• Login
  • Register
The Daily Sceptic
No Result
View All Result
  • Articles
  • About
  • Archive
    • ARCHIVE
    • NEWS ROUND-UPS
  • Podcasts
  • Newsletter
  • Premium
  • Donate
  • Log In
The Daily Sceptic
No Result
View All Result

Booster Jab Invitations to Be Sent to 1.5 Million People in England This Week

by Michael Curzon
19 September 2021 10:49 AM
Influenza vaccine injection. Injection into a patient's arm of the 2018/2019 seasonal influenza (flu) vaccine for the northern hemisphere season. This is a quadrivalent inactivated vaccine designed for intramuscular and subcutaneous injection. Inactivated influenza vaccines contain dead influenza viruses. When injected, these stimulate the body's immune system to produce antibodies that protect against future infection by live viruses. Influenza vaccination is recommended for the elderly, the very young, and anyone suffering from respiratory or circulatory disease. It is provided annually because of the need to protect against new strains. This is a vaccine from the Sanofi Pasteur Europe company.

Influenza vaccine injection. Injection into a patient's arm of the 2018/2019 seasonal influenza (flu) vaccine for the northern hemisphere season. This is a quadrivalent inactivated vaccine designed for intramuscular and subcutaneous injection. Inactivated influenza vaccines contain dead influenza viruses. When injected, these stimulate the body's immune system to produce antibodies that protect against future infection by live viruses. Influenza vaccination is recommended for the elderly, the very young, and anyone suffering from respiratory or circulatory disease. It is provided annually because of the need to protect against new strains. This is a vaccine from the Sanofi Pasteur Europe company.

The booster vaccine roll-out is well underway in England, despite warnings that this could help to cause a permanent state of lockdown. 1.5 million invitations are being sent to people – starting with those aged 50 and over, as well as to the clinically vulnerable and healthcare workers – this week to book their third dose. Sky News has the story.

Texts will be sent out on Monday, while letters will be posted to those who are eligible for a third coronavirus vaccine dose later in the week, NHS England said.

Around 1.5 million people will be contacted and encouraged to use the National Booking Service.

Those eligible for booster jabs include those aged 50 and over, people living and working in care homes for the elderly and frontline health and social care workers.

Booster shots will also be available to those who are clinically extremely vulnerable and anyone aged 16 to 65 in an at-risk group for Covid.

The Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI) said this week that people should receive their booster dose at least six months after they received their second Covid jab.

The JCVI also said half doses of the Moderna jab could be used as an alternative.

Health Secretary Sajid Javid said boosters will “strengthen the wall of defence” created by the vaccines.

Ministers say the success of the booster vaccine roll-out (and of the roll-out of vaccines for children) will determine whether further restrictions – including mask mandates, vaccine passports and possibly another lockdown – should be imposed this winter.

The Sky News report is worth reading in full.

Tags: Booster vaccineVaccine

Donate

We depend on your donations to keep this site going. Please give what you can.

Donate Today

Comment on this Article

You’ll need to set up an account to comment if you don’t already have one. We ask for a minimum donation of £5 if you'd like to make a comment or post in our Forums.

Sign Up
Previous Post

The Lancet Changes Mind on Lab Leak Theory – Calls for “Objective, Open and Transparent Debate”

Next Post

U.K. Orchestra Provokes Outrage by Dropping Nearly Half Its Performers To “Prioritise Increased Diversity”

Subscribe
Login
Notify of
Please log in to comment

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

139 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
RickH
RickH
3 years ago

A fantastic boost to public health. 🙂 £££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££

74
-2
RickH
RickH
3 years ago
Reply to  RickH

Hey-up. Somebody here thinks it’s done for public benefit. Takes all sorts.

15
-1
Richard Austin
Richard Austin
3 years ago
Reply to  RickH

He actually means it is done for money! Keeerchhiiing!

16
0
Hugh
Hugh
3 years ago
Reply to  RickH

A pretty accurate summing up of the situation.

6
0
Major Panic in the jabby jabbys
Major Panic in the jabby jabbys
3 years ago

meanwhile, over at the FDA….

https://media.gab.com/system/media_attachments/files/085/284/838/original/b77baae8ab60b848.mp4

22
0
Mark
Mark
3 years ago

“1.5 million invitations are being sent to people – starting with those aged 50 and over,“

Well they would get a two word response from me, starting with “fuck” and ending in “off”, but I suspect I’m so accustomed to ignoring them by now that I won’t even notice the invitation.

121
0
Bella Donna
Bella Donna
3 years ago
Reply to  Mark

We are of one mind Mark!

44
0
RickH
RickH
3 years ago
Reply to  Mark

I’m interested that I seem to have been nagged less than a lot of people posting here, given that I’m a frequent flyer in terms of the NHS.

After the initial campaign, (one initial unpushy call from the GP surgery and one from the initial wider telephone operation that simply accepted my response) I’ve not been bothered, apart from a standard question from a pharmacist preparing a discharge prescription.

21
-2
Julian
Julian
3 years ago
Reply to  RickH

I had a letter and a phonecall. That was it. I ignored the letter. The lady on the phone asked me why I was refusing the vaxx – I told her many reasons but she could put waiting for results of long term trials. That was it. My Mrs got a letter I think, and nothing more.

29
0
Richy_m_99
Richy_m_99
3 years ago
Reply to  Julian

Likewise. Not a single letter, just a half hearted last minute call because they had run out of arms to jab one afternoon. Then a second call two weeks later from the same GP receptionist who recognised my name and simply said she eould put me on the opted out list. Not heard a dicky bird from them since.

16
0
peyrole
peyrole
3 years ago
Reply to  Richy_m_99

It almost makes you suspect the numbers that are reported…..

8
0
Richard Austin
Richard Austin
3 years ago
Reply to  RickH

It’s odd really because I go for blood tests at least once a fortnight and always have the Flu jab. I had one text for the Covid jab, said No and that was it. My wife was plagued by them. I have a review coming up soon and I’m quite looking forward to getting a chance to tell the real truth not what the NHS are spouting courtesy of the Socialist / Fascist Not Tories with their Not Vaccines.

18
0
RickH
RickH
3 years ago
Reply to  RickH

The finger jerk gets more intriguing – now down voting a simple fact.

6
0
IanC
IanC
3 years ago
Reply to  RickH

I fear it must be a Jibby-jabby. Uncontrollable twitches and shakes.

