Forcing care homes to sack staff who choose not to get vaccinated will create a staffing crisis that could put homes at risk of closing, warns Unison as the Government seems set to march on with its plans. “Staff… say they are heartbroken to have to leave the jobs they love,” says the union, the largest in social care. “However, many feel totally undervalued and bullying is the last straw for them.” GB News has the story.
Unison said ministers were “sleepwalking” into a disaster, and revealed an exodus of staff had already begun.
The union said the controversial mandatory vaccination rule for England was pushing thousands of workers to the brink of quitting care work ahead of the September 16th deadline to get their first vaccination or face losing their job.
Mandatory vaccination has been a “massive distraction” from the job of caring for people, diverting time and resources from employers and the Government, said Unison.
General Secretary Christina McAnea said: “Minister have been told repeatedly that using force instead of persuasion will fail, but they’ve not listened and now their ill-considered policy is backfiring. …
“The Government must scrap the ‘no jab, no job’ rule now. Widespread care home closures could be the consequence if they ignore the warnings.”
Worth reading in full.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
Surely it is illegal to enforce compliance with taking a mandatory, untested, unapproved, experimental vaccine? This needs someone to step up and take the Government to Court. I simply cannot see how the Government could possibly win when the voluntary Nuremburg Code says this cannot be done and three sections of the human rights act say it is illegal.
Again, mandatory is legalise. It is not law. They use that word as scare tactics because they can’t enforce it. Care home workers need to know their rights and not resign or leave. If they are fired, they can sue for unfair dismissal.
You can not be fired for refusing a medical procedure. It’s blackmail which is illegal in its own right. End of.
Excellent point. Why are no newspapers, or more pointedly the Labour party and Unions, screaming about this? It is constructive dismissal and it will lead to the deaths of people in Care Homes.
If this truly is an ongoing population reduction agenda then surely this plays into the overall plans? I have read that Midazolam (promoted by Hancock) was used on the elderly in care homes once the Scamdemic kicked off purely to hasten their deaths. And Remdesivir in the USA, promoted by Fauci.
Sometimes I feel I have slipped into a dystopian parallel universe.
”I have read that Midazolam (promoted by Hancock) was used on the elderly in care homes…purely to hasten their deaths.”
I assume you followed this up with your own independent research since it suggests that nurses are murdering patients with this drug?
Please tell me what other drugs or therapies are available to them for managing terminal agitation and anxiety?
This is a bit from the Bernician:
It is our contention that the excess deaths in the first wave occurred AS A RESULT of the relentless implementation of this policy, which was coupled with the inappropriate use of respiratory depressing medications such as Midazolam during the same period. This is how the excess deaths occurred. They were NOT because of a novel virus, isolation of which, according to long held standards, has never occurred.
It is worth reading the whole article. This portion just touches on it.
The video link doesn’t support the theory that residents were/are being deliberately bumped off with Midazolam.
I haven’t yet looked at the references that were momentarily flashed on screen but they appear to deduce that the amount of people who were dying correlate with the amount of end of life drugs that have been administered for decades to manage end of life symptoms.
Nothing significant about that.
So, given that you believe the entire healthcare system is capable of working in unprecedented collaboration to dispatch elderly patients – at the risk of imprisonment and no personal gain whatever please tell me you’ve presented your evidence to the police or at least CQC?
Also, to avoid succumbing to a healthcare-inspired despatching of your own, what will you have detailed in your Advanced Healthcare Directive to manage terminal agitation or anxiety?
I assume Morphine/Diamorphine is not going to be included in your therapy options?
What will you choose to manage a pain score of 6+ with?
How will you manage terminal agitation and/or anxiety?
Please also tell me how you’ve successfully managed both of these distressing symptoms in actively dying patients or do you believe they should all go out kicking and screaming like the good old days (which they quite literally do with unmanaged symptoms of pain and anxiety).
*Ah, a downvote, however will I cope?
No down tick from me! I want answers! I am going down one rabbit hole after another trying to determine fact from fiction. This site is very useful in helping me with that, though it is an ongoing procedure.
