• Login
  • Register
The Daily Sceptic
No Result
View All Result
  • Articles
  • About
  • Archive
    • ARCHIVE
    • NEWS ROUND-UPS
  • Podcasts
  • Newsletter
  • Premium
  • Donate
  • Log In
The Daily Sceptic
No Result
View All Result

Sadiq Khan’s Mask Mandate on London Transport is Not Based on Science

by Toby Young
6 November 2021 10:50 AM

We’re publishing a guest post today by Rob Tyson, one of the organisers of Smile Free, a group that campaigns against mask mandates in the U.K. Rob points out that Sadiq Khan’s mask mandate on Transport for London doesn’t appear to be based on a single scientific study.

Britain’s well-established, pre-Covid pandemic plan, endorsed by Chief Medical Officer Chris Whitty as late as March 19th 2020 before being abandoned four days later, contains an interesting sentence relating to the wearing of face masks in the community (an intervention the plan did not recommend):

Although there is a perception that the wearing of facemasks by the public in the community and household setting may be beneficial, there is in fact very little evidence of widespread benefit from their use in this setting. Facemasks must be worn correctly, changed frequently, removed properly, disposed of safely and used in combination with good respiratory, hand, and home hygiene behaviour in order for them to achieve the intended benefit. Research also shows that compliance with these recommended behaviours when wearing facemasks for prolonged periods reduces over time.

Unfortunately, despite the fact that no nation on earth can demonstrate ‘widespread benefit’ of forced masking on infection control after a year of mandates, no-one in authority wants to disabuse the public of this perception.

Rather, they want to continue and even intensify this irrational behaviour.

Indeed it is striking how Sadiq Khan and Transport for London (TfL) – which runs the London tube, trains and bus network – justify their forced masking requirement.

“Following the science” this ain’t.

Numerous supporters of Smile Free, our campaign group advocating for the repeal of all U.K. mask mandates, have shared with us the responses they’ve had from TfL in response to their complaints about compulsory masking.

It’s a stock response references five pieces of opinion polling – but not one scientific study.

“YouGov produced the results that over two thirds of people support the retention of face coverings on public transport at this point in the pandemic,” TfL explains.

The majority believe that face coverings play an important role in giving people confidence to use public transport. 86% of customers say they are always wearing face coverings on our public transport services… More than most of the people want to wear them and feel safer doing so. Of the 14% not wearing a face covering at all times or not at all, almost three-quarters (75%) have an exemption or good reason under the regulations for not doing so. [“More than most”? What does that mean?]

TfL appears to think that quoting all this opinion polling makes a cast-iron case for forced masking. But to the critical reader it simply highlights the lack of evidence.

Could it be that TfL doesn’t quote cite a single study supporting forced masking because – like the Department for Transport – it hasn’t actually commissioned one?

As thin a justification as it is, later on in its stock response TfL even undermines its own case for masking.

“That said, the requirement to wear a mask is not to say that public transport is no less safe (sic) than any other similar setting,” it says. [It means “less safe” obviously – the double negative reverses the meaning of the sentence.]

“Independent testing by Imperial College has been carried out regularly since September, taking swabs of touch points and air samples in trains, stations and buses, and has found no traces of coronavirus on the public transport system.”

In which case, why continue to force masks on commuters? Particularly as TfL’s own advertising all over the network now also claims: “Air on our tubes and trains is refreshed every three minutes”?

Khan and TfL’s forced masking is everything wrong with the authorities’ Covid response in microcosm.

You can learn more about Smile Free, the campaign advocating for the repeal of U.K. mask mandates, here.

Tags: Mask MandatesSadiq KhanTfL

Donate

We depend on your donations to keep this site going. Please give what you can.

Donate Today

Comment on this Article

You’ll need to set up an account to comment if you don’t already have one. We ask for a minimum donation of £5 if you'd like to make a comment or post in our Forums.

Sign Up
Previous Post

Vaccine Efficiency in Preventing Transmission Dramatically Declines Over a Six Month Period, Research Shows

Next Post

New York City to Offer Children $100 for Getting Vaccinated

Subscribe
Login
Notify of
Please log in to comment

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

68 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Marcus Aurelius knew
Marcus Aurelius knew
1 year ago

Sadiq the LTN – Little Terrible Nuisance

Can’t scrap the lot though, can he? That would upset his C40 minders.

Last edited 1 year ago by Marcus Aurelius knew
119
-1
JXB
JXB
1 year ago
Reply to  Marcus Aurelius knew

Lousy…

0
0
transmissionofflame
transmissionofflame
1 year ago

Restricting traffic in one area increases it in surrounding areas – only a conspiracy theorist would have predicted that. It’s almost as if the people using the roads all have very good reasons for doing so and are determined to make their journeys.

169
-1
AethelredTheReadier
AethelredTheReadier
1 year ago

They should call it an STN…a slow traffic neighbourhood.

57
-1
zebedee
zebedee
1 year ago

Since they like attributing individual deaths to motor vehicle pollution which people died because of these jams?

42
0
iconoclast
iconoclast
1 year ago
Reply to  zebedee

CORRECTION:

The only individual death ‘attributed to air pollution‘ in the entire world was based on unchallenged expert evidence: “Key witnesses to the Inquest, including Dr Claire Holman and Professor Sir Stephen Holgate, had expressed the need for setting health-based targets for air pollution reduction.”

With unchallenged expert evidence the Coroner has no choice but to accept it.

And the death was not “caused by” air pollution.

According to the Coroner, the death was caused by asthma. The child had extreme asthma.

So had the NHS investigated the causes of the child’s extreme asthma she and her family should have been rehoused away from the South Circular road in London:

“Ella died of asthma contributed to by exposure to excessive air pollution.” “Ella’s mother “was not given information about the health risks of air pollution and its potential to exacerbate asthma”. The lack of information also possibly contributed to her death.”

