• Login
  • Register
The Daily Sceptic
No Result
View All Result
  • Articles
  • About
  • Archive
    • ARCHIVE
    • NEWS ROUND-UPS
  • Podcasts
  • Newsletter
  • Premium
  • Donate
  • Log In
The Daily Sceptic
No Result
View All Result

Leading Scientists Call For End to Lockdown Restrictions

by Toby Young
25 April 2021 12:34 AM

Twenty-two leading scientists and health experts, including Lockdown Sceptics contributors David Livermore, David Paton and Anthony Brookes, have put their names to a letter calling on the Government to end all restrictions on June 21st, including mask wearing and social distancing, and to stop mass testing of healthy people and abandon its vaccine passport proposals. The Mail on Sunday has more.

Leading scientists are calling on the Government to remove all coronavirus restrictions and allow people to ‘take back control of their own lives’ when the ‘roadmap’ to freedom ends in June.

With real-world data showing vaccines reduce the risk of death by 98 per cent and hospitalisations by more than 80 per cent, the experts say Covid-19 is being turned into a ‘mild’ disease in Britain, akin to the flu.

In an open letter to The Mail on Sunday, they criticise ‘confused and contradictory’ messages from Ministers and scientific advisers about the virus, which they say are exaggerating the real threat.

The 22 signatories include Professors Carl Heneghan and Sunetra Gupta from Oxford University, Emeritus Professor Hugh Pennington from the University of Aberdeen and Professor Robert Dingwall from Nottingham Trent University.

“We are being told, simultaneously, that we have successful vaccines and that major restrictions on everyday life must continue indefinitely. Both propositions cannot be true,” the scientists write. “We need to give more weight to the data on the actual success of the vaccines.”

You can read the letter in full here.

The full list of signatories is as follows:

  • Professor Ryan Anderson, Translational Science, Medicines Discovery Catapult
  • Dr Colin Axon, Mechanical Engineering, Brunel University
  • Professor Anthony Brookes, Genomics and Bioinformatics, University of Leicester
  • Professor Jackie Cassell, FFPH, Deputy Dean, Brighton and Sussex Medical School
  • Professor Angus Dalgleish, FRCP, FRCPath, FMedSci, Oncology, St George’s, University of London
  • Professor Robert Dingwall, FAcSS, HonMFPH, Sociology, Nottingham Trent University
  • Professor Sunetra Gupta, Theoretical Epidemiology, University of Oxford
  • Professor Carl Heneghan, MRCGP, Centre for Evidence Based Medicine, University of Oxford
  • Professor Mike Hulme, Human Geography, University of Cambridge.
  • Dr John Lee – formerly Pathology, Hull York Medical School
  • Professor David Livermore, Medical Microbiology, University of East Anglia.
  • Professor Paul McKeigue Genetic Epidemiology and Statistical Genetics, University of Edinburgh
  • Professor David Paton, Industrial Economics, University of Nottingham
  • Emeritus Professor Hugh Pennington, CBE, FRCPath, FRCP (Edin), FMedSci, FRSE, Bacteriology, University of Aberdeen
  • Dr Gerry Quinn, Biomedical Sciences, University of Ulster
  • Dr Roland Salmon, MRCGP, FFPH, former Director of the Communicable Disease Surveillance Centre (Wales).
  • Emeritus Professor John Scott, CBE, FRSA, FBA, FAcSS, Sociology, University of Essex
  • Professor Karol Sikora, FRCR, FRCP, FFPM, Medicine, University of Buckingham
  • Professor Ellen Townsend, Psychology, University of Nottingham
  • Dr Chao Wang, Health & Social Care Statistics, Kingston University and St George’s, University of London,
  • Professor John Watkins, Epidemiology, Cardiff University
  • Professor Lisa White, Modelling and Epidemiology, University of Oxford.

Stop Press: Lucy Johnston, the Health Editor of the Sunday Express, has more on the letter. In addition to asking the Government to drop all restrictions on June 21st, the signatories have demanded that schoolchildren stop being told to wear masks on May 17th.

Stop Press 2: The Sunday Telegraph has splashed the letter on its front page.

Tags: MasksOpen LetterSocial distancing

Donate

We depend on your donations to keep this site going. Please give what you can.

Donate Today

Comment on this Article

You’ll need to set up an account to comment if you don’t already have one. We ask for a minimum donation of £5 if you'd like to make a comment or post in our Forums.

Sign Up
Previous Post

More People Died in U.S. States Which Locked Down Than Those Which Did Not – Here’s Why

Next Post

News Round Up

Subscribe
Login
Notify of
Please log in to comment

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

26 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Username1
Username1
3 years ago

How many tests have been done in the UK? 375 Million. Running at 1.3 million+ per day, it will be about 400 million by New Year. Recent figures are showing 96% negative. This is a typical percentage. It is also not surprising as tests are in the main carried out on people who have no sickness whatsoever. Fraudulent advice has told people:
You can be sick, not know it, yet be a danger to all around you (asymptomatic transmission)
Against all human knowledge prior to 2020, coughing and sneezing are not the only actions to mitigate (by covering face with handkerchief/tissue when coughing or sneezing), but normal, everyday, shallow breathing is a culprit. We must therefore cover up the virus laden nose and mouth all day with a cloth or plasticised paper tissue mask.
If you are one of the 4% then you must isolate from society for a week or two, no matter if you are sick or not. There have been 44 fortnights since March 2020 but it would have only taken 25 for everyone tested positive to have isolated at least once. 

Last edited 3 years ago by Username1
79
-1
twinkytwonk
twinkytwonk
3 years ago
Reply to  Username1

Information requested
Confirm the at cost price to the NHS laboratories the cost of processing our PCR tests for covid 19 and subsequent costs of the genomic sequencing for positive tests all as I said at cost price.

Response
The answer to your question can be found below. We are unable to provide exact costing as this depends on the circumstances described below.

  • PCR Testing Range Average £19 – £43 per test dependant on location of test and type of analyser used.
  • Sequence PCR Sample Average £26 – £69 per test dependant on location of test and type of analyser used.

At £30 per test then that is £39,000,000 per day minimum currently being spent on testing!

one days pcr testing=

2294 heart bypass operations @£17,000 each
3545 replacement hips @£11,000 each
14,444 hernia operations @ 2700 each

The nhs conducts an average of 20,000 heart bypass operations per year ( based on 2000 to 2020 figures) so approximately one week of covid pcr tests costs as much as a the total heart bypass operation expenditure in one year.

Bare in mind that Heart and circulatory diseases cause a quarter of all deaths in the UK, that’s more than 160,000 deaths each year – an average of 460 deaths each day or one every three minutes in the UK.

A five minutes google research reveals how disgusting this whole charade is. 🙁

141
0
Amtrup
Amtrup
3 years ago
Reply to  twinkytwonk

So very very this ^^^^^ !!!

17
0
Hester
Hester
3 years ago
Reply to  twinkytwonk

Really good piece, such a pity the Terrorgraph or the BBC don’t pick this up, but then its not about health

36
0
FarligGods
FarligGods
3 years ago
Reply to  Hester

The media are owned by Blackrock and Vanguard, they own most of the world’s companies from big food to big pharma – they feed you the crap you eat to make you sick to make you need drugs and now have a new plan:
Watch this video: “MONOPOLY – Who owns the world?”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UNg3Vnfu4Pk

Last edited 3 years ago by FarligGods
9
0
David Beaton
David Beaton
3 years ago
Reply to  Hester

They both work for Gates, not the British people.

0
0
karenovirus
karenovirus
3 years ago
Reply to  twinkytwonk

Noises were being made, here and elswhere, about the true costs of ‘free’ testing since they were introduced.
£X or £Y millions means nothing so thanks for supplying those comparisons.

17
0
Username1
Username1
3 years ago
Reply to  twinkytwonk

Thanks Twinkytwonk – great piece of research/writing. Really, what are the mask/lockdown/testing afficionados thinking? Shutting down the Health Service and diverting vast resources to cater for people who aren’t sick?

