ uses ‘dictatorship’ several times. He’s been an NHS GP 30 years so he saw it happen first-hand.
A friend’s brother (unmarried, 67) died of cancer in Sep. There was no written document available to the NHS so he endured over a month’s pointless suffering. He’d said to his relatives in summer that he was fed up of medics. surrounding his bed and just wanted to die. They complained to the NHS but the medics. ignored them and continued to behave as if his body was NHS property.
Are they now taught this in medical school, that the state owns us?
When Schwab said, “You’ll own nothing” – that included your body.
As soon as conscription came in, the state owned your body and could use it as cannon focder ad lib.
One of many!
I think it is well past the time that the names of those responsible for such announcements and decisions are made public. Hiding behind a Trust or Corporation or Public Body cannot be allowed to continue. You want to jab my child without my consent? Then I want to know who you are? Where you work? What position you hold? What medical credentials you hold? And by what authority are you claiming ownership of my child? Also, I want to know who to instigate criminal prosecutions against, and/or sue for damages…
A friend of mine runs a small charity helping to build/improve schools in a Himalayan country. He has twinned one of the schools to a local UK school. The children from the foreign country sent the local school a video to say hello. The video hasn’t been shown as parental consent is required for the local kids to see it.
Children can consent to have an experimental drug but parental consent is required to see a video of children saying hello to other children.
I hope I live long enough to see this insanity as a bigger joke than the Dutch tulip bubble.
It’s not insanity. It’s not bungling. It’s not incompetence. It’s not a joke. It’s not Johnson.
….
This disgraceful move by an NHS trust, a move in which the Department of Health and probably Cabinet Office propagandists too must surely have had a hand, needs to be taken to court.
There are likely to be other developments in the same vein.
Don’t forget the very peculiar “feed children at schools during the vacations” propaganda that was put out a while ago, including using a famous footballing celebrity as a front man. That carried a similar message between the lines, namely that even if parents have the money in their pockets you can’t expect them to spend it on food for their children, because they’ll prefer to spend it on slot machines or bags of smack instead. That is a truly vile insult against parents…but the question isn’t whether or not it’s vile; it’s where is this shift in state policy headed?
There are a couple of paths I can imagine for the near future which involve pupils being locked in schools day and night with no access by parents allowed. One involves plague; the other food shortage. Most likely they will braid together…
Many kids in Finland go to school with a can of ‘energy drink’ in their hands for breakfast. Not all parents are responsible.
Tomorrow is the 41st day of jabbing kids in schools in the UK.
Wishful thinking on the part of the state. Do they really think a young person will use a phone to talk to someone to book an appiontment and have the means to get to where the vaccination is being given! If there are young people out there who can and are determined to negotiate all that then they are capable of deciding if they want one or not…surely. Let’s hope they don’t have a Mum like me who throws away the appointment letters before they find them!
Good for you! I did the same when the letter from school came home!
https://www.reuters.com/article/factcheck-coronavirus-vaccine-idUSL1N2S31ML
says that tromethamine isn’t being added to the childhood version to prevent heart problems but rather to lengthen the shelf life. It seems to be the only vaccine ingredient except for mRNA, PEG and water that’s been disclosed?
Will we ever know what the real reason is, unless some details leak from a more sceptical country, e.g. India or Japan?
I seem to be living in a science fiction film. Governments are telling, even ordering, people to get injected with a ‘magic’ substance. If anyone dares pass on samples of the substance to an analyst, and the sender’s name gets out, they may be threatened or killed. If a government sues the seller the government must pay the seller’s defence costs.
It’s a great opportunity to educate kids about the workings of the real world and its evils. A bit harsh to rob the young ones of their unconcerned childhood like that, but sooner or later they will have to learn anyway.
Actually, the sooner kids will understand how they are being lied to, the better people they will become.
The NHS probably won’t inform parents if their child wants to undergo hormone treatment and gender reassignment surgery either, so why would this be any different?
An opinion of an adult who knows what it’s like to be over-ruled as a child; maybe not acceptable to some adults but it’s time other point of view was given: –
Children are people. Only slave-traders believe they own and possess people.
Children are responsibility of those who brought them into being until they reach age of consent. That responsibility is parents’ whether or not they carry it.
There is no such thing as consent unless there is equally free access to word ‘no’ as there is to word ‘yes’.
Until they reach age of consent, children are not granted access to word ‘no’.
That inaccessibility of word ‘no’ makes them vulnerable to the predatory.
Irrespective of how competent they are, a child’s ‘yes’ is not consent.
Nor is ‘yes’ by adults consent if that ‘yes’ is coerced or not fully informed.
Medical procedures cannot legally be done without consent. If they are, it’s physical assault and that is what has been done to all who’ve been jabbed. And residents in ‘care homes’ were over-dosed with midazolam.
‘No jab, no job’ for carers and NHS staff is insufficient; each and all involved in jabbing should be totally excluded from society
Good comment, age should never take away your inalienable rights!
Doctors have no business involving themselves in personal vaccine decisions, it is not medical treatment!
https://www.bitchute.com/video/eigzm5TchMHf/
Update from Anna de Buisseret
https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/bills/2021/a416
Seen this? Suspected contacts carriers cases can be rounded up and detained.
https://www.coffeeandcovid.com/p/-coffee-and-covid-saturday-november-4af
The Circuit Court in Duval County, Florida (Jacksonville) entered an order yesterday GRANTING our petition for mandamus. I want to give a special mention to heroic attorney Nick Whitney, who was crazy enough to buy into my theory that mandamus was a viable pathway, and who ably handled the Duval side of our jointly-filed cases. He’s been an amazing battlefield comrade.