So had the NHS investigated the causes of the child’s extreme asthma she and her family should have been rehoused away from the South Circular road in London.

And this does not seem to be correct: “Ella died of asthma contributed to by exposure to excessive air pollution.”

A more accurate statement is “Ella died of asthma contributed to by exposure to air pollution which was excessive for someone with her particular extreme asthma.”

So when you read the ridiculous numbers of alleged air pollution deaths all based on ‘estimates’ none of them are real air pollution deaths but estimates based on the usual ‘modelling’ and epidemiology which we are all now so used to knowing we cannot trust.

The fact this is the only death worldwide attributed to air pollution should ring the alarm bells about citing this as evidence air pollution all by itself kills people.

It certainly used to when the main form of heating in london was open fires in people’s homes and the famous London ‘pea-souper’ fogs were part of daily life. But then we got legislation to clean everything up with smokeless fuels later followed by natural gas central heating.

Plus cars have catalytic converters to reduce emissions.

It has all gotten a lot better since the 1950s and earlier.

When I was young all the buildings in london were dark grey because they were covered in soot.

London now is unrecognisable. Take a look at some of the old movies on TV and check out the colour of the buildings compared to now.

Last edited 1 year ago by iconoclast
9
0
RTSC
RTSC
1 year ago

One step back for the little tyrants. But they will now be planning how to turn it into a NTN …. no traffic neighbourhood.

36
0
iconoclast
iconoclast
1 year ago
Reply to  RTSC

Soon to be a “no-people-neighbourhood”.

13
0

NEWSLETTER

View today’s newsletter

To receive our latest news in the form of a daily email, enter your details here:

DONATE

PODCAST

The Sceptic | Episode 45: Jack Hadfield on the Anti-Asylum Protests, Alan Miller on the Tyranny of Digital ID and James Graham on the Net Zero Pension Threat

by Richard Eldred
25 July 2025
0

LISTED ARTICLES

  • Most Read
  • Most Commented
  • Editor’s Picks

News Round-Up

30 July 2025
by Toby Young

Trump Was Right to Skewer Starmer Over Britain’s “Windmills Scam”

30 July 2025
by Ben Pile

The Online Safety Act is a Censor’s Charter

30 July 2025
by Andrew Doyle

The False Promises of Electric Vehicles Are Being Exposed

29 July 2025
by Tilak Doshi

Political Censors Have Cynically Hijacked Vital Child Protections

30 July 2025
by Toby Young

Trump Was Right to Skewer Starmer Over Britain’s “Windmills Scam”

24

Starmer to Recognise a Palestinian State

51

Political Censors Have Cynically Hijacked Vital Child Protections

17

The False Promises of Electric Vehicles Are Being Exposed

47

Rotherham Police Sexually Abused Us Too, Say Five Grooming Victims

12

Masking Our Schoolchildren Was Child Abuse – A Rare Chance to Stop It Returning

30 July 2025
by Dr Gary Sidley

The Online Safety Act is a Censor’s Charter

30 July 2025
by Andrew Doyle

Edinburgh University’s Decolonisation Report is Pure Left-Wing Politics

30 July 2025
by James Alexander

Trump Was Right to Skewer Starmer Over Britain’s “Windmills Scam”

30 July 2025
by Ben Pile

The NHS ‘Non-Jobs’ Bonanza

29 July 2025
by David Craig

POSTS BY DATE

November 2021
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930  
« Oct   Dec »

SOCIAL LINKS

Free Speech Union

NEWSLETTER

View today’s newsletter

To receive our latest news in the form of a daily email, enter your details here:

POSTS BY DATE

November 2021
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930  
« Oct   Dec »

DONATE

LISTED ARTICLES

  • Most Read
  • Most Commented
  • Editor’s Picks

News Round-Up

30 July 2025
by Toby Young

Trump Was Right to Skewer Starmer Over Britain’s “Windmills Scam”

30 July 2025
by Ben Pile

The Online Safety Act is a Censor’s Charter

30 July 2025
by Andrew Doyle

The False Promises of Electric Vehicles Are Being Exposed

29 July 2025
by Tilak Doshi

Political Censors Have Cynically Hijacked Vital Child Protections

30 July 2025
by Toby Young

Trump Was Right to Skewer Starmer Over Britain’s “Windmills Scam”

24

Starmer to Recognise a Palestinian State

51

Political Censors Have Cynically Hijacked Vital Child Protections

17

The False Promises of Electric Vehicles Are Being Exposed

47

Rotherham Police Sexually Abused Us Too, Say Five Grooming Victims

12

Masking Our Schoolchildren Was Child Abuse – A Rare Chance to Stop It Returning

30 July 2025
by Dr Gary Sidley

The Online Safety Act is a Censor’s Charter

30 July 2025
by Andrew Doyle

Edinburgh University’s Decolonisation Report is Pure Left-Wing Politics

30 July 2025
by James Alexander

Trump Was Right to Skewer Starmer Over Britain’s “Windmills Scam”

30 July 2025
by Ben Pile

The NHS ‘Non-Jobs’ Bonanza

29 July 2025
by David Craig

SOCIAL LINKS

Free Speech Union
  • Home
  • About us
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy

Facebook

  • X

Instagram

RSS

Subscribe to our newsletter

© Skeptics Ltd.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password? Sign Up

Create New Account!

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • Articles
  • About
  • Archive
    • ARCHIVE
    • NEWS ROUND-UPS
  • Podcasts
  • Newsletter
  • Premium
  • Donate
  • Log In

© Skeptics Ltd.

wpDiscuz
You are going to send email to

Move Comment
Perfecty
Do you wish to receive notifications of new articles?
Notifications preferences