The anti-lockdown group Back to Normal, which campaigns by delivering postcards door to door by hand – and has delivered over half a million to date – has produced a new postcard (see above). Geoff Cox, one of the organisers of Back to Normal, explains what it’s about:
To take advantage of not having to talk about lockdowns (for the moment), Back to Normal are teaming up with the growing number of medical and scientific voices calling for Ivermectin to become the drug of choice in combating COVID-19. If we can bring this to the attention of doctors, MPs and the general public, there will be no excuse for governments around the world to ignore it any longer. This is a win/win for us as either governments will use Ivermectin and the Covid crisis is over, or they don’t and it will be confirmed that governments are working to a different agenda.
If you are not yet up to speed with Ivermectin, The Ivermectin Story is a shortish video which will show you why we are so excited about this development.
Please order your boxes of postcards for delivery door to door by emailing backtonormalrh@yahoo.com.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
We’ve known about Ivermectin for over a year. This denial has supposedly cost millions of lives and trashed the global economy.
We’re all going to be living like peasants and hundreds of millions in the 3rd world will probably starve to death. They’re not listening any more now than they were then.
The question is: what are we going to do about it?
Assassinating Johnson or Hancock is the only way. Maybe one of those protesting French army officers could be persuaded to help? A Day of the Jackal in the UK.
Or witless, unbalanced and the sage cunts.
It’s all very well executing the monkeys, but how are we going to deal with the obscenely rich and powerful Organ Grinders with their inpenetrable security? Because they haven’t finished with us yet. The attack-society bandwagon rolls on, with the same pro-vaccers, pro-lockdown gullible returning to their previous religion of Climate Change.
We need to support Dr Reinhart Fuellmich in his case for Crimes Against Humanity, exposing the lies of Big Pharma, Big Tech, the big banks and corporations who are involved in stripping we proles of our assets and our lives, under their belief that ‘the bigger the lie, the more the people will believe it’. It’s like a game to these wealthy elite, the people are just like imaginary characters on a computer screen, disposed of with the touch of a keyboard.
Satisfying as this suggestion may seem, as an act of revenge for the devastating harm these two have caused, both to everyone’s health and to the economy it does have a number of disadvantages.
Firstly, any satisfaction you may feel will very quickly be overshadowed by the guilt felt for any friends and relatives who’s world you have just turned upside down.
Secondly and arguably of more importance you will have just created two martyrs giving weight to most if not all of their previous actions and thus almost guaranteeing their replacements will be that much worse.
Thirdly and of most significance however is that you will have just removed any credibility from the hard fought opposition to their devastating interference of all our daily lives.
If this stuff really does everything that is claimed for it, and is proven safe in use, then surely a failure to use it for Covid, either as a treatment or prophylactic, is a complete betrayal of every medical ethic that I’m aware of?
There is a strong case that Ivermectin makes the emergency use of vaccines illegal.
Certainly Dr Peter McCullough in the US has intimated as such as he leads thousands of doctors there in its use. He has made this point to the Senate. It needs a class action in the US to start the ball rolling.
Agree, I found the recent interview with him stunning. If you have the link would be great if you could post it.
In case Dr McCullough is new to anybody, here’s a recent 45-minute interview: https://rumble.com/vgqayr-something-is-up.-therapeutic-nihlism-is-worldwide.html
Found it! https://rumble.com/vgjw85-covid-shot-killing-large-numbers-warns-top-covid-doctor-peter-mccullough.html
Stunning and chilling – a must watch!
The grammar in that sentence is awful.
Curious to see your edit.
I missed an s off the word ‘passports’ when writing the quotation. I’m jumping between writing the odd comment on here and doing my day-time job.
Fixed for free.
Is anyone going to give a reason for disagreeing with my comment?
You’ve confused everyone by talking about grammar.
Your point (but please correct as appropriate) was that the word “now” was superfluous, either since the efficacy of Ivermectin had been established before “vaccines” received temporary authorisation, or (possibly) because CoViD-19 has never been sufficiently serious to warrant vaccination.
