Chief Medical Officer Chris Whitty should resign for approving the vaccination of all healthy teenagers against Covid “without good clinical reason”, according to Marcus Fysh MP. The Independent has the story.
A row broke out on Monday after the government announced 12 to 15 year-olds will be offered one Pfizer jab from next week, following a decision made by the chief medical officers (CMO) of each of the U.K.’s four nations…
Responding to the move in a tweet on Monday night Marcus Fysh, the Conservative MP for Yeovil, claimed Prof Whitty “does not deserve the confidence of the country” as he called for him to step down.
Speaking in the House of Commons earlier, Mr. Fysh said he had “grave concerns about this policy and the fact that the CMOs have made their decision on the basis of the educational impact rather than the health of the children at clinical level”.
In a previous ruling the JCVI, which looks at vaccinations from a purely clinical perspective, concluded that the virus presents a very low risk for children and therefore an inoculation programme would offer only minor benefits.
The CMOs, who had come under significant political and media pressure to approve the roll-out, told a Downing Street press conference on Monday that there were other benefits, including reducing the disruption to the school term.
Professor Whitty told the news conference it had been a “difficult decision” but CMOs would not be recommending the jabs “unless we felt that benefit exceeded risk”.
Three million eligible teenagers will be offered a first dose as early as next week as part of in-school vaccination services.
Worth reading in full.
Stop Press: Appearing on talkRADIO later on Tuesday, Marcus said the vaccination of healthy children is “an appalling decision [that’s] not based on medical need or clinical need”.
They’ve come up with the idea, because the JCVI didn’t think it was warranted, that somehow children’s mental health is a clinical need for this vaccination. Well, I’m sorry [but] we need to lead children to a better place of understanding they are not at risk if they are worried about getting Covid. It just is not something that is going to be dangerous for them. I just don’t buy that for a second and I think it’s an outrageous way that the medical advice has been manipulated.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
Well – Whitty isn’t going to resign now, after staying in post after a myriad of wrong decisions and misdirections.
He’s too useful an idiot.
He won’t resign. And only one MPs calls for his resignation. How much Chinese money is around all this we ask ourselves?
UK’s Crème de la Crème Universities are directly funded by the CCP
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v10YvqOTbMw
Wednesday 15th September 5.30pm Rebels on Roundabouts
Downshire Way, Bracknell RG12 7AA
near Premier Inn/Bracknell Fire Station
From our friends in Buckinghamshire:
Wednesday 15th September 6pm
Marlow Hill, High Wycombe
Park up at Waitrose car-park
Saturday 18th September 12pm at Chequers
meet up point as below
Coombe Hill Car Park
Lodge Hill, Aylesbury HP17 0UR
yellow boards with other banners and maybe a little protest outside BJ mansion
Sunday 19th September 2021 12pm to 3pm
Surrey’s Super Stand in the Park , Stoke Park, Nightingale Rd, Guildford GU1 1ER. – after your local Stands!!
Monday 20th September 5pm
Big Yellow Boards roadside event
Pavement outside (Morrisons The Peel Centre), Skimped Hill Ln, Bracknell RG12 1EN
Saturday 2nd October 2pm
GRAND STAND IN THE PARK BERKSHIRE
– with a couple of guest speakers and a stroll thought the town centre at the end
Reading River Promenade
Reading RG4 8BX
Saturday 16th October 1pm
Combined Berks/Bucks/Oxon/Surrey MEGA Yellow Board-Hold the Line
Stafferton Way
Maidenhead
SL6 1AY
Stand in the Park Reading River Promenade Reading
Sundays from 10am
Telegram https://t.me/standindparkreading
Stand in the Park Bracknell South Hill Park
Sundays from 10am
Wednesdays from 2pm
Make friends – keep sane
Telegram http://t.me/astandintheparkbracknell
There must be a better source but this may do for now at least to pose the question: if Huawei and the Chinese industrial complex generally posed security issues for the West as the media would have us believe, why were the mRNA experimental gene therapy injections created to target virus based on genomes *received from China*? The trust variability doesn’t make sense.
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2021/03/25/magazine/genome-sequencing-covid-variants.html
“…scientists could look at 12 complete virus genomes shared from China and conclude that the fact that they were nearly identical …”
Indeed this is true.
