Results from a US trial of AstraZeneca’s Covid vaccine may have used “outdated information” on its efficacy, according to a US health agency. Reuters has the story.
The concerns throw into question whether the British drugmaker can seek US emergency use authorisation for the vaccine in the coming weeks as planned, and come just one day after interim data from the trial had shown better-than-expected results.
The vaccine developed with Oxford University was 79% effective in preventing symptomatic illness in the large trial that also took place in Chile and Peru, according to the data. It was also 100% effective against severe or critical forms of the disease and hospitalisation and posed no increased risk of blood clots.
The Data Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB), an independent committee overseeing the trial, has “expressed concern that AstraZeneca may have included outdated information from that trial, which may have provided an incomplete view of the efficacy data”, the US National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) said in a statement.
“We urge the company to work with the DSMB to review the efficacy data and ensure the most accurate, up-to-date efficacy data be made public as quickly as possible,” it said, adding that the DSMB had informed AstraZeneca of its concerns.
The NIAID did not specify what outdated information AstraZeneca relied on from its trial. In Europe, the AZ Covid vaccine has been at the centre of fears relating to side effects from the jab, such as blood clots. This latest development in the US could, if found to be true, see the country refusing to grant emergency use authorisation as planned.
Worth reading in full.
Stop Press: AstraZeneca has responded to concerns over its vaccine from the DSMB, saying that the numbers it published yesterday were “pre-specified” and that more detailed information would be sent to US health officials within 48 hours.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
You get the government you deserve and you, Scotland, just voted these barstewards back. The Scottish Health Commissar is the same guy who wants to criminalise “hate speech” in the home.
As a resident Scot, I couldn’t agree more. Most in the rest of the UK don’t appreciate the extent of the problems there are here. Corrupt police, corrupt courts, the school system pushing extreme ideologies at the expense of literacy, money stolen from the yes campaign and the imprisonment of journalists (Craig Murray with others to surely follow).
A zeal for population control means there will be a confined lust for lockdowns north of the border
“Corrupt police, corrupt courts, the school system pushing extreme ideologies at the expense of literacy, money stolen from the yes campaign and the imprisonment of journalists”
So just like the UK and all other western democracies. With the odd exception, western politicians appear to be selected for their willingness to stay bought.
It’s worse in several cases. For example:
The about-to-depart head of the prosecution service treated the ‘parliament’ with utter contempt during the Salmond affair. Even Mr Kier Smarmer wouldn’t have tried that.
Education standards are below England’s.
Plus more than one ‘journalist’ arguably committed offences far worse than Craig Murray’s, yet because they either outright fawn over the SNP, or at least give them an easy ride, the police have not pursued them. (To be clear, I am not necessarily defending Murray’s actions).
And the SNP generally ‘own’ the Scottish media and the charity sector in a way that is not remotely true of the Cons in Westminster. It isn’t even close.
A minority put the Sad, Nasty Pondlife back into power.
I agree that Yousaf is bad news. That awful bill is extremely sinister.
Resent the opinion that the people like myself “deserve” this terrible government we have up here. More Scots voted against the SNP than voted for them, it’s not our fault the anti-nationalist parties can’t organise themselves into any kind of organised coalition.
When we start saying groups of people “deserve” whatever unpleasantries are coming their way, that sounds a lot like some of the comments and ideas that are voiced by the self styled health Nazis that most people here abhor.
For the record, I know of no one in Scotland that does not view Humza Yousaf as a complete and utter turd.
Turn the quoted figures into a percentage and you see that you have a choice of interpretation :
(1) Insanely unbalanced sociopathic interpretation
or
(2) Venal manipulation using the innumeracy of a majority of people.
Add to the figures the fact that these are just positive PCR results, and you really do have mental illness induced by the certifiably mad.
P.S. I have in my head the figure of 17% as the proportion of PCR+ results that represent an actual illness ….??? … and about the same for the rate of infectivity. So actual risk – even given contact with someone who is PCR+ is (being generous) about 0.20 squared of the x in 100,000.
Which means about a 0.006% chance of catching Covid in the area with the most PCR+ results.
Before a court takes away your liberty you can have a barrister speak on your behalf
For example that barrister could ask Mr Yousef if he could tell the court what the false positive rate was for the PCR test
No such niceties under a dictatorship
As was shown in the Salmond affair the Lord Advocate is under the First Minister’s thumb…there is an issue with the separation of powers in Scotland
Despite the warm weather there was no march on Saturday
No one on the beach yesterday or today, but we COULD be at the start of a third wave
The state propagandists at the BBC makes Pravda look like a beacon of freedom
And of course Nictator has announced this afternoon it is too ‘dangerous’ or whatever word she used to ‘unlock’ further next week. And of course, everyone goes along with it!
However, I can report from my neck of the woods that apart from the ‘vaccine’ uptake, in which everyone seems to have absolute faith, below the surface, there are a lot of disgruntled people. People seem to be doing their own thing & only paying lip service to the ‘rules’ where they have to.
First time, I’ve been able to say that.