• Login
  • Register
The Daily Sceptic
No Result
View All Result
  • Articles
  • About
  • Archive
    • ARCHIVE
    • NEWS ROUND-UPS
  • Podcasts
  • Newsletter
  • Premium
  • Donate
  • Log In
The Daily Sceptic
No Result
View All Result

Met Office Climate Report More Scare Story Than Science

by Paul Homewood
14 July 2025 7:00 AM

The UK Met Office has just published its annual State of the UK Climate report for last year. It reads more like a political pamphlet than a scientific one.

The Press Release sets the tone at the very start:


To read the rest of this article, you need to donate at least £5/month or £50/year to the Daily Sceptic, then create an account on this website. The easiest way to create an account after you’ve made a donation is to click on the ‘Log In’ button on the main menu bar, click ‘Register’ underneath the sign-in box, then create an account, making sure you enter the same email address as the one you used when making a donation. Once you’re logged in, you can then read all our paywalled content, including this article. Being a donor will also entitle you to comment below the line, discuss articles with our contributors and editors in a members-only Discord forum and access the premium content in the Sceptic, our weekly podcast. A one-off donation of at least £5 will also entitle you to the same benefits for one month. You can donate here.

There are more details about how to create an account, and a number of things you can try if you’re already a donor – and have an account – but cannot access the above perks on our Premium page.

Tags: Climate AlarmismExtreme weatherMet OfficePropagandaRising Sea Levels

Donate

We depend on your donations to keep this site going. Please give what you can.

Donate Today

Comment on this Article

You’ll need to set up an account to comment if you don’t already have one. We ask for a minimum donation of £5 if you'd like to make a comment or post in our Forums.

Sign Up
Previous Post

News Round-Up

Next Post

Simple FOI Requests for Data Said to Back Non-existent Temperature Stations Refused on “Vexatious” Grounds by UK Met Office

Subscribe
Login
Notify of
Please log in to comment

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

10 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
For a fist full of roubles
For a fist full of roubles
11 months ago

I cannot see how asking when the Government knew could prejudice any court proceedings.

32
0
iconoclast
iconoclast
11 months ago
Reply to  For a fist full of roubles

I make the point here that nothing 2TK. government, police, prosecuting Counsel nor Judges in any hearings, nor the Home Secretary, nor any Home Office government officials have said nor published implicates this innocent-unless-until-proven-guilty unfortunate young man in any wrong-doing whatsoever.

None of any of them have revealed anything about him nor the circumstances in which he came to be detained nor any information of any kind whatsoever which implicates him in anything.

If he is not tried because of prejudicial information published before trial it will not be their fault.

It will only be your fault.

The only reason any of you know anything about this case is from misinformation published online. If it was not for misinformation this poor young fellow would not even be in custody.

So as they have gone out of their way to ensure he has a fair trial not prejudiced by any information they have released so too must you By Far White deplorable despicables all “keep your bloody big gobs shut or get banged up by us in chokey for life or as long a sentence as we can blackmail the judiciary to give” – and that is official from a Ms A Rayner – Deputy Prime Minister.

Got it?

I trust she has made herself clear dressed in sexy lingerie “work clothes for use while undertaking duties” paid for with great generosity by Lord Alli who expects and expected nothing in return.

2
0
RW
RW
11 months ago

One has to marvel at how much sense of all this makes. There’s a guy known to possess a terrorist training manual who also manufactured some amount of deadly poison at home who – for no apparent reason – attacked eleven elementary school age girls attending a dance class (and two adults), killing three of them and severly wounding the others. But

police and prosecutors made clear the stabbings are not being treated as an act of terrorism.

So, what are they being treated as? Accidental manslaughter by a guy who repeatedly slipped on the floor while holding a knife in his hands for no particular reason?

Last edited 11 months ago by RW
29
0
iconoclast
iconoclast
11 months ago
Reply to  RW

Sadly you have not been paying attention.

He is innocent unless and until proven guilty.