If you look at my original post I say that I have read about Midazolam being used to hasten death. I read that in one of The Bernician posts as follows.
There is of emerging evidence that over 65’s in the UK were targeted for ‘a good death’ by lethal injections of Midazolam and Morphine, thereby creating the illusion that Britain was in the grip of a viral pandemic.
I do not know if there is any truth in it but can’t imagine Michael O’Bernicia making that statement if he has no factual evidence. There was also a supporting video I watched – I reckon it was one of Reiner Fuellmich’s interviews but please give me time to check that out and get back to you.
This is the Fauci/ Remdesivir link
https://www.brighteon.com/7e46be55-1bbd-494b-ac87-20e2b91142a3
And this is MSM article regarding the use of Midazolam in Care Homes
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/12100515/care-homes-accused-sedatives-coronavirus-die-quickly/
https://brandnewtube.com/watch/dr-mike-yeadon-the-alleged-midazolam-murders-in-the-united-kingdom_6OppEqjK2qyJ5aF.html
And this is the wonderful Mike Yeadon giving some further insight
did you not see the video of the health committee where Hancock was giving evidence and was asked if they had ordered enough supplies of Midazolam and he said they had ordered double the usual quantity and had further supplies in the chain????
”I have read that Midazolam (promoted by Hancock) was used on the elderly in care homes…purely to hasten their deaths.”
I assume you followed this up with your own independent research since it suggests that nurses are murdering patients with this drug?
Please tell me what alternative drugs or therapies are available to them for managing terminal agitation and anxiety?
https://www.thebernician.net/midazolam-morphine-mass-murder-by-government-policy/
This is the link. Hope that helps
They (The Tyrants In Charge, The Tyrants In Waiting and the MSM) don’t give a rats arse and are too busy making money from the scamdemic, and feathering their own nests.
They don’t give a rats arse and are too busy overriding science, their own departments, common sense, logic and morals.
They don’t give a rats arse and are too busy making children’s lives an utter misery.
They don’t give a rats arse about the elderly or anyone who looks after them.
It all makes sense when you realise they truly do not give a rats arse about anything or anyone other than their own enrichment.
“It will lead to the deaths of people in care homes” how fucking novel thats not happened before no one gives a shit about old peole or the old before their time mugs who have to look after them thats why the newspapers arent interested and the unions are only interested in closing down schools shops and making peoppl wear masks stuffed
would imagine that is the intended consequence – plan working nicely….
They are using changes to CQC inspection procedures to enforce this requirement.
Also, please be aware, unfair dismissal in England, Scotland and Wales only applies if you have more than 2yrs service (with a few ltd exceptions) and if the employer can prove they have a reasonable case and have followed a fair process, it will be acceptable to an employment tribunal. It doesn’t actually matter at the point of dismissal whether they might prove to be mistaken down the line.
Oh and there will be a entire town of lawyers all helping these poor employees to sue the government will there .Probably not by the time the “democratic”government fail to run a few law changes past the rest of parliamet they wont be able to sue anyone for anything .By the way hows the China made this whole thing up to ruin our economy and boost their own thing going ??
Stupid mornic British people will say “oh thats ok im a fuckwit do what you like to me “So then it isnt illegal ,We became so im allright jack in this country that we didnt realisr we werent allright Jack and now we are paying….. Illegal.. ha! cute.
Medical Consent has three parts to it:
Would any Court really go against Medical Ethics? What kind of can of worms would that open up? Government would be able to decide every medical issue for you and you would have no say.
We really need to accept that the system is completely broken. Broken by the government and the bureaucracy which have overstepped every reasonable mark.
I don’t have any faith in any institution to make all this right. The only way out of this is to decide that we don’t want to live in a state of extreme control, that the world we knew is over and that we are going to have to resist by not complying and rebuild something new and better afterwards.
