In the last 10 years, we’ve welcomed a lot of ill-behaved and criminal young men into our country for no discernible reason, and along the way we’ve had the dubious privilege of discovering whole new categories of crime. There is the hostile-immigrant-drives-his-car-into-a-crowd-of-unsuspecting-innocents crime, there is the hostile-immigrant-stabs-a-bunch-of-random-people crime, there is the immigrant-gang-collectively-rape-underage-girl-in-park crime, and there is the immigrants-at-swimming-pool-molest-or-assault-various-children crime.
The latter has been stealing the headlines since the latest (allegedly carbon dioxide-induced) ‘heatwave’ in Germany. Recent stories include this one about a 25 year-old man of undisclosed background (who is almost certainly a migrant, otherwise authorities would not be so secretive about his origins) exposing himself to a bunch of underage teenagers at a pool in Asperg (Baden-Württemberg). Or this one, about a 21 year-old Syrian at a pool in Schweinfurt (Bavaria) caught exposing himself to four boys. Or this one, about men of “dark complexion” who severely beat an 18 year-old and threw him down some stairs. Or this disturbing one, about two Syrians who groped and assaulted a 12 year-old girl at a pool in Hof (Bavaria), forcing her beneath the water repeatedly and leaving her with a bloody nose.
Stories like this often come in groups, and what set off the present cascade was a particularly grim incident from June 22nd in Gelnhausen (Hessen), in which a group of Syrian migrants aged 18 to 28 molested eight or nine underage girls at the local pool. When the girls first complained about what was happening, pool personnel sent them back into the water. After this incident became a nationwide story, the Mayor of Gelnhausen, Christian Litzinger (CDU) gave an interview in which he appeared to ascribe the crime to “high temperatures”, which can cause “tempers to flare up”.
Naturally, this is but a partial list comprising only those news reports that I found, that anybody bothered to report to the police and that have made it into the press. The problem is vastly more pervasive than my brief summary might suggest. Personally, I haven’t been to a public pool in Germany in 10 years. I would never go again, and I would certainly never send my kids there. What used to be occasionally amusing places to get a bit of exercise have become crowded loci of urban chaos invariably full of drunken 20 year-old men from the global south. Everybody knows this is happening but it’s very politically incorrect to acknowledge that it’s happening, and so it’s become the occasion for a great deal of bizarre messaging from our progressive establishment.
A small group of peculiar lunatics have decided that what we really need to do is remind everybody that groping and assaulting and molesting is not okay. Thus we’ve been treated to an array of bizarre anti-swimming-pool-molestation messaging campaigns that just love to reverse the typical ethnicities of perpetrator and victim.
Consider the Cologne “Ich sag’s” (“I say it”) poster series. “Shoving is not funny!” screams this placard, with an awkward cartoon of a blonde German boy joining in harassing a brown girl:
Another poster from the same series informs viewers that “groping” is “forbidden” and likewise features a blonde German offender, because obviously that’s the problem demographic here.
All of that is irritating enough, but it’s nothing compared to the posters devised by a literal blue-haired city bureaucrat in Büren (near Paderborn), which take the woke programme so far around the bend that I had trouble believing they weren’t intended as subversive parodies. In the anti-groping category, Büren provides this insane PSA of a fat red-haired woman molesting a diminutive black man with a prosthetic leg, while a bizarre sea turtle named Tiki lurks beneath them and deplores unwanted touching.
Tiki the retard turtle, who apparently cannot even swim because he requires goggles and flotation devices, recurs in this anti-peeping placard, which – you guessed it – features a German man intruding upon a black woman.
Aside from other obvious objections, what strikes me about these posters is how infantilising and trivialising they all are – waving away an entire category of crime that is overwhelmingly, disproportionately committed by adult male migrants as some kind of cartoonish childhood problem that just requires a bit of schoolmarmish clarification to iron out.
This article originally appeared on Eugyppius’s Substack newsletter. You can subscribe here.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
It does rather fit with male proclivities. Adventure, problem solving, overcoming one’s fears and limitation, bloodlust. Although if you can give a woman a taste for blood at a young age you can get her fired up for life. Hunting is seen as a bad thing in England in my experience by the middle class. Perhaps they think of foxhunting alone or perhaps their pussy-ass attitude pervades the whole of their thinking. Working class people have no problem hunting and killing animals in my experience.
Well I’m glad that’s been sorted out at last.
Is ‘Man the Hunter’ a Myth?
I am fairly confident that the answer to this question will be confirmed within the next generation.
Bear Grylls Idland series tells you all you need to know. Women are utterly crap at looking after themselves. Total societal collapse would occur if women take charge. Oh, wait…….