2
0
mishmash
mishmash
3 years ago
Reply to  Mark

They will choose the most gullible 1.5 million based on how quickly they accepted the first 2 doses.

19
0
Hugh
Hugh
3 years ago
Reply to  Mark

But you can’t reply to those texts – or block them, or opt out of them. This is proper hard sell, bordering on harassment.

6
0
mwhite
mwhite
3 years ago

Suport for Nicki Minaj.

Nicki Minaj was right and all the world’s COVID vaccine experts were wrong (trialsitenews.com)

“It’s right there. There are line items for miscarriage, testicular pain/swelling. All the stuff Fauci said the vaccine didn’t cause… it’s all there in plain sight: miscarriages, menstrual disorders, testicular pain/swelling, erectile dysfunction, vaginal/uterine hemorrhage, etc.”

unnamed-4.png.webp (512×414) (trialsitenews.com)

VAERS data.

77
0
TheGreenAcres
TheGreenAcres
3 years ago
Reply to  mwhite

Nicki Minaj redpilling the kids. The Lord does in work in mysterious ways.

53
-1
miketa1957
miketa1957
3 years ago
Reply to  TheGreenAcres

When you have like 200 million followers, you really can suay “f*** off” to the establishment.

51
0
rayc
rayc
3 years ago
Reply to  mwhite

Too bad any antivaxx bullshitter can submit report to VAERS. But you already knew it, didn’t you?

0
-120
milesahead
milesahead
3 years ago
Reply to  rayc

And you know that the vast majority of people who do report to VAERS and the Yellow Card system have genuinely had an adverse reaction.

You and your Pharma/government mates can’t conceal the truth forever – the gig is almost up and Nuremberg II will happen.

76
0
rayc
rayc
3 years ago
Reply to  milesahead

How do you know what “vast majority of people reporting to VAERS” had. For all we know, it can be a vast majority of Trumpian antivaxx bots submitting trash. This is also the very reason why this database is largely ignored, unlike other more reliable databases based on actual clinical data. And the reason why it even exists is that it used to be useful pre-COVID era when politics and vaccination were not intertwined, and that removing it would cause antivaxxers to get mad about losing their favorite toy.

0
-84
milesahead
milesahead
3 years ago
Reply to  rayc

Because people have researched it. You are a shill – for whom, I know not, but you really are transparent.

45
0
rayc
rayc
3 years ago
Reply to  milesahead

Researched what? And what “people”?

0
-38
milesahead
milesahead
3 years ago
Reply to  rayc

Look it up if you’re such an expert. You won’t, though, because you ‘re much happier toeing the narrative line and making up stuff.

16
0
Mayo
Mayo
3 years ago
Reply to  rayc

Dr Jessica Rose has probably performed the most extensive research on VAERS. She has found strong temporal signals related to specific Adverse Events, i.e. events are not random.

https://www.bitchute.com/video/UODpC2znALf7/

If anti-vaxxers are responsible for the huge increase in VAERS submissions they would need to be incredibly well co-ordinated and extremely well informed about VAERS requirement data. A significant number would also need to be board certified clinicians.

We also need to question why anti-vaxxers appear never to have tried this tactic before, say, for example, as the number of mandatory vaccinations for US children increased from around a dozen to over 50.

22
0
Winston Smith
Winston Smith
3 years ago
Reply to  rayc

Why would any sane, informed person want a SARS-COV-2 ‘vaccine’?

11
0
timsk
timsk
3 years ago
Reply to  rayc

Vaccines go wrong on occasions. For example, following the swine flu pandemic of 2010, Pandemrix was rolled out, resulting in over 1,000 cases of narcolepsy. Dengvaxia, a new vaccine against Dengue, was also rolled out to children ahead of the full trial outcomes, and 19 of them died of possible ADE. Both vaccines were subsequently withdrawn. VAERS in the U.S. and The Yellow Card system in the U.K. are intended as early warning systems to prevent such disasters from happening again. So, to ignore them and assume they’re mostly just “Trumpian antivaxx bots submitting trash” is – to say the very least – grossly irresponsible.

Last edited 3 years ago by timsk
58
0
rayc
rayc
3 years ago
Reply to  timsk

As I said, there are other monitoring systems that are used to catch the unusual complications. That’s how the myocarditis and clots were identified btw. Not through VAERS.

0
-28
timsk
timsk
3 years ago
Reply to  rayc

That doesn’t make the VAERS and Yellow Card reports invalid.

The onus is on the vaccine evangelists like you to prove to sceptics like me that these early warning systems have no value. Prove that the majority of the reports are bots, bogus or exaggerated. Prove that there’s no correlation between the millions of adverse reactions reported and the vaccines. Prove the medium to long term safety of the vaccines and that there’s no damaging cumulative impact of repeated ‘booster’ shots. All this is before their efficacy which, as is becoming clearer by the day, is highly suspect. They don’t stop infection or spread and they wane to about 10% after just 6 months.

In light of the above, it’s only sensible to invoke the precautionary principle and not vaccinate the population – especially children – until vaccines are provably safe and effective. Common sense says that it would be wise to assume the bulk of the reported adverse effects are bona fide and caused by the vaccines unless and until there’s compelling evidence to the contrary.

Last edited 3 years ago by timsk
24
0
PartyTime
PartyTime
3 years ago
Reply to  rayc

Which other monitoring systems are you thinking of? If you mean just checking for incidence of very unusual conditions, which is what myocarditis in young people and the clots happen to be, then yes that can work for very unusual conditions. For more common conditions such as seizures and heart attacks in older people, even quite high rates of adverse events may not show up above the background level. The only systematic followup system that I know of is run by Australia’s AusVaxSafety and they no longer publish detailed results, they only publish heavily redacted results showing the “most common” (and relatively trivial) adverse events. If we are to disregard systems like VAERS then we are left without any significant pharmacovigilance, so the vaccines should be withdrawn.

12
0
Trojan House
Trojan House
3 years ago
Reply to  rayc

Do you know that it is actually illegal to submit a false report to VAERS? Punishment for doing so includes jail time.

22
0
rayc
rayc
3 years ago
Reply to  Trojan House

Lol, It is also illegal to produce fake vaxxports. By your logic, it means they don’t exist.

0
-26
RickH
RickH
3 years ago
Reply to  rayc

“other more reliable databases based on actual clinical data.”

Such as?

