The ONS announced on Friday that there were 38,611 deaths registered in England in June, which is 9.1% more than in May, and 0.8% more than the five-year average. However, the increase is relative to an exceptionally low value the month before. What about the age-standardised mortality rate (which is the best overall measure)?
In June, the age-standardised mortality rate was 12.5% higher than in May, but was still 6.1% lower than the five-year average. It was also the second-lowest figure on record for that month. (The only lower figure was observed in June of 2019.)
This means that England’s age-standardised mortality rate has been below the five-year average for four consecutive months. In other words, we’ve had four months in a row of “negative excess mortality”.
This chart from the ONS shows the age-standardised mortality rate for the first six months of the year, each year, going back to 2001:
Although 2021’s figure was higher than the figure for 2019, it was 3.6% lower than the figure for 2015 and 2.4% lower than the figure for 2018. This means that – despite higher-than-expected mortality in the winter – the overall level of mortality in the first half of 2021 was actually lower than three years before.
The past four months have “cancelled out” more than 85% of the age-adjusted excess mortality observed in January and February. Unsurprisingly, COVID-19 was not among the leading causes of death in June. All in all, the first half of 2021 has been pretty normal with respect to the average level of mortality.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
Go-ahead Government ministers and their progressive fellow travellers need to be force-fed a diet that eliminates brain farts.
I couldn’t help but notice, the cow in the center of the picture has an expression very much similar to the one I would have if I had to suppress mine!
Can these pills be adapted for the flatulence and hot air expelled by politicians and unelected self-appointed experts?
I had to smile at the idiocy of this idea, every animal on the planet belches and/ or flatulates, and these idiots want 8 billion of them to have a more vegetable intense diet, if not vegetarian. at the same time medically forcing other animals to change their digestive system to reduce a natural function.
As soon as you think they have reached peak absurdity, they take it to a whole new level.
If this was yesterday, I’d think it was an April Fool’s – give me strength!
That’s what I thought too. It can be hard to tell now that we’re living in Clown World can’t it? What was once absurd-sounding is now the new norm. Yesterday’s offering in the Dutch news is a prime example. I’ll bet many fell for this because nothing would probably surprise many people any more. It is funny though!
”Government officials are planning a string of experiments to reduce human methane and nitrogen waste in line with Brussels directives. The drive, led by a taskforce known as Aanpak Reductie Stikstof Eenheid, has been secretly designated hoge nood – or urgent. Veteran politician Stan Koverlast has been drafted in as ‘toilet tsar’ to negotiate with affected provincial communities in an attempt to break down local objections. His suggestions include closing late-night takeaways by 10pm and banning fizzy lager. ‘People have understandably been kicking up a stink about the idea of having to forgo their frites and drink flat bitter under orders from Brussels, but the alternative is even more unpalatable,’ he said. ‘If we don’t cut our emissions significantly by April 2030, it could cause blockages right through the planning system.’”
https://www.dutchnews.nl/news/2023/04/april-fool/
FFS!
Did anyone not notice the initials of the Taskforce? What a load of ARSE!
The name Mootral was a hint that it is an April Fool. They tried garlic but the milk tasted of garlic. Still, making the additive is still a profitable industry provided you get the Government to mandate use of the product. Under Tullock’s Law this is cheaply achievable
It’s all for nothing. There is no Climate Emergency just as there were no witches. We are not able to control the Earth’s global average temperature and why isn’t it obvious that it is insane to think that it is possible to control an average temperature of a multi faceted complex global open system. Average temperatures will not tell you anything about the underlying and highly complex dynamics of all of the Earth’s various climates, because averages can’t do that. For example, Russia has 16 climate zones, Australia 6, Ethiopia 14. In the case of Ethiopia it has:
In addition many people across the planet will live at the boundaries between different climate zones and these will move and are not fixed in stone, So some people will think the climate (singular) is changing. Are people less or more observant of the world around them?