NB to my earlier post, even at 4% the huge number of tests mean that there have been 15 million positive tests. Can someone explain to the politicians that once you reach even a tiny fraction of that number the time to flatten the curve is perhaps over?

18
0
twinkytwonk
twinkytwonk
3 years ago
Reply to  Username1

5 minutes which is obviously to much time to spend doing some research for the MSM. For anybody that is waiting an operation or has a relative that is. I hope those in charge burn in hell.

16
0
TheyLiveAndWeLockdown
TheyLiveAndWeLockdown
3 years ago
Reply to  twinkytwonk

Dear MSM worm-tongues
THE ABOVE is what real journalism looks like.

Regards,
The British People.

23
0
huxleypiggles
huxleypiggles
3 years ago
Reply to  twinkytwonk

Surely the minimum cost per test should be £45 at least?

£19 plus £26 = £45. So that would be £58,500,000,

What have I missed?

1
0
twinkytwonk
twinkytwonk
3 years ago
Reply to  huxleypiggles

I excluded genomic sequencing as I am unsure of how many they do per number of tests. I expect they will do only maybe one for every 1000 tests conducted.

The numbers therefore are the absolute minimum .

7
0
huxleypiggles
huxleypiggles
3 years ago
Reply to  twinkytwonk

Thank you for your prompt explanation.

4
0
Think Harder
Think Harder
3 years ago
Reply to  twinkytwonk

I really screwed up. I did not invest in Pharma, testing or PPE – damn!

4
0
VAX FREE IanC
VAX FREE IanC
3 years ago
Reply to  twinkytwonk

Excellent post. I might borrow it if you don’t mind?

2
0
Amtrup
Amtrup
3 years ago
Reply to  Username1

Awesome post, thank you!

17
0
TheyLiveAndWeLockdown
TheyLiveAndWeLockdown
3 years ago
Reply to  Username1

You need 5% symptomatic case to be positive to follow the definition of a pandemic.

So it’s not a pandemic.

Last edited 3 years ago by TheyLiveAndWeLockdown
10
0
huxleypiggles
huxleypiggles
3 years ago
Reply to  TheyLiveAndWeLockdown

Indeed, and that’s using WHO guidelines.

3
0
Banjones
Banjones
3 years ago
Reply to  Username1

They could give out ANY exaggerated figures, and there’d be no way of verifying them. Aren’t all the ‘labs’ overwhelmed with all these ‘tests’? How many people are working on them, and where?

0
0
Matt Mounsey
Matt Mounsey
3 years ago

Why is the recovered then vaccinated line so short? Would it show a slide into negative efficacy if it were longer? This “hybrid” or “super” immunity seems to have very little supporting science.

In fact, it seems like a ploy to get the recovered onto the same 3-monthly vaccine schedule as everyone else, when they’ll otherwise have durable immunity for life.

From this study (https://www.rockefeller.edu/news/30919-natural-infection-versus-vaccination-differences-in-covid-antibody-responses-emerge/) we see that the vaccine induced memory B cells stop developing after about 2 months, whereas natural immunity continues to develop for years.

I think the case for this “super” immunity is so thin it just needs a little more prodding and it will fall to pieces. We’re lucky we have a superhuman Dr Will Jones to hold the line and keep prodding for us.

37
0
Milo
Milo
3 years ago
Reply to  Matt Mounsey

Thanks for the link Matt.

“Hope for a future without fear of COVID-19 comes down to circulating antibodies and memory B cells. Unlike circulating antibodies, which peak soon after vaccination or infection only to fade a few months later, memory B cells can stick around to prevent severe disease for decades. And they evolve over time, learning to produce successively more potent “memory antibodies” that are better at neutralizing the virus and more capable of adapting to variants.“

This is similar to what Dr Mike Yeadon has been saying all along and chimed with my understanding of natural immunity. Which makes me struggle to understand why the NI section of vaxx passports only recognises NI following recovery within 6 months of a positive PCR test.

Begs the question A) why do they not know that NI lasts for decades and B) is more potent than a vaxx and capable of responding to variants?

I would feel a letter to my MP coming on but as he didn’t bother to vote against the vaxx passport measures in HoC the other night I fear it would be a waste of time.

9
0
Sandra Barwick
Sandra Barwick
3 years ago
Reply to  Milo

They know. They don’t want the people to know.

1
0
Lucan Grey
Lucan Grey
3 years ago

Politicians don’t deal with science. All they do is absorb and reflect the prejudices of their electorate and tell them what they want to hear.

They are increasingly followers, not leaders.

It’s not science analysis we need; little of that is being done.

We need Psy-ops analysis.

44
0
Julian
Julian
3 years ago
Reply to  Lucan Grey

I think it would have been relatively easy for them not to vaxx kids. There have been myriad chances to declare victory and step back from the folly and evil, and at almost each turn the opposite has been done. The prejudices of the electorate are in part being shaped by what the government is deliberately doing, through their lies, their messages, their falsified stats. For me, the balance of evidence is now overhwhelmingly that we have gone way beyond just following the electorate.

60
0
peyrole
peyrole
3 years ago
Reply to  Julian

Not sure. Just inspect the average response to a Times article in the comments. Some of it is unbelievable.

6
0
Julian
Julian
3 years ago
Reply to  peyrole

Yes, but what has caused the unbelievability of those responses? Surely in large part deliberately egged on by govt lies.

10
0
peyrole
peyrole
3 years ago
Reply to  Julian

Agreed, its self reinforcing

6
0
Jabba the Hut
Jabba the Hut
3 years ago
Reply to  peyrole

I did this in the Guardian the other day. The comments were along the line of they want the unvaxxed to catch covid so that they all die. Obviously Guardian readers are statistically illiterate and nasty middle class wankers.

18
0
Think Harder
Think Harder
3 years ago
Reply to  Jabba the Hut

It’s frightening how nasty people are. It feels like the majority of the population are vicious bullies. It may not be the case but unfortunately it’s the big mouths who seem to set the agenda.

9
0
FarligGods
FarligGods
3 years ago
Reply to  Think Harder

well there was an “electrical torture” experiment done that reveals that 90% of sheeple will inflict pain on others when told to do so by a “person of authority”
This can be interpreted as the sheeple following the herd against the unvaxed

EEFC8ACD-3511-4E46-9CD9-DFEC40B7DFAD.jpeg
3
0
huxleypiggles
huxleypiggles
3 years ago
Reply to  Lucan Grey

That is a complete inversion of the facts.

Government started with a “shock and awe” fear campaign which they have not recinded. They set the tone. The electorate are responding in line with the official propoganda as anticipated by SAGE killers.

Government are indeed “followers” but they are following Davos et al orders. The electorate is largely a herd of sheep and acts accordingly.

12
0
Julian
Julian
3 years ago
Reply to  huxleypiggles

I don’t think it’s a complete inversion in so far as there would have been some pressure from public and media based on what was happening in other countries, just as there was in Sweden. But ut’s undeniable that the govt deliberately stoked panic rather than calming it, so any defence that they had to react as they did for political reasons is untenable IMO.

5
0
Londo Mollari
Londo Mollari
3 years ago

The correct answer to your question is “because he is an immoral bastard.”

53
0
stewart
stewart
3 years ago
Reply to  Londo Mollari

Yes but how so? Given that children are at no risk from this disease and given that the jabs do not stop infection or transmission, then there are three possibilities.

  1. They are acting rationally towards the goal of implementing a global digital ID.
  2. They are acting semi-rationally, knowing that everything they have done so far has been a failure and if they stop know they will be crucified, so might as well push on and hope for the best.
  3. They are acting completely irrationally and are placing all their faith in a group of crazed scientists in a death cult type fashion.

Take your pick.

49
0
A Sceptic
A Sceptic
3 years ago
Reply to  stewart

Personally I think they want to get kids on the treadmill of a digital id and vaccinations for life.