9
0
RickH
RickH
3 years ago
Reply to  rayc

You can always suss a bullshitter by the use of the propaganda term ‘antivaxx’.

56
0
rayc
rayc
3 years ago
Reply to  RickH

It is in fact quite a fitting and convenient short term to describe the exaggerated bullshit that people spread about COVID vaccines.

0
-35
milesahead
milesahead
3 years ago
Reply to  rayc

PO and have your booster, Ray.

20
0
Richard Austin
Richard Austin
3 years ago
Reply to  rayc

On the contrary, it is a term used by complete and utter idiots who know nothing about the issues. I for example am far from anti vaccines, I have always promoted them and even with MMR have argued the risk is outweighed by the benefit even though one of my friends children was disabled by MMR.
In the case of the Covid vaccines it is extremely clear that the risk of taking them far outweighs any benefits for circa 99% of the population. Do you really think that nearly 1700 deaths from Covid vaccines in the UK alone is justified? How about the hundreds blinded, disabled and now deaf? Do you really think it was worth it for them to die because you are an arsehole who wouldn’t know a fact from a lie?

Last edited 3 years ago by Richard Austin
35
0
Richard Austin
Richard Austin
3 years ago
Reply to  rayc

Here is just a snapshot of the reality of these Vaccines. It is well known that heart inflammation is especially prevalent in young males (the test results from the companies themselves show it). Yet you think we are all fools and you are right even though you offer no proof?

Fatal – 524 (Pfizer) + 1,064 (AZ) + 16 (Moderna) + 28 (Unknown) = 1,632
Acute cardiac – 5,129 (Pfizer) + 9,214 (AZ) + 544 (Moderna) + 40 (Unknown) = 14,927
Pericarditis/myocarditis (Heart inflammation) – 427 (Pfizer) + 259 (AZ) + 81 (Moderna) + 3 (Unknown) = 770
Anaphylaxis – 476 (Pfizer) + 816 (AZ) + 37 (Moderna) + 1 (Unknown) = 1,330
Blood disorders – 10,736 (Pfizer) + 7407 (AZ) + 895 (Moderna) + 44 (Unknown) = 19,082
Infections – 7,421 (Pfizer) + 18,237 (AZ) + 802 (Moderna) + 90 (Unknown) = 26,550
Herpes – 1,602 (Pfizer) + 2,492 (AZ) + 81 (Moderna) + 13 (Unknown) = 4,188
Headaches – 22,354 (Pfizer) + 83,728 (AZ) + 2,883 (Moderna) + 232 (Unknown) = 109,197
Migraine – 2,599 (Pfizer) + 8,064 (AZ) + 319 (Moderna) + 29 (Unknown) = 11,011
Eye disorders – 5,236 (Pfizer) + 13,818 (AZ) + 542 (Moderna) + 57 (Unknown) = 19,653
Blindness – 101 (Pfizer) + 283 (AZ) + 14 (Moderna) + 4 (Unknown) = 402
Deafness – 195 (Pfizer) + 367 (AZ) + 16 (Moderna) + 2 (Unknown) = 580

Last edited 3 years ago by Richard Austin
22
0
Richard Austin
Richard Austin
3 years ago
Reply to  rayc

Incidentally all of those figures are courtesy of the NHS.

19
0
helenf
helenf
3 years ago
Reply to  rayc

I see you are pro vaccine today, and it’s “bad cop” day. The 77th really must try harder.

18
0
RickH
RickH
3 years ago
Reply to  rayc

If you think that, then you’ve become incredibly detached from reality.

If you can’t grasp the simple fact that there is no adequate data re. the efficacy and safety of the experimental snake oil that is being forced on people, and that this is ethically out of bounds, then you are incredibly slow on the uptake.

Last edited 3 years ago by RickH
11
0
Julian
Julian
3 years ago
Reply to  RickH

100% this. I’m a terrible hypochondriac, terrified of dying and was very worried about covid when it first emerged. I’d love to think the vaccine would save me and if I really thought it would I’d take it tomorrow. I have every reason to want to believe in it. But I can’t – not with the data I’ve seen so far.

11
0
Hugh
Hugh
3 years ago
Reply to  RickH

As I’ve said before, we need all cause mortality data for “vaccinated” compared to “unvaccinated”. So far as I know, we still don’t have it.

3
0
Richard Austin
Richard Austin
3 years ago
Reply to  rayc

and you clearly know you are a plonker which is probably the only fact you ever got right in your life.

16
-1
sophie123
sophie123
3 years ago
Reply to  rayc

They can but they don’t. 86pct of reports are from healthcare professionals and there are fines and threats of imprisonment for false data entry.

It is FAR more likely, given the complexity of making a VAERS entry that they represent only the tip of a very large iceberg.

Watch the latest edition of The Highwire with the nurse who has been making entries at her hospital.

18
0
Major Panic in the jabby jabbys
Major Panic in the jabby jabbys
3 years ago
Reply to  rayc

Didn’t Dr Peter Mccullough say it takes him 30mins to enter any vax injuries into VAERS – which is why he believes most docs don’t – so vax injury reality is under represented

17
0
refusenick
refusenick
3 years ago
Reply to  rayc

Fact-check: 85%+ of VAERS reports are submitted by medical professionals.

13
0
Hugh
Hugh
3 years ago
Reply to  refusenick

Who could be antivaxx Trumpians. 🙂

0
-2
TheGreenAcres
TheGreenAcres
3 years ago

Watch for the trend in Covid deaths over the next three weeks.

56
0
Rowan
Rowan
3 years ago
Reply to  TheGreenAcres

Indeed. A very sharp spike expected, which will then be used to justify bringing in all those restrictions “the government doesn’t want to impose”.

Last edited 3 years ago by Rowan
59
0
vlysander
vlysander
3 years ago
Reply to  TheGreenAcres

Its a cycle of attacks on us the public.
Get your vaccine, otherwise we close down life and society. Meanwhile many get ill or die from the vaccine. Many are missing crucial diagnosis and treatment for other illnesses or simply wrongly diagnosed with covid. These hospitalisations and deaths are then blamed on covid due to the “test” and cause numbers to increase and lockdowns to come.
Start over…

34
0
HelenaHancart
HelenaHancart
3 years ago
Reply to  vlysander

Like an abusive partner: If you don’t do as I say I’ll have to punish you again…it’s for you own good.