“First of all, developed countries have basically expropriated the atmosphere of the world community. But one must say clearly that we redistribute de facto the world’s wealth by climate policy. Obviously, the owners of coal and oil will not be enthusiastic about this. One has to free oneself from the illusion that international climate policy is environmental policy. This has almost nothing to do with environmental policy anymore, with problems such as deforestation or the ozone hole.”. [Ottmar Edenhofer, IPCC]
1966 Oil Gone in Ten Years
1967 Dire Famine Forecast by 1975
1968 Over population will spread worldwide
1969 Everyone will disappear in a cloud of blue steam by 1989
1970 World will use up all its natural resources by 2000
1970 Urban citizens will require gas masks by 1985
1970 Nitrogen build up will make all land unusable
1970 Decaying pollution will kill all the fish
1970s Killer bees
1970 Ice Age by 2000
1970 America subject to water rationing by 1974 and food rationing by 1980 1971 New Ice Age coming by 2020 or 2030
1972 New Ice age by 2070
1972 Oil depleted in 20 years
1974 Space satellites show new Ice Age coming fast
1974 Another Ice Age?
1974 Ozone depletion a ‘Great Peril to Life’
1976 Scientific consensus Planet cooling, famines imminent
1977 Department of Energy says Oil will peak in 90s
1978 No end in sight to 30 year cooling trend
1980 Acid Rain kills life in lakes
1980 Peak Oil in 2000
1988 Regional droughts in 1990s (that never happened)
1988 Temperatures in DC will hot record highs
1988 Maldive Islands will be underwater by 2018 (Maldives opened five new airports in 2019)
1989 Rising sea levels will obliterate nations if nothing done by 2000
1989 New York City’s West Side Highway underwater by 2019 (it’s not)
1996 Peak oil in 2020
2000 Children won’t know what snow is
2002 Famine in 10 years if we don’t give up eating fish, meat and dairy
2002 Peak Oil in 2010
2004 Britain will be Siberia by 2024
2005 Manhattan underwater by 2015
2006 Super Hurricanes 2008 Arctic will be ice free by 2018
2008 Climate genius Al Gore predicts Ice-Free Arctic by 2013
2009 Climate genius Prince Charles says we have 96 months (8 years) to save the world
2009 UK Prime Minister says 50 days to ‘Save the planet from catastrophe’ 2009 Climate Genius Al Gore moves 2013 prediction of Ice-Free Arctic to 2014 (remember Harold Camping?)
2013 Arctic Ice-Free by 2015
2014 Only 500 days before ‘Climate Chaos’
2019 Ocasio-Cortez: “The World Is Going To End In 12 Years If We Don’t Address Climate Change”
That’s nailed it.
When steam trains were in their infancy, it was said that they would be useless for transporting people at speeds above 20mph because all the air would be sucked out.
And that’s just a selection.The 1976 “planet cooling” one is ironic; I seem to remember there was a heatwave in the UK in that year!
100% fail rate. ———-Yet people still believe it all and some are so thoroughly captured by their secular religious cult that they glue themselves to roads and buildings.
Wasn’t April Fools Day yesterday..?
Guess who has recently invested in a company that makes methane suppressants: –
https://edition.cnn.com/2023/01/24/world/cows-methane-emissions-seaweed-bill-gates-climate-intl/index.html
A more blatant example of bovine stupidity would be difficult to find.
On a more serious note the health implications for the national herd don’t bear thinking about. And poorly livestock will ultimately mean poorly humans. Still it’s bound to be ‘safe and effective.’
As a dairy farmer who has fed seaweed to cows in the past I welcome this low cost intervention to reduce methane.
Hmm. You might have fed cattle seaweed but it’s an odds on bet these so-called supplements will also carry some dodgy ingredients that will not help with cattle health. And if cattle health is undermined it is an odds on bet there will be an adverse effect on human health.
Hello David, why is it necessary to reduce methane (apart from “saving the planet”, obviously)?
I am not a climate catastrophist but happy to sensibly reduce our reliance on fossil fuels where we can do so cost-effectively and to reduce other greenhouse gas emissions. I believe the supplements change the cow’s gut enzymes to reduce methane production – we of course need to make sure they are truly safe and effective.