God help us when did people feel they couldnt say NO FUCK OFF did the virus effect a part of many peoples brains .All the plans by all the goverments in the world will get nowhere if the people being governed refuse the will of such governments .No one will be shot,murdeerd ,tortured or imprisoned for gods sake shake off this ridiculous “inevitability” that has cursed the british people
There is an interesting statement in the Parliamentary Committees Written Evidence
Neither the Coronavirus Act 2020, nor the PHA 1984 grant the executive the power to mandate vaccination. Indeed, section 45E of the PHA 1984 and schedules 18 and 19 of the Coronavirus Act 2020 rule out provisions requiring medical treatment, including ‘vaccination or other prophylactic treatment’.[14]
https://committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/9253/html/
I cannot see how this is legal. Obliging people to take a vaccine or lose their jobs is coercion and must infringe human rights laws.
Dobba’s point below is very pertinent on this:
“Again, mandatory is legalise. It is not law. They use that word as scare tactics because they can’t enforce it. Care home workers need to know their rights and not resign or leave. If they are fired, they can sue for unfair dismissal.
You can not be fired for refusing a medical procedure. It’s blackmail which is illegal in its own right. End of.”
Please see my response to Dobba. A further important point is that once you have been dismissed, it’s more or less a done deal, realistically you’re not likely to get your job back even if you do take the matter to an employment tribunal and they find in your favour. You might just get a payment worth a couple of months salary if it goes your way. Reinstatement is very rare.
This will not pan out like the employers wish though .If thousands refuse then this wil leave an employmet hole that cant be filled .No one who isnt already doing such a dreadful job will want to do it and the only people willing to do it have all been sacked .Interetsing to see how that all works out
UK judges decided many months ago to step aside and stay well away from any of this, when they ruled against all the Keep Britain Free lawsuits.
There is no law now really. Not regarding coronavirus. The government is bullying and intimidating the population, the bureaucracy is backing it up with apps and testing and all kinds of coercive measures.
The only resistance to this is non-compliance and the resulting collapse of they system.
Unstaffed care homes is where it begins.
im inclined to agree .These oafish elites can not see past the point where they get there own way.The boy who holds on to his own football will have no one to play with (not Confucious)
No, no: you are thinking that we live in some sort of democracy in which ethics, morality and laws have some part to play!
easy change the laws
Essentially the Government are lying (no surprises there) to employers. They do not have the right to sack anyone. What are the Labour party doing? Sitting on their hands agreeing with Government. We need complete, root and branch, change in Parliament. This is no longer about which party you support it is about right and wrong and we, as Sceptics, know the difference.
I’m no expert re. the legal issues, but my twitch is about the use of that slippery term ‘emergency‘, which may be the key to opening Mengele’s grave for this most dishonest of governments.
Of course – there is no ’emergency’, and never has been in any sense that relates to the English language as we know it. However, the entire propaganda superstructure has been erected around the notion that there is such a phenomenon – called a ‘pandemic’.
Again, we know that the claimed ‘pandemic’ is only that because the crucial part of the definition (about causing massive death) was altered by fiat of the WHO. The enlightened also know that it’s a funny ‘pandemic’ that has not created a local community ‘epidemic’ in terms of accepted definition.
However, the WHO – that corrupted organisation – and the captured government agencies will most probably hold sway with the judiciary when push comes to shove, even when the notion of an ‘emergency‘ is a patent lie and lacks any rationale. Although versed in the intricacies of semantics and logic, that judiciary is vulnerable in terms of conflicting scientific advice.
That is my fear – if the fundamentals get as far as a legal case – that the claims of non-existent exceptionality may, despite the evidence, overwhelm otherwise irrefutable ethical and legal arguments.
Great Video: worth watching all the way through (approx 21 mins). The fight back is explained from around 17:00 – also available on Youtube (if you still use it) – Fight this on an individual level.
“It is not for nothing that our age cries out for a redeemer personality – for the one who can emancipate himself from the grip of the collective psychosis and save at least his own soul, who lights a beacon of hope for others, proclaiming that there is at least one man who has succeeded in extricating himself from the fatal identity with the group psyche” CARL JUNG
BITCHUTE VIDEO HERE
More useful information, links and resources: https://www.LCAHub.org/
There may be another aspect of this, care homes are expensive and with many residents publicly funded they are costing the government a lot of money. Just maybe the Government would not be unhappy to see the care home sector contract and thus put pressure on families and the charity sector to look after the elderly. There have also been a number of news reports recently about a shortage of home visit carers, here again it is an area where much Government money is spent. So does the Government care if all this contracts? the only problem is that it causes bed blocking in NHS hospitals but there again, these days, if you hang around in an NHS hospital for a while you will probably get covid………..!