Like Jame “Buffalo Bill” Gumb in Silence of the Lambs: “It puts the lotion on it’s skin, or else it gets the hose again!”

19
0
Richard Austin
Richard Austin
3 years ago
Reply to  TheGreenAcres

Watch for falsified figures is more accurate and we all know it is coming.

15
0
sjonesy1999
sjonesy1999
3 years ago

At last I am starting to get through to my parents who watch nothing but the BBCrap. They were both thinking they would not get CoFib if they are injected. The old man has been in ICU with breathing problems. The boosters will just keep coming to have the possible certificate up to date. Mum is a full on conformist but even she was listening to me yesterday. Progress. Lose their minds in herds but regain their senses one by one.

93
0
Rowan
Rowan
3 years ago
Reply to  sjonesy1999

Lose their minds in herds but regain their senses one by one.

For the injected it will likely be a death bed realisation that they have been duped, but always better late than never.

32
0
milesahead
milesahead
3 years ago
Reply to  Rowan

All part of the plan:
https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/world-news/tyranny/the-stupid-will-believe-it-and-ask-to-be-treated-pandemic-to-depopulate-1981/

13
0
Richard Austin
Richard Austin
3 years ago
Reply to  Rowan

You have more patience than I. I gave up on my family about a year ago. They choose their truth.

14
0
Rowan
Rowan
3 years ago
Reply to  Richard Austin

Patience is a virtue, but it has been sorely tested. I make allowances for those that were already in their dotage, when they accepted the death shots. The others I have little time for.

6
0
I am Spartacas
I am Spartacas
3 years ago
Reply to  sjonesy1999

They were both thinking they would not get CoFib if they are injected.

Amazing how many people out there think the same – they have absolutely no idea that the jab was never developed to stop people getting covid … only to alleviate the symptoms should you get it .

As someone who has had the virus the symptoms are flu-like and if it wasn’t for the sensationalised media headlines and the governments propaganda putting the fear of god in everyone anyone unlucky enough to get the symptoms would have (like myself) probably have treated it like the flu and once over it would have got on with their lives – in fact when I had the virus I actually told people I had the flu and won’t be round for a few days while I stayed home and recovered (sprawled on the sofa watching TV feeling sorry for myself)

I was more-or-less fully recovered after a few days – not had a variant or anything else since.

I suspect the vast majority of the public have had it but didn’t know it,they probably all have natural immunity and don’t need the jab at all.

Last edited 3 years ago by Ember von Drake-Dale 22
52
0
Rowan
Rowan
3 years ago
Reply to  I am Spartacas

…they have absolutely no idea that the jab was never developed to stop people getting covid … only to alleviate the symptoms should you get it.

There is scant evidence that they provide any relief other than what the makers claim. Far more likely the jabs were developed to further the aims of the UN Agendas for sustainable development. Sustainable development is UN code for depopulation.

Last edited 3 years ago by Rowan
4
0
JohnK
JohnK
3 years ago
Reply to  I am Spartacas

Correct, but it makes you wonder whether they can actually read the paperwork that was issued to offer it. The version I received made it fairly clear what it does, and doesn’t do. “We do not yet know whether it will stop you from catching and passing on the virus” – NHS leaflet March 2021.

I’m a bit like you, and had something just before New Year 2020, but no-one is interested to find out what the cause was; almost certainly a virus, but which one is unknown. It was normal to say nothing in those days, and it was holiday time anyway, and the new illness hadn’t been announced then.

5
0
186NO
186NO
3 years ago
Reply to  JohnK

Me too, in December 2019 – convinced it was not winter cold/flu but cannot prove it without blood tests – and there is a shortage of vials so that’s not on the agenda…

0
0
186NO
186NO
3 years ago
Reply to  I am Spartacas

With the greatest respect if it was flu-like, you were very fortunate to recover in a few days….

0
0
timsk
timsk
3 years ago
Reply to  sjonesy1999

Forgive the pedant in me jonesy – but the quote I think you have in mind is this one:
“Men, think in herds; they go mad in herds, while they only recover their senses slowly, and one by one.” – Charles Mackay
🙂

15
0
Hopeless
Hopeless
3 years ago

This seems to be a road to nowhere. The stuff doesn’t work well, at least not as first touted, so shove some more of the same in. It doesn’t seem to be working too well in Israel, with talk of Jab 4 already. As with many other things, “more of the same” doesn’t always mean “better”, and, as usual, the “trials” of this seem to be lamentably small and incomplete. The false reassurances and “information” from Government and the NHS is not enough to provide for “informed consent”, which, given the all-round inadequacies, isn’t surprising.

Yet another gross deceit, with many possible unpleasant consequences.

44
0
SweetBabyCheeses
SweetBabyCheeses
3 years ago
Reply to  Hopeless

I seem to recall that it was first touted as only even being intended to reduce the severity of symptoms in those who were at risk? That’s certainly what it was designed to do, and they knew it wasn’t a sterilising vaccination.

Flawed claims that it prevented infection or transmission came much later. I think if you’re a scientist who actually understands how these “vaccines” work then you would have been very surprised at these results!

16
0
RickH
RickH
3 years ago
Reply to  SweetBabyCheeses

I think it was actually first touted as a cure-all for all our Covid-related political and health ills.

Last edited 3 years ago by RickH
12
0
Bella Donna
Bella Donna
3 years ago

Look if the first two jabs haven’t worked a third one won’t either! People’s immune systems are under attack by this evil government. If only more people did the research before listening to this government!

52
0
rayc
rayc
3 years ago
Reply to  Bella Donna

They worked for a couple months, and so will every following one. Whether or not it makes sense to pursue such temporary protection is another story and should be decided exclusively by every concerned individual.

3
-27
Richard Austin
Richard Austin
3 years ago
Reply to  rayc

Worked in what way? They did not reduce infections because the graphs were already on a downward trend and if you study them you will find the trend exactly follows the standard trend for any Coronavirus. It does not deviate at any point.
Are you actually aware that not one company stated an aim to prevent people catching or transmitting Covid? Not one. They do not do that. They, allegedly, there is no real proof, alleviate symptoms if you get it. That is all. So, again, worked in what way?

27
0
RickH
RickH
3 years ago
Reply to  rayc

“They worked for a couple months”

Not even much evidence of that. Comparison of the 2020 and 2021 mortality curves do not reflect well on the post-jab period.