39
0
peyrole
peyrole
3 years ago
Reply to  stewart

There is the possibility that they are all a thick as shit and are blindly following the simple equation that tells them how many need to be vaccinated depending on the R number. With omicron its now going to be about 150% of the population. Which is a bit tricky without exhuming bodies and jabbing the unborn. Not sure they have worked that out.
This would be consistent with your third option.
My guess is its a combo of all 3 options with pressures for no 1 globally.

16
0
Amtrup
Amtrup
3 years ago
Reply to  peyrole

Yes, a thoroughly toxic potent runaway-train combo of all three.

10
0
Amtrup
Amtrup
3 years ago
Reply to  stewart

🙂 ^^^^

5
0
Proveritate
Proveritate
3 years ago
Reply to  stewart

Of course, they must be in one of the categories ‘rational’, ‘semi-rational’ or ‘irrational’ but there are many more possibilities than you give for those three categories. For example, implementing a global digital ID is not the only end that would make their behaviour rational, although it might be part of an overall strategy.

Certainly these are not rational measures if the end is public health since they have done the polar opposite from what their pandemic plan required, and in the full knowledge that it would prolong the pandemic, increase the number of deaths overall, and cause untold misery far worse than if they had stuck to the 2011 pandemic plan. So we can be sure that the response of this government and many others across the world has not been to secure public health because from their own plans (and WHO’s) they all knew that what they were doing was neither evidence based nor best practice. The lurch into lockdowns had no exit route, so one must reasonably suppose that no exit (back to normality) was intended.

Quite often bad things happen because of incompetence. However, there are two factors that mitigate against the ‘incompetence theory’, and those are that general incompetence based on some knowledge and desire for best practice will produce policies that may be sub-optimal, but will in most cases at least be in the right direction, taken as a whole. Secondly, incompetence might be expected in some countries here and there, but not nearly all countries at the same time. I think therefore that the incompetence hypothesis must be disfavoured in this instance.

I would also dismiss the idea that the ruling party merely feels it must push on with a bad policy. Opposition parties would ‘crucify’ them (as you put it) for that, because that’s what opposition parties do – they sniff out and expose weaknesses and inconsistencies, and mounting contrary evidence. Opposition parties love it when ruling parties paint themselves into a corner. But here in the UK we have no credible opposition, and what is the official opposition would adopt all these bad policies and make them even worse.

Thus we have a complete capture of the whole political class, supported by BigTech, BigPharma and the media, to an end that is anything but in the interested of public health.

Last edited 3 years ago by Proveritate
27
0
huxleypiggles
huxleypiggles
3 years ago
Reply to  Proveritate

Excellent post.

3
0
huxleypiggles
huxleypiggles
3 years ago
Reply to  stewart

You neglected to mention the obvious:

Genocide.

8
0
RW
RW
3 years ago
Reply to  stewart

3, obviously. ‘Boris’ is a jelly under irregular pressure from all sides. Hence, he’s deforming in random ways.

2
0
Milo
Milo
3 years ago
Reply to  stewart

All 3 – possibly – 1 definitely

2
0
Think Harder
Think Harder
3 years ago
Reply to  stewart

I vote for 1. but I think that is stage 1.

2
0
David101
David101
3 years ago
Reply to  Londo Mollari

I think the answer is simply, there is no profit in natural immunity. Just follow the money and stop scratching your heads. The more vaccination we take in current times, the more likely we are to need it again (and again and again) in future years – especially pandemic years. Hence nicely setting up Pfeizer and the like and their shareholders to become filthy rich beyond anything you can imagine, while the plebs get battered with the austerity needed to pay for this regular barrage of jabs on a yearly basis.
FOLLOW THE MONEY!

5
0
David101
David101
3 years ago
Reply to  David101

And the same is true of Big Tech, who, along with Big Pharma, stand to absorb the majority of the world’s wealth if there is a demand for stuff like digital IDs.

5
0
tom171uk
tom171uk
3 years ago

Politicians are obsessed with process above outcomes and with seeing to be doing something. They are obsessed with delivering vaccines rather than with achieving immunity.

30
-1
Rogerborg
Rogerborg
3 years ago

Why?

He is only following orders.

26
0
Proveritate
Proveritate
3 years ago
Reply to  Rogerborg

As he said, he had no choice. Sounds like a man with a gun put to his head.

13
0
zners
zners
3 years ago
Reply to  Proveritate

Yeah looks like whoever is running the show will “Epstein” any politician who goes against the grain.

Last edited 3 years ago by zners
9
0
Annie
Annie
3 years ago

The zombie parrots have been trained to squawk ‘vax good, no vax bad’, and as they have no brains, there’s no reason why they should not go on squawking it for ever.

35
0
Aleajactaest
Aleajactaest
3 years ago

“vaccinate children to keep schools open….”

Not, inject (they’re not vaccines) children for their own health??

Not, children have a 0.001% chance of deleterious health outcomes from COVID infection

Not, children have a 7/1 ratio of adverse affects including death to life saved from COVID

Did anyone in the room counterpoint this psychopath?

Stay away from my kids. That’s a red line and a terminal one if they cross it.

Last edited 3 years ago by Aleajactaest
86
0
CoronanationStreet
CoronanationStreet
3 years ago
Reply to  Aleajactaest

Closing schools for a common cold is a political decision based on caving into union demands and as a form of blackmail, the alternative to which is;

Jabbing kids against a common cold which is a political decision made outside of Westminster and the entry requirement for the social credit system.

Neither have anything to do with health or wellbeing of kids.

Johnson should just come clean and admit he’s not in charge.

12
0
Castorp
Castorp
3 years ago
Reply to  Aleajactaest

Time to hit the streets. Join the demonstration.

Sat Dec 18th, 1pm London Parliament Square

Join Telegram groups –
https://t.me/dailyexpose
https://t.me/Not_On_The_Beeb

4
0
Ruth Learner
Ruth Learner
3 years ago

The most infantile of adults blames the children – go and play in the sandpit forever BJ – and stop snivelling.

23
0
PatrickF
PatrickF
3 years ago

Answer: because it’s not about health. Johnson follows his orders.

44
0
Hopeless
Hopeless
3 years ago
Reply to  PatrickF

Not sure about “orders”, but certainly biased and bad advice, presumably so that he can follow his usual practice of blaming everyone except himself.

Being a dedicated cynic, I also consider the cui bono factor aka follow the money.

17
-2
BJs Brain is Missing
BJs Brain is Missing
3 years ago

Johnson is a monster and I look forward to the removal of him as Prime Minister, followed by his eventual trial, and hopefully incarceration. He has been nothing but a disgrace and he has brought great dishonour to this country and Parliament.

The spiritual, psychological, emotional and physical damage he and his ilk have caused will take a generation or two to correct.

He should serve a life-time sentence for what he has done.

Last edited 3 years ago by BJs Brain is Missing
51
0
LovelyGirl
LovelyGirl
3 years ago
Reply to  BJs Brain is Missing

Sadly I don’t think it would matter who was PM at the moment. The system itself would always ensure someone who will do its bidding will be at the top.

16
0
zners
zners
3 years ago
Reply to  BJs Brain is Missing

Nothing to do with him. He’s a sheep like the rest of them. We need a UK version DeSantis

Last edited 3 years ago by zners
17
0
BJs Brain is Missing
BJs Brain is Missing
3 years ago
Reply to  zners

I know, but a start has to be made at some point. At the moment it is far too easy for those who are complicit in these crimes against humanity, and they are getting away with it.

8
0
huxleypiggles
huxleypiggles
3 years ago
Reply to  BJs Brain is Missing

I agree with your comments largely however I think the psychological, emotional and physical changes wrecked upon the people of these islands will be pretty much irreversible and certainly not undone in just two generations.

Some of us will at least die with fond memories of the freedoms we enjoyed but for the young the future looks fugly however this pans out.

6
0
Emerald Fox
Emerald Fox
3 years ago
Reply to  BJs Brain is Missing

Watch your words or Boris will get his mate Darius Guppy to crack a couple of your ribs! Etonian thugs, that’s all they are.

