• Login
  • Register
The Daily Sceptic
No Result
View All Result
  • Articles
  • About
  • Archive
    • ARCHIVE
    • NEWS ROUND-UPS
  • Podcasts
  • Newsletter
  • Premium
  • Donate
  • Log In
The Daily Sceptic
No Result
View All Result

Another Question for Chris Whitty

by Noah Carl
3 November 2021 8:16 AM

I previously posed a question for Chris Whitty here on the Daily Sceptic. (Outrageously, I have not yet had a response.) To jog your memory, here’s what I asked.

In an interview with The BMJ on 4th November 2020, you (Whitty) characterised the Great Barrington Declaration as “wrong scientifically, practically, and probably ethically as well”.

Yet five months earlier, you had outlined a plan to the Health and Social Care Committee which sounded an awful lot like focused protection. You said that we’re “very keen” to “minimise economic and social disruption”, and mentioned that “one of the best things we can do” is “isolate older people from the virus”. 

Given that you were recommending focused protection as recently as March of 2020, why did you subsequently describe the Great Barrington Declaration as “wrong scientifically”?

I now have a follow-up question for Professor Whitty. (If he answers this one promptly and in a satisfactory manner, I am willing to forgive his having ignored my first question.)

Professor Whitty, you opined that the Great Barrington Declaration is “probably” wrong ethically. I presume you said this because you believe that focused protection would have led to a higher death toll (notwithstanding the fact that you were recommending it back in March of last year).

The UK’s official death toll is on the order of 150,000. Let’s assume that if we had followed focused protection, the death toll would be double – i.e., 300,000. Note: I don’t consider this remotely plausible, but let’s assume it for the sake of argument.

Now, the ‘UK Influenza Pandemic Preparedness Strategy 2011’ states that planners should “aim to cope with up to 210,000 – 315,000 additional deaths across the UK over a 15 week period”.

Given that “315,000 additional deaths” is comparable to the number of people who would have died if the UK had followed focused protection, which you regard as unethical, you must regard the UK’s pandemic preparedness plan as unethical too?

If so, why did you not seek to change the plan while you were Chief Scientific Adviser to the Department of Health and Social Care between 2016 and 2021? Note: the ‘UK Influenza Pandemic Preparedness Strategy 2011’ was published by this very department.

Thank you for listening, and I once again look forward to your answer.

Tags: Chris WhittyEthicsGreat Barrington Declaration

Donate

We depend on your donations to keep this site going. Please give what you can.

Donate Today

Comment on this Article

You’ll need to set up an account to comment if you don’t already have one. We ask for a minimum donation of £5 if you'd like to make a comment or post in our Forums.

Sign Up
Previous Post

2021 is An Average Year for Deaths so Far. But What is Killing the Under-65s?

Next Post

CDC Approves the Pfizer Vaccine for Five Year-Olds

Subscribe
Login
Notify of
Please log in to comment

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

53 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

NEWSLETTER

View today’s newsletter

To receive our latest news in the form of a daily email, enter your details here:

DONATE

PODCAST

The Sceptic | Episode 43: William Yarwood on Labour’s Welfare Farce, Niall Gooch on Catholicism vs Lib Dems & Tilak Doshi on Trump’s Climate Science Fightback

by Richard Eldred
4 July 2025
0

LISTED ARTICLES

  • Most Read
  • Most Commented
  • Editor’s Picks

Met Office Caught Deliberately Choosing an Unrealistic Scenario to Predict Climate Doomsday

4 July 2025
by Will Jones

Ofcom Still Isn’t Sure What a Woman is – But it’s Sure There’s Going to be a Climate Apocalypse

4 July 2025
by Will Jones

News Round-Up

5 July 2025
by Toby Young

French Police Puncture Migrant Boats at Sea for First Time

4 July 2025
by Will Jones

Pet Hates: Are Muslims in Britain Really Trying to Ban Dogs?

5 July 2025
by Steven Tucker

French Police Puncture Migrant Boats at Sea for First Time

35

Jeremy Corbyn “Launches New Hard-Left Party” to Oppose Gaza “Genocide”

40

Ofcom Still Isn’t Sure What a Woman is – But it’s Sure There’s Going to be a Climate Apocalypse

23

Pet Hates: Are Muslims in Britain Really Trying to Ban Dogs?

11

Defunding Gavi is Good for Public Health

11

Germany is Not Being Honest About Who is Assaulting Children at Swimming Pools

5 July 2025
by Eugyppius

Defunding Gavi is Good for Public Health

5 July 2025
by Dr David Bell

Pet Hates: Are Muslims in Britain Really Trying to Ban Dogs?

5 July 2025
by Steven Tucker

Aberdeen’s Ditching of ESG Proves the Green Finance Revolution is Dead

4 July 2025
by Tilak Doshi

The UK’s Crisis Point is Fast Approaching

3 July 2025
by Dr David McGrogan

POSTS BY DATE

November 2021
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930  
« Oct   Dec »

SOCIAL LINKS

Free Speech Union

NEWSLETTER

View today’s newsletter

To receive our latest news in the form of a daily email, enter your details here:

POSTS BY DATE

November 2021
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930  
« Oct   Dec »

DONATE

LISTED ARTICLES

  • Most Read
  • Most Commented
  • Editor’s Picks

Met Office Caught Deliberately Choosing an Unrealistic Scenario to Predict Climate Doomsday

4 July 2025
by Will Jones

Ofcom Still Isn’t Sure What a Woman is – But it’s Sure There’s Going to be a Climate Apocalypse

4 July 2025
by Will Jones

News Round-Up

5 July 2025
by Toby Young

French Police Puncture Migrant Boats at Sea for First Time

4 July 2025
by Will Jones

Pet Hates: Are Muslims in Britain Really Trying to Ban Dogs?

5 July 2025
by Steven Tucker

French Police Puncture Migrant Boats at Sea for First Time

35

Jeremy Corbyn “Launches New Hard-Left Party” to Oppose Gaza “Genocide”

40

Ofcom Still Isn’t Sure What a Woman is – But it’s Sure There’s Going to be a Climate Apocalypse

23

Pet Hates: Are Muslims in Britain Really Trying to Ban Dogs?

11

Defunding Gavi is Good for Public Health

11

Germany is Not Being Honest About Who is Assaulting Children at Swimming Pools

5 July 2025
by Eugyppius

Defunding Gavi is Good for Public Health

5 July 2025
by Dr David Bell

Pet Hates: Are Muslims in Britain Really Trying to Ban Dogs?

5 July 2025
by Steven Tucker

Aberdeen’s Ditching of ESG Proves the Green Finance Revolution is Dead

4 July 2025
by Tilak Doshi

The UK’s Crisis Point is Fast Approaching

3 July 2025
by Dr David McGrogan

SOCIAL LINKS

Free Speech Union
  • Home
  • About us
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy

Facebook

  • X

Instagram

RSS

Subscribe to our newsletter

© Skeptics Ltd.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password? Sign Up

Create New Account!

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • Articles
  • About
  • Archive
    • ARCHIVE
    • NEWS ROUND-UPS
  • Podcasts
  • Newsletter
  • Premium
  • Donate
  • Log In

© Skeptics Ltd.

wpDiscuz
You are going to send email to

Move Comment