Jason Arday, the Cambridge DEI poster boy embroiled in a plagiarism row, boasts a back story so implausible it raises the question: is he, in fact, the latest comedy creation of Sacha Baron Cohen? His extraordinary claims – from running 600 miles in six days to raising £5.5 million for charity – have been accepted without question by universities, the BBC and fellow academics alike. Read my piece about what may be Baron Cohen’s most spectacular stunt yet in the Spectator:
Are congratulations in order for Sacha Baron Cohen? The more I read about Jason Arday, the Cambridge sociology professor and DEI poster boy caught up in a plagiarism row, the more convinced I am he’s the comedian’s greatest creation.
Arday’s academic career, like his athletic achievements, reads like a fairy tale
First, there’s the over-the-top back story. He claimed to have been totally mute until the age of 11 – having been diagnosed with autism – and unable to read or write until he was 18. Yet in spite of these disadvantages, he earned a PhD by the time he was 30 – which he managed to complete while suffering from a brain tumour!
On the face of it, utterly incredible. But it begins to make sense if you think of Arday as an Ali G-like character designed to test the limits of how unwilling white do-gooders are to challenge the claims of black people suffering from ‘intersectional oppression’, however implausible.
And test the limits he has. He chalked up some truly extraordinary achievements in ultra-endurance running, or so he says, completing the 600 miles from Edinburgh to London in just six days – 50 miles short of the world record for ultra-distance running over six days – and 30 marathons in 35 days. During this latter feat, he suffered a hairline fracture on day 21 and, according to him, his leg swelled to twice its normal size. Yet, remarkably, he went on to complete another nine marathons. In all, he maintains, he raised £5.5 million for charity.
All of these claims have been accepted at face value by the four universities who’ve awarded Arday honorary degrees, as well as the BBC, which published a laudatory profile when he became a Cambridge professor. How Baron Cohen must have laughed – assuming I’m right about Arday being a satirical creation. A stunt designed to expose the wilful blindness of hand-wringing liberals has succeeded beyond his wildest dreams.
Arday’s academic career, like his athletic achievements, reads like a fairy tale. After getting a degree in education studies at St Mary’s University, Twickenham, he went on to do a PhD at Liverpool John Moores University, before becoming a professor of sociology at Glasgow in 2021, then a sociology professor at Cambridge in 2023. At the age of 37, he was the youngest black person ever to be given a Cambridge chair.
Baron Cohen, who’s apparently been developing this character as a long-term sleeper project, must have been cock-a-hoop. But could he push the joke even further? Doubts about Arday’s academic integrity began to surface in 2023 when two sociology professors started asking awkward questions about his doctoral thesis and some of his journal papers. Not so fast, thought Baron Cohen, who must have anticipated that his hastily-cobbled together ‘thesis’, masquerading as original research, would one day be rumbled – the title of Arday’s PhD even includes a rogue apostrophe.
To deflect these allegations, the comedian appears to have come up with the genius idea of enlisting his cousin, Sir Simon Baron Cohen, as a co-conspirator. In 2025, the director of Cambridge’s autism research centre co-authored an open letter furiously accusing Arday’s detractors of being racists. This was the academic equivalent of Ali G’s famous catchphrase whenever anyone challenged him: ‘Is it because I is black?’
Worth reading in full.


Discussion
Comments
This week across the site:
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to the Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
If he was non verbal for such a long time surely he would have gone to a special school or received speech therapy ? His mother Gifty and his siblings never appear to have been questioned by the press about this.
Good to read, in the full piece, that the colossus of investigative journalism that is James O’Brien, stands fully behind him and believes his claims to be ‘credible and true’.
So many outstanding people in the world, I wonder why anyone would waste so much time and effort on a professor of sociology. Professor Willie Soon, astrophysicist, is worth at least a mention in the daily sceptic. His topic…..climate change. Compare and contrast him to David Keith, PhD.
Well that’s what he told the border authorities when he jumped from the dinghy.
Thank you Toby, you are so clever and funny. It is so good to have a laugh when all the shit is hitting the fan!
This is a tale of the emperor’s new clothes. It looks like both academia and politicians are going to get a bucket full of egg on their faces. If Baron Cohen has gone to all this trouble he is not going to stop at writing a book. I’m waiting for the film.
I read that his colleagues at Cambridge are demanding an investigation.
Reads like the four Yorkshire men sketch. “I did 30 marathons in 10 days with a broken leg which swelled to double t’normal size”
And when he was growing up mute and autistic he was living in a shoe box int middle of road…..
This is a joke I presume. Clever idea though.
https://www.richmondandtwickenhamtimes.co.uk/news/8350040.clapham-based-jason-arday-completes-30-marathons-in-35-days-for-shelter-and-the-shooting-star-childrens-hospice/
All of the claims, like ultra runs, brain tumours etc should have documentation in sports bodies, the NHS, social media, charity accounts. Accusations of plagiarism are easy to investigate.
Absence of evidence does not necessarily mean absence of achievement of course, although the number of claims makes the need for investigation more pressing.
Will anyone be brave enough to carry out that investigation? But a lack of investigation would expose the University (etc.) to further criticism.
Especially the £5 million charity donations. Surely this must be traceable?
Hang on there! Wasn’t he also the pacemaker when Lord Byron swam the Hellespont?
It’s the shamelessness of it that I can’t understand. Imagine: you know you’re a fake, the world knows you’re a fake, your academic colleagues know you’re a fake (even if they simply refuse to address it). How can you have any sense of achievement or hold your head up? And what does this say about your group? How does this behaviour honour those who have gone before you (but done it for real)?
Most people in positions of authority and prestige are fakes.
Pretty much everyone in parliament has just talked and kissed ass to reach that point.
Almost everyone in the bureaucracy has done little more to get there than pass exams – which in and of itself has no intrinsic value to anyone other than as an artificial selection process.
The ones who reach the top excel at institutional politics and little else.
There are probably a handful of exceptions. Maybe.
Quite right. Remember that most of the morons in Parliament went to Oxbridge