The last week has seen some further extraordinary developments in Ed Miliband’s Net Zero agenda and his continuing divorce from material and political reality. While the Prime Minister is plagued by a seemingly unending series of scandals caused by his hypocrisy and impropriety, the Secretary of State for Energy Security and Net Zero has been summoning up unicorns with taxpayer’s cash.
Miliband’s team of unicorn hunters was convened this week and came up with quite a plan for ‘grid stabilisation’. As was reported by David Turver here back in August, Miliband and his new chief of Mission Control – the former Chief Exec of the Climate Change Committee, Chris Stark – wrote to National Grid ESO Director Fintan Slye, asking him for ideas on how to meet the new Government’s Clean Power 2030 target. In doing so, Stark and Miliband were admitting that they do not know what they’re doing and have no idea how to reach their political targets. National Grid Energy System Operator was subsequently bought by the Government last month to become National Energy System Operator (NESO). The handover completed on Tuesday October 1st.
To read the rest of this article, you need to donate at least £5/month or £50/year to the Daily Sceptic, then create an account on this website. The easiest way to create an account after you’ve made a donation is to click on the ‘Log In’ button on the main menu bar, click ‘Register’ underneath the sign-in box, then create an account, making sure you enter the same email address as the one you used when making a donation. Once you’re logged in, you can then read all our paywalled content, including this article. Being a donor will also entitle you to comment below the line, discuss articles with our contributors and editors in a members-only Discord forum and access the premium content in the Sceptic, our weekly podcast. A one-off donation of at least £5 will also entitle you to the same benefits for one month. You can donate here.
There are more details about how to create an account, and a number of things you can try if you’re already a donor – and have an account – but cannot access the above perks on our Premium page.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
The Gates Foundation is a non-profit technically.
In practice it is a tax efficient way of holding and putting assets to work. In Gates’ case for global social engineering purposes based on his personal beliefs and ambitions.
He is in effect the sole decision maker regarding the use of the funds.
Billy boy is still just plain EVIL
He is still only a puppet like Epstein, even though their souls are as black as coal, , they have their strings pulled by others(Rothschild’s)
Don’t be so naive as to think that there isn’t a backwater connection to the main shareholders and The Gates Foundation!
The Elite work at a different level, so I suspect even though it isn’t obvious in the front, the network will have also some connection to either BlackRock or Vanguard, ultimately the Rothschild’s of this world.
It’s important to distinguish ownership and control as the latter can often dictate the course of events. In a Communist state, all wealth is OWNED collectively by the people, but CONTROLLED by the very few. Similarly, the big ‘Capitalist’ investment funds like Blackrock or banks for that matter don’t OWN most of the wealth they manage, but certainly have disproportionate CONTROL over what’s done with it and, due to their size, can even assert significant influence of wealth they don’t directly manage.