1
0
Sandra Barwick
Sandra Barwick
3 years ago
Reply to  BJs Brain is Missing

And Starmer. But Boris much more, obviously.

0
0
cornubian
cornubian
3 years ago

They were always coming for our children. They can kill off the old ones but they also need to control the future so they dont have to do this all over again. Billions of plebs are consuming too many of the resources the elite wish to keep for themselves. This is why they meet regularly to discuss ways of lowering the population under the guise of sustainability. Prince Philip said he wanted to be reincarnated as a virus to kill billions of people. Obama’s Chief Scientific Officer John Holdren called for forced abortions, “compulsory sterilization,” and the creation of a “Planetary Regime” that would oversee human population levels. He also hatched a plan to secretly add sterilising agents to US water supplies. Johnson himself said that he would not shy away from tackling the difficult questions when it comes to depopulation. If this is what they say in public, just imagine what they plan in secret.

william too many people.png
35
0
karenovirus
karenovirus
3 years ago
Reply to  cornubian

He got the depopulation stuff from his dad who wrote a book about it in the 1980s.

12
0
karenovirus
karenovirus
3 years ago
Reply to  karenovirus

Correction, that was bozo and his dad, Charlie probably soaked it up though.

3
0
Rowan
Rowan
3 years ago
Reply to  karenovirus

Yes, Stanley spent most of his working making a killing out of advocating depopulation.

0
0
Sandra Barwick
Sandra Barwick
3 years ago
Reply to  Rowan

While personally repopulating.

1
0
FlynnQuill
FlynnQuill
3 years ago
Reply to  cornubian

Prince William, the man who breeds like a f@king Rabbit. His wife must a have fanny like a wizard’s sleeve!!

Two words William F@ck Off!

14
-1
TheyLiveAndWeLockdown
TheyLiveAndWeLockdown
3 years ago
Reply to  cornubian

People who say “There’s too many people” for some reason rarely take their own advice.

Last edited 3 years ago by TheyLiveAndWeLockdown
10
0
huxleypiggles
huxleypiggles
3 years ago
Reply to  cornubian

Spot on.

2
0
huxleypiggles
huxleypiggles
3 years ago
Reply to  cornubian

How is it these population reduction merchants never volunteer to show us plebs the way?

4
0
stewart
stewart
3 years ago

In the last days of the 3rd Reich, Hitler sent teenagers to be butchered by the Soviet army knowing full well all was lost.

His best mate Goebbels killed his own children,

People can do some truly horrific things when they are desperate and not thinking straight.

28
-1
karenovirus
karenovirus
3 years ago
Reply to  stewart

The Germans have recently shown themselves the funny side of that. See their movie Jo Jo Rabbit.

Last edited 3 years ago by karenovirus
5
0
karenovirus
karenovirus
3 years ago

o/t but after months of being told that my very larger GP Practice is only ‘commissioned’ to provide boosts for 75yo+. This text arrived (presumably to their entire patient list) indicating all of their resources are suddenly being transferred to the booster programme.

That this is political in nature is made clear by their opening remarks about bozo Speech To The Nation and their bizarre assumption that everyone watched it.

20211216_074310.jpg
19
0
twinkytwonk
twinkytwonk
3 years ago
Reply to  karenovirus

What fucking idiot thought that it was a good idea to commandeer GP surgeries to do the vaccine when there are village halls etc empty?

15
0
karenovirus
karenovirus
3 years ago
Reply to  twinkytwonk

I don’t know where the boosts will take place but if they are ‘discouraging’ routine appointments the GPs might as well stay home since they won’t be doing lowly jabs themselves.

It occurs to me that this sudden rush to get involved, at the expense of everything else, must mean the government has finally come up with a sufficient BRIBE.

9
0
Hopeless
Hopeless
3 years ago
Reply to  karenovirus

Probably the use of GP surgeries, irrespective of who wields the needles, will provide the GPs with £15 per injection. A nice little earner, in much the same way as being paid to have “patients” on the books, for whom medical advice and treatment is now not provided.

9
0
karenovirus
karenovirus
3 years ago
Reply to  Hopeless

The first two jabs earned Practices £25 a pop.
I imagine they have been holding out for more like that before becoming more involved.
The profits, of course, will all be going to the Partner GPs but at least the others will be able to put their feet up until the New Year.

3
0
Sandra Barwick
Sandra Barwick
3 years ago
Reply to  Hopeless

It’s £30, isn’t it, for boosters?

1
0
ComeTheRevolution
ComeTheRevolution
3 years ago
Reply to  twinkytwonk

Likely the same person who drew up the protocol for registering Covid deaths as any death within 28 days of a positive PCR test regardless of actual cause of death. Whoever that person or those people are have blood on their hands and should be hounded by the forces of good trying to re-instate the law in this country. We have a right to know the names faces and connections of the people actively engineering these crimes, blatantly undermining British democracy and law, they need to be named and shamed and prosecuted

Last edited 3 years ago by ComeTheRevolution
7
0
karenovirus
karenovirus
3 years ago
Reply to  ComeTheRevolution

The “28 days” thing was a humiliating climbdown for Hancock and others who took a month to confess that until then anyone who died of anything at any time into the future who had tested positive was put down as Covid dead.

The catalyst for the climbdown was when it was pointed out that if bozo, ‘Covid Survivor, was subsequently assassinated or run over a bus he would count as Covid dead.

UK total Covid deaths overnight (June/July 2020 from memory) went down from 60k to 40k as a direct result.

1
0
Emerald Fox
Emerald Fox
3 years ago
Reply to  twinkytwonk

Churches too – they are very keen on ‘vaccination’ these days – The Baptism of Pfizer.

7
0
Amtrup
Amtrup
3 years ago
Reply to  karenovirus

Good point ref assumption that watch TV, govt press conference news, etc.

5
0
huxleypiggles
huxleypiggles
3 years ago
Reply to  karenovirus

How perversely, utterly SICK is that?

“Grab a jab.”

Talk about demeaning a life threatening procedure.

7
0
karenovirus
karenovirus
3 years ago
Reply to  huxleypiggles

Yeah, I noticed but not yet looked into “Grab a Jab”.
Wasn’t “Grab a Bag” the tagline for a confectionery advert many years ago?

Update on this post to be posted on lead article in a few minutes.

2
0
huxleypiggles
huxleypiggles
3 years ago
Reply to  karenovirus

👍

1
0
Emerald Fox
Emerald Fox
3 years ago
Reply to  huxleypiggles

Talking of sick… let’s not forget this old tripe:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CPjoQ3XpzkM

1
0
Emerald Fox
Emerald Fox
3 years ago

The UK Government have been told to buy these so-called ‘vaccines’ – probably bribed and threatened to do so. That is all. Like every other government around the world.

So… what next? I reckon this:

Next Saturday there will be a bit of placard waving in Parliament Square and shouts of “Freedom!” By 4pm people will start thinking about what time they should leave to catch their train home.

Boris and pals are going to have a go at jabbing the 5-11 year olds in the New Year. People will moan and groan about this, but no-one will actually stop them, just as nobody stopped them from jabbing the 12 year olds and up.

Lots of people will get their 3rd ‘booster’. No-one will know the percentage as both the ‘official’ figures, and those given by the ‘opposition’ are made up. Those who have had their 3rd shot will have their ‘Vaxx Passes’ extended and be rewarded with ‘privileges’ that the ‘unvaxxed’ will not have.
Those who don’t want these ‘vaccines’ will either be persecuted, or just ignored… new generations are growing up all the time, teachers are indoctrinating kids to believe in face masks, regular ‘vaccines’ for ‘Covid’, this is becoming their world now. They will not know how life was pre-March 2020.