15
0
John
John
3 years ago

I will be declining this generous offer, despite having had two AstraZeneca doses without issue, as it is the Pfizer mRNA.

20
0
miketa1957
miketa1957
3 years ago

A thought …..

The all-cause mortality rate for 2020 is nothing to write home about. As someone has posted here, given a bar chart of all-cause population adjusted mortality rates for 2000 through 2020 but with the years jumbled, it is pretty well impossible to pick out 2020 (it is somewhere in the middle of the range of values). Also, the age distribution of C19 deaths is very close to the age distribution of all-cause deaths (the older you are, the more likely you are to die).

The only conclusion one can draw is, people who died of C19 in 2020 (and by extension, 2021) would have died of something else in the absence of C19 (and the with/of C19 argument does not affect this).

So, however many people are “saved” from C19 by the vaccine, that number will simply die of something else. Hence, the vaccines are of no use; whether I die of C19 or some other chest infection does not matter to me a whole lot, and at a societal level it does not matter at all. Indeed, if the vaccines to have significant negative side effects (which I personally believe they do) then the net affect at a societal level is negative, let alone for the affected individuals.

This observation might also explain the mortality rates from China, which are normally viewed with scepticism. An article linked from the daily summary suggests that the Chinese use PCR testing with a CT of 25 (which would mean a much lower number of “cases”) and the presence of two symptoms for a death to be associated with C19. If this is correct (and if the Chinese have a similarly non-existant excess death rate) then the Chinese figures are entirely plausible, it simply being that they have a different (and arguably better) criteria for which deaths are counted as C19.

49
0
186NO
186NO
3 years ago
Reply to  miketa1957

Watched the video of the interview of John O’Looney, the Milton Keynes Funeral Director; his experience from late 2019 skewers the “official” information on all things SARS COV2; I found it heartbreaking and very disturbing.

2
0
bennyboy
bennyboy
3 years ago

I think the next 2/3 months are pivotal. If as some say children start to get ill, and double jabbed start to die in big numbers due to complications with A.D.E,they wont be able to continue. Some doctors and nurses will speak out and Johnson and his cronies will be toast.
They always do things in plain sight, they have said if the N H S is under severe pressure, vaccine passports, lock downs are all on the cards and we know how that play book will pan out. So its a horrible and awful situation. Children and adults will have to be maimed for them to stop, and like all politicians they will cling on till the bitter end.

42
0
rayc
rayc
3 years ago
Reply to  bennyboy

Actually, if there is more deaths, they will be much emboldened to continue and the support will rise (“see, the terrible virus is as terrible as we’ve told”). The best outcome would be the infection rates dying off for “inexplicable” reasons (the chief one being that every known viral pandemic in history did not last longer than 2-3 years). Even though in that case the vaccinations and other measures will be of course portrayed as the cure (however this is easy to debunk if we just keep a few countries without mandatory measures).

7
-3
bennyboy
bennyboy
3 years ago
Reply to  rayc

You may be correct, but im thinking its much harder to explain when its 12- 15 y/o and the double jabbed/ boosted that get ill.

14
0
Jon Garvey
Jon Garvey
3 years ago
Reply to  bennyboy

It’s the dreaded Mu variant wot done it!

9
0
mwhite
mwhite
3 years ago
Reply to  rayc

There is a study on mice (not well done apparently) indicating that most of the injection circulates in the blood. At the beginning the lipids the MRNA seem attracted to female ovaries(not good if you are a woman).
At the end of the 2 days this study on mice began to show the lipids congregating in lymph nodes and bone marrow(pity they didn’t go further than 2 days).

We’ve all heard about women complaining about disruption to their menstrual cycles.

Swedish Women – New Side Effect Detected / Why White House staff mute their TV-sets – YouTube

3 minutes 20 seconds

“Lymph nodes or lymph glands are an important part of the immune system, acting as “nodes” between the lymphatic vessels that span the body. Immune cells that cluster in these nodes stand ready to attack any bacteria, viruses, or other foreign substances that enter the body.”

Lymph Nodes: Structure, Function, Types, and Diseases (verywellhealth.com)

10
0
rayc
rayc
3 years ago
Reply to  mwhite

Well, where is the link to the study, rather than to some shitty YouTube videos? And why would we jump to conclusions from mouse ovaries? Are you aware how many thousands of shitty studies have been published on all matters COVID-related since the start of this pandemic? P.S. That’s what academics do for a living.

0
-20
RickH
RickH
3 years ago
Reply to  rayc

You don’t actually need many links to suss that this is a scam. Just get all-cause mortality figures over a decent period and adjust for population – and just look.

9
0
Richard Austin
Richard Austin
3 years ago
Reply to  bennyboy

It sounds horrible but I am hoping a few children die pretty early on. The reason is pretty obvious, the Government has to be stopped and deaths are the only way. I do accept that it is most likely that they will be spun as having died from Covid.

9
-2
rockoman
rockoman
3 years ago
Reply to  bennyboy

It will be sold as a new variant.

8
0
TreeHugger
TreeHugger
3 years ago

My mum is 73 and has had two jabs. She told me this week she categorically refuses to have a third. She will have an annual jab like the flu one and no more. She’s gone along with it all until now so hopefully there are many more feeling as she does.

54
0
Number48
Number48
3 years ago
Reply to  TreeHugger

There’s definitely going to be a significant percentage of those who took the first two who will draw a line with the third. That percentage will increase with every booster.

If my dad was still here, I’m convinced my mum (pushing 80) wouldn’t have had the first two. Unfortunately she’s re-married now to somebody who very much tows the party line and she won’t listen to me. I sent her a subtle warning in a text last week, but I have to channel my energy towards those I know I can still protect.

20
0
Smelly Melly
Smelly Melly
3 years ago

I hope my invitation will come through the post as they are so soft and absorbent.

25
0
BJs Brain is Missing
BJs Brain is Missing
3 years ago

I see that schizophrenic ‘newspaper’ the Mail on Sunday has produced a full page article penned by the former Health Secretary, Matt Hancock, denouncing ‘anti-vaxxers’ for being the cause of all the nation’s ills, and imploring people to take the ‘perfectly safe vaccine’. Principally because it’s the right thing for a patriotic Briton to do… Quite sickening. I sincerely hope this man serves time.

And yet a couple of pages before the Hancock article is a full-page and damning indictment of Professor Neil Ferguson’s incredibly bad record of computer modelling and how his covid death predictions were wildly inaccurate and overblown…

The Propaganda Media, twisting the nation’s mind for over 30 years and still doing it.

