Covid Vaccine Was Worst Threat to My Career and Turned Me Into a Zombie, Says Nigel Kennedy

Violinist Nigel Kennedy has said the Covid vaccine was the "worst threat" to his career and left him with partial deafness and turned him "into a zombie".

5 min read

Violinist Nigel Kennedy has said the Covid vaccine was the “worst threat” to his career and left him with partial deafness and turned him “into a zombie”.

Asked in a new interview with the Telegraph to name the “worst threat to your career”, the virtuosos replied:

After taking my third Covid vaccine in 2021, I developed partial deafness for three months – not great in my trade. It also turned me into a zombie. I was falling asleep at 4pm every day and wasn’t in a fit state to play concerts. BoJo was partying away while the rest of us were having reactions to this unresearched vaccine.

Elsewhere in the interview Kennedy recalls the 2013 BBC proms concert where he dedicated his performance “to all the forgotten and displaced heteros” – and says he hasn’t been invited back by the BBC since:

I caused friction in 2013 when the singer Joyce DiDonato declared she would be dedicating her performance “to transgender people around the world”. I subsequently dedicated my performance “to all the forgotten and displaced heteros”. I felt out of place as a heterosexual geezer with everyone proclaiming their sexual or life preferences when all we were meant to be doing was playing some music. I believe in a million types of genders, but I don’t want them rammed down my throat. Needless to say, I’ve never done a concert with those guys since. There’s a silent BBC ban in place, although I’ve not done anything politically incorrect. Maybe wearing an Aston Villa shirt on stage is what’s done it.

His comments on his vaccine injury come as the Covid Inquiry publishes its latest report, recommending that payouts from the Vaccine Damage Payment Scheme should be doubled and eligibility expanded. From the Telegraph:

Payouts to the victims of Covid vaccines and their bereaved families should be doubled, an inquiry into the pandemic has found.

The Covid Inquiry said “opportunities had been missed” by successive governments to reform the Vaccine Damage Payment Scheme (VDPS), adding that anyone injured by the jabs should receive “proper recognition”.

The families of those who died or people who suffered vaccine-related injuries as a result of the jab are awarded a one-off, tax-free lump sum of £120,000, but only if judged to have 60% “disablement”.

The payout, which was last revised nearly two decades ago, is not “sufficiently supportive” to those affected, the inquiry’s vaccine rollout report has found.

Baroness Hallett, the inquiry Chairman, described the scheme as inadequate and said victims felt “silenced, ignored or treated as vaccine deniers”, with many people waiting up to two years for a decision on their claim.

She said it was clear that the current maximum payment was too low and “should be raised at least to come into line with inflation”.

This would mean payments “in excess of £200,000” as of December 2025, Lady Hallett said, adding that the scheme should be reformed to allow more victims to qualify.

The Telegraph has also recently highlighted the story of Rebecca Stevens, who was left largely incapacitated by the AstraZeneca vaccine and subsequently died at the age of 48:

John Stevens, whose late wife Rebecca Stevens was wheelchair-bound and largely incapacitated after receiving the AstraZeneca jab in April 2021, said the Government’s compensation system was “not fit for purpose”.

Stevens told the Telegraph that the Vaccine Damage Payment Scheme (VDPS) – which awards a flat fee of £120,000 to people seriously injured after having vaccinations – needed to be “brought up to date with modern costs”.

He criticised the arbitrary level of 60% “disablement” that patients must reach in order to qualify for a payout.

Mrs Stevens – known as Bec – received a payment under the VDPS, which Mr Stevens described as wholly inadequate given the level of care she required and the impact her disability had on her capacity to work.

She died in October last year at the age of 48. Her death was attributed to natural causes and “a complication which arose following administration of the AstraZeneca vaccination”.

Stevens said that his wife, the mother of two grown-up sons, had gone from being a highly eloquent lawyer to having very limited speech and being unable to wash, dress or feed herself.

The couple received financial assistance through her employer’s insurance.

Stevens said that while the money from the VDPS cleared the mortgage and reduced the bills, “in no way is this payment relevant to the impact on Rebecca and her family’s lives, their futures and the costs these days”.