By Christmas 2022 people will be seeking their 5th ‘vaccine’. The 12 year olds will be on their 3rd ‘vaccine’ by then. Sending e-mails to your MP more than once a year will be outlawed, labelled as ‘harrassment’. On-line discussion forums will be more closely monitored for signs of ‘dissent’. Travel restrictions will still be in force. People will be ‘encouraged’ not to travel abroad but instead be left scratching their heads and thinking about how they can pay their electricity, water and gas bills, and driving less to save on petrol costs.

Not very cheery, but, I think, sounds realistic.

47
0
stewart
stewart
3 years ago
Reply to  Emerald Fox

Wouldn’t bet heavily against it.

9
0
Proveritate
Proveritate
3 years ago
Reply to  Emerald Fox

What is being said publicly about this pseudopandemic does not align with what is known and never has.

On December 10 the UKHSA published details showing that those who had received two doses of the AZ vaccine now had deeply negative vaccine effectiveness against Omicron, so negative that for much of the time it was off the scale (worse than minus 60%). It is completely official and known therefore (but not disclosed publicly to the masses) that the government have induced people to take a drug that makes them much more likely to contract Omicron than if they had never been vaccinated.

The next day (December 11) a report was published co-authored by Jonathan Van-Tam showing that vaccination suppresses antibodies to Omicron – that every person studied except one who had been double vaccinated with AZ produced no antibodies (or, strictly, the amount was below the detection threshold). He also admitted that he had no idea what the booster shot would do. Here are his words with my bold:

In summary, there was a substantial fall in neutralisation titres in recipients of both homologous AZD1222 and BNT162b2 primary courses, with evidence of some recipients failing to neutralise at all…This will likely lead to increased breakthrough infections in previously infected or double vaccinated individuals, which could drive a further wave of infection…it should be noted that higher transmission, will inevitably lead to increased numbers of cases and greater burden on health systems, even without proportional changes in severity. The impact of a third-dose vaccine is currently unknown…

So there you have it – a vaccine policy that is increasing infection in the population, and a medical officer who hasn’t a clue what the booster will do to address that self-induced problem.

That’s not what we are being told, is it?

17
0
John001
John001
3 years ago
Reply to  Proveritate

Do you have any links for those?
If yes, I’ll post on another forum where they’re fussy about people saying where they got their info from.
Thanks.

2
0
Proveritate
Proveritate
3 years ago
Reply to  John001

https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1040076/Technical_Briefing_31.pdf

https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.12.10.21267534v1.full.pdf

Here are extracts of images showing just what two does of AZ vaccine did in respect of vaccine effectiveness against Omicron – note how deeply negative.

See separate response for image of the effect of two doses of AZ on neutralization of four variants, ‘Victoria’, Beta, Delta, and Omicron. The dashed horizontal line is the limit of detectability.

AZ against delta and omicron.jpg
4
0
Proveritate
Proveritate
3 years ago
Reply to  Proveritate

Effect of two doses of AZ on neutralization of four variants, ‘Victoria’, Beta, Delta, and Omicron. The dashed horizontal line is the limit of detectability.

AZ against variants.jpg
3
0
JaneDoeNL
JaneDoeNL
3 years ago
Reply to  Proveritate

Yesterday there was a live technical briefing by the Dutch OMT, where MPs could ask questions. They showed Figure 7 from England tech. briefing 31 to indicate how serious things were and that boosters were necessary – also used Pantsdown’s calculations for the gazillion people a day that could end up being introduced into hospital, saying that could lead to 600 admissions a day here in NL – I think the highest we ever had was around the 200 mark in the very first wave.

In any event, one MP, I believe a member of the party most critical of all of this nonsense, said the figure showed negative effectiveness, what did that mean. The prof. heading the OMT just said that was wrong, it was zero. The MP asked again, pointing out that it clearly shows negative, the prof. again said no, it did not go beyond zero. Utterly ludicrous – why show a figure you are claiming is incorrect, or if nothing else, explain why it shows negative but the expert showing it believes there is nothing below zero. Literally telling us not to believe what we see with our own eyes.

Not overly impressed that the person who put the slides together couldn’t be bothered to change the PHE England at the top to the new name.

6
0
The old bat
The old bat
3 years ago
Reply to  Emerald Fox

I said similar to my husband. He thinks I am being dramatic. Consequently we are both going to do a list of predictions for 2022 and see who gets the most right. Unfortunately the prize is unlikely to be the holiday in St Lucia we had planned (or anywhere, come to that – how long before even British hotels and holiday rentals are only accessible to the vaccinated?)

1
0
snipola
snipola
3 years ago
Reply to  Emerald Fox

Not cheery – but I am going on Saturday just to see and be with like minded people and remind myself that i am not alone.

7
0
PhantomOfLiberty
PhantomOfLiberty
3 years ago

Utterly unethical, disgraceful. First do no harm anybody? Whitty’s original argument for vaccinating the children was psychiatric – this was also the argument for bringing in masks. Nothing to do medical benefit.

Last edited 3 years ago by PhantomOfLiberty
26
0
Dobba
Dobba
3 years ago

I’m not sure why the question has to be asked but it’s pretty simple now:

If children are vaccinated with this they’re already in the system from an early age. Getting as many people jabbed is the end game. I know Toby doesn’t like to think it’s some sort of global agenda and more down to incompetence, but you’d have to be pretty thick and brainwashed by it all now to not think otherwise with what’s happening around the world.

38
0
Will
Will
3 years ago
Reply to  Dobba

Even if you don’t believe in the WEF conspiracy, which I don’t, getting kids jabbed is still all about getting them into the system, the system of three monthly boosters for ever. Getting two shots into kids was probably a condition of Pfizer granting the UK preferential supply. There will be a new round of vaccination in the spring against the Omicron scariant; everyone will return to zero and travel will be dependent on two doses of the Omicron vaccine.

They will tell everyone, “this time it will work” (it won’t) and the sheeple will queue up. Then it will be omicron boosters every three months until the next scariant comes along and it will be rinse and repeat, again…

19
-2
DanClarke
DanClarke
3 years ago
Reply to  Dobba

They’ve made no secret of wanting a global passport for many years, the secret was how they would do it and now we know. For individuals now who are critical thinkers, it to stay out of the system. No one knows if it will work, it may not or not as well as they think, so staying out it if possible seems to be the best plan.

17
0
steve_z
steve_z
3 years ago

everybody should get out and about – lets have this thing wrapped up by New Year

15
0
Stephensceptic
Stephensceptic
3 years ago

My read of behaviour is that many people are not afraid of the virus (if that is even the cause of this illness) but are afraid of a positive test.

Various lunches I was due to attend were canceled last week because people who were planning to travel overseas for Christmas did not want to run the perceived risk of a positive test from human interaction. It is a rational reaction to what is going on if one believes in the Germ Theory model.

The government has literally gone off the rails though. It is embarrassing to watch. They are behaving the way that demagogues in the past behaved with respect to wars on foreign countries.

Tom Cowan (one of the proponents of the view that viruses are not the cause of illness but poisons are) describes this as a pandemic of not thinking. I see very few data points that contradict this.

The only silver lining is that a large number of MPs seem to be seeing through this now and there is serious political opposition. Reader comments in newspapers such as The Telegraph (whose news desk position is to fuel the panic) seem almost overwhelmingly sceptical.

Just a couple of reflections ought to make people stop and think:

  1. Government is not talking about positive test percentages, just absolute numbers
  2. The test has an inherent bias to produce false positives and is calibrated against itself not on any objective measure of a virus in nature
  3. Nobody has managed to show that the virus they have associated with the genetic sequence that the test finds is itself the “cause” of any illness either.

This whole thing is mad. Whatever caused people to die of new symptoms in early 2020 has not been understood. That is the biggest travesty and no one with serious resources is looking either.

22
0
Horse
Horse
3 years ago

Boris Calls For Vaccination of Children to Keep Schools Open – But Why When Almost All of Them Have Had the Virus?
Because, as I posted elsewhere, this is not about a virus. Johnson and the Cabinet are abusing the secondary legislation process to trample all over British freedoms at the behest of globalist institutions. We need people who are senior in the government machine to start pressuring Johnson to stand down, now. It might seem unthinkable, but it’s time to stop this insanity, including the abuse of our Constitution that is allowing it, and if that means a major overhaul of things, then so be it. The government is failing the people and it’s time for a shake up.