MPs have been pitiful from the start and it’s been a case of too little too late all the way through.
However, while the future seems bleak I think we should also take heart from tiny signs like this.
Logically, if he’s calling for Whitty to quit he should also be calling for his boss to quit – the Prime Minister.
P.S. Was anyone surprised by the pronouncement by Whitty and confederates?
A little. I think the government have been quite clever in knowing when to turn the heat up and when to ease off, and vaxxing kids could backfire on them more than other measures that people seem to have grown used to. I was quite surprised when they actually delivered on some of the promises on the 19th July. But my surprise is more in relation to the tactics and the politics rather than any expectation that he would suddenly have an attack of conscience.
My default expectation is that the madness will continue in some form for the rest of my life, and that we can’t trust governments to do the right thing, but I’ve given up thinking too much about exactly what forms the madness will take as it’s exhausting and futile.
I suspect the reason vax passes were delayed is purely because they knew they couldnt force through vaccines for kids AND vax passes at the same time.
They need a replacement for handcock in that role.
Of course there’s no clinical reason to vaccinate children or anyone under 60 as the risk of serious disease is negligible. Also what is the point of JCVI if the CMO can effectively ignore their advice? Whitty, Van Tamm and others should resign or be sacked.
But they won’t be, because they are too valuable to the scamdemic and know too much. They could be dangerous to the government if they were sacked. Whitty would mysteriously accidentally cut his head off whilst mowing the lawn.
Please stop quoting ages as if everyone over 60 is about to snuff it.
Its only infirm people with comorbidities that are at risk. Fit and healthy 70 yr olds have far less risk than obese 30 year olds for instance.
People should be given personal responsibility for making their own decisions. They know if they are unwell and at risk and can make the decision to get jabbed if they feel the risk of covid-added problems exceeds the jab risks. Or at least they shouldf be able to if the psyop allows.
Absolutely right. I’m in my 60’s and cycle 100+ miles a week. I’m probably fitter than a lot of blokes in their 20’s.
Just to clarify I am in my 60’s having just retired, hence I cannot understand why you’re taking umbrage. I was not advocating compulsory vaccination. It is a fact that 65+ are treated differently to under 65 by the NHS. When you’re 75 you will be offered a shingles vaccination. The flu vaccine is different between the two age groups due to differences in the immune system in the older person. If you have a fall and are over 65 you will be treated very different to the under 65’s. It is an acknowledged fact that ageing affects the immune system, it is suspected that the body is in a chronic inflamed state.
Ageing does not affect the immune system, you are confusing causation with correlation.
There are some immunity damaging factors that get worse the longer you don’t correct them, but most of the most damaging factors are due to bad ‘lifestyle’ choices – and the NHS and Government are paying little or no attention to them.
I have to disagree. I don’t have access to suitable references at the moment as I am away from home until later today.
As promised:
“At the same time, signs of an active immune response – cytokines, clotting factors and other inflammatory molecules – are often found at higher levels in the blood of elderly people, even when there are no overt signs of infection. ( Jamieson, B. D., et al.1999)
This phenomenon is sometimes called ‘inflamm-ageing’. There are many reasons why a low level of background inflammation might persist in elderly people, such as there being an accumulation of damaged or senescent cells,
but the effect is that the system is less able to discriminate between germs and the body’s own cells and tissues, and is particularly weak at detecting germs that have never been encountered before. In broad-brush terms, it is easier for an immune reaction to be triggered in elderly people but, by the same token, the system is less stringent in responding appropriately. Crucially, this means that older people have more of their immune cells devoted to battling previously encountered infections, leaving fewer immune cells available for the fight against new infections.”
—from The Beautiful Cure: The New Science of Human Health by Daniel M Davis (Daniel M. Davis is Professor of Immunology at the University of Manchester. )
Jamieson, B. D., et al., ‘Generation of functional thymocytes in the human adult’, Immunity 10 , 569–75 (1999).
In fact the opposite, they recommend a diet which makes things worse, and likewise the wrong kind of exercise. Then drugs as antidotes.