Anyway, you’ll want to read about a few things the judge wrote. First, he noted that the school boards’ lame argument that they should be able to create their own tiny departments of health and do whatever they liked had ALREADY been “squarely rejected:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w6tPD4bDIIk&ab_channel=GlobalNews
Prominent COVID-19 activist Robert F. Kennedy Jr. on Saturday joined Italians protesting the “Green Pas
https://theexpose.uk/2021/11/14/children-are-dying-because-bill-gates-funds-medicine-regulator-and-has-shares-in-covid-vaccines/
Because the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation is a primary funder of the UK’s Medicine & Healthcare products Regulatory Agency, and the Foundation also owns major shares in both Pfizer, BioNTech, and Moderna, suggesting the vaccination of children against Covid-19 has absolutely nothing to do with health, but everything to do with money, corruption, and power
Well the spokesperson for NHS Sussex Community Trust is wrong. They can’t be vaccinating children in line with JCVI guidance, because the JCVI guidance is not to vaccinate children! Furthermore, if JCVI had approved the vaccination of 12-15 year olds, this would still be out of line with the guidance as they are NOT seeking approval of the parents! This is a scripted response that is a blatant contradiction of reality.
the seniormost staff at Moderna, BioNTech, Pfizer & JNJ. Those involved in setting the technical parameters for the fraudulent vaccines knew what they were doing couldn’t work safely.
Choosing lipid nanoparticle technology as formulations (Pfizer / BioNTech & Moderna) was known years before to result in a drug product which accumulated in the ovaries.
And choosing spike protein wasn’t a casual error. You don’t do anything casually in human healthy drug / treatment R&D. Where’s the internal reports showing they considered multiple alternative immunogen than spike protein? And isn’t it astonishing that all four companies all chose the same, inappropriate virus component to target?
Best wishes
Mike
I’ve been listening to Yeadon from the beginning totally agree with him, but think he made a mistake about openly discussing depopulation, it’s helped the establishment to discredit him, he should have played his hand better. We needed his scientific expertise, that is/was his strength.
Many months ago, I recall reading, but stupidly did not bookmark, a scientist making the point that the use of the spike protein in these jabs was known BEFORE the jabs were approved to involve post injection clotting. The person commented that had they used a different methodology – which was indicated to be available by said scientist – the inflammatory/clotting disaster could have been avoided.
Does anyone remember reading/seeing this?
There’s a tiny bit of sense in this, but only a tiny bit.
If a child wants medical treatment but their parents disallow it, then the child should be able to go to a suitably qualified adult, where they can be questioned about their maturity, their ability to understand rather complex medical information and to check that they’re not being coerced in some way / under peer pressure.
If they did all that and the child noted that they did want to get vaccinated, despite their being under no threat from covid, the vaccines offering negligible protection against infection and onwards transmission and the presence of vast amounts of social pressure to get vaccinated — then in that case I’d suggest that maybe they should. But I’d warn that very very few in the 12-15 age range would pass even the maturity test.
Thinking about it, perhaps this is a catch 22 situation:
Perhaps anyone under about 60 who wants to get vaccinated given the information we now have should be considered as insufficiently informed to make the decision and they should be considered as being unduly influenced by peer and social pressure. Hence they should be left unvaccinated…
But vaccines aren’t medical treatment, treating an existing condition.
FIRST, do NO harm!
Hospitals in USA and in first world countries are refusing life-saving Ivermectin treatment even with court orders. Big Pharma doing everything they can to jab us no matter what, while alternative COVID cures EXIST! There happens to be heavy censorship who are looking for these treatments. The Research Is Clear: Ivermectin Is a Safe, Effective Treatment for COVID. Get your Ivermectin today while you still can! https://ivmpharmacy.com
Now the communist regime in Britain has comprehensively smashed the social contract, people might want to start asking themselves how they can fight back before it’s too late.
I never signed up, whilst we’re at it, I never filled out a police consent form neither.
Funny. Given that parents are also not allowed into schools anymore, to “stop the spread”. And “avoid mixing”. And my toddler is not allowed to bring toys into the nursery. Wow. It’s hard to believe we’re not dreaming this. Maybe that’s why so many is sleep walking.
All communist regimes always pursue the destruction of the church and the family. Britain’s “communitarian” regime is no different.
https://twitter.com/dempz8/status/1459640733498060808?s=21
Have a little listen Twitter and share it around. Watch this happen if we don’t wake up. Catherine A. Fitts on the vax pass and centralised control of all assets and taxation
12 year olds have been terrorised. My niece was too scared to go back to school after half term and wouldnt wait until Monday when the school jabbing started. She got so distraught and asked her mother to take her to the drop in centre which she did and got the jab. Its horrendous what psychological damage they are doing to kids.
How is this even legal? It’s like a dirty old paedophile grooming a child and saying “it’ll be our little secret so don’t tell your parents.”
Disgusting.
Child grooming.
The NHS trust need reminding that parents are LEGALLY responsible for 12-15 year-olds, so the MUST both get parental consent and inform them. Children are NOT owned by the state.
This is state child abuse.
Any health “care” worker that goes along with it is also a child abuser.