This means:

  • he is innocent of possessing an Al-Qaeda training manual, but even if he did possess one, his human rights and rights to freedom of speech allow Al-Qaeda to publish training material for UK teenagers and for those teenagers the freedom to read it – without any implication wrong-doing is involved
  • he is innocent of manufacturing deadly poison at home and even if he did it was clearly a failure of his school domestic science and cooking lessons to ensure food is properly prepared and cooked
  • he is innocent of attacking anyone and especially of attacking eleven elementary school age girls attending a dance class (and two adults), or of killing three of them and severely wounding the others.
  • he is innocent of manslaughter and never repeatedly slipped on the floor while holding a knife

Pay better attention of risk being banged up in chokey.

0
0
Roy Everett
Roy Everett
11 months ago

This is how UK government has worked for at least two decades! If you wish to query the decisions of some public sector employee either on a particular case or on general policy, you will be routed eventually to some invisible bureaucrat who says that they cannot discuss individual cases, or some obfuscating waffle, or that the matter should be raised by your MP. If you contact your MP they will write on your behalf but you get the same response with more elaborate waffle. If they then try to raise the question in the house, or by written answer, or in committee (e.g. Select Committees), you meet essentially the same response. Ultimately, if you go to law you will either be made insolvent by legal costs in a civil case or find that the police (even if they can be bothered to initiate an inquiry) will either drop the case as it would “not be in the public interest, even if the allegations are true”, or pass it to the Crown Prosecution Service to drop! This happens regardless of which political party is in power. The UK leads the world in covering up public sector official blunders and the consequences of embarrassing political policies.
The next step will be to make it illegal to criticise government policy, or even discuss it publicly.

26
0
RW
RW
11 months ago
Reply to  Roy Everett

The next step will be to make it illegal to criticise government policy, or even discuss it publicly.

At least for the German government, it’s routine practice to smear anyone doing this as far right, no matter who he is and what his political leanings are and no matter which government policies are being criticized. To paraphrase the mayor of a German town where a female language teacher got recently killed, suspect being an Iranian refugee she taught, “members of the public are to leave political discussions to the institutions responsible for politics” — quite shome democracy.

Last edited 11 months ago by RW
17
0
7941MHKB
7941MHKB
11 months ago
Reply to  RW

Well, in the UK, mass gang rape of schoolgirls, up and down the Country, was deemed to be so potentially hurty for the enthusiastic RoP perpetrators that the Director of Public Prosecutions himself was allegedly completely unaware of any problem.
His diligence has been well rewarded, not just with gifts of Taylor Swift tickets, loans of millionaire’s apartments and new knickers for his wife, but is now Prime Minister!
Who would have thought?!?

11
0
Jeff Chambers
Jeff Chambers
11 months ago

Our anti-white government is beside itself in desperation not to have to admit that the murder of our people (including completely innocent little white girls) by the Establishment’s imported people could be terrorism. Once they admit that it’s terrorism, more people will ask “why have you imported these people?”. Lots of people are getting to that stage now. Now, when I mention the Establishment’s real purpose – The Great Replacement – more and more people listen. Everyone can see 2TK’s and the Anti-White Party’s blind hatred of us.

22
0
Mogwai
Mogwai
11 months ago
Reply to  Jeff Chambers

What i haven’t read anything about is if his parents are being investigated. Surely any parent is going to notice if their teenage kid has become radicalised, and if they hadn’t noticed him making a poisonous weapon in their kitchen then I’m a Blue-Footed Booby. Why are his parents not under arrest, possibly for aiding and abetting, as surely they’re complicit, if not in the actual deadly mass-stabbing, then for not informing authorities that their son’s doing dodgy experiments in the home and has become an Al-Qaeda fanboy.
The fact schools are being told to inform Prevent if a pupil says there’s only two sexes does rather make a mockery of what they consider terrorism these days.

15
0
Jeff Chambers
Jeff Chambers
11 months ago
Reply to  Mogwai

The Establishment has several preferred myths, for example: “the loan wolf”, “mental health issues”, “racist whites”. All of these will be deployed to divert attention from the fact that some of the Establishment’s imported people hate us.