Undoubtedly. I’m 60 and when walking the dogs recently with various younger family members aged 13-30 none of them could keep up when walking up a hill in the woods at a pace that was hardly demanding. I looked around to see red faces and gasps for breath- staggering. I’m hardly a keep fit fanatic either. I had to talk some of them into coming- you know, outside, away from the screens…I wonder if this is behind childhood obesity…?
Survival rate for those aged over eighty five WHO CATCH THE VIRUS, for which there is no effective test, is 99.32%, or just sixty eight people per ten thousand aged over eighty five who catch the virus, and those sixty eight people have on average 2.4 co-morbidities, or other conditions that were going to cause their deaths anyway.
D’accord mon ami.
He’s right, Whitty and Valence should both resign. And then put on trial.
Just emailed this to my MP. She was onboard for a long time but has recently started to shift position. If anyone wants to copy and paste to their own MP be my guest. It’s written for a Tory MP so may need slight adjustments for Lib Dem and Labour MP’s.
In two parts as it was too long !
Info graphic mentioned in the email attached to this message.
Apologies for having to contact you yet again but having read ‘plans A, B & C’ and the fact that the vote regards granting the Government another 6 month extension of the powers granted to it via the Coronavirus Act is coming soon, I felt no I had no choice.
First of all I would like to state that I no longer believe a single word any Government Minister says. After 18 months of U-Turns and ever changing positions, I view my relationship with my elected Government as an abusive one. I am not alone.
Given the infamous ‘3 weeks to flatten’ the curve statement I find it interesting that after such a long period of time, the approach by Public health officials has not evolved in the slightest. There has been absolutely no change in approach to provide any early treatments of those diagnosed as having caught the virus. The only tactic appears to be to do the same things we tried before that didn’t work and coerce the population into entering a large scale medical trial of an experimental vaccine. The fact this trial has now moved onto healthy 12-15 year old children who are at more risk from the vaccine than the virus itself should have given any Government pause for thought but not this one. Even without the approval of the JCVI (follow the science?) the CMO has used mental health issues and loss of education, all of which were caused by this Government and not the virus, as the primary reasons for the decision. This is obviously a political move and has absolutely nothing to do with the individual health of any of the child whatsoever. At this point i’m wondering how high up the scale on the dead-kids-o-meter they are willing to go? Given the current numbers of deaths and injuries on the Yellow Card system I don’t think they even care how bad it may get. What’s a few dead children after all?
I find it puzzling that the working population are to continue to pay for (now with increased taxation) and protect a ‘Health Service’ which in reality was supposed to protect them? Given the high number (reported between 25-40%) of patients classed as Covid admissions who actually catch the virus after entering a hospital for other reasons, I’m amazed the Government hasn’t just closed down the NHS too. The NHS is now so obsessed with everything Covid that I doubt anyone without need of treatment for the virus would even notice it had gone.
We no longer need Government by Executive Fiat. There is nothing this Government needs to do that cannot first be scrutinized and debated by Parliament. It’s obvious that the original plan for the Vaccine Passport was a risk to the Government given the child vaccination program and NI increases arrived at the same time.
To extend the Coronavirus virus act for another six months will most likely result in the destruction of what little is left of our civil liberties and freedoms along with many more small businesses. It’s obvious that deaths of the elderly ‘with Covid’ will increase over the autumn and winter, same as they always did with Influenza. Plan B is baked in 100%. I’m pretty sure now the Government’s tactic will be just to play the vaccinated off against the unvaccinated minority. They had their chance after all !!! This will be the back drop for the wide scale implementation of Vaccine Passports. At this point, anyone who believes it’s just for Nightclubs and Large Events is beyond help.
Many media pundits are already cheerleading for discrimination in spite of evidence that the vaccine provides little to no reduction in infections and transmission and a very low Absolute Risk Reduction (yet to pass 5%) overall. If it wasn’t for GB News this would now be across the board unrestricted, full on, propaganda drive.
I guess it all comes down to what kind of country you want to live in in the end which is why I am asking that you vote against the extension of the Coronavirus Act in order to provide a check against further Government over reach. I know many MP’s on all sides have supported this Government throughout the pandemic but the time make them accountable to Parliament again is now.
