46810
  • Log in
The Daily Sceptic
No Result
View All Result
  • Articles
  • About
  • Archive
    • ARCHIVE
    • NEWS ROUND-UPS
  • Forum
  • Donate
  • Newsletter
The Daily Sceptic
No Result
View All Result

Lockdown Enthusiasts Belatedly Recognise Limitations of ‘Precautionary Principle’

by Toby Young
16 March 2021 4:11 PM

“The EU, and often its member states, doggedly follows the ‘precautionary principle’,” writes Matthew Lesh in CapX, blaming this principle for the suspension of the rollout of the AstraZeneca vaccine in various EU countries. But hang on a minute. Is this the same Matthew Lesh who has been an enthusiastic cheer leader for the British lockdowns? He goes on to say about this rationale for erring on the side of caution: “To pass the precautionary principle challenge requires doing the impossible: proving something is completely safe. Based on this logic, if stairs or pools were invented today they would be forbidden because of the risks of falling and drowning.”

Well quite. In case it’s escaped your attention, Matthew, this is precisely the argument that lockdown sceptics have been making for the past year. It was the rigid application of the precautionary principle that led governments across the world to lock their citizens in their homes last year because the dangers posed by SARS-CoV-2 were still largely unknown. Or, more precisely, it was the combination of the precautionary principle and short-termism that led to the embrace of the lockdown policy, with the priority of political leaders being to prevent immediate harm befalling their populations even if the excessive precautions they took ended up causing far greater harm in the long-term. And this, surely, is exactly the combination that’s behind the AstraZeneca ban in continental Europe. Better to avoid the immediate political fallout caused by a handful of adverse events apparently caused by the vaccine than provide their populations with lasting protection from infection.

If people like Matthew Lesh can see how disastrous the application of this principle is to the vaccine rollout, how can they not see how disastrous it was when applied to managing the pandemic last year? And, of course, it isn’t just Matthew, but vast numbers of pro-vaxxers who were gripped by the same panic European leaders are now gripped by this time last year.

The senior financial journalist who’s been a longtime contributor to Lockdown Sceptics had this to say about the double-standards of the lockdown zealots.

It’s half amusing to see commentators decrying the Europeans for the the misuse of the ‘precautionary principle’ when suspending the Astra-Zeneca vaccination (e.g. Ambrose Evans-Pritchard writing in the Telegraph that the “French Precautionary Principle is literally killing Europe”. Also the Economist’s Health Correspondent said on BBC radio today that it is folly to apply the precautionary principle during a pandemic. But it is the same precautionary principle that was invoked 12 months ago to justify lockdowns in the first place – on the grounds that we didn’t know the covid infection fatality rate, its reproduction number and because hospitals might possibly be overwhelmed. The same precautionary principle was later invoked to justify two-metre social distancing, face masks, school closures, further lockdowns, etc. It seems that almost every day for 12 months we have had to endure some member of SAGE, notably Chris Whitty, appealing to the precautionary principle to justify some repressive measure unsupported by reliable data. Not only does the extreme risk aversion of the precautionary principle ignore costs (as LS has noted many times over the last year), but it returns to bite its advocates. One doesn’t know whether to laugh or cry.

Tags: AstraZenecaLockdownPrecautionary PrincipleVaccines

Donate

We depend on your donations to keep this site going. Please give what you can.

Donate Today

Comment on this Article

You’ll need to set up an account to comment if you don’t already have one. We ask for a minimum donation of £5 if you'd like to make a comment or post in our Forums.

Sign Up
Previous Post

European Medicines Agency Says “No Indication” AstraZeneca Jab Is Cause of Blood Clots

Next Post

40% of Theatre and Arts Workers Have Lost Job in Past 12 Months

Subscribe
Login
Notify of
Please log in to comment

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

15 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

NEWSLETTER

To view today's newsletter click here

To receive our latest news in the form of a daily email, enter your details here:

DONATE

LISTED ARTICLES

  • Most Read
  • Most Commented
  • Editors Picks
1,200 Scientists and Professionals Declare: “There is No Climate Emergency”

1,200 Scientists and Professionals Declare: “There is No Climate Emergency”

18 August 2022
by Toby Young
News Round-Up

News Round-Up

17 August 2022
by Jonathan Barr
Most People Infected With Omicron Weren’t Even Aware They Had It

Most People Infected With Omicron Weren’t Even Aware They Had It

18 August 2022
by Toby Young
White House Climate Change Official Sanctioned by National Academy of Sciences for Scientific Misconduct

White House Climate Change Official Sanctioned by National Academy of Sciences for Scientific Misconduct

17 August 2022
by Toby Young
The Government, the Healthcare Profession and the BBC Have Made Muppets of Us All Over Covid

‘Net Zero’ Groupthink Got Us Into This Mess

18 August 2022
by Jonathan Barr
News Round-Up

News Round-Up

52
Most People Infected With Omicron Weren’t Even Aware They Had It

Most People Infected With Omicron Weren’t Even Aware They Had It

22
RAF ‘Pauses Job Offers For White Men’ to Meet ‘Impossible’ Diversity Targets

RAF ‘Pauses Job Offers For White Men’ to Meet ‘Impossible’ Diversity Targets

36
The Government, the Healthcare Profession and the BBC Have Made Muppets of Us All Over Covid

‘Net Zero’ Groupthink Got Us Into This Mess

8
1,200 Scientists and Professionals Declare: “There is No Climate Emergency”

1,200 Scientists and Professionals Declare: “There is No Climate Emergency”

7
Can Nuclear Energy Save Europe?

Can Nuclear Energy Save Europe?

18 August 2022
by Noah Carl
The U.S. Are Not the Good Guys

The U.S. Are Not the Good Guys

17 August 2022
by Noah Carl
Woke Medicine Abandons Meritocracy and Sense

Woke Medicine Abandons Meritocracy and Sense

15 August 2022
by Noah Carl
No, the Arctic isn’t Warming Four Times Faster Than the Planet

No, the Arctic isn’t Warming Four Times Faster Than the Planet

14 August 2022
by Chris Morrison
The Argumentum Hystericum

The Argumentum Hystericum

14 August 2022
by Dr James Alexander

POSTS BY DATE

March 2021
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031  
« Feb   Apr »

SOCIAL LINKS

Free Speech Union
  • Home
  • About us
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy

Facebook

Twitter

Instagram

RSS

Subscribe to our newsletter

© 2022 Skeptics Ltd.

No Result
View All Result
  • Articles
  • About
  • Archive
    • ARCHIVE
    • NEWS ROUND-UPS
  • Forum
  • Donate
  • Newsletter

© 2022 Daily Sceptic.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Create New Account!

Please note: To be able to comment on our articles you'll need to be a registered donor

Already have an account?
Please click here to login Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
wpDiscuz
You are going to send email to

Move Comment