30
0
Chris_uk
Chris_uk
3 years ago
Reply to  Horse

And who will we get if Johnson goes? There are plenty worse!

1
0
karenovirus
karenovirus
3 years ago
Reply to  Chris_uk

Gove or Sunak would not even be mildly amusing on occasion.

1
0
Emerald Fox
Emerald Fox
3 years ago
Reply to  Chris_uk

Don’t go, Boris – we love you!!!

stockholm.jpg
0
0
Horse
Horse
3 years ago

Boris Calls For Vaccination of Children to Keep Schools Open – But Why When Almost All of Them Have Had the Virus?

Perhaps Bojo should read this, from Dr. Robert Malone, inventor or mRNA vaccine therapy:

“My name is Robert Malone, and I am speaking to you as a parent, grandparent, physician and scientist. I don’t usually read from a prepared speech, but this is so important that I wanted to make sure that I get every single word and scientific fact correct.
I stand by this statement with a career dedicated to vaccine research and development. I’m vaccinated for COVID and I’m generally pro-vaccination. I have devoted my entire career to developing safe and effective ways to prevent and treat infectious diseases.
Before you inject your child – a decision that is irreversible – I wanted to let you know the scientific facts about this genetic vaccine, which is based on the mRNA vaccine technology I created.
There are three issues that parents need to understand before they take this irrevocable decision.
The first is that a viral gene will be injected into your children’s cells. This gene forces your child’s body to make toxic spike proteins. These proteins often cause permanent damage in children’s critical organs, including:

  • Their brain and nervous system.
  • Their heart and blood vessels, including blood clots.
  • Their reproductive system.

And most importantly, this vaccine can trigger fundamental changes to their immune system.
The most alarming point about this is that once these damages have occurred, they are irreparable.
You can’t fix the lesions within their brains.
You cannot repair heart tissue scarring.
You cannot repair a genetically reset immune system, and this vaccine can cause reproductive damage that could affect future generations of your family.
The second thing you need to know about is the fact that this novel technology has not been adequately tested.
We need at least 5 years of testing/research before we can really understand the risks associated with this new technology. The harms and risks from new medicines often become revealed many years later.
I ask you to ask yourself, as a fellow parent, if you want your own child to be part of the most radical medical experiment in human history.
One final point: the reason they’re giving you to vaccinate your child is a lie. Your children represent no danger to their parents or grandparents.
It’s actually the opposite. Their immunity, after getting COVID, is critical to save your family, if not the world from this disease.
In summary: there is no benefit for your children or your family to be vaccinating your children against the small risks of the virus, given the known health risks of the vaccine that as a parent, you and your children may have to live with for the rest of their lives.
The risk/benefit analysis is not even close with this vaccine, for children. As a parent and grandparent, my strong recommendation to you is to resist and fight to protect your children.

35
0
karenovirus
karenovirus
3 years ago
Reply to  Horse

Please flag this up to Topy and the team (beyond my skills on an Android).
It deserves much wider exposure.

3
0
NeilofWatford
NeilofWatford
3 years ago

Why?
To perpetuate rhe myth that vaxxes stop transmission.
To sell more vaccines.
To create vax dependency.
To instill fear.
See the graphic for Dr Robert Malone (inventor of MRNA vaxxing) advice …

IMG_20211214_085055_727.jpg
Last edited 3 years ago by NeilofWatford
16
0
helenf
helenf
3 years ago

Anyone else feel uneasy when they see that message “get boosted now” on Boris’s lecturn? Not just the content of the message, or the colours and chevrons used, but what’s with the yellow “O”? Is it supposed to stand for Omicron? Is it an all-seeing eye looking out for those dirty refuseniks? Whatever it is, I’m sure it’s some kind of brazen psychological manipulation of the masses intended to subconsciously influence people’s behaviour, maybe trying to reach those not yet hypnotised by these bastards.

24
0
Horse
Horse
3 years ago
Reply to  helenf

I saw the big yellow O as well and wondered what it meant.

10
0
huxleypiggles
huxleypiggles
3 years ago
Reply to  Horse

Well it appears none of us on here know what the big yellow “O” stands for therefore I conclude it’s a huge bloody failure.

2
0
karenovirus
karenovirus
3 years ago
Reply to  huxleypiggles

Yet again the propaganda slogan comes in threes, as thought by Mr Goebbels.

Last edited 3 years ago by karenovirus
2
0
huxleypiggles
huxleypiggles
3 years ago
Reply to  karenovirus

Ah, of course.

Re the capital ‘O,’ perhaps it’s a little Davos spin on “Oww, that hurt.”

Hurt as in dead. They do like their hidden in plain sight jokes.

C O V I D – confirmation of vaccine I D.

OMICRON – Moronic.

Cominarte – come here naughty. And others.

3
0
Emerald Fox
Emerald Fox
3 years ago
Reply to  Horse

It means you will Own nothing and be happy miserable.

5
0
karenovirus
karenovirus
3 years ago
Reply to  helenf

All Seeing Eye?

Further to my post above about my GP Practice suddenly getting all keen on boosting everyone while ignoring all other actual ailments.
Less than 24 hours after receiving my digital link to book my booster they have sent me a personalised reminder because they ‘know’ that I have ignored it.
How much more such harassment will I have to undergo while they ignore my requests for action for real dicomforting and dangerous conditions?

6
0
TheyLiveAndWeLockdown
TheyLiveAndWeLockdown
3 years ago
Reply to  karenovirus

“Oddly” i have received no communications but i did ignore TnT and all previous invitations to harm my health with a clot shot.

1
0
grob1234
grob1234
3 years ago

People at large are purely and simply brainwashed.

My opposite neighbours yesterday: oh we have taken out son out of school. There’s so much covid around and we wanted to be safe for Christmas.

My wife’s friend on declining her little boy to come and play with our boy: oh well we are quite a vulnerable family so we won’t…

Chap on the phone: it’s probably best working from home, much safer than being in the office with all this covid about.

I will explode soon at some stupid covidian when they sprout this utter crap!!!!

31
0
Prester John
Prester John
3 years ago

Meanwhile, Johnson’s MPs have a plan. We will, overall, agree to whatever you put forward so long as you threaten to do something worse.

12
0
Hopeless
Hopeless
3 years ago

Of course, we do have a Parliament and, supposedly, a matching bunch of lacklustre individuals across the aisle jokingly known as “The Opposition”. Starmer is no less culpable for a lot of this than Johnson, with Labour now Red Tories, and falling in with just about everything, including this monstrous idea.

Mike Graham on TalkRadio this morning was speaking to some political commentator, whose name I missed, and posited the question as to why Starmer didn’t side with the Tory rebels to bring down Johnson. I nearly choked on my toast when the reply was that Starmer/Labour wouldn’t want to be seen “playing politics with public health”. That rotten crew have done nothing but.

19
0
Horse
Horse
3 years ago
Reply to  Hopeless

The real problem is the near-total by-passing of parliamentary scrutiny and votes by the Cabinet’s abuse of secondary legislation. Blair started it. Everyone since then, including this fat clown, have been steadily destroying the very careful and delicate balance of power in Britain.

11
0
RickH
RickH
3 years ago
Reply to  Horse

No. It started way back in the Thatcher era, and has grown ever since.

0
-2
Capecorona
Capecorona
3 years ago

Current thoughts on quarantining by reputable experts in the land of Omnicron: quaratining(self isolating) because someone near you tested positive is completely pointless, as is contact tracing. Obviously even more so for children. https://www.dailymaverick.co.za/article/2021-12-15-covid-19-in-south-africa-its-time-to-ditch-quarantining-and-contact-tracing/
And if test positive only isolate for 5 days.
https://www.dailymaverick.co.za/article/2021-12-15-public-health-experts-propose-relaxing-existing-covid-regulations/
Sadly they do still go on about masks indoors(and vaccines).
Currently case fatality rate in Western Cape with Omnicron is less than 2% of the rate in previous waves.
Time to endure a common cold and get on with life.