Last edited 3 years ago by BJs Brain is Missing
73
-1
rayc
rayc
3 years ago
Reply to  BJs Brain is Missing

Taking the vaccine (once, not in an eternal subscription, unless maybe you are in a risk group) while opposing the vaxxports and all other mandatory measures is actually the right thing to do.

1
-57
Julian
Julian
3 years ago
Reply to  rayc

Not sure about the “taking the vaccine bit” but it’s your choice. I would add you should also be opposing vaccine bullying, coercion, propganda, vaxxing kids and lack of decent data, informed consent, unblinding of long term trials, flimsy basis on which emergency license was granted etc etc – opposing the whole mass vaxx madness. You’ve presumably thought carefully about this. Not many have, and the govt and health authorities are quite happy about that.

38
0
rayc
rayc
3 years ago
Reply to  Julian

Indeed, I agree that you should oppose unnecessary vaccinations for purely political reasons, and all the related marketing. That is the tragedy of the current situation – the first ever working measure is being blindly pushed by one group of idiots and entirely rejected by another group of idiots.

1
-47
Julian
Julian
3 years ago
Reply to  rayc

I’m not sure it’s idiotic to be highly sceptical of an experimental emergency vaccine pushed by political idiots for a disease that is not an emergency for most people, that has no long term safety data, scanty trials and for which any kind of risk/benefit analysis is almost impossible given that the data around covid is garbage.

57
0
RickH
RickH
3 years ago
Reply to  rayc

“you should oppose unnecessary vaccinations for purely political reasons”

Which is precisely why many of us are opposing the Covid junk.

18
0
Will
Will
3 years ago
Reply to  rayc

Is it bollocks.

20
0
mishmash
mishmash
3 years ago
Reply to  rayc

Based on a limited window of ‘effectiveness’ that is easily manipulated with bogus PCR data?
Meanwhile there is no published list of ingredients for these shots, there is no long term safety data and already millions of adverse reactions and thousands of deaths attributed to them which even the corrupt FDA can’t ignore anymore.

16
0
Hugh
Hugh
3 years ago
Reply to  rayc

For whom? Not for healthy 15 year olds anyway.

1
0
Will
Will
3 years ago
Reply to  BJs Brain is Missing

I don’t mind a paper giving a variety of opinion, although Wancock is obviously completely wrong. It is the likes of the BBC, Guardian, Independent and Times that don’t have any sceptical content that grind my gears.

16
0
coppelledstreets
coppelledstreets
3 years ago
Reply to  BJs Brain is Missing

Matt Hancock is just evil, a part of the 4th generation industrial revolution.
The man lies for a living, I wish someone would take him to court for his lies.

He needs to hang just before Boris.

12
0
Hugh
Hugh
3 years ago
Reply to  BJs Brain is Missing

“Perfectly safe ‘vaccine’ “?I can only assume that stick-at-nought Hancock is lying or distorting the truth, especially given his background.

7
0
rayc
rayc
3 years ago

When your wall of defence is made of cardboard, you can get very busy strengthening it.

1
-29
BJs Brain is Missing
BJs Brain is Missing
3 years ago

I would like to know why some scientists and politicians think their recently made-up and experimental concoction is better than my finely tuned, multi-generational immune system, and which has been millions of years in development?

53
0
wendy
wendy
3 years ago
Reply to  BJs Brain is Missing

Are you spreading conspiracies again about humans having an immune system? Only pharma and lovely caring government can prevent us from being wiped out? They know what is best for us!!!!!

37
0
refusenick
refusenick
3 years ago

I’m coming to the conclusion that forcing acceptance of natural immunity may be the way to go here. There has been some notable success with this here in the US courts. I’m not saying it’s enough – nor by any means all that I’d like to see – but a re-focus on the scope of social immunity rather than ‘vaccine’ coverage would be a step in the right direction.
I’d certainly be ready to take my chances with the disease, if that became the case.

12
0
RW
RW
3 years ago

I read this to the point where they were quoting some GP in charge of something about how getting jabbed once more would be the best way “to protect yourself and your loved ones from this cruel virus”. Someone really needs to remove the dime novel author in disguise from this PR team. People can be cruel. Eg, by cutting dementia sufferes off from their relatives for the largely hypothetical benefit of somebody else. But not viruses.

Inappropriate use of shock & awe adjectives in official communication out to be a punishable offence.

32
0
mwhite
mwhite
3 years ago

Here’s where – and why – San Francisco Marathon runners will need to wear masks (msn.com)

“Participants in four races must wear masks on some portions of the course, race officials announced in updates to the race’s health protocols over the last two weeks.”

8
0
Anonymous
Anonymous
3 years ago

Logically, un-jabbed won’t be sent the letters.
In theory, ‘restrictions depend on uptake of boosters’; emotional blackmail yet again, but we’ve heard that one before, it’s becoming ‘water off a duck’s back’.
In practise, restrictions depend only on whether or not they get complied with

19
0
Old Maid
Old Maid
3 years ago
Reply to  Anonymous

More lols. “Restrictions depend on uptake of boosters.” Really? So Johnson is saying that restrictions won’t depend on ‘infections’, won’t depend on deaths, but will depend on whether he can bully the jabbed to submit again? So we’ll be able to blame the only-double-jabbed for any further lockdowns? The clown hasn’t thought this one through, has he?

30
0
Annie
Annie
3 years ago
Reply to  Old Maid

Since when did Bozo do any thinking?

17
0
Anonymous
Anonymous
3 years ago
Reply to  Annie

Beware under-estimating your opponent. He is doing everything right if his aim is mass murder. He ‘plays the clown’, it’s his cover-story and it works every time

15
0
Julian
Julian
3 years ago
Reply to  Old Maid

“ The clown hasn’t thought this one through, has he?” Au contraire, it makes perfect sense if your obective is to maximise the amount of vaccination you do and keep the pandemic going forever.

20
0
Anonymous
Anonymous
3 years ago
Reply to  Old Maid

Maybe I didn’t make it clear that with ‘restrictions depend on uptake of boosters’ I was cynically quoting what ‘nanny’ had said and warning to not submit to the blackmail yet again

7
0
MizakeTheMizan
MizakeTheMizan
3 years ago

Both people in my office that are double-jabbed have said that they will not be getting the booster because they don’t believe the BS any more. It’ll be interesting to know how many of the double-jabbed refuse the booster.