14
0
7941MHKB
7941MHKB
11 months ago
Reply to  Jeff Chambers

A hate shared by our Beloved Leaders themselves.

7
0
RW
RW
11 months ago
Reply to  Mogwai

The fact schools are being told to inform Prevent if a pupil says there’s only two sexes does rather make a mockery of what they consider terrorism these days.

Terrorism needs a motive to be established and while people may kill other people, especially girls below ten, for all kinds of more or less benevolent reasons, claiming that there are only two sexes cannot ever have been done innocently. Only far right terror incels about to go on misantrophic mass-killing sprees would ever say something like that.

12
0
Marialta
Marialta
11 months ago
Reply to  Mogwai

Yes we’ve heard nothing of the parents. It beggars belief that the powers that be now protect these people from scrutiny while in the same breath punish wrong speak about gender.

3
0
RW
RW
11 months ago

Quote from a Sky article titled Why the police have not Southport attack a terror incident:

“We would strongly advise caution against anyone speculating as to motivation in this case. The criminal proceedings against Axel Rudakubana are live and he has a right to a fair trial,” Ms Kennedy added.
“It is extremely important that there is no reporting, commentary or sharing of information online that could prejudice these proceedings.”

Rudakubana’s trial is scheduled for January next year.
[Ms Kennedy is Merseyside Police Chief Constable Serena Kennedy]

In other words, members of the public are essentially prohibited from talking about this topic until at least seven months after the attack to protect the suspected attacker.

16
0
Jon Garvey
Jon Garvey
11 months ago
Reply to  RW

Surely if the evidence in court reveals to the jury good evidence that the motive was stopping voices in the head, or hastening the return of Christ, or helping the CIA, then any false speculations now would have little bearing on the fairness of a trial.

Will jurors really continue to believe he’s an Arab asylum seeker if they are shown contrary evidence?

9
0
RW
RW
11 months ago
Reply to  Jon Garvey

Ts ts ts … you are being seriously hasty. While the suspect was arrested on the scene of the crime and a load of eyewitnesses were present, whether or not someone got actually attacked or even killed there and if the guy with the knife was really the perpetrator still needs to be established by a fair trial three months from now, which must not be prejudiced by others claiming that the dead girls were murdered by the guy who allegedly stabbed them, especially not online.

Last edited 11 months ago by Hardliner
12
0
7941MHKB
7941MHKB
11 months ago
Reply to  RW

Heaven forfend that something hurtful might be said about a young Welsh lad!

7
0
huxleypiggles
huxleypiggles
11 months ago

Tommy Robinson update.

He has been moved to Woodhill prison. Category B. He has been forced to move on to the Block with the worst of the prisoners.

Kneel is determined to have him killed.

14
0
Freddy Boy
Freddy Boy
11 months ago
Reply to  huxleypiggles

Yes ! Maybe it was the 10,000 emails the chunky woman of colour Belmarsh Governor got asking her to careful with TR,s residency !

4
0
Hardliner
Hardliner
11 months ago
Reply to  huxleypiggles

Blair [and Thames Valley Police] would know all about removal of the inconvenient….

2
0
huxleypiggles
huxleypiggles
11 months ago
Reply to  Hardliner

Indeed.

1
0
varmint
varmint
11 months ago

Are we turning into North Korea? Where we cannot even discuss what we are not allowed to discuss? How utterly pathetic.

15
0
NeilofWatford
NeilofWatford
11 months ago

Watch closely folks and recognise the pattern.
Labour is following the Democrat Party playbook.
In this case, the ‘on-going investigation’ ploy of blocking access to criminal activity ( as Christopher Wray of the FBI used to stop Trump supporters interrogating election interference).
Another is to hijack the economy to fund their communist agenda, kill off energy production.
Add to it massive state surveillance, open borders to increase Labour’s vote share, taking orders from China (Lammy has already visited).
Top it off with legal intimidation of the right wing (Southport) and releasing or not prosecuting criminals, as we saw a few weeks ago.
Labour’s agenda is obvious, just study the Biden Cartel.