I have attached an info-graphic from the Workplace Mental Health Institute to this email which is titled 15 signs you are in an abusive relationship. I think you will find many of the statements match this Governments behavior 100%. I have passed this on to many friends and family members and all were quite shocked as to how close it mirrored our current situation.
Lastly, I would like to state categorically that should the Act be extended I will no longer adhere to ANY further restrictions, ridiculous rules (masks to leave your restaurant table?) and limitations on my civil liberties. I will also actively encourage others to do so as I know I am not alone in my derision for this Dictatorship and its enablers in Parliament. If I am arrested so be it. If I am fined I will not pay. I will never buy any goods or pay for any services from businesses that require a vaccine passport. I will not comply any longer, full stop.
Regards
An excellent letter! Top banana!
Thanks. Steam was coming out of my ears as I typed !!!
Thanks – I’ve just sent it to my MP, too.
Great !
Wow, excellent! This is what my MP needs to read. He stopped replying to me some time ago. No matter. He can run, but he can’t hide! Many of us locally are onto him.
Excellent stuff, and well-put!
That abusive relationship diagram is an absolute treasure in this scenario, thank you for sharing. Even the most blinkered fool would have to agree that we are indeed in such a relationship.
Thanks for your letter. This was your best point in my opinion:
“… the CMO has used mental health issues and loss of education, all of which were caused by this Government and not the virus …”
In America I am so tired of reading of athletic events that were cancelled “because of COVID” when in fact these events were cancelled because of unnecessary “COVID protocols” created by bureaucrats.
It’s scary how so many people just can’t make this connection.
Depends on how many naughts are in the credit column of his numbered Swiss account I presume.
I think it is quite telling that this man has no family. Mind he does look like ET eating one of Elliots’ M&Ms.
100034, 98662, 24957 This is my Sajid Javid impression on BBC this morning,
I can also pull meaningless numbers out of fresh air.
ALERT! they’re not wasting any time… !!! I have received a letter from the school this morning about covid vaccination for year 8 at school NEXT WEEK (this is south Hertfordshire). At least they are giving the day this will be “available”, so we know what day to avoid…
Will be interesting to know what the attendance rate is on that day….
Well – just look at all the blood on Bliar’s hands and he’s still jetting around making money (and offering advice, to boot).
when the first children are injured or sadly die will these men including whitty, van tam, valance , Johnson, javid and Zahawi be jailed for murder I wonder? or will they be allowed tocover up, make excuses and progress with their careers unchallenged. as surely they will blame the children and parents
It will be the children’s fault for being unvaxxed before they were vaxxed.
we have today’s winner.
History already tells us that these people will be rewarded with promotions. They will certainly suffer no adverse effects to their careers. Meanwhile, those who correctly predicted myriad “unintended” consequences, will continue to be ignored, censored, attacked, fired and impugned. It’s like we’ve all found ourselves in some surreal episode of “The Twilight Zone.”
Jab healthy teenagers with an experimental gene therapy, to make them unhealthy.
I will not be allowing my children to have this and if they decide to go ahead without my permission and something happens to them, I will personally go and find Whitty myself! He’s a dangerous monster. Hasn’t got kids himself and has financial interest in the vaccines! He’s a scumbag. I’ve predicted for a while now that a politician will come to harm over their decision making and quite frankly, I don’t give a toss if one of them does!
All of those associated with SAGE should resign or be sacked, as should Johnson, Javid, Sunak, Zahawi and co. I am sick to death of these crooks and psychopaths. This country would be better off without these maniacs.
Pfizer have acknowledged in their labelling that teens are at risk of myocarditis https://labeling.pfizer.com/ShowLabeling.aspx?id=14471
Myocarditis has a 50% 5 year survival rate Myocarditis | Circulation (ahajournals.org)
Yet we are going to maim our children to benefit their mental health! I was completely unaware of a sterilising inoculation against mental health disorders…
I’ve done a little research on myocarditis and actually found the best studies on the topic at a non-profit Foundation created to raise awareness of this medical condition.
I’m stunned (well maybe not) that this Foundation and it’s website have been completely silent on the enhanced risk of myocarditis among vaccinated young males.