Incel or cuck?🤔 Definitely a toss-up between the two…😂
claims that foraging societies lack or have weak gendered divisions of labor are contradicted by empirical evidence.
Isn’t the concept of empirical evidence an invention of the white patriarchy? And doesn’t that mean that, from the point of view of some feminists, it couldn’t possibly exist in fact?
The reality is plain, and well researched:
‘Among modern foraging societies, men hunt more than women, who mostly target relatively low-quality, reliable resources (i.e., plants and shellfish). This difference has long been assumed to reflect human female reproductive constraints, particularly caring for and provisioning mates and offspring. Long-term studies of chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) enable tests of hypotheses about the possible origins of human sex differences in hunting, prior to pair-bonding and regular provisioning. We studied two eastern chimpanzee communities (Kasekela, Mitumba) in Gombe, Tanzania and one (Kanyawara) in Kibale, Uganda. Relative to males, females had low hunting rates in all three communities, even where they encountered red colobus monkeys (the primary prey of chimpanzees) as often as males did. There was no evidence that clinging offspring hampered female hunting. Instead, consistent with the hypothesis that females should be more risk-averse than males, females at all three sites specialized in low cost prey (terrestrial/sedentary prey at Gombe; black and white colobus monkeys at Kanyawara). Female dominance rank was positively correlated with red colobus hunting probability only at Kasekela, suggesting that those in good physical condition were less sensitive to the costs of possible failure. Finally, the potential for carcass appropriation by males deterred females at Kasekela (but not Kanyawara or Mitumba) from hunting in parties containing many adult males. Although chimpanzees are not direct analogs of the last common ancestor (LCA) of Pan and Homo, these results suggest that before the emergence of social obligations regarding sharing and provisioning, constraints on hunting by LCA females did not necessarily stem from maternal care. Instead, they suggest that a risk-averse foraging strategy and the potential for losing prey to males limited female predation on vertebrates. Sex differences in hunting behavior would likely have preceded the evolution of the sexual division of labor among modern humans.’
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5570454/
Nah!
Weve always used Tesco.
It is obvious really just look at a group of primary school boys and primary school girls. The same goes for teenage years. Their pursuits are so different that each one almost requires a separate emotional language. And this is despite the attempts of parents to iron out the differences. But it is difficult when you have a predatory class that seeks to neutralize the male and the female in order to reduce the potency of any resistance. The less perspicacious are left in a state of confusion and neurosis.
The only problem? Andersen and colleagues’ study appears to be flawed.
No S**t.
I don’t need to review their work to know that, and I also don’t need a degree to know what a women is.
My empirical experience is that I like shooting and hard physical exercise and my wife PBUH likes picking olives, wild strawberries collecting eggs and what have you.
It’s a no-brainer.
Baked into the DNA.
We have rather restricted access to weapons. Just look at how weak British airguns are. I suppose you could argue that it improves accuracy. You can’t even buy a low calibre rifle in this country without a firearms certificate. The twentieth century was a slow motion removal of gun rights. You aren’t even allowed to carry a full length sword in England I think the limit is a 10 cm not locking blade. How are you supposed to slice someone up with that you are more likely to chop your fingers off in the process. We need to allow men to carry any reasonable weapon. I don’t care about spree killings and mass shootings that is a small price to pay.
My BSA Supersport 177 is powerful. And you can’t go wrong with a good Axe!
Yes, but what is a woman? Just asking for my mate Keir.
The move towards the androgyne has been documented to be a sign of the falling of a civilisation,Tits, dick, scrotum you name it.It always happens. The notion of the most certain things being turned on their head. You can’t engage with it you can’t stop the decline. And it roots in deeper and deeper. Yesterday you looked in your trousers and had a penis. Today you barely have a clit. What does one do in such a situation? How does one endure?
Nowadays “objective” science is so ideologically driven that if the woke left demanded that the moon is made of cheese immediately there would be publications popping up in all the scientific magazines proving that this is indeed the case.
After all it wouldn’t be any more absurd than saying that a person with a penis can be a woman and there are 72 genders.
Science these days is not a method of enquiry to determine objective truth, it is mostly just a support vehicle for political power.
(By the way, having seen my wife pregnant and looking after our babies, my personal experience is that motherhood is not conducive to activities such as hunting.)
Elaine Morgan’s “The Descent of Woman” puts forward an aquatic ape theory which is very interesting: that we spent a lot of time at the water’s edge and that fishing and eating shell fish enabled our brains to grow and our bodies to store fat under the skin and to lose a lot of body hair, among other theories. Well worth a read. She wrote it in response to Bronowski’s the Ascent of Man because she felt that he had left out half the human race….