12
0
RW
RW
11 months ago
Reply to  NeilofWatford

Labour is following the Democrat Party playbook.

Of course they do. The US Democrats have a fifth column in basically every so-called “western country”, not the least because most of them wouldn’t even exist without the American desire to lord over an ethnically as fractured as possible – ideally, a bunch of better city states – ‘democracies’ whose subjects have been carefully stripped of all the “human rights” the US founding fathers unwisely bestowed on their own population, first and foremost to right to bear arms and the right to speak once’s mind freely in public, both of which are hugely detrimental to effective Democratic government.

It’s also important to bear in mind that the Democrats are the former southern slaveholder party. This should explain why they greatly prefer their voting serfs to be defenseless and silenced. Anything else is sort-of disorderly and can only lead to very bad outcomes!

2
0
huxleypiggles
huxleypiggles
11 months ago
Reply to  RW

😀😀😀

0
0
Richard Austin
Richard Austin
11 months ago

If he was white, well, we all know the difference.

7
0
Gezza England
Gezza England
11 months ago

Had Richard Tice been fully acquainted with the Parliamentary rules he could have called out Hoyle – the Labour speaker – for being wrong as he, not for the first time, sided with Labour.

11
0
CircusSpot
CircusSpot
11 months ago
Reply to  Gezza England

He could call him out but Hoyle is Liebore’s creature and does their bidding.
It will be interesting to see how little the new Tory leader does to support Reform’s efforts to oppose the Govt.

7
0
Matt Dalby
Matt Dalby
11 months ago

It’s starting to look an Islamist terror attack, did the police find a copy of the Koran at his home? Obviously if this was admitted it could well lead to more riots, which I definitely don’t condone, but the public should know the background, including religious belief, of people who commit these acts so we can decide whether or not it’s a good idea to allow this sort of individual into the country.

8
0
lymeswold
lymeswold
11 months ago

The Establishment has several preferred myths, for example: “the loan wolf”, “mental health issues”, “racist whites”.

Then there’s the “lone shark”…

Last edited 11 months ago by Hardliner
4
0
7941MHKB
7941MHKB
11 months ago

Compare and contrast.
On 16 June 2016, Thomas Mair killed Jo Cox MP.
On 20 June 2016, a Judge remanded Mair in custody until a hearing to be held “under terrorism protocols”.
Mair made some comments that he had acted “for Britain” but mostly refused to speak at all, despite being universally portrayed as a Far Right blowhard. The fact that he was clearly clinically depressed and had asked for help the morning of the murder and had been fobbed off was held to be irrelevant.

Isn’t it nice that in just eight years, our Beloved Leaders have all become so much more caring about what can be said about the perpetrator of a massacre of little girls?

8
0
flamenco
flamenco
11 months ago

So, an important question, Keith: When you performed Sad Face holding flowers and ignoring the local people of Southport, did you know the police had found the things we now all know about? So you showed your back to the people who were affected. Was it shame or cowardice?

8
0
iconoclast
iconoclast
11 months ago

You all really must have a bit of patience, trust 2TK, his government and the authorities to act as impeccably as they always do in such matters and let the law and justice system take its course.

This poor young fellow is innocent in the eyes of the law unless and until proven otherwise by due process.

This poor young innocent fellow’s trial has not been prejudiced by anything published by the police or government informing the public of anything to do with this matter.

Neither the police nor the government have published any information which might suggest he bears the slightest iota of guilt,

Nothing has been published by the police nor by the government nor anything said by anyone including prosecuting Counsel nor any Judge in any Court appearances nor hearings which in any way implicates this innocent unless and until proven guilty young man.

Neither the police nor the government have published any information regarding the circumstances of nor reason for his arrest and detention pending trial nor anything which remotely implicates him in any wrongdoing of any kind.

It is a part of the freedoms of this great country and particularly of speech to have access to and read whatever one chooses so nothing can be inferred from this poor innocent young man’s choice of reading material which is of course irrelevant to any alleged crime.