He added: “Some people have lost loved ones or had their lives changed so dramatically that this does not even scratch the surface.”

Stevens said that the VDPS should be reformed. “This wouldn’t mean all should be paid massive amounts but only what is relevant to the individual cases,” he said.

“It is understood that the VDPS is not compensatory but it should be relevant to the individual and it would lessen the need for very lengthy, even more costly, legal cases.”

His wife was one of dozens of claimants who began legal action against AstraZeneca over its “defective” Covid vaccination. The pharma giant is defending the claim, which the Government is indemnifying, meaning taxpayers could ultimately be liable for some costs.

Stevens is continuing his wife’s claim. 

Mrs Stevens suffered a severe stroke in May 2021, after receiving the vaccination the month before.

She was given life-saving surgery to remove blood clots that had formed, but was left with little movement in her right side and struggled with speech and language tasks.

“From initially saying nothing, to then being able to only say ‘no’, was heartbreaking for her family and massively frustrating for Bec,” said Stevens.

As a lawyer, “her words were her sword and shield”, Stevens said.

“Her anger and sadness stemmed from this as she only wanted to do the right thing and have the COVID-19 jab so she would be protecting others as well as herself,” he said.

Rebecca Stevens’s story is worth reading in full.

Comments

This week across the site:

Email me alerts for this discussion
Notify of

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to the Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

22 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Epi
Epi
5 months ago

All those responsible for allowing this disgusting death jab to be put on the market should be prosecuted and serve extremely long prison sentences. The pharmaceutical companies responsible should also pay for the death and injuries they caused with fines (paid to the victims of their experimental gene therapy treatments) sackings and prosecutions.

CrisBCTnew
CrisBCTnew
5 months ago
Reply to  Epi

Hear, hear.

RTSC
RTSC
5 months ago

If you are severely damaged as a result of having a poorly researched, experimental jab (their not vaccines) with NO medium/long-term safety data which the Government was effectively coercing you to take, then you should have financial support for life.

£200,000 wouldn’t last more than a couple of years if you are severely disabled.

Of course, the best policy is not to have a poorly researched, experimental jab …. and resist the coercion to do so.

Mrs.Croc
Mrs.Croc
5 months ago

I really like Nigel Kennedy and applaud what he does musically.
However, he is going to have to come off the fence politically sooner or later.

ElaineH
ElaineH
5 months ago

Prostate cancer cases seem to have increased noticeably. Is there a connection.

Judy Watson
Judy Watson
5 months ago
Reply to  ElaineH

I do believe that the increase is 25%. To say nothing of all the other increases in cancer, stroke, dvt, etc

Hester
Hester
5 months ago

And yet they are still stuffing this poison into people, and the Pharma companies collect the profits and are free of liability. The tax payer has to fund the injuries and deaths and people like Albert Bourla sit atop their millions made off the injuries and deaths of others,

CircusSpot
CircusSpot
5 months ago
Reply to  Hester

Apparently the summer season of Covid jabs has just opened with Pharmacists now administering these jabs into the arms of fools. What could possibly go wrong.

Sforzesca
Sforzesca
5 months ago

That said we should nevertheless express our eternal gratitude to the fact (tm. Covid Inquiry) that the wonderful jabs saved 470,000 lives in the UK alone.
Surely that means vindication for Prof. Ferguson who must surely soon be knighted in the footsteps of Sir P Vallance and Sir C Witty.
Without their towering intellects alongside that of that Dame woman who wisely authorised the vaccine rollout without any proper safety checks (thankfully ignoring the fact that mmRNA jabs are gene therapies) I shudder to think what might have happened.

transmissionofflame
transmissionofflame
5 months ago

“BoJo was partying away while the rest of us were having reactions to this unresearched vaccine.”

Well then you’re a chump aren’t you mate? You trusted Big Pharma and politicians. Would you be happier if “BoJo” had not been “partying away”? Would that make your vaccine injury OK? What is this childish obsession with politicians partying? To me it was just more confirmation (not that I needed it) that the whole thing was bollocks. Others seem to be outraged. Idiots. We should all have been partying – and some of us were!

thechap
thechap
5 months ago

You beat me to it (by over 8 hours, granted!)