Even an organization created to protect young people from myocarditis is not willing to utter a peep about a vaccination program that has just dramatically increased this risk for millions of people.
Mind boggling that children in this age group cannot legally:
Yet they can override their parents wishes and get a vaccine (which they realistically will not be of an age have the the mental capacity to critically understand the pro’s and cons).
If we read about this in the history books, we’d be wondering how on earth a government were able to do this. Unfortunately it’s a vicious spiral, those in power who can prevent and stop this are clearly and categorically quite happy for it to go ahead.
Please search NHS consent Children. It has been stated that schools will obtain parental consent, if that is forthcoming then there should be no test for Gillick competency in the child. Also be aware that if your 13 year old can go to the GP without your consent or presence and ask for any medical intervention, the onus will be on the GP to determine competency. A child under 16 can only consent they cannot decline.
When writers or speakers say that there is a “very low risk” to the health of healthy children, they are actually overstating this “risk.” The real risk of mortality “from” COVID is as close to non-existent as math and probabilities can express.
A team of researchers from prestigious U.K. hospitals recently quantified this risk in the “most comprehensive” study of its kind. From a close examination of medical records of EVERY child who was hospitalized in the U.K. between March 2020 and February 2021, the researchers found that only 25 deaths occurred because of COVID. Of this number, 19 deaths occurred among those with severe, chronic or “life-altering” medical conditions. This leaves just six “healthy” U.K. children (between the ages of 0 and 17) who died of COVID in the first year of the pandemic.
There are 12 million children in the UK, which makes this mortality risk approximately 1 in 2 million, which when expressed as a percentage is 0.000 percent. This is not a “very low” risk. It is literally a zero-percent risk of death. One has to go out to four decimal points after the zero to pick up a risk that is above 0.000.
Now what is the risk a vaccinated child or young adult will develop, say, myocarditis after being vaccinated? According to one Israeli report, this risk among vaccinated young males might be as high as 1 in 3,000. Now it is still very unlikely a vaccinated young male will develop myocarditis (inflammation of the heat that can lead to cardiac arrest), but what person capable of comparing statistical probabilities would trade a 1-in-3000 health risk (which could result in death, even suddenly or in years to come) for a 1 in 2 million mortality risk?
These children are being told they should be vaccinated to “protect” them against a “risk” that is as close to zero as math can get. And they are assuming KNOWN risks that are vastly larger … and this doesn’t count the unknown risks that might manifest themselves years in the future.
https://uncoverdc.com/2021/07/30/for-majority-of-uk-children-covid-mortality-is-0-000/
Very well said. From the very beginning, this has always put me in mind of bloated psychopathic WW1 generals sending young men (including many teenagers) into machine gun fire in order to get one over the bloated psychopathic general on the other side.
I recommend Persico’s “Eleventh Month, Eleventh Day, Eleventh Hour” for an exposition of how they were still doing this long after the armistice was known and scheduled for a glimpse into the same basic mindset.
More healthy and innocent children died in one Hellfire missile strike in the final days of America’s war in Afghanistan than have died from COVID in the last 19 months in that country. According to one report, more than 40,000 civilians died in Afghanistan in the last 19 years. One assumes 25 percent of these innocent victims were children. There didn’t seem to be ANY concern over this. But the foreign policy and military “experts” in America said America HAD to fight this war. And the press just went along. I found it ironic, or revealing, that we finally got ONE story on the innocent children blown up by errant missile strikes and this story happened after America had finally withdrawn from this country.
Put it this way: If it is now deemed “unsafe” for unvaccinated children (or unmasked) children to attend school, it is and was also “unsafe” for them to attend school before COVID. This is because the mortality risk from influenza for children is at least two times higher than it is for COVID.
I still don’t understand why or how parents could send their kids to school without a flu shot or without a mask for hundreds of years. I mean should we even have school given these terrible health risks?
Not to mention the risk to their mental acuity from the indoctrination they get once there.
I still don’t understand why so many American parents spend so much money – and incur so much debt – to send their kids to colleges where their children are “educated” by such people.
This appears to be the only non-profit Foundation in America devoted to raising awareness about the risks of myocarditis, especially to young adults.
Note the complete silence of topics and discussions, statements, papers, etc. about vaccination and the likely/possible enhanced risk of myocarditis.