Yes, the word ‘now’ is unnecessary because of the very reasons you mention, but I also think it reads badly. I don’t usually make a habit of being overly critical of others’ writing skills, but I want campaigns like this to be successful.
Come on people – we can make it more than 20 down-votes for a completely harmless critique of a poorly worded leaflet!
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Grammar Nazi!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Gv0H-vPoDc
The “now” is there as a nod towards those who have already been vaccinated. We don’t want to put them off from reading the postcard.
But the message is good.
Is a September lockdown still on? My money is on yes.
https://www.indiamart.com
if interested in a bit of self-medication !
https://covid19.onedaymd.com/2021/03/quercetin-and-zinc-zelenko-treatment.html
Quercetin can still be bought online and at health shops.
Is this a joke? FFS, Toby, it’s been mentioned in the comments daily for the past 12 months.
Toby didn’t write this – I did. There are a lot of people who come to LS only occasionally and I am pretty sure there will be many people not yet up to speed with Ivermectin.
The drug regulators, FDA, HMRA, EMA etc. are reluctant to approve Ivermectin out of concern for the effect approval could have on the vaccination program.
Yes, this essentially makes the vaccine rollout illegal and it exposes it for the crime against humanity it truly is. It’s not going to look good and there could be fireworks when the penny drops that 100s of millions of people have been duped into needlessly risking their short, medium and long term health prospects in this global game of Russian Roulette our wonderful leaders have tricked them into playing. I still can’t believe they’ve done this.
Here is an amazing document from Amercia’s Frontline Doctors outlining all the issues with this genetic modification injection insanity from a professional point of view (small section included below:
America’s Frontline DoctorsWhite PaperOn Experimental VaccinesFor COVID-19
https://www.americasfrontlinedoctors.com/wp-content/uploads/Vaccine-PP.pdf
Is the vaccine safe?
Vaccine safety requires proper animal trials and peer-reviewed data, neither of which has occurred during operation warp speed. This is especially concerning considering the fatal failure of prior coronavirus vaccine attempts such as SARS-CoV-1, the virus that is 78% identical to SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19). Prior coronavirus (and other respiratory) vaccines have failed due to the scientific phenomena known as pathogenic priming that makes the vaccine recipient morelikely to suffer a sudden fatal outcome due to massive cytokine storm when exposed to the wild virus. In addition to pathogenic priming there are three other potential safety issues that are being minimized. While we are hopeful thatthe vaccine is both effective and safe, hope is not science. Because these experimental vaccines have not been tested in accordance with the usual standards, we have serious concerns about safety.
Is AFLDS suggesting that the COVID vaccine is unsafe?
No.We are saying that by definition it is unsafe to widely distribute an experimental vaccine, because taking a vaccine is completely different than taking an ordinary medication. In contrast to taking a medication for an actual disease, the person who takes a vaccine is typically completely healthy and would continue to be healthy without the vaccine.As the first rule of the Hippocratic Oath is: do no harm, vaccine safety must be guaranteed. That has not yet happened. More studies of the vaccine’s safety and efficacy should be conducted and published, and more transparency about possible risks provided to the public before Americans enter the largest experimental medication program in our history
“Mass treatment with ivermectin: an underutilized public health strategy”
For anyone who hasn’t yet seen this: https://www.who.int/bulletin/volumes/82/8/editorial30804html/en/
N.B. It’s from 2004 and nothing to do with CoViD-19.
On the face of it, this is a great piece from Toby Young, and really puts paid to my controlled opposition theory. … Unless, Toby’s got wind of some damning evidence against Ivermectin that’s going to come out in the next couple of days!