THE STRATEGY TO SAVE CARE WORKER’S JOBS
All necessary links below, please share with those in need, this is not cut & dry!
https://www.workersofengland.co.uk/
https://www.workersofengland.co.uk/…/the-strategy-to…/
https://cqc.org.uk/
https://godfreybloom.uk/your-health/
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2021/09/03/librarians-could-asked-work-care-homes-amid-fears-staffing-meltdown/
They’re even trying to force librarians to do care work!
I would not be at all surprised if in the next few months reintroducing national service for school leavers were seriously talked about. It’d be very convenient to have a large supply of extremely cheap labour, which cannot quit, to prop up everything the government has seen fit to destroy over the last year.
Oh, yeah, good idea. Put unqualified, and unwilling people in to do a job they’re entirely unsuited for. What can possibly go wrong?
don’t give them ideas
I suspect that the “plan” (if Saint Boris ever plans anything) is to play for time until the very last moment, while keeping up the propaganda, so that meanwhile more care workers feel pressured into taking their vaccines to keep the peace, and to satisfy the Stasi’s “acceptable percentages”. Then, bingo the U-turn – “actually, we don’t think it’s necessary after all”. Those who are frightened by unvaxed care staff might then withdraw their elderly parents from care homes, which would be exactly what the government wants, especially if they also start hinting at forcibly isolating them again.
Does anyone ever stop and think This virus is load of baloney from start to finsih and how did we get this far with such a shaky plan i do, all the time just coronaflu isnt it from China the nation we have always trusted for great ideas lets lockdown like they did we have no more case all gone they said oh i see any proof nevermind well do it anyway but now we cant stop fucking around with it and pretending its really serious and stuff what are we going to do ???
Withdrawing elderly relatives from a care home won’t be easy, as most people don’t have the space or facilities, or the time to look after their relatives, and by time I mean 24/7 care.
People weren’t actually allowed to take their relatives out of visits though? Are they even allowed in without ppe? Aren’t old people stuck behind Perspex? If you can’t even see someone then I doubt you’ll be allowed to remove them.
Hey let them close the fuckwit government would it seems rather see old peole suffer again and again instead of realisisig this was a phony Chinese economy stunt .Let them close .Then let them explain the sense of it i two years time when they are being prosecuted on mass
I don’t think they care if the homes close. They d care when they allowed all those patients to be sent back to the care homes last April, or that an untold number of elderly were quietly disposed of with midazolam, or another untold number died within days of vaccination….
Ministers don’t care that the JCVI have rejected the mass vaccination of 12-15 year olds, and are going ahead with their plans regardless, getting
ShiftyWhitty to come up with a cover story for them.They are beyond description. What they’ve done and are continuing to do is irrational and illogical unless they only care about forcing digital IDs onto everyone, to force us into a social credit system.
…”disposed of with Midazolam..”
Assuming there are nurses gleefully murdering people in care homes, palliative care centres and medical wards where Midazolam is and has been a commonly used drug for terminal anxiety and agitation you also have to then assume that the nurses who counter-sign these drugs and the nurses who work the next shift, care staff, doctors (as well as the coroner) and pharmacy are all complicit in murder.
That’s one hell of a chain of co-conspirators – don’t you think?!
Who decides (within that chain) who’s murdered that day and how do they all communicate their agreement?
Is there some sort of WhatsApp group where one or more can opt out?!
Don’t worry. There will be thousands of new carers arriving from Afghanistan.
What could possibly go wrong
Ah well, its exactly what the government wanted. As state pensions are one of the governments biggest expenditure, they are now executing a slow death by stealth…disgusting!
Perhaps Unison should have supported it’s members against the Tory and Labour Tyrants and the push to mandate the injections. This care deficit situation may not have arisen.