Furthermore, whatever herbal or other remedies this poor innocent young man has chosen to make in his kitchen using his culinary skills, as we have been told by Merseyside police and as discussed in recent court appearances, nor to take in his tea or sprinkle on his halal cornflakes or feed to his family and friends has any bearing on anything whatsoever.

None of you By Far White despicable deporables should repeat anything published by our great police forces, prosecuting Counsel, Judges, Home Secretary, government official nor governing party politicians in Court or otherwise from and since the moment this poor innocent young man was first fitted up for alleged wrongdoing he had no part whatsoever in.

Nor must any of you speculate based upon any such of that matter and material as implicating him in any way in events of which as matters stand today he is wholly innocent of.

Nothing has been published by the police nor the government concerning his alleged involvement in anything remotely suspicious which might cast the slightest hint of guilt upon this poor innocent young man.

Government and the police have bent over backwards to avoid giving any hint of guilt in any shape way or form whatsoever.

In short you must all follow the example of our great government, our great Home Office and Home Secretary, our great Courts, prosecuting Counsel, Judges, police and officials of any kind whatsoever in ensuring nothing is published or said which in any way might suggest this poor innocent young man bears the remotest shred of guilt for anything.

So “STFU the lot of you miserable By Far White despicable deplorable scuum or we will bang you up in chokey for life with all the others we have already fitted up” [a personal message from a Ms A Rayner that last bit is – including an attempt to spell ‘scuum’ as she herself pronounces it].

The great agencies of State and the Courts are uninfluenced by any woke issues or weekly marches through London by Woke protestors in favour of one thing or another taking place in far off lands and all of which should not be discussed or criticised in any way shape or form.

And especially not by the disgraceful scourge on this great land by any of the By Far White despicable deplorables, all their friends and family and everyone they know who should all be deported instantly if not shot dead on sight but of course only by duly authorised law enforcement personnel and not by baying crowds of vigilante Far Left protestors or other kinds of extremist terrorist knife-wielding activists [of a kind which you are not allowed to mention nor discuss ever].

Those not subject to instant deportation etc include 2TK and his family friends and members of his great British national socialist party, the Socialist Workers Party, the Workers Revolutionary Party, the trades union leaders and their immediate subordinates and families, Stonewall and its supporters, the entire Free Palestine movement [etc etc] …. [the Home Office is continuing to compile a list of the exceptions].

So to quote again Ms Rayner, “STFU the lot of you miserable By Far White despicable deplorable scuum or we will bang you up in chokey for life with all the others we have already fitted up”.

Is that clear?

Last edited 11 months ago by iconoclast
4
0
VAX FREE IanC
VAX FREE IanC
11 months ago
Reply to  iconoclast

There now, thats better isn’t it Ico. 😉

2
0
iconoclast
iconoclast
11 months ago
Reply to  VAX FREE IanC

Yes. catharsis has set in.

BTW how does one spell ‘scum’ in one’s best Stockport, Manchester accent?

Is it ‘scuum’ or is it ‘scoom’ or something else?

Last edited 11 months ago by iconoclast
1
0
VAX FREE IanC
VAX FREE IanC
11 months ago
Reply to  iconoclast

Sssshhcuuum!

1
0
Curio
Curio
11 months ago

Strange that the article and the comments (unless I’ve missed it) do not mention millionaire Waheed Alli, Baron Alli , the biggest donor to the Labour Party and Starmer’s very close friend. Has Lord Alli’s generosity towards the Party, the Starmer household and Rayner’s wardrobe been motivated purely by his powerful philanthropic tendencies?
Or, does he want, in return, the Labour Government to implement policies which suit his personal beliefs? Incidentally, his mother was Hindu and his father Muslim.

2
0
Crosby
Crosby
11 months ago

I had no idea that the Parliamentary Privilege right of an MP in the Commons to raise a key issue could be stamped down by the executive or the Speaker. Could a lawyer please explain? Does this mean David Davis’ opening up of the Letby disaster can be shut up? The spattering around of the accusation of ‘fascist’ seems common, but burning down the Reichstag after winning an election and shutting up MPs does have some analogy in principle.