8
0
DanClarke
DanClarke
3 years ago

Getting governments to spend their money on vaccines instead of all of the other necessary operations and health treatments seems to be the plan. Then to pay for all of the continuing vaccines, charge people more for everything else. Its not about a virus its about the money

Last edited 3 years ago by DanClarke
10
0
nobber10
nobber10
3 years ago

This is why nobody, never mind children shouldn’t get vaccinated, and it disproves the governments claims that vaccines save lives.
These figures are taken from official government data that any one can access.
UK Figures
1/1/20 to 7/12/20 ( before vaccination started ) 61,434 covid deaths
8/12/20 to 13/12/21 ( vaccination ) 85,043 covid deaths 23,609 more deaths
World Figures.
1/1/20 to 31/12/20 ( Mostly no Vaccination ) 1,951,575 covid deaths
1/12/21 to 13/12/21 ( Mass Vaccination ) 3,377,562 deaths. 1,825,987 more deaths

6
0
The Meissen Bison
The Meissen Bison
3 years ago

It’s all very well for Boris Johnson to play fast and loose with the health of children – at the rate he knocks them out he can afford to lose one or two.

16
0
iane
iane
3 years ago
Reply to  The Meissen Bison

Well, a reduction in the Johnson gene pool certainly has its attractions.

9
0
FrankFisher
FrankFisher
3 years ago

NO NO NO.

No Boris, no. Keep away from my children, keep away from me. There is no possible scientific rationale for jabbing kids for a bug they have almost certainly already been exposed to an likely have already had AND that does them no damn harm.

11
0
iane
iane
3 years ago

Why is it a good idea? Stupid question: those backhanders won’t keep coming if the stabbings aren’t ramped up further and faster.

6
0
I am Spartacas
I am Spartacas
3 years ago

I believe this to be politics – he wants to keep the schools open regardless of the evidence that children are at very low risk from this virus and its variants – even if that means jabbing millions of kids with an experimental vaccine – he needs to be seen doing something. The common sense thing to do would be to state the fact that kids are at zero risk but he knows the Labour backing teachers unions won’t have any of it so I believe he wants kids jabbed to appease the unions.

No coincidence that the recent restrictions came about when it was being revealed that the Johnson Junta were having boozy wine and cheese partys while the rest of the country were told to cancel Christmas in 2020 – it was a political move to save his arse. Senselessly jabbing millions of kids is no coincidence either – this is a political game for Johnson who wants to save his failing premiership.

Johnson is a lying self-serving twisted narcissist who will say and do anything to remain in power.

Last edited 3 years ago by Ember von Drake-Dale 22
14
0
Horse
Horse
3 years ago
Reply to  I am Spartacas

Johnson is a lying self-serving twisted narcissist who will say and do anything to remain in power.

And that’s his good side.

9
0
John001
John001
3 years ago

‘We are trying to roll this booster out at speed and at pace’.

That was just broadcast on BBC R4 Woman’s Hour … I must go & turn the bloody propaganda off, as I do when R4 goes off the rails.

Also, I heard earlier, another suggestion that it’s totally safe for pregnant woman.

Er, that wasn’t what Pfizer said, was it?

13
0
Sforzesca
Sforzesca
3 years ago

Hitler Youth.
Human shields.
Helps save the NHS.
Helps keep the fear going.
Helps please the Puppet Masters.

And err, that’s it.

Last edited 3 years ago by Sforzesca
7
0
Gregoryno6
Gregoryno6
3 years ago

Meanwhile, here in the Western Lands, we’re wondering who ordered fear porn with extra fear porn and a side of intimidation.
You hear that sound? That’s the ticking of a clock that will toll for unvaccinated West Aussies at 12.01.am on Saturday, February 5.
Recommended if you want a good laugh.
And to think McClown got nicknamed ‘Sneakers’ because HE was a gold-medal brown nose. Ben O’Shea is so far up Masky Mark he can see daylight when the Premier speaks.

7
0
TheyLiveAndWeLockdown
TheyLiveAndWeLockdown
3 years ago
Reply to  Gregoryno6

Those with nothing left to lose have EVERYHTING to gain.

5
0
Gregoryno6
Gregoryno6
3 years ago
Reply to  TheyLiveAndWeLockdown

I’m not sure whether you’re referring to the citizens or idiot journalists like Ben O’Shea. Personally, after his bucketload of BS article, I’d say Ben feels the walls closing in more than any vax averse Australian.

1
0
Barbara Baker
Barbara Baker
3 years ago

Ok, so it’s time to kill some kids, because none were dying of covies…..

7
0
huxleypiggles
huxleypiggles
3 years ago

By this very announcement Bozo has confirmed he is guilty of crimes against humanity. He has been warned by countless, respected sources NOT to vaccinate children.

If we ever get the bastard in court he’s had it.

9
0
Emerald Fox
Emerald Fox
3 years ago
Reply to  huxleypiggles

“If we ever get the bastard in court he’s had it.”

How so, if all the judges are corrupt?

3
0
DanClarke
DanClarke
3 years ago

When you read the propaganda out there during WW11, even in what were msm then, this is very similar

4
0
martinbritnell83
martinbritnell83
3 years ago

I’d be more than happy to keep my child out of school forever if it means she needs to be vaccinated just to attend. Straw haired wanker!

Last edited 3 years ago by martinbritnell83
4
0
Moist Von Lipwig
Moist Von Lipwig
3 years ago

Why? Because he’s Prime Domestic Abuser Kim Jong Johnson, that’s why.

3
0
ThisIsMyName
ThisIsMyName
3 years ago

But Why When Almost All of Them Have Had the Virus?

Yeah never mind the criminal abuse aspect of the “vaccines” eh?

2
0
Castorp
Castorp
3 years ago

Time to hit the streets. Join the demonstration.

Sat Dec 18th, 1pm London Parliament Square

Join Telegram groups –
https://t.me/dailyexpose
https://t.me/Not_On_The_Beeb

5
0
David Beaton
David Beaton
3 years ago

Vaccinating children = Evil. No other word.

Those who advocate it = Evil or just Ignorant

7
0
Gregoryno6
Gregoryno6
3 years ago
Reply to  David Beaton

Not merely ‘ignorant’. At this point they have to be considered willfully ignorant.

2
0
Tyrbiter
Tyrbiter
3 years ago

It’s the unions, because of school’s behaving as essential childcare for people who work allowing them to close under union threat is essentially shutting down much of the country’s economy.

This needs to be better known and then perhaps the PM (whoever that is) would have more support to allow the unions to be faced down. If you want more on this look for Ben Irvine on YouTube or @BenIrvineAuthor on Twitter. He’s got the measure of the mad Marxists in the NEU and other unions.

1
0
huxleypiggles
huxleypiggles
3 years ago
Reply to  Tyrbiter

I was saying much the same last Summer but what you miss is that the teaching unions have clearly been given the nod by Bozo and chums to act as they do.

The unions claim they are protecting the nation’s health and Bozo can claim it’s not his fault – it woz the Unions. Honest.

2
-1
RickH
RickH
3 years ago

I find the tone of this piece a bit tentative, given the strong condemnation from experts such as Malone and Bakhdi.

One need, in fact, go no further than to highlight the basics (and forget ‘infection’ rates) :

– vaccines cannot be declared safe or effective in this timescale

– vaccinating children who are not at risk flies in the face of all civilised ethical principals – unless you are a follower of Mengele.

4
0
David101
David101
3 years ago

Look at that sloganeering: Omicron is the letter of the Greek alphabet equivalent to our “O”. “Get boosted nOw”. Omicron is nOw a brand!

2
0
FarligGods
FarligGods
3 years ago

Why??
Because this is not about the virus, it´s not about the vax..

