Nonconsequential Pa...
 
Notifications
Clear all

Nonconsequential Patterns in the deployment of Toxic Covid Vaccine Batches.

48 Posts
8 Users
13 Likes
5,870 Views
Posts: 38
(@dave-b)
Joined: 4 years ago

I have a potential problem

 

It looks like "our" people may be making a huge mistake eg at

 

https://thewhiterose.uk/covid-injections-a-giant-experiment-designed-to-kill/

[I have tried to contact them about it but don’t seem to able to get through]

 

With their 'conclusions' from the fact  that 95% of the batches or lot numbers have very few adverse events reported against them on the VAERS system and that only 5% of the batches or lot numbers have the majority of adverse events reported against them.

 

It appears that the VAERS data entry system has no look-up system to screen out typo errors.

 

 And thus when typo error occurs when entering a lot number.

 

Eg using a o instead of a 0 or z instead of a 2 etc

 

It effectively creates a new batch or lot with adverse event(s) recorded against it as the lot number data entry is infrequently repeated.

 

Moderna fortunately has a lookup site to check expiry dates that can be used to see  if  lot numbers are real.

 

https://www.modernatx.com/covid19vaccine-eua/providers/vial-lookup

Reply
4 Replies
lordsnooty
(@lordsnooty)
Joined: 3 years ago

Posts: 636
Posted by: @dave-b

I have a potential problem

 

the lots with high numbers of events are all labelled NONE, which is a default value for poor data entry. 

Reply
(@dave-b)
Joined: 4 years ago

Posts: 38
lordsnooty
(@lordsnooty)
Joined: 3 years ago

Posts: 636
Posted by: @dave-b

looks like the problem has just been picked up.

 

https://www.globalresearch.ca/ocla-statement-analysis-batch-specific-toxicity-covid-19-vaccine-products-using-vaers-data/5766270

https://ocla.ca/ocla-statement-on-analysis-of-batch-specific-toxicity-of-covid-19-vaccine-products-using-vaers-data/

 

i raised it on dailyexpose first about a month ago in comments

 

Indeed but is Rainer Fuelmich and his band of foolish followers just too stupid, to get that Garbage in means garbage out?

Reply
lordsnooty
(@lordsnooty)
Joined: 3 years ago

Posts: 636
Posted by: @dave-b

i raised it on dailyexpose first about a month ago in comments

 

This Paardekoop nonsense has occupied me for weeks, it was very suspicious, I had no concrete way to nail it, so you have done very well to find this.Does Craig Paardekoop even exist and where does Mike Yeadon fit in. I just called it hogwash from day 1, but it is better to have something stronger.Shame on Rainer Fuellmich and Woodarg for spoutinmg hogwash, they should have known better. good work!

Reply
Posts: 38
(@dave-b)
Joined: 4 years ago

I am unvaccinated and have been totally opposed to the covidian cult from the beginning and support the German Corona Investigation Committee and Yeardom and most of what he says.

 

I am desperate to prevent them making fools of themselves.

 

I have spent 30 years of my life having typo errors on batch/lot numbers mess up my job, so am not clever but just experienced.

 

I have been an analytical chemist in the food industry having to trace where faulty batches have come from and what they went into etc

 

I have not done an in depth analysis of the VAERS database other than identifying that there are what we call  phantom batches.

 

[ wouldn’t claim to be very computer literate.]

 

What is totally astonishing is that there was no lookup system in place in the VAERS system to screen out or separate out phantom batches.

 

It is a fairly simple few lines of code from library routines.

 

There are probably are only about <100-200 real batches of moderna as batch seems to be about 2 million doses

 

Dave B comment 3 days ago at

 

https://dailyexpose.uk/2022/01/06/death-by-covid-injection-is-premeditated-and-co-ordinated-experts-conclude/

Reply
Posts: 38
(@dave-b)
Joined: 4 years ago

This nonsense has to stop.

 

The link below has helpfully provided a list of the Moderna batches.

 

About 95% of the batches have less than 50 adverse reports against them and all those 95%  low adverse event batches appear to be “phantom” batches ,not real batch numbers

 

as a result of data input errors.

 

As I suspected it looks like only about 200 of the batches are real

 

or the first 200 with the highest number of adverse events recorded against it.

 

https://www.howbadismybatch.com/moderna.html

 

https://www.globalresearch.ca/how-bad-is-my-batch/5766629

 

 

https://www.modernatx.com/covid19vaccine-eua/providers/vial-lookup

 

[I had not been totally confident that I had downloaded VAERS datafile completely ]

Reply
1 Reply
lordsnooty
(@lordsnooty)
Joined: 3 years ago

Posts: 636
Posted by: @dave-b

This nonsense has to stop.

 

[I had not been totally confident that I had downloaded VAERS datafile completely ]

 

 

The people you telling  have  bought the idea that BigPharma are murdering  the public,and this is the main evidence they have.

Reply
Posts: 38
(@dave-b)
Joined: 4 years ago

I believe big pharma are deliberately trying to kill people.

However when I first read of this on daily expose around about early December I think ,I commented that I found this particular thesis hard to believe.

I have been a forensic analytical chemist eg looking at batches of food raw materials to detect deliberate adulteration; so I am used to this kind of thing.

Actually data on authentic batches does still look a bit strange so it needs further cleaning up eg number of doses/vaccinations performed for each that would be collected under the VAERS system.

And the age cohorts etc to whom the batches were released to; early batches going to the most vulnerable aged etc etc

 

Reply
Page 3 / 3
Share:
April 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930  
Free Speech Union

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Create New Account!

Please note: To be able to comment on our articles you'll need to be a registered donor

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.