1
0
GMO
GMO
11 months ago

Will this logic of not being able to ask questions be applied to all court cases?

0
0

NEWSLETTER

View today’s newsletter

To receive our latest news in the form of a daily email, enter your details here:

DONATE

PODCAST

The Sceptic | Episode 53: Starmer’s Bizarre Bid to Brand Reform Racist, the Real Danger Posed by Labour’s Digital ID and the True Cost of Net Zero

by Richard Eldred
3 October 2025
2

LISTED ARTICLES

  • Most Read
  • Most Commented
  • Editor’s Picks

Backlash as Nando’s Limits Customers to One Coke per Visit Under New ‘Nanny State’ Rules

6 October 2025
by Will Jones

Stupidologiology

6 October 2025
by James Alexander

News Round-Up

7 October 2025
by Richard Eldred

Does Trump Not Realise How Globally Toxic Tony Blair Is?

6 October 2025
by Ramesh Thakur

Green Party Votes to Abolish Landlords

6 October 2025
by Will Jones

Stupidologiology

27

Britain Needs a New Backbone

26

News Round-Up

24

The Tories Need to Renounce Their Climate Authoritarian Past

24

Backlash as Nando’s Limits Customers to One Coke per Visit Under New ‘Nanny State’ Rules

34

Britain Needs a New Backbone

7 October 2025
by Clive Pinder

The Tories Need to Renounce Their Climate Authoritarian Past

7 October 2025
by Ben Pile

Does Trump Not Realise How Globally Toxic Tony Blair Is?

6 October 2025
by Ramesh Thakur

Stupidologiology

6 October 2025
by James Alexander

‘Nudge’ Has a New Evil Twin: ‘Stochastic Terror’

6 October 2025
by Nick Rendell

POSTS BY DATE

July 2025
M T W T F S S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031  
« Jun   Aug »

SOCIAL LINKS

Free Speech Union

NEWSLETTER

View today’s newsletter

To receive our latest news in the form of a daily email, enter your details here:

POSTS BY DATE

July 2025
M T W T F S S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031  
« Jun   Aug »

DONATE

LISTED ARTICLES

  • Most Read
  • Most Commented
  • Editor’s Picks

Backlash as Nando’s Limits Customers to One Coke per Visit Under New ‘Nanny State’ Rules

6 October 2025
by Will Jones

Stupidologiology

6 October 2025
by James Alexander

News Round-Up

7 October 2025
by Richard Eldred

Does Trump Not Realise How Globally Toxic Tony Blair Is?

6 October 2025
by Ramesh Thakur

Green Party Votes to Abolish Landlords

6 October 2025
by Will Jones

Stupidologiology

27

Britain Needs a New Backbone

26

News Round-Up

24

The Tories Need to Renounce Their Climate Authoritarian Past

24

Backlash as Nando’s Limits Customers to One Coke per Visit Under New ‘Nanny State’ Rules

34

Britain Needs a New Backbone

7 October 2025
by Clive Pinder

The Tories Need to Renounce Their Climate Authoritarian Past

7 October 2025
by Ben Pile

Does Trump Not Realise How Globally Toxic Tony Blair Is?

6 October 2025
by Ramesh Thakur

Stupidologiology

6 October 2025
by James Alexander

‘Nudge’ Has a New Evil Twin: ‘Stochastic Terror’

6 October 2025
by Nick Rendell

SOCIAL LINKS

Free Speech Union
  • Home
  • About us
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy

Facebook

  • X

Instagram

RSS

Subscribe to our newsletter

© Skeptics Ltd.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password? Sign Up

Create New Account!

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • Articles
  • About
  • Archive
    • ARCHIVE
    • NEWS ROUND-UPS
  • Podcasts
  • Newsletter
  • Premium
  • Donate
  • Log In

© Skeptics Ltd.

wpDiscuz
You are going to send email to

Move Comment
Perfecty
Do you wish to receive notifications of new articles?
Notifications preferences