If, Mr Kennedy, you knew it was an unresearched vaccine (like a lot of people knew and said at the time), then why did you take it?

transmissionofflame
transmissionofflame
5 months ago

“I believe in a million types of genders”

Really Nige? Only a million? Can you list them all? There are either an infinite number (one for every human that has ever or will ever live) or there are none. Nonsense either way. Idiot.

kev
kev
5 months ago

There is no moral justification for indemnifying experimental products, especially when an effective mandate, for some (care Home and Healthcare) exists.

There is no moral justification for blanket protections for any pharmaceutical product, but some at least were possibly sufficiently and properly tested!

“Her anger and sadness stemmed from this as she only wanted to do the right thing and have the COVID-19 jab so she would be protecting others as well as herself,” he said.

All based on a blatant lie, true misinformation. Those peddling these lies, knowingly or unknowingly, should equally be facing prosecution. We know only too well what the Nuremburg trials had to say about obeying orders, either implicitly or explicitly!

JohnK
JohnK
5 months ago
Reply to  kev

And the lie was built on the deliberate suppression of alternative methods, both by established drugs (such as Ivermectin, according to some) and dietary methods, that would reduce the risk of the infection under consideration. By doing that, it was possible to permit Emergency Use Authorization (EUA). If there was an alternative, EUA would have been illegal.

kev
kev
5 months ago
Reply to  JohnK

Absolutely

transmissionofflame
transmissionofflame
5 months ago
Reply to  JohnK

That was despicable
We must never forget and never stop reminding people of that

CrisBCTnew
CrisBCTnew
5 months ago
Reply to  JohnK

Don’t forget about HCQ, the anti-malarial prophylactic that had proved itself totally safe over many decades of use. HydroxyChloroQuine.

stewart
stewart
5 months ago

Ah, but will he learn the lesson that the state authorities cannot be trusted? Not just with everything, but with anything.

I believe in a million types of genders, but I don’t want them rammed down my throat.

Based on that, I wouldn’t bet on it. Sounds like he wants to be good with everyone, which is fine in principle, but if it involves forcing yourself to believe ideas that you know to be idiotic…

I guess it illustrates how brutal and merciless the state machinery is. You don’t get to be at the top of a field like he is without being a strong person. And yet, the ease with which the state apparatus has abused him is chilling.

JohnK
JohnK
5 months ago

The VDPS looks like a con, operating as a cash limit for the organisation that promoted the use of the product. It’s completely different to normal suits for damages, in which the financial compensation demanded is worked up by solicitors/barristers and presented to a County Court judge, who can order whatever the settlement has to be. That way, there is no arbitrary cash limit – it depends on the projected financial loss of the claimant.

Been there, done that, as a claimant (not to do with C-19, but a claim against a culprit that caused a road injury). The culprits insurer had to pay, via my solicitor, who issued a cheque to me, along with the Court judgement.

Hedghunter
Hedghunter
5 months ago
Reply to  JohnK

The main problem is that the pharmaceutical companies are completely exempt from liability for damages caused by approved vaccines, and therefore the government step in to compensate victims at a miserly maximum £120k subject to the victim being able to prove that they are 60% plus disabled. With a road traffic accident, 60% plus injured victims could easily receive compensation well into the millions, and clearly there is a massive discrepancy here. At least with a road traffic accident, the victim will usually receive compensation from the insurer, whereas vaccine damage compensation is covered by the taxpayer, who will obviously need to cover any proposed increase.

kev
kev
5 months ago
Reply to  Hedghunter

I believe their exemption can be void if it can be proven they blatantly lied about their product, if they are guilty of fraud. Such as people died, but they covered it up on the tests!

If you could hide that for maybe lets say 75 years, maybe statutes of limitations, or no living victims surviving, just a thought!

Thank you for reading. Please help us keep the Daily Sceptic going by becoming a donor.