43
0
PatrickF
PatrickF
3 years ago

As an unvaxxed 61 year old, I shall be declining the invitation to be injected with an experimental gene therapy. So, blame me for the next lockdown and further restrictions. I’m looking after number one.

56
0
oblong
oblong
3 years ago
Reply to  PatrickF

I am an unvaxxed 61 year old too.
I thought I was a socialist before this malarkey but now I realise I am a misfit.

31
0
Richy_m_99
Richy_m_99
3 years ago
Reply to  oblong

I had covid in Jan 2030. Why the fuck do I need to be innoculated afainst a disease I have already had.

15
0
huxleypiggles
huxleypiggles
3 years ago
Reply to  Richy_m_99

2030 eh? You got there before the rest of us.

😀

11
0
iainclark
iainclark
3 years ago

So, will those who reluctantly had two doses because they wanted to go on holiday have been wasting their time unless they also have a booster (possibly every few months forever)?

24
0
Annie
Annie
3 years ago
Reply to  iainclark

Looks like it. Israel points the hellward way.

22
0
Richard Austin
Richard Austin
3 years ago

Kerchiing! This is complete and utter insantity but the Sheeples simply cannot see it and the mainstream media are either oblivious or as stupid as the Sheeples.

Last edited 3 years ago by Richard Austin
15
-1
HelenaHancart
HelenaHancart
3 years ago

“Ministers say the success of the booster vaccine roll-out (and of the roll-out of vaccines for children) will determine whether further restrictions – including mask mandates, vaccine passports and possibly another lockdown – should be imposed this winter.”

The game is up, you sick b@stards. Even the jabbed have had enough now! First it was the tired old “three weeks to flatten the curve”, then it was mask mandates, then it was “tiers” and circuit breakers, and “moonshot” testing, then the removal of Christmas, with all the normies hanging on for their precious jab. Then it was two jabs, then the jabbed were suddenly at risk from the unjabbed, even though the jabbed could still spread it, then all the flip-flopping of bloody “passports”, now it’s a third bloody jab, and children having to be vaxxed to “protect others”, plus a multitude of other nonsensical nonsense…in order for daddy pig regime to “give” us our “freedom” back?!!! Too many know now something is seriously wrong, even if they aren’t fully on board to what is going on!

69
0
iainclark
iainclark
3 years ago
Reply to  HelenaHancart

How much of this blackmail is coming from the communist behaviour control adviser?

18
0
Major Panic in the jabby jabbys
Major Panic in the jabby jabbys
3 years ago

The frail unwell (and/or elderly) at risk group, who survived the initial (and very recent) two death shots are likely at extreme risk from the booster – I am expecting mortality to increase in this group and this will be blamed on; covid, a new variant, the pure bloods, and anything else except the experimental clot shots….

Last edited 3 years ago by Major Panic in the jabby jabbys
29
0
MizakeTheMizan
MizakeTheMizan
3 years ago

I’m looking forward to the moment when the triple-jabbed turn on the double-jabbed, and accuse them of being anti-vaxxers. Shouldn’t be long now.

48
0
Will
Will
3 years ago
Reply to  MizakeTheMizan

And in March 2022, the quadruple vaxed will turn on the triple vaxed.

22
0
DanClarke
DanClarke
3 years ago

Ministers say the success of the booster vaccine roll-out (and of the roll-out of vaccines for children) will determine whether further restrictions – including mask mandates, vaccine passports and possibly another lockdown – should be imposed this winter. Doesn’t make any sense. But that’s all of this farce

18
0
Jane G
Jane G
3 years ago

In other words, come and get the jab or else…..

You’ll only have yourself to blame if we have to have another lockdown….

Look what you made me do….I really didn’t want to do this and if you hadn’t been so difficult, it could have been so different….

36
0
MizakeTheMizan
MizakeTheMizan
3 years ago
Reply to  Jane G

The words of every abuser in every abusive relationship.

32
0
Will
Will
3 years ago
Reply to  Jane G

The coercive control continues…

19
0
Hester
Hester
3 years ago
Reply to  Jane G

I returned from Greece on Friday the 17th I am not vaccinated this is to date
Monday 20th September the level of intimidation and harassment I have received as an unvaccinated amber traveller. Incidentally I have followed to the letter all that is required of me in my “less than human status”
Saturday evening in the dark at post 7pm a man turns up at my rural isolated home, I live down a dirt track private half a mile long I live in the middle of 4 arable fields.
The Man knocks on my door he has a mask, and a tabard on, I open the door he shouts my name and that of my husband, my guard dog leaps forward to protect. I shut the door and my husband warns the man to stand back.
The man then goes to his car and sits on my drive for nearly 15 minutes. My cat as I notice on our cameras has gone behind his car, so I go to collect the cat. The man stays in his car watching me. He then drives away.
On Sunday We each receive two texts, 2 voice mails and a telephone call from test and trace, we record all the details.
Incidentally I complain on line to test and trace regarding the intimdation by the man I assume they sent, the response is call 119, there is no responder there, or write a complaint which they have 25 days to respond to.
On the same day at 4pm Apolice car turned up, the officer who was very pleasant was she said checking we were following Amber guidelines, I asked was this levelof harassment due to our vaccination status, she said no she had to do this for lots of people. She asked if we had a nice holiday, to which I replied yes, but seems I am being made to pay for it now.
So here we are on Monday, and I await to see what further harassment and discrimination our Government can place on me. Because this is discrimination and intimidation. How do I know this
Because non of my friends who have been vaccinated and have travelled from Amber countries, or USA have been subjected to this level of harassment.
Because I when I boraded the plane to leave Greece had been proved negative for Corona, the vaccinated who can transmit it, had to take no such test. I arrived home presumably covid free, the only way I could have contracted it was from a vaccinated person, and yet the vaccinated do not have to Isolate for 10 days, have their private life and home violated by the Government, and all because I refuse to give the Governments rights over my body.

9
0
Richy_m_99
Richy_m_99
3 years ago

Watch the headlines as “covid deaths” start climbing into the hundreds in the next couple of weeks. Every one, of course, blamed on a now non existent virus, while the pharma and their buddies in Govt keep pocketing millions of our money keeping the whole vax and test charade going.

When is someone finally going to have the bollocks to stand up and openly accuse them of genocide.