If you really want to know what’s going on, watch this video: MONOPOLY – Who owns the world

0
0
olaffreya
olaffreya
3 years ago

Simply beyond irrational – follow the link, says it all really. Think nuclear fallout and then imagine what we are facing in the future. Grim indeed.

https://www.hartgroup.org/open-letter-to-the-jcvi/

0
0
LonePatriot
LonePatriot
3 years ago

Our healthcare system is about to experience a tsunami! Potential side effects of jabs include chronic inflammation, because the vaccine continuously stimulates the immune system to produce antibodies. Other concerns include the possible integration of plasmid DNA into the body’s host genome, resulting in mutations, problems with DNA replication, triggering of autoimmune responses, and activation of cancer-causing genes. Alternative COVID cures EXIST. Ivermectin is one of them. While Ivermectin is very effective curing COVID symptoms, it has also been shown to eliminate certain cancers. Do not get the poison jab. Get your Ivermectin today while you still can! https://ivmpharmacy.com

3
-1
Think Harder
Think Harder
3 years ago

So what are people thinking:

  1. conditioning
  2. depopulation
  3. prep for Stoma (happy pills)
  4. sadism
  5. pure insanity
  6. prep for a 5G controlled kill pill
  7. money transfer

I wish I could think of a logical nice explanation.

Last edited 3 years ago by Think Harder
3
0
sophie123
sophie123
3 years ago
Reply to  Think Harder

I am going with pure insanity for the most part. And then there is a cadre who see the vaccine passports as a gateway to data culling ($$$)/digital ID/CBDC control.

But I think they are the minority and the others have just decided that the solution to a pandemic must be a vaccine, and if it’s not working then it’s because not enough people have done it. Insanity.

0
0
PatrickF
PatrickF
3 years ago

Good luck Romy. Will daddy and Carrie ensure you have the jabs to start your life?

Last edited 3 years ago by PatrickF
1
0
wantok87
wantok87
3 years ago

To use an mRNA “vaccine “ on a child who has recovered from Covid19 is of no benefit to society or the child but carries known risk of adverse reaction. The Pfizer study specifically excluded this group. While Chris Whitty chose a career in an office , many of us were treating patients and publishing scientific and medical articles and profoundly disagree with his analysis.
This is the Pfizer child study exclusion: …In addition, in the phase 1 study, children with a previous clinical or virologic Covid-19 diagnosis were excluded. 

4
0
sophie123
sophie123
3 years ago
Reply to  wantok87

Quite right. They cannot approve it in a group that has not been studied.
And both my children have had covid.

1
0
VAX FREE IanC
VAX FREE IanC
3 years ago

“Boris Calls For Vaccination of Children to Keep Schools Open – But Why When Almost All of Them Have Had the Virus?”
Oh Come on…
We know only too bloody well why!

Last edited 3 years ago by VAX FREE IanC
1
0
annepassman
annepassman
3 years ago

Since when did we vaccinate children against flu? Since when did we inject chemicals of a vaccine that has had little long term testing and does in fact have harmful effects on some children, just so that adults can be “protected”. The MP whose tweet was deleted was wrong. We already live in a “public health socialist society” and have since March 2020. And, if anyone asks, I am (reluctantly) jabbed, boosted and doubtless have armfuls of T cells, and antibodies from all the other viruses I’ve picked up in 75 years.

1
0
sophie123
sophie123
3 years ago
Reply to  annepassman

Actually since around the time my son started school in 2013. They’ve been vaccinating his age cohort every winter. It’s nonsense, but at least it’s a fairly safe vaccine.

This year I told them to sod off. I hadn’t fully understood the risk of original antigenic sin before, and I think he’s better off without it.

0
0
JohnK
JohnK
3 years ago

Years ago, if you said that there was a dodgy drug dealer advertising (for free) on the telly, they’d say you were mad!

2
0
Bill Francis
Bill Francis
3 years ago

Maybe it’s just British reserve, don’t want to be rude, etc, but isn’t it about time somebody called out Bojo, his cabinet, and all those MPs who think sticking needles into kids is a good thing, as sadistic paedophiles who are only interested in the money they get from Big Pharma, and not in the nation they are supposed to serve, and from whom they draw obscene salaries. Vaccinating kids is not about health, but about weirdos fulfilling their fantasies of domination and control over those who cannot resist.

2
0
Banjones
Banjones
3 years ago

I don’t know about not being ”medically or ethically sound” – it’s bloody wicked.

2
0
David Beaton
David Beaton
3 years ago

Johnson knows that children can die or suffer very serious side effects and harm after and experimental mRNA Gene Therapy injection which they do not need an which has no significant effect on the transmission or contraction of any Covid variant – the evidence is stacked high round the world for all to seek out and read..

He is attempting to use scare mongering, threats and coercion to push these injections onto them

He is therefore in violation of the Nuremberg Code International Human Rights Conventions is a disgrace to his Office and indeed to humanity.

We are at a new moral low point in this country

Last edited 3 years ago by David Beaton
2
0
Newman20
Newman20
3 years ago

My father and millions of others fought for six years against a regime that had a predilection for forcibly injecting people and demanding ‘papers please’. He would be turning in his grave if he knew that this was now part of our society.

As an aside, if I was a satirist I would not have been able to improve on the fact that a Communist, Susan Michie, AKA ‘Stalin’s Nanny’ is advising what purports to be a Tory Government.

1
0

NEWSLETTER

View today’s newsletter

To receive our latest news in the form of a daily email, enter your details here:

DONATE

PODCAST

Episode 36 of the Sceptic: Karl Williams on Starmer’s Phoney Immigration Crackdown, Dan Hitchens on the Assisted Suicide Bill and Tom Jones on Reform’s Local Council Challenge

by Richard Eldred
16 May 2025
0

LISTED ARTICLES

  • Most Read
  • Most Commented
  • Editor’s Picks

Chinese ‘Kill Switches’ Found in US Solar Farms

15 May 2025
by Will Jones

News Round-Up

16 May 2025
by Richard Eldred

Spy Agency Report on the Alleged “Extremism” of AfD Turns Out to Be So Stupid That it Destroys all Momentum for Banning the Party

16 May 2025
by Eugyppius

The Folly of Solar – a Dot on the Horizon Versus a Blight on the Land

16 May 2025
by Ben Pile

Civil Servants Threaten to Strike Over Trans Ban in Women’s Lavatories

16 May 2025
by Will Jones

The Folly of Solar – a Dot on the Horizon Versus a Blight on the Land

29

Civil Servants Threaten to Strike Over Trans Ban in Women’s Lavatories

25

Spy Agency Report on the Alleged “Extremism” of AfD Turns Out to Be So Stupid That it Destroys all Momentum for Banning the Party

19

News Round-Up

18

Chinese ‘Kill Switches’ Found in US Solar Farms

27

Trump’s Lesson in Remedial Education

16 May 2025
by Dr James Allan

Spy Agency Report on the Alleged “Extremism” of AfD Turns Out to Be So Stupid That it Destroys all Momentum for Banning the Party

16 May 2025
by Eugyppius

The Folly of Solar – a Dot on the Horizon Versus a Blight on the Land

16 May 2025
by Ben Pile

Renaud Camus on the Destruction of Western Education

15 May 2025
by Dr Nicholas Tate

‘Why Can’t We Talk About This?’

15 May 2025
by Richard Eldred

POSTS BY DATE

April 2021
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930  
« Mar   May »

SOCIAL LINKS

Free Speech Union
  • Home
  • About us
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy

Facebook

  • X

Instagram

RSS

Subscribe to our newsletter

© Skeptics Ltd.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password? Sign Up

Create New Account!

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • Articles
  • About
  • Archive
    • ARCHIVE
    • NEWS ROUND-UPS
  • Podcasts
  • Newsletter
  • Premium
  • Donate
  • Log In

© Skeptics Ltd.

wpDiscuz
You are going to send email to

Move Comment
Perfecty
Do you wish to receive notifications of new articles?
Notifications preferences