Even organizations allegedly concerned about this topic have apparently received a “do not discuss” memo from the powers that be.
I did learn from one of the studies I found at this site that myocarditis events can occur suddenly, or the condition can be dormant for years before striking, sometimes with fatal results. So while there almost certainly will be an increase in the events of young people hospitalized with myocarditis, we won’t know the real health effects for years.
https://www.myocarditisfoundation.org/wpcontent/uploads/MyocarditisAndSuddenDeath.pdf
https://www.myocarditisfoundation.org
Fucking Maggot needs a rope around his rancid neck that is all. Intelligent debate has expired.
What particularly infuriates me is that (to the best of my knowledge) not ONE senior clergyman from ANY denomination has made any comment about this enormity.
They made comments about Brexit, Black LIves Matter, Climate Change all sorts of things but about this? Nothing.
Somebody prove me wrong. Please.
Top marks for appropriate use of ‘enormity’, this should be a dictionary definition
Thank you. I used to edit a church magazine and someone once (but only once) used the word ‘enormity’ with reference to the Christ’s sacrifice on the cross. The article was changed.
Thank you. But where is the proof that I am wrong??
He should have resigned a long time ago, he’s not fit for purpose just like the rest of them!
He shouldn’t resign he should be arrested and jailed along with several others
Tory MP blah blah blah blaaaah …
Witty should be arrested, tried, convicted, condemned and then executed, not called upon to resign.
Here here
Surely it’s time for the rump of decent Tory MPs to breakaway from the Party and form their own. The Tories stand to be obliterated at the next election and only the even greater incompetence of Labour will save them from utter decimation.
A well-run, credible new centre-right party with a more libertarian leaning agenda would surely clean up. I told my decent, anti-pass-of-shame local Tory MP that I would vote for him as an independent but will never, as long as I live, vote Tory again.
Do you really believe that new political parties are the solution?
Party splits under first past the post haven’t worked out well. Most of them will be aware of that and will probably avoid it like the plague. Internal amorphism is the norm; after all, who believes the Tories are the same party that won the 1979 general election?
I apologise for referring to Mr Whitty as a Maggot I was meant to say CUNT!!!!
Also the rope remark was also unforgivable I meant a Columbian Neck Tie !!!!
quite. why should he be allowed to quietly resign with the millions he’s made out of this scam? string him up along with the rest of them.
Thank God there’s at least one MP with sufficient knowledge to judge a lie & a willingness to call it out.
Its too late, the damage is done.
Should read: “Huge number of MP’s tell Whitty to resign and deliver 900 page list of reasons why”
The Thames leviathan will strike and there will be no mercy.
One thing that I am curious about is that in all the comments I am reading regarding jabbing 12-15 year olds with an experimental biologically active chemical cocktail is that this age is the sweet spot for puberty, i.e. the development of the reproductive systems.
What research I can find on jabbing young people does not seem to take account of this. The average age for girls to start puberty is 11 and 12 for boys. As this is an average, many will start later.
The pituitary gland starts pushing out hormones that drive breast growth, ovary growth, first period, first ovulation, testicle growth etc. We know the spike protein from the jab is inflammatory in nature and that it leaves the site of the jab. We know that the spike protein accumulates in other organs. We know that there are reported irregularities in menstrual cycles and excessive bleeding for older females above 16 years. We know that there is neurological damage. So what is to stop there being an impact of the spike protein on some children’s reproductive development? Some impact on the pituitary gland, the ovaries ability to make eggs, the testes ability to make healthy sperm? There is no research, nor can there be, on the impact on developing fertility in children, given the experimental drug cocktail’s short life to date. If Whitty was asked what will be the impact of this jab on the future fertility of children who are being jabbed during puberty, he could not say. No one can. So why risk anything happening? Especially as has been pointed out ad nauseum, the risk of adverse reaction to the virus itself is very low, and other risks from the jab are higher. When in 10 years we find that some percentage of those jabbed at 12-15 are infertile, who is going to carry the can?
It’s intended.
Well done, Marcus Fysh. I wonder if he has a spare spine anywhere that he could lend to another MP (or perhaps a few could share it)?