Adverse reaction st...
 
Notifications
Clear all

Adverse reaction statistics

9 Posts
5 Users
2 Likes
1,495 Views
Posts: 1
Topic starter
(@informed-consent)
Joined: 2 years ago

I have been trying to post this on the Daily Telegraph but it kept being rejected so I am hoping that the Daily Sceptic will allow me to do so:

Since the Mainstream Media do not appear to be concerned about the growing number of adverse drug (‘vaccine’) reactions (ADRs) being reported, I thought I would analyse the total number of ADRs that have been reported post vaccination for key specific diseases since records began.

The figures (up to 16th November) have been extracted from the WHO’s VigiAccess global database, which pulls together all reported ADRs from around 150 countries. The data for the various types of vaccine are grouped together by disease as it is not possible to separate by specific vaccine/tradename.

The MHRA estimate that only 10% of serious reactions and between 2-4% of non-serious reactions are actually reported so the actual total numbers will be much higher than those shown.

I believe the figures speak for themselves (particularly when you consider that the total number of Measles, Smallpox, Tetanus, Polio and Influenza ADRs reported are cumulative since 1968).

Mumps: 1972-2021, Total ADRs = 719

Measles: 1968-2021, Total ADRs = 5,841

Smallpox: 1968-2021, Total ADRs = 6,902

Tetanus: 1968-2021, Total ADRs = 15,174

Hepatitis B: 1984-2021, Total ADRs = 105,572

Polio: 1968-2021, Total ADRs = 122,861

Influenza: 1968-2021, Total ADRs = 278,261

COVID-19: 2020-2021, Total ADRs = 2,739,683

Using the MHRA estimates and assuming that an average of 5% of ADRs are actually reported (this is in-line with various expert studies on the under-reporting of ADRs), then the total number of Covid-19 vaccine ADRs up to the 16th November 2021 could well be over 50 Million!

Surely the ADR figures for COVID should be ringing alarm bells – or at least pause for concern and proper investigation, before more boosters are rolled out?? 

8 Replies
1 Reply
 TTT
(@ttt)
Joined: 3 years ago

Posts: 847
Posted by: @informed-consent

 

COVID-19: 2020-2021, Total ADRs = 2,739,683

Using the MHRA estimates and assuming that an average of 5% of ADRs are actually reported (this is in-line with various expert studies on the under-reporting of ADRs), then the total number of Covid-19 vaccine ADRs up to the 16th November 2021 could well be over 50 Million!

Surely the ADR figures for COVID should be ringing alarm bells 

Well... alarm bells should be ringing for you!

When you take one set of figures, multiply by a factor, which is an estimate and come up with a number that clearly isn't anything like reality, then something in your sums is incorrect.

So what might you have failed to consider? 

With the covid vaccination campaign being massive and more highly publicised than any others, so draws much more in the way of reporting of site effects.

That means the factor of 20 under-reporting you have applied to covid jabs is just not appropriate.

I have a hunch that the MHRA may be quite interested in looking at vaccine safety. And perhaps all the other regulatory bodies worldwide.

 

 

 

Reply
Posts: 615
 jmc
(@jmc)
Joined: 4 years ago

What makes the ADR statistics even more frightening is that the COVID numbers are for only one year. 

Most of those ARDs are for childhood vaccines so % number per year of total population is low but over decades amounts to about at least 1X the total population. I have been very impressed by just how safe the childhood vaccines are. They are exceptionally safe. Public health medicine at it best. 

The Influenza vaccines is a better comparison. At least 50% of the population every year. For at least three or four decades.  Using the US numbers the COVID vaccines have at least 230x the death rate of the Influenza vaccines. For a much lower general population positive health outcome. 

The scandal here is the ADR numbers we are seeing for the various SARs CoV 2 vaccines are very typical of experimental vaccines during Phase I trials. These are the sort of ADR numbers that previous clinical trials for SARs 1, MERS, and mRNA vaccine candidates were getting. Which is why none ever got regulatory approval. A process which takes 4 to 6 years. They were too dangerous for general use. 

You can be 100% certain that the senior public health officials and relevant regulators know this. Discussions about these very problems are in the public record with the FDA vaccine safety committee over the last 4 months at least. And you can be 100% certain that the same people are well aware of the legal problems they will be facing in the future.  Because by this stage we are deep into criminal negligence territory. 

As for the MSM, given their very active roll in fomenting the mass hysteria and keeping it going you can be 100% certain that will will go to great lengths to suppress this information.  Hiding behind "fact checkers".  Because where does it leave the MSM when at some time in the future the majority of people realize how complicit the media have been in de-facto killing so many people.