It most likely is a controlled opposition site but the mainstream media slant it has is actually quite good because for people just dipping their toes in truth who have questions, this is a “heavy” subject and the material is dark, so it’s kind of ying and yang. You get the mainstream lighter slant in the articles, with some decent articles and some questionable ones, then you get the comments section which is pretty loose, not heavily censored and we are free to share what we believe is the truth. It’s not perfect, but nothing ever is
To access the latest evidence on ivermectin via a UK site, go to www.(http://www.bird-group.org), run by Dr Tess Lawrie in Bath, who I’ve been working with. She wrote to Hancock in January about ivermectin but has yet to receive a reply!!) You will also see talks from the recent 1st International Conference on Ivermectin, which she hosted and which featured many leading frontline workers, including Dr Pierre Cory in the US, who has given evidence before Congress. ‘Peyrole’ below is quite correct that the main reason that hapless Hancock and witless Whitty (nevermind the WHO’s latest travesty of an update report) won’t acknowledge it, is that it would stop the rollout of inadequately tested, experimental ‘vaccines’ dead in its legal tracks – just as they have to deny the huge benefit of high-dose vitamin D (despite the 4 main, high-risk groups (the elderly, overweight, BAME and immune-compromised) are all grossly vitamin D deficient. And this despite an Open Letter to governments just before Christmas signed by over 220 of the world’s leading vitamin D experts, who advocate 4-6,000 International Units (IU)/day (https://vitamindforall.org/letter.html ; I will post this on the Vitamin D blog). It really does need a large class action lawsuit to expose this deliberate, criminal suppression of cheap, effective, existing treatments – but which, of course, Big Pharma cannot patent and make huge amounts of money from.
Old style and ‘analogue’ as the Back to Normal campaign may seem, it is deliberately so as we believe this is the only sure way of reaching those who rely on the MSM for all their information.
One positive action you can take to stop this madness is joining the growing army of ordinary citizens delivering these cards. It’s also a chance to meet other like-minded sceptics in your local area for a sane chat.
If you haven’t already done so, please order some cards from backtonormalrh@yahoo.com The website is https://backtonormal.org.uk/
I watched the Ivermectin Story and it was chilling. I would however love to see analysis of the Indian state of Uttar Pradesh, which was singled out as proactively using ivermectin. I can’t find a population adjusted mortality of this state vs others. Does anyone know what is happening in India?
My thoughts exactly, Jane.
If – and it’s a bif if – Uttar Pradesh have been spared the hospitalisations and deaths experienced elsewhere in India – then this really would be extremely telling. Conversely, if the region has similar numbers of hospitalisations and deaths per million as other Indian states, then this suggests the efficacy of Ivermectin might be a tad overstated. Fingers crossed it’s the former and not the latter. Hopefully, someone will be able to follow up on this with an answer!
And here is the Indian government taking Ivermectin off the list in October 2020: https://health.economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/pharma/anti-parasitic-drug-ivermectin-not-to-be-included-for-covid-19-treatment-protocol-health-ministry/78819616
“A government official said, “Many states, for example–Uttar Pradesh, are utilising the drug as off label for treatment purpose and also for prophylaxis use against Covid-19. Now, it has been decided not to recommend ivermectin medicine in the National Clinical Management Protocol for Covid-19 as there is not enough safety and efficacy evidence as per the randomised trials held across the world.”
Ivermectin medicine is an inexpensive and safe drug that is used for the treatment of intestinational parasites and scabies…..
The Central government has already recommended the use of–remdesivir under “investigational therapies” only for restricted emergency use in moderate Covid-19 cases. Another drug called–tocilizumab is being used as off-label for the treatment of Covid patients. Meanwhile, anti-malaria drug hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) is being utilised in patients during the initial stage of infection.”
Ha! Thank you, I thought I remembered reading that Ivermectin was being used successfully in India until it was banned shortly before the vaccine rollout, coincidentally of course. And of course the rapidly rising cases were just another coincidence
It is a nice sentiment but it will never happen. Before it could happen a large number of high ranking politicians of all breeds would have to admit to genocide or at the very least with diminished responsibility. Getting then to admit to minor infractions is next to impossible. They have almost complete control of the media and the most significant portions of the internet. What possible chance is there of any return to normality until the powers that be have engineered a method of claiming victory as a result of their intervention.