How does feeding cows seaweed reduce the country’s reliance on fossil fuels?
Who is the “we” in “we need to make sure they are truly safe and effective” , David?
And you haven’t answered my first question.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O9Ed84v_C5k&t=438s I don’t agree with all of this but it is an admirable defence of the cow. And we can reduce methane emissions too!
I hope the part you disagree with is when he says there is a climate crisis? He praises the cow and then says their numbers need to be reduced by 20%. I assume a dairy farmer would also disagree with that?
What exactly are greenhouse gas emissions and how and in what way do they effect this millions year old planet spinning through space?
The cows won’t be given a choice in this. We’re all cattle, you know.
I wonder who makes the suppressants? Follow the money.
Just out of interest has anyone actually shown that this does what it says on the packet?
The large size of the cows stomachs suggests that you would probably have to give litres of the stuff and would it not mess up their digestive system?
April fool?
Just leave the poor cows alone, you insane meddlers and do-gooders!
can we have a referendum on Net Zero please?
its starting to get on my nerves
How many cow-years of methane are equal to two Nordstream pipelines worth? Does US Intelligence stay green by offsetting the greenhouse gases from blowing up the pipelines by banning meat in America?
We need to be told.
Aren’t April Fool’s jokes supposed to be confined to April 1st?
Carbon, carbon, carbon, carbon. ———–Western governments have carbon on the brain. The industrial revolution started in Britain and apparently Britain is to save the planet harder and faster than everyone else. So we end up with an energy policy out of Alice in Wonderland, millions in energy poverty having the government pay a chunk of their bill, with thousands of huge industrial turbines to provide us with part time energy. We want rid of perfectly good cars and fantastic central heating systems (gas). We want to reduce everything people do down to the bare minimum. ——-Our braindead politicians pander to the United Nations rather than to the people who vote for them and bludgeon us into submission with tales of a “climate emergency” for which no evidence exists. The “emergency” exists only in un-validated climate models churned out by government funded data adjusters. In the real world of observations, no such emergency exists. When we are told that everything that ever occurs is caused by fossil fuels with zero evidence to back it up then we long ago stopped dealing with science. Climate Change is “Official Science”, and it is virtually impossible to get a scientist to be objective when his salary and funding depends on being the opposite. If government are going to chuck money about like confetti for scientists to look for purple horses then it is understandable that there will be more and more of them hunting for those purple horses and in no big hurry to say they can’t find any. ——–This nonsense with cattle is just another example of the subsidy farming industry desperate to come up with anything at all no matter how absurd so they can rake in taxpayers money for their braindead idea.
I thought this was an April Fool story. It’s as mad as the proposal to fit cows with masks, which Charlie-Boy thought was such a good idea.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/environment/2022/04/27/face-masks-cows-could-help-save-planet-one-burp-time/
I expect they’ll be taxing Baked Beans next ….. to “save the planet.”
Question. Wasn’t CJD in humans caused by feeding cattle something they shouldn’t have eaten when introduced into their feed as a waste recycling measure? Another good idea at the time.
True, but CJD in humans was another fuss about nothing. The slaughter of all those healthy cows, on the other hand…
Is it important to note that this story emerged on April Fools Day?
Ian, it’s April 3rd. You missed the April 1st deadline!
Mind you with the muppets we have trying to control our lives then every day is April 1st.
Leave the cows alone! I suggest the methane suppressants should be given to our political class! The Green Party both here and abroad are yet another fascistic entity we need to quell. Our lives are being turned upside down by malevolent unelected billionaires who want to rule over us without our consent!
“Bovine herd leaders have yet to comment on the scheme”.
This, I imagine, is because they are lost for words. Is this really a scheme to tackle “climate change”, or an effort to discourage people from eating beef? If I were not already a vegetarian, I would be tempted to become one today!
If this is being done as a contribution towards the “Net Zero” target, then “net zero” is about the difference it will make.
How about feeding politicians with suppressants?
Of the ‘pb’ variety?
Shall I tell you the joke about sodium?
Na.