25
0
huxleypiggles
huxleypiggles
3 years ago

In other words, if not enough agree to another clot shot we will really lock you down.

However, if enough sheep agree to the kill shot we will still lock you all down as soon as we hit the target our masters have given.

Fuck right off.

30
0
Annie
Annie
3 years ago

Double jabberoids! Be the first to become triple jabberoids! Get your triple by-pass now!
Order a fourth dose straight away and get the fifth half price! Limited time only! An offer you can’t refuse!!

20
0
Norman
Norman
3 years ago

Sorry, posted on wrong thread.

Last edited 3 years ago by For a fist full of roubles
5
0
Hugh
Hugh
3 years ago

“Permanent state of lockdown”?

I thought that was what they were trying for…

When are we going to see some evidence of this wall of defence then?

3
0
ellie-em
ellie-em
3 years ago

No doubt this will be another exercise to engage with those who have declined any ‘offers’ up to now. For me, it’ll be a case of ‘return to sender’ – the murdering tosspots coercing the people to have this shite in a syringe. Doesn’t matter how many damn texts, emails or letters they inundate me with, this lady isn’t for turning. Shove their ‘offer’ where the sun don’t shine – along with their ‘flu’ jabs, too.

7
0
marebobowl
marebobowl
3 years ago

When everyone knows masks and lockdowns do not even work. Why would the “ministers” think they are going to suddenly work. How weird.

0
0
TheBigman
TheBigman
3 years ago

The restrictions will happen regardless. Don’t be fooled. Fight back.

1
0
Epi
Epi
3 years ago

And if enough people say F off to the booster jab and parents and children tell them exactly where they can stick their poisonous potion that’s their trigger for Lockdowns “you naughty naughty people smacked bottoms all round”. Unfortunately it would appear there are rather too many masochists for my liking.

1
0
Newman20
Newman20
3 years ago

I might be naive, but if the original jabs work why does anyone now need a booster? Even my son queried the necessity for a booster just a few months after the initial jabs.

0
0

NEWSLETTER

View today’s newsletter

To receive our latest news in the form of a daily email, enter your details here:

DONATE

PODCAST

The Sceptic | Episode 38: Chris Bayliss on the Commonwealth Voting Scandal, Sarah Phillimore on the Bar’s Scrapped EDI Plans and Eugyppius on ‘White Genocide’

by Richard Eldred
30 May 2025
2

LISTED ARTICLES

  • Most Read
  • Most Commented
  • Editor’s Picks

Did Muslim Home Office Staff Block Persecuted Christian Woman’s Asylum Claim?

31 May 2025
by Richard Eldred

Basic Physics All at Sea in Sky News Climate Scare Nonsense Story

31 May 2025
by Chris Morrison

News Round-Up

31 May 2025
by Richard Eldred

John Rentoul’s Fake Cost of Net Zero

31 May 2025
by Paul Homewood

Britain Is Sleepwalking Into Total State Control of Our Daily Lives

31 May 2025
by Richard Eldred

News Round-Up

42

Free Speech Union Scores Victory as Ex-Cop Wins £20,000 Over ‘Thought Crime’ Arrest

26

Did Muslim Home Office Staff Block Persecuted Christian Woman’s Asylum Claim?

24

Comedian’s Show Cancelled Over Liverpool Parade Crash Joke

58

‘Stop Letting Criminals Choose Their Own Gender’, UN Warns After UK Police Forces Allow 49 Rapists to Identify As Female Offenders

18

Basic Physics All at Sea in Sky News Climate Scare Nonsense Story

31 May 2025
by Chris Morrison

John Rentoul’s Fake Cost of Net Zero

31 May 2025
by Paul Homewood

Are Schools Actually Institutionalised Childcare?

30 May 2025
by Joanna Gray

Trump is Handing Africa to the Chinese for the Sake of Social Media Clout

29 May 2025
by Noah Carl

Hooked on Freedom: Why Medical Autonomy Matters

29 May 2025
by Dr David Bell

POSTS BY DATE

September 2021
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930  
« Aug   Oct »

SOCIAL LINKS

Free Speech Union

NEWSLETTER

View today’s newsletter

To receive our latest news in the form of a daily email, enter your details here:

POSTS BY DATE

September 2021
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930  
« Aug   Oct »

DONATE

LISTED ARTICLES

  • Most Read
  • Most Commented
  • Editor’s Picks

Did Muslim Home Office Staff Block Persecuted Christian Woman’s Asylum Claim?

31 May 2025
by Richard Eldred

Basic Physics All at Sea in Sky News Climate Scare Nonsense Story

31 May 2025
by Chris Morrison

News Round-Up

31 May 2025
by Richard Eldred

John Rentoul’s Fake Cost of Net Zero

31 May 2025
by Paul Homewood

Britain Is Sleepwalking Into Total State Control of Our Daily Lives

31 May 2025
by Richard Eldred

News Round-Up

42

Free Speech Union Scores Victory as Ex-Cop Wins £20,000 Over ‘Thought Crime’ Arrest

26

Did Muslim Home Office Staff Block Persecuted Christian Woman’s Asylum Claim?

24

Comedian’s Show Cancelled Over Liverpool Parade Crash Joke

58

‘Stop Letting Criminals Choose Their Own Gender’, UN Warns After UK Police Forces Allow 49 Rapists to Identify As Female Offenders

18

Basic Physics All at Sea in Sky News Climate Scare Nonsense Story

31 May 2025
by Chris Morrison

John Rentoul’s Fake Cost of Net Zero

31 May 2025
by Paul Homewood

Are Schools Actually Institutionalised Childcare?

30 May 2025
by Joanna Gray

Trump is Handing Africa to the Chinese for the Sake of Social Media Clout

29 May 2025
by Noah Carl

Hooked on Freedom: Why Medical Autonomy Matters

29 May 2025
by Dr David Bell

SOCIAL LINKS

Free Speech Union
  • Home
  • About us
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy

Facebook

  • X

Instagram

RSS

Subscribe to our newsletter

© Skeptics Ltd.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password? Sign Up

Create New Account!

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • Articles
  • About
  • Archive
    • ARCHIVE
    • NEWS ROUND-UPS
  • Podcasts
  • Newsletter
  • Premium
  • Donate
  • Log In

© Skeptics Ltd.

wpDiscuz
You are going to send email to

Move Comment
Perfecty
Do you wish to receive notifications of new articles?
Notifications preferences