For me the greatest crime of all is the large number of old people with dementia and Alzheimers who were given this vaccines. Which using a conservative multipliers from the US case numbers at least several thousand died from an ADR. And given the very low potential YLL (Years of Life Lost) and low potential efficacy in old people with age degraded immune -system is straight up medical manslaughter. No other word for it.

Thats part of the reason the MSM dont want this story getting much coverage. They are very much one of the guilty parties by this stage.

Reply
4 Replies
 TTT
(@ttt)
Joined: 3 years ago

Posts: 847

@jmc 

Full scale anti-vaxx rhetoric here...

 

Reply
 jmc
(@jmc)
Joined: 4 years ago

Posts: 615

@checkthefacts 

Nope. Just people who actually know what they are talking about.

Go look up the vaccines stats I quoted. Easy to find. If you know what you are talking about. 

Go look up the FDA 505(b)1 clinical trial papers and documentation I refer to. Easy to find. If you know what you are talking about.

Go look up the history of eugenics in the 20'th century and the very active involvement of the medical establishment. Easy to find. If you know what you are talking about.

Interesting that you call someone the lazy slur "anti-vax" when they say just how safe all previous public health vaccines have been. In fact a fantastic record of safety. Very evident from the product safety monitoring systems data.

So that's "Anti-vax" then? Then you must be a low information imbecile  of remarkably limited intelligence. Who does not know what they are talking about.

So. Have you got your 10 year Tdap booster yet?

Reply
 TTT
(@ttt)
Joined: 3 years ago

Posts: 847
Posted by: @jmc

@checkthefacts 

Nope. Just people who actually know what they are talking about.

Go look up the vaccines stats I quoted. Easy to find. If you know what you are talking about. 

 

So where's your analysis of the complete picture?

What steps have you taken to cater for the numbers of each vaccine delivered?

What steps have you taken to weed out the trivial side effects?

What steps have you taken to understand the difference in reported proportion between each vaccine?

What steps have you taken to establish causality between vaccine and reaction?

The answer to all these questions is NONE.

On the other side of the picture, where there is a clear benefit to vaccination, there seems to be a missing analysis in your consideration. Had you taken the steps above and considered the upside, your analysis could be considered worthy of reading.

So we can assume it is just a classic case of confirmation bias on your part. Not worthy of someone why claims to "know what he is talking about"

So let's consider the benefit of vaccines for you. Taking the UK numbers for confirmed cases and hospital admissions, comparing a 7-day mean for admissions to a 7-day mean for cases 14 days prior, you will see that the ratio has fallen from around 10% to 2%, between this time last year and now.

That's a lot of avoided admission and subsequent deaths.

In the second half of this year, there have been about 6 million cases in the UK. So, 8% of these have avoided admission to hospital. That's  480k people.

This is something to offset against the adverse reactions, the vast majority of which are minor and temporary.

Reply
 TTT
(@ttt)
Joined: 3 years ago

Posts: 847
Posted by: @jmc

@checkthefacts 

 

Interesting that you call someone the lazy slur "anti-vax" 

So that's "Anti-vax" then? Then you must be a low information imbecile  of remarkably limited intelligence. Who does not know what they are talking about.

 

I stand corrected, you are just "anti-covid-vaxx."

It is of course the only vaccine being spoken of at the moment, so represents the maximum opportunity to influence people away from being covid vaccinated.

Clearly, your unpleasant side does become evident in your posts (see above).Of course these words are meaningless and don't have the impact you hope for.

But it does beg the question...

In trying to steer people away from vaccination for covid, how much harm are you trying to bring about?

Reply
Posts: 125
(@halfhearted)
Joined: 3 years ago

I'm asking for a bit of help here. The CDC regulated VAERS system in the US is reporting 20,000 deaths (from Covid vaccine/s) in the last year. I cannot see how one extracts figures for deaths from the data available on the VAERS web site. Does anyone know how it's done? I just need a few pointers. I'd be very grateful.

Secondly, is there a UK equivalent of VAERS? Thank you.

Reply
1 Reply
(@jane-g)
Joined: 4 years ago

Reputable Member
Posts: 304

@halfhearted 

The UK equivalent of VAERS is the Yellow Card system: instructions can be found in prescription medicines packaging.

Reply
Share:
March 2024
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
Free Speech Union

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Create New Account!

Please note: To be able to comment on our articles you'